[Home] [Server] [Queue] [About] [Remove] [Statistics]

I-TASSER results for job id S802499

(Click on S802499_results.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modeling results listed on this page. Click on Annotation of I-TASSER Output to read the instructions for how to interpret the results on this page. Model results are kept on the server for 60 days, there is no way to retrieve the modeling data older than 2 months)

  Submitted Sequence in FASTA format

>protein
MLILMRMFFVVVQHEVLMSLILGLLRSWNDPLYHLVTEVRGMKGAPDAILSRAIEIEEEN
KRLLEGMEMIFGQVSSFMKASLLFS

  Predicted Secondary Structure

Sequence                  20                  40                  60                  80
                   |                   |                   |                   |     
MLILMRMFFVVVQHEVLMSLILGLLRSWNDPLYHLVTEVRGMKGAPDAILSRAIEIEEENKRLLEGMEMIFGQVSSFMKASLLFS
PredictionCHHHHHHHHHCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCCC
Conf.Score9478999998188999999999999998739999999871078999999999999999999999999999985696500156789
H:Helix; S:Strand; C:Coil

  Predicted Solvent Accessibility

Sequence                  20                  40                  60                  80
                   |                   |                   |                   |     
MLILMRMFFVVVQHEVLMSLILGLLRSWNDPLYHLVTEVRGMKGAPDAILSRAIEIEEENKRLLEGMEMIFGQVSSFMKASLLFS
Prediction4311333323414463113102311301430032014204627723440243044046325402620440143133635646638
Values range from 0 (buried residue) to 9 (highly exposed residue)

   Predicted normalized B-factor

(B-factor is a value to indicate the extent of the inherent thermal mobility of residues/atoms in proteins. In I-TASSER, this value is deduced from threading template proteins from the PDB in combination with the sequence profiles derived from sequence databases. The reported B-factor profile in the figure below corresponds to the normalized B-factor of the target protein, defined by B=(B'-u)/s, where B' is the raw B-factor value, u and s are respectively the mean and standard deviation of the raw B-factors along the sequence. Click here to read more about predicted normalized B-factor)


  Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER

(I-TASSER modeling starts from the structure templates identified by LOMETS from the PDB library. LOMETS is a meta-server threading approach containing multiple threading programs, where each threading program can generate tens of thousands of template alignments. I-TASSER only uses the templates of the highest significance in the threading alignments, the significance of which are measured by the Z-score, i.e. the difference between the raw and average scores in the unit of standard deviation. The templates in this section are the 10 best templates selected from the LOMETS threading programs. Usually, one template of the highest Z-score is selected from each threading program, where the threading programs are sorted by the average performance in the large-scale benchmark test experiments.)

Rank PDB
Hit
Iden1Iden2CovNorm.
Z-score
Download
Align.
                   20                  40                  60                  80
                   |                   |                   |                   |     
Sec.Str
Seq
CHHHHHHHHHCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCCC
MLILMRMFFVVVQHEVLMSLILGLLRSWNDPLYHLVTEVRGMKGAPDAILSRAIEIEEENKRLLEGMEMIFGQVSSFMKASLLFS
11rw5A 0.51 0.52 1.00 1.48Download ATPEDKEQAQQMNQKDFLSLIVSILRSWNEPLYHLVTEVRGMQEAPEAILSKAVEIEEQTKRLLEGMELIVSQVHPETKENEIYP
26zv0A 0.09 0.17 0.91 0.65Download ----SNAASETSMDSRLQRIHAEIKNSLVNRCIEALDELASLQ-VTMQQAQKHTEMITTLKKIMEKSTMLYNKFKNMFLVGE---
31rw5 0.51 0.52 1.00 4.68Download ATPEDKEQAQQMNQKDFLSLIVSILRSWNEPLYHLVTEVRGMQEAPEAILSKAVEIEEQTKRLLEGMELIVSQVHPETKENEIYP
41rw5 0.51 0.52 1.00 3.49Download ATPEDKEQAQQMNQKDFLSLIVSILRSWNEPLYHLVTEVRGMQEAPEAILSKAVEIEEQTKRLLEGMELIVSQVHPETKENEIYP
51rw5A 0.54 0.52 0.94 1.04Download -----KEQAQQMNQKDFLSLIVSILRSWNEPLYHLVTEVRGMQEAPEAILSKAVEIEEQTKRLLEGMELIVSQVHPETKENEIYP
61rw5 0.58 0.52 0.87 5.90Download ----------QMNQKDFLSLIVSILRSWNEPLYHLVTEVRGMQEAPEAILSKAVEIEEQTKRLLEGMELIVSQVHPETKENEIY-
73nceA 0.49 0.51 1.00 1.65Download ATPEDKEQAQQMNQKDFLSLIVSILRSWNEPLYHLVTEVRGMQEAPEAILSKAVEIEEQTKRLLERMELIVSQVHPETKENEIYP
87rcwA 0.08 0.22 1.00 0.63Download EYLKSHMSSYNVNLNDAIKLADKMKAEKEKELSLIKKKLENKDLKDEERKKLEEELEDGDKVNSSYLRKAIKELNPKITDKQDYG
91n9dA 0.51 0.52 1.00 2.67Download ATPEDKEQAQQMNQKDFLSLIVSILRSWNEPLYHLVTEVRGMQEAPEAILSKAVEIEEQTKRLLEGMELIVSQVHPETKENEIYP
103ew3A 0.65 0.52 0.76 1.32Download -----------MNQKDFLSLIVSILRSWNEPLYHLVTEVRGMQEAPEAILSKAVEIEEQTKRLLEGMELIVSQVHP---------
(a)All the residues are colored in black; however, those residues in template which are identical to the residue in the query sequence are highlighted in color. Coloring scheme is based on the property of amino acids, where polar are brightly coloured while non-polar residues are colored in dark shade. (more about the colors used)
(b)Rank of templates represents the top ten threading templates used by I-TASSER.
(c)Ident1 is the percentage sequence identity of the templates in the threading aligned region with the query sequence.
(d)Ident2 is the percentage sequence identity of the whole template chains with query sequence.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of the threading alignment and is equal to the number of aligned residues divided by the length of query protein.
(f)Norm. Z-score is the normalized Z-score of the threading alignments. Alignment with a Normalized Z-score >1 mean a good alignment and vice versa.
(g)Download Align. provides the 3D structure of the aligned regions of the threading templates.
(h)The top 10 alignments reported above (in order of their ranking) are from the following threading programs:
       1: MUSTER   2: SPARKS-X   3: HHSEARCH2   4: HHSEARCH I   5: Neff-PPAS   6: HHSEARCH   7: pGenTHREADER   8: PROSPECT2   9: SP3   10: FFAS03   

   Top 5 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of a higher value signifies a model with a higher confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated; this is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)
    (By right-click on the images, you can export image file or change the configurations, e.g. modifying the background color or stopping the spin of your models)
  • Download Model 1
  • C-score=0.61 (Read more about C-score)
  • Estimated TM-score = 0.80±0.09
  • Estimated RMSD = 2.5±1.9Å

  • Download Model 2
  • C-score = -3.27

  • Download Model 3
  • C-score = -4.58

  • Download Model 4
  • C-score = -3.99

  • Download Model 5
  • C-score = -3.99


  Proteins structurally close to the target in the PDB (as identified by TM-align)

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)


Top 10 Identified stuctural analogs in PDB

Click
to view
RankPDB HitTM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovAlignment
11rw5A0.936 0.940.5061.000Download
21f6fA0.808 1.450.2910.929Download
33ew3A0.804 1.620.4750.941Download
41pvhD0.779 1.840.0510.918Download
57nhrA0.752 2.870.0480.953Download
63sidA0.744 2.030.0530.882Download
73d48P0.743 1.190.5140.824Download
81cnt10.741 2.070.0620.882Download
91cn4C0.735 2.310.0250.906Download
107ocyB0.732 2.370.0820.882Download

(a)Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.


  Predicted function using COFACTOR and COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COFACTOR and COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. While COFACTOR deduces protein functions (ligand-binding sites, EC and GO) using structure comparison and protein-protein networks, COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results (on ligand-binding sites) from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)

  Ligand binding sites


Click
to view
RankC-scoreCluster
size
PDB
Hit
Lig
Name
Download
Complex
Ligand Binding Site Residues
10.28 35 3bknC HEM Rep, Mult 22,25,26,29,57,61,64,65,67,68
20.07 9 3bknB HEM Rep, Mult 26,29,30,33,58,61,62,65
30.02 3 1z4aG LFA Rep, Mult 22,23,61,65,68,72
40.02 3 3f36A IP0 Rep, Mult 22,25,26,64,83
50.02 2 3e1jB HEM Rep, Mult 36,37,40,47,51,54


Download the residue-specific ligand binding probability, which is estimated by SVM.
Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
Download the templates clustering results.
(a)C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column.
Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

  Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites


Click
to view
RankCscoreECPDB
Hit
TM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovEC NumberActive Site Residues
10.3323ee4A0.695 2.730.0600.988 1.17.4.1  NA
20.3281jk0A0.681 2.690.0250.953 1.17.4.1  NA
30.3272wlaA0.720 2.520.0630.918 1.16.3.1  55,64
40.3253g61A0.706 2.110.0940.871 3.6.3.44  NA
50.3241smsA0.687 2.720.0240.953 1.17.4.1  NA

 Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted active site residues.
(a)CscoreEC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. CscoreEC values range in between [0-1];
where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided
by length of the query protein.

  Gene Ontology (GO) terms
Top 10 homologous GO templates in PDB 
RankCscoreGOTM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovPDB HitAssociated GO Terms
1 0.410.9356 0.94 0.51 1.001rw5A GO:0005576 GO:0040014 GO:0046427 GO:0005829 GO:0007166 GO:0005148 GO:0007565 GO:0007595 GO:0008283 GO:0005179
2 0.360.8083 1.45 0.29 0.931f6fA GO:0005179 GO:0005576
3 0.360.8040 1.62 0.47 0.943ew3A GO:0005576 GO:0040014 GO:0046427 GO:0005829 GO:0007166 GO:0005148 GO:0007565 GO:0007595 GO:0008283 GO:0005179
4 0.340.7436 2.08 0.05 0.883qhbA GO:0046872 GO:0009842 GO:0009536 GO:0016491 GO:0046914 GO:0055114
5 0.330.7434 1.19 0.51 0.823d48P GO:0005148 GO:0007565 GO:0007595 GO:0008283 GO:0005179 GO:0005576 GO:0040014 GO:0046427 GO:0005829 GO:0007166
6 0.330.7266 2.67 0.04 0.951buyA GO:0043249 GO:0033574 GO:0042523 GO:0032496 GO:0010766 GO:0005615 GO:0051602 GO:0001666 GO:0048678 GO:0070555 GO:0006357 GO:0042541 GO:0043526 GO:0007568 GO:0046579 GO:0033189 GO:0043627 GO:0008284 GO:0071474 GO:0006915 GO:0055093 GO:0043499 GO:0007584 GO:0043066 GO:0005515 GO:0045893 GO:0007566 GO:0030218 GO:0045666 GO:0045740 GO:0032413 GO:0009651 GO:0008015 GO:0005576 GO:0005179 GO:0007165 GO:0005128
7 0.330.7760 1.85 0.05 0.922q7nB GO:0051461 GO:0048708 GO:0033141 GO:0008083 GO:0005125 GO:0048286 GO:0031100 GO:0060463 GO:0060290 GO:0008284 GO:0005146 GO:0001974 GO:0042517 GO:0045835 GO:0019827 GO:0005102 GO:0042511 GO:0072108 GO:0010976 GO:0007275 GO:0005576 GO:0008285 GO:0060426 GO:0060708 GO:0016525 GO:0060707 GO:0045944 GO:0042503 GO:0048666 GO:0048861 GO:0007566 GO:0030324 GO:0005615 GO:0050731 GO:0046888 GO:0045595 GO:0048711 GO:0043410 GO:0046697 GO:0045651 GO:0033138 GO:0048644 GO:0060135 GO:0072307 GO:0070373 GO:0060041 GO:0006955
8 0.330.6837 1.54 0.06 0.781cntA GO:0046668 GO:0048666 GO:0008083 GO:0008284 GO:0014068 GO:0005127 GO:0060081 GO:0005515 GO:0005634 GO:0043231 GO:0007399 GO:0007259 GO:0030307 GO:0043526 GO:0005138 GO:0042517 GO:0005615 GO:0007165 GO:0043524 GO:0051291 GO:0007275 GO:0060075 GO:0043025 GO:0046887 GO:0005737 GO:0005829 GO:0043410 GO:0046427 GO:0048644 GO:0030424 GO:0046533 GO:0048143 GO:0032838 GO:0070120 GO:0030154 GO:0005125 GO:0048680 GO:0040007
9 0.330.7195 2.52 0.06 0.922wlaA GO:0055114 GO:0016491 GO:0004322 GO:0003677 GO:0006879 GO:0006950 GO:0008199 GO:0046914
10 0.320.7148 2.65 0.06 0.981biqB GO:0004748 GO:0006260 GO:0055114 GO:0005829 GO:0005515 GO:0016491 GO:0046872 GO:0009186 GO:0046914


Consensus prediction of GO terms
 
Molecular Function GO:0005179 GO:0005148 GO:0046914 GO:0016491
GO-Score 0.84 0.75 0.34 0.34
Biological Process GO:0008283 GO:0007565 GO:0007166 GO:0007595 GO:0040014 GO:0046427 GO:0055114
GO-Score 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.34
Cellular Component GO:0005576 GO:0005829 GO:0009842
GO-Score 0.84 0.75 0.34

(a)CscoreGO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on CscoreGO of the template.


[Click on S802499_results.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modeling results listed on this page]



Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
  • Wei Zheng, Chengxin Zhang, Yang Li, Robin Pearce, Eric W. Bell, Yang Zhang. Folding non-homology proteins by coupling deep-learning contact maps with I-TASSER assembly simulations. Cell Reports Methods, 1: 100014 (2021).
  • Chengxin Zhang, Peter L. Freddolino, and Yang Zhang. COFACTOR: improved protein function prediction by combining structure, sequence and protein-protein interaction information. Nucleic Acids Research, 45: W291-299 (2017).
  • Jianyi Yang, Yang Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.