D-I-TASSER Q14149

D-I-TASSER results for Q14149

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

Summary of the Protein

Uniprot ID: Q14149
Protein Name: MORC family CW-type zinc finger protein 3
Gene Name: MORC3

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>Q14149 (939 residues)
MAAQPPRGIRLSALCPKFLHTNSTSHTWPFSAVAELIDNAYDPDVNAKQIWIDKTVINDH
ICLTFTDNGNGMTSDKLHKMLSFGFSDKVTMNGHVPVGLYGNGFKSGSMRLGKDAIVFTK
NGESMSVGLLSQTYLEVIKAEHVVVPIVAFNKHRQMINLAESKASLAAILEHSLFSTEQK
LLAELDAIIGKKGTRIIIWNLRSYKNATEFDFEKDKYDIRIPEDLDEITGKKGYKKQERM
DQIAPESDYSLRAYCSILYLKPRMQIILRGQKVKTQLVSKSLAYIERDVYRPKFLSKTVR
ITFGFNCRNKDHYGIMMYHRNRLIKAYEKVGCQLRANNMGVGVVGIIECNFLKPTHNKQD
FDYTNEYRLTITALGEKLNDYWNEMKVKKNTEYPLNLPVEDIQKRPDQTWVQCDACLKWR
KLPDGMDQLPEKWYCSNNPDPQFRNCEVPEEPEDEDLVHPTYEKTYKKTNKEKFRIRQPE
MIPRINAELLFRPTALSTPSFSSPKESVPRRHLSEGTNSYATRLLNNHQVPPQSEPESNS
LKRRLSTRSSILNAKNRRLSSQFENSVYKGDDDDEDVIILEENSTPKPAVDHDIDMKSEQ
SHVEQGGVQVEFVGDSEPCGQTGSTSTSSSRCDQGNTAATQTEVPSLVVKKEETVEDEID
VRNDAVILPSCVEAEAKIHETQETTDKSADDAGCQLQELRNQLLLVTEEKENYKRQCHMF
TDQIKVLQQRILEMNDKYVKKETCHQSTETDAVFLLESINGKSESPDHMVSQYQQALEEI
ERLKKQCSALQHVKAECSQCSNNESKSEMDEMAVQLDDVFRQLDKCSIERDQYKSEVELL
EMEKSQIRSQCEELKTEVEQLKSTNQQTATDVSTSSNIEESVNHMDGESLKLRSLRVNVG
QLLAMIVPDLDLQQVNYDVDVVDEILGQVVEQMSEISST

Predicted Contact and Distance Map Used in D-I-TASSER simulation

Contact Map

Distance Map

D-I-TASSER simulation is guided by the consensus contact map (left figure) and distance map (right figure) derived based on confidence scores of AttentionPotential. In the contact, distance map and hydrogen bond networks, the axes mark the residue index along the sequence. For the contact map, each dot represents a residue pair with predicted contact, while for the distance map and hydrogen bond network, a color scale represents a distance of 1-20+ angstroms or a angle of 0-180 degree.

Information of Domain

No. of Domain	Domain	Domain Boundary	Length of Domain	Models of Domain	Sequence
1	Q14149-D1	1-939	939		MAAQPPRGIRLSALCPKFLHTNSTSHTWPFSAVAELIDNAYDPDVNAKQIWIDKTVINDHICLTFTDNGNGMTSDKLHKMLSFGFSDKVTMNGHVPVGLYGNGFKSGSMRLGKDAIVFTKNGESMSVGLLSQTYLEVIKAEHVVVPIVAFNKHRQMINLAESKASLAAILEHSLFSTEQKLLAELDAIIGKKGTRIIIWNLRSYKNATEFDFEKDKYDIRIPEDLDEITGKKGYKKQERMDQIAPESDYSLRAYCSILYLKPRMQIILRGQKVKTQLVSKSLAYIERDVYRPKFLSKTVRITFGFNCRNKDHYGIMMYHRNRLIKAYEKVGCQLRANNMGVGVVGIIECNFLKPTHNKQDFDYTNEYRLTITALGEKLNDYWNEMKVKKNTEYPLNLPVEDIQKRPDQTWVQCDACLKWRKLPDGMDQLPEKWYCSNNPDPQFRNCEVPEEPEDEDLVHPTYEKTYKKTNKEKFRIRQPEMIPRINAELLFRPTALSTPSFSSPKESVPRRHLSEGTNSYATRLLNNHQVPPQSEPESNSLKRRLSTRSSILNAKNRRLSSQFENSVYKGDDDDEDVIILEENSTPKPAVDHDIDMKSEQSHVEQGGVQVEFVGDSEPCGQTGSTSTSSSRCDQGNTAATQTEVPSLVVKKEETVEDEIDVRNDAVILPSCVEAEAKIHETQETTDKSADDAGCQLQELRNQLLLVTEEKENYKRQCHMFTDQIKVLQQRILEMNDKYVKKETCHQSTETDAVFLLESINGKSESPDHMVSQYQQALEEIERLKKQCSALQHVKAECSQCSNNESKSEMDEMAVQLDDVFRQLDKCSIERDQYKSEVELLEMEKSQIRSQCEELKTEVEQLKSTNQQTATDVSTSSNIEESVNHMDGESLKLRSLRVNVGQLLAMIVPDLDLQQVNYDVDVVDEILGQVVEQMSEISST

Top 1 final models from D-I-TASSER

Click to view	Rank^a	Download	Estimated TM-score^b
	1	model1.pdb.gz	0.6301

(a)

D-I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, i.e. decoys. These decoys are clustered by SPICKER based on pairwise structure similarity to report up to five final models from the five largest clusters. Models are ranked in descending order of cluster size. If the simulations converge well, it is possible to have less than 5 models generated, which is usually an indication of good model quality.

(b)

The model confidence is quantitatified by estimated TM-score (eTM-score), calculated based on significance of threading template alignments, contact map satisfaction rate, mean absolute error between distance of model and distance of AttentionPotential, and convergence of D-I-TASSER simulations. eTM-score is typically in the range of [0, 1], with higher eTM-score signifies higher model confidence.

Proteins with similar structure

Top 10 structural analogs in PDB (as identified by TM-align)

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	Download Alignment
1	5a22A	0.30	9.05	0.036	0.477	model1_5a22A.pdb.gz
2	6w2jA	0.29	8.83	0.051	0.451	model1_6w2jA.pdb.gz
3	6eqoA	0.28	8.78	0.040	0.438	model1_6eqoA.pdb.gz
4	6bq1A2	0.27	8.52	0.035	0.420	model1_6bq1A2.pdb.gz
5	4bgdA	0.27	8.57	0.042	0.411	model1_4bgdA.pdb.gz
6	6uebA	0.27	8.31	0.022	0.397	model1_6uebA.pdb.gz
7	6yejA	0.26	8.73	0.021	0.410	model1_6yejA.pdb.gz
8	6pzkA	0.26	8.86	0.044	0.400	model1_6pzkA.pdb.gz
9	5yz0A	0.26	9.01	0.030	0.409	model1_5yz0A.pdb.gz
10	5n2eA	0.26	9.25	0.037	0.416	model1_5n2eA.pdb.gz

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Gene Ontology (GO) Terms

Molecular Function (MF)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:1901363	0.82	heterocyclic compound binding
GO:0097159	0.82	organic cyclic compound binding
GO:0003824	0.72	catalytic activity
GO:0000166	0.59	nucleotide binding
GO:0097367	0.58	carbohydrate derivative binding
GO:0035639	0.57	purine ribonucleoside triphosphate binding
GO:0032559	0.57	adenyl ribonucleotide binding
GO:0032550	0.57	purine ribonucleoside binding
GO:0043169	0.53	cation binding
GO:0016787	0.52	hydrolase activity
GO:0003676	0.51	nucleic acid binding

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Molecular Function. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Biological Process (BP)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0065007	0.93	biological regulation
GO:0050794	0.92	regulation of cellular process
GO:0044699	0.86	single-organism process
GO:0009987	0.86	cellular process
GO:0008152	0.76	metabolic process
GO:0071704	0.75	organic substance metabolic process
GO:0044763	0.75	single-organism cellular process
GO:0044238	0.75	primary metabolic process
GO:0044237	0.74	cellular metabolic process
GO:0043170	0.73	macromolecule metabolic process
GO:0044260	0.72	cellular macromolecule metabolic process
GO:0043412	0.64	macromolecule modification
GO:0048519	0.63	negative regulation of biological process
GO:0019538	0.62	protein metabolic process
GO:0044267	0.61	cellular protein metabolic process
GO:0051179	0.60	localization
GO:0044767	0.60	single-organism developmental process
GO:0018193	0.59	peptidyl-amino acid modification
GO:1902578	0.58	single-organism localization
GO:0048523	0.58	negative regulation of cellular process
GO:0006796	0.58	phosphate-containing compound metabolic process
GO:0065008	0.57	regulation of biological quality
GO:0048869	0.57	cellular developmental process
GO:0016310	0.57	phosphorylation
GO:0051457	0.56	maintenance of protein location in nucleus
GO:0050821	0.56	protein stabilization
GO:0048147	0.56	negative regulation of fibroblast proliferation
GO:0018105	0.56	peptidyl-serine phosphorylation
GO:0007569	0.56	cell aging

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Biological Process. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Cellular Component (CC)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0044424	1.00	intracellular part
GO:0044446	0.85	intracellular organelle part
GO:0044428	0.79	nuclear part
GO:0005654	0.69	nucleoplasm
GO:0043226	0.64	organelle
GO:0043229	0.61	intracellular organelle
GO:0043227	0.60	membrane-bounded organelle
GO:0043231	0.58	intracellular membrane-bounded organelle
GO:0005634	0.54	nucleus

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Cellular Component. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Predicted Enzyme Commission (EC) Numbers

Top 5 enzyme homologs in PDB

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	EC Number	Predicted Active Site Residues
1	0.060	2vdcF	0.228	9.03	0.028	0.362	1.4.1.13	NA
2	0.060	3b9jC	0.173	8.62	0.047	0.269	1.17.3.2 1.17.1.4	NA
3	0.060	1ofdA	0.246	8.90	0.030	0.388	1.4.7.1	NA
4	0.060	2q1fA	0.221	9.07	0.024	0.354	4.2.2.21	NA
5	0.060	1ea0A	0.238	8.50	0.038	0.363	1.4.1.13	NA

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted active site residues.
(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the Enzyme Commission (EC) number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Ligand Binding Sites

Template proteins with similar binding site:

Rank	Cscore^LB	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	BS-score	Lig. Name	Download Complex	Predicted binding site residues
1	0.01	3nvvC	0.172	8.66	0.045	0.269	0.13	UUU	complex1.pdb.gz	103,104,105,110
2	0.01	2e3tA	0.244	9.11	0.030	0.388	0.35	BCT	complex2.pdb.gz	26,27,83,104,105
3	0.01	3sr6L	0.172	8.72	0.038	0.269	0.12	UUU	complex3.pdb.gz	32,33,37
4	0.01	1fiqB	0.131	5.75	0.068	0.164	0.12	FAD	complex4.pdb.gz	31,32,97,100,101,104,105,106
5	0.01	2e1qA	0.251	9.31	0.044	0.409	0.33	BCT	complex5.pdb.gz	35,83,102,103
6	0.01	1n5xA	0.246	9.02	0.030	0.392	0.12	TEI	complex6.pdb.gz	39,100,101,102
7	0.01	2ckjD	0.239	8.89	0.045	0.375	0.34	PO4	complex7.pdb.gz	30,82,105
8	0.01	3ns1K	0.131	5.84	0.068	0.165	0.11	FAD	complex8.pdb.gz	26,27,83,104

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted binding site and residues.
(a)	Cscore^LB is the confidence score of predicted binding site. Cscore^LB values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable ligand-binding site prediction.
(b)	BS-score is a measure of local similarity (sequence & structure) between template binding site and predicted binding site in the query structure. Based on large scale benchmarking analysis, we have observed that a BS-score >1 reflects a significant local match between the predicted and template binding site.
(c)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(d)	RMSD^a the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(e)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(f)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

References:
1.	Wei Zheng, Chengxin Zhang, Yang Li, Robin Pearce, Eric W. Bell, Yang Zhang. Folding non-homology proteins by coupling deep-learning contact maps with I-TASSER assembly simulations. In preparation, 2020.