D-I-TASSER P0C7U9

D-I-TASSER results for P0C7U9

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

Summary of the Protein

Uniprot ID: P0C7U9
Protein Name: Protein FAM87A
Gene Name: FAM87A

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>P0C7U9 (286 residues)
MTGTLERENWISGGKSLVLRKQHPGPLRPWRKRAAQLGGGCGWRTAVAPAKFCLWYVVPS
WLWEPPGYLHSSLFLSILFQVTLLETALQSRPNLSLPLVRCGWACTQAMSTRSNCGSRSF
LWAQTQADAASGLPRSRLGFLGLGGCGLIVKHGMTLRNWASFFVVFQAWSLMILQVLGDM
LNIYYAYIQATLTLKVDVAPRLFFPEGGALKEHFSSMDSFQLREAGGTRIPRPALIYGRA
VVTRTVTKAQSLKSALAWAALGCKHPVLSTLCEESQQGAWSEFRRF

Predicted Contact and Distance Map Used in D-I-TASSER simulation

Contact Map

Distance Map

D-I-TASSER simulation is guided by the consensus contact map (left figure) and distance map (right figure) derived based on confidence scores of AttentionPotential. In the contact, distance map and hydrogen bond networks, the axes mark the residue index along the sequence. For the contact map, each dot represents a residue pair with predicted contact, while for the distance map and hydrogen bond network, a color scale represents a distance of 1-20+ angstroms or a angle of 0-180 degree.

Information of Domain

No. of Domain	Domain	Domain Boundary	Length of Domain	Models of Domain	Sequence
1	P0C7U9-D1	1-286	286		MTGTLERENWISGGKSLVLRKQHPGPLRPWRKRAAQLGGGCGWRTAVAPAKFCLWYVVPSWLWEPPGYLHSSLFLSILFQVTLLETALQSRPNLSLPLVRCGWACTQAMSTRSNCGSRSFLWAQTQADAASGLPRSRLGFLGLGGCGLIVKHGMTLRNWASFFVVFQAWSLMILQVLGDMLNIYYAYIQATLTLKVDVAPRLFFPEGGALKEHFSSMDSFQLREAGGTRIPRPALIYGRAVVTRTVTKAQSLKSALAWAALGCKHPVLSTLCEESQQGAWSEFRRF

Top 1 final models from D-I-TASSER

Click to view	Rank^a	Download	Estimated TM-score^b
	1	model1.pdb.gz	0.474

(a)

D-I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, i.e. decoys. These decoys are clustered by SPICKER based on pairwise structure similarity to report up to five final models from the five largest clusters. Models are ranked in descending order of cluster size. If the simulations converge well, it is possible to have less than 5 models generated, which is usually an indication of good model quality.

(b)

The model confidence is quantitatified by estimated TM-score (eTM-score), calculated based on significance of threading template alignments, contact map satisfaction rate, mean absolute error between distance of model and distance of AttentionPotential, and convergence of D-I-TASSER simulations. eTM-score is typically in the range of [0, 1], with higher eTM-score signifies higher model confidence.

Proteins with similar structure

Top 10 structural analogs in PDB (as identified by TM-align)

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	Download Alignment
1	1dgkN	0.44	6.13	0.061	0.734	model1_1dgkN.pdb.gz
2	2j69A	0.43	6.04	0.074	0.692	model1_2j69A.pdb.gz
3	2ok5A	0.42	6.77	0.063	0.755	model1_2ok5A.pdb.gz
4	4nfuA	0.41	6.39	0.063	0.724	model1_4nfuA.pdb.gz
5	4bejA	0.39	6.50	0.078	0.692	model1_4bejA.pdb.gz
6	4aurA	0.32	5.28	0.048	0.465	model1_4aurA.pdb.gz
7	1hkgA	0.32	5.88	0.038	0.514	model1_1hkgA.pdb.gz
8	3b8aX1	0.29	5.19	0.059	0.423	model1_3b8aX1.pdb.gz
9	3d6yA	0.28	6.25	0.071	0.469	model1_3d6yA.pdb.gz
10	1elvA	0.27	6.79	0.067	0.486	model1_1elvA.pdb.gz

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Gene Ontology (GO) Terms

Molecular Function (MF)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0048029	0.47	monosaccharide binding
GO:0035639	0.47	purine ribonucleoside triphosphate binding
GO:0032559	0.47	adenyl ribonucleotide binding
GO:0032550	0.47	purine ribonucleoside binding
GO:0004396	0.47	hexokinase activity

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Molecular Function. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Biological Process (BP)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0072595	0.47	maintenance of protein localization in organelle
GO:0072594	0.47	establishment of protein localization to organelle
GO:0070585	0.47	protein localization to mitochondrion
GO:0061718	0.47	glucose catabolic process to pyruvate
GO:0061620	0.47	glycolytic process through glucose-6-phosphate
GO:0055082	0.47	cellular chemical homeostasis
GO:0051220	0.47	cytoplasmic sequestering of protein
GO:0044262	0.47	cellular carbohydrate metabolic process
GO:0042593	0.47	glucose homeostasis
GO:0006735	0.47	NADH regeneration
GO:2000377	0.36	regulation of reactive oxygen species metabolic process
GO:0098780	0.36	response to mitochondrial depolarisation
GO:0046902	0.36	regulation of mitochondrial membrane permeability
GO:0046323	0.36	glucose import
GO:0032941	0.36	secretion by tissue
GO:0031324	0.36	negative regulation of cellular metabolic process
GO:0030879	0.36	mammary gland development
GO:0010827	0.36	regulation of glucose transport
GO:0007589	0.36	body fluid secretion
GO:0006915	0.36	apoptotic process
GO:0000423	0.36	macromitophagy

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Biological Process. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Cellular Component (CC)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0044464	0.81	cell part
GO:0044444	0.75	cytoplasmic part
GO:0043231	0.75	intracellular membrane-bounded organelle
GO:0005829	0.69	cytosol
GO:0005739	0.69	mitochondrion
GO:0044446	0.56	intracellular organelle part
GO:0016020	0.50	membrane

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Cellular Component. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Predicted Enzyme Commission (EC) Numbers

Top 5 enzyme homologs in PDB

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	EC Number	Predicted Active Site Residues
1	0.060	1reqA	0.389	6.41	0.060	0.671	5.4.99.2	10
2	0.060	1gpjA	0.386	6.26	0.037	0.622	1.2.1.70	NA
3	0.060	1tj7A	0.385	6.26	0.039	0.636	4.3.2.1	NA
4	0.060	2vumA	0.357	6.24	0.040	0.608	2.7.7.6	NA
5	0.060	1w27A	0.318	6.72	0.036	0.559	4.3.1.24	NA

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted active site residues.
(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the Enzyme Commission (EC) number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Ligand Binding Sites

Template proteins with similar binding site:

Rank	Cscore^LB	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	BS-score	Lig. Name	Download Complex	Predicted binding site residues
1	0.01	3myhX	0.338	6.32	0.029	0.580	0.19	BIT	complex1.pdb.gz	2,3,22,23,24
2	0.01	1dgkN	0.439	6.13	0.061	0.734	0.18	ADP	complex2.pdb.gz	25,26,27,30
3	0.01	3mylX	0.292	6.57	0.027	0.503	0.35	POP	complex3.pdb.gz	3,4,21,25
4	0.01	1qhaA	0.410	6.40	0.059	0.710	0.15	ANP	complex4.pdb.gz	25,31,32
5	0.01	1mmaA	0.288	5.86	0.027	0.448	0.16	ADP	complex5.pdb.gz	66,67,69,70,71,72
6	0.01	1qhaB	0.438	6.43	0.075	0.755	0.15	ANP	complex6.pdb.gz	27,31,44
7	0.01	2xo8A	0.366	6.72	0.060	0.661	0.18	H70	complex7.pdb.gz	25,26,29
8	0.01	1mmdA	0.282	6.94	0.041	0.531	0.16	UUU	complex8.pdb.gz	20,21,22,23,24,58,71,72
9	0.01	1g8xA	0.393	5.89	0.035	0.615	0.16	ADP	complex9.pdb.gz	4,26,27,28,29
10	0.01	1rtkA	0.376	6.71	0.050	0.685	0.17	GBS	complex10.pdb.gz	2,23,29,30

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted binding site and residues.
(a)	Cscore^LB is the confidence score of predicted binding site. Cscore^LB values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable ligand-binding site prediction.
(b)	BS-score is a measure of local similarity (sequence & structure) between template binding site and predicted binding site in the query structure. Based on large scale benchmarking analysis, we have observed that a BS-score >1 reflects a significant local match between the predicted and template binding site.
(c)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(d)	RMSD^a the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(e)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(f)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

References:
1.	Wei Zheng, Chengxin Zhang, Yang Li, Robin Pearce, Eric W. Bell, Yang Zhang. Folding non-homology proteins by coupling deep-learning contact maps with I-TASSER assembly simulations. In preparation, 2020.