D-I-TASSER P0C025-D2

D-I-TASSER results for P0C025-D2

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>P0C025 (220 residues)
LGVAVILQSSDKTVLLTRRARTLSVSPNLWVPPGGHVELEEELLDGGLRELWEESGLHLP
QGQFSWVPLGLWEIVLYLLVISQESQQQLQARIQPNPNEVSALMWLTPDVAAAVAAAEDG
TETPGLLPQDLPPSVLAVELEEDGRARPLVLHMSTLLRMIPTMAEDKERVSTGTKFALKL
WLQHLGRTPPPCKSAAYLDPGPAKEEWNMDPLPPNQGSGK

Predicted Secondary Structure

Sequence	20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| LGVAVILQSSDKTVLLTRRARTLSVSPNLWVPPGGHVELEEELLDGGLRELWEESGLHLPQGQFSWVPLGLWEIVLYLLVISQESQQQLQARIQPNPNEVSALMWLTPDVAAAVAAAEDGTETPGLLPQDLPPSVLAVELEEDGRARPLVLHMSTLLRMIPTMAEDKERVSTGTKFALKLWLQHLGRTPPPCKSAAYLDPGPAKEEWNMDPLPPNQGSGK
Prediction	CSSSSSSSSCCCSSSSSSSCCCCCCCCCCSSCCCCSCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCSSCCCSSSSSSCCCCCCSSSSSSSSSSSSSCCCCCSCCCCCHHHSSSSCCHHHHHHHHHCCCCHHHHHHHHHHCCHHHHHHSSCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHCCCCCHHHHCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCCCC
Confidence	9799999949997999995899889998274886214999999999999999987955126658888614546269999998755411266202591153354616899999864078642467654442881344312255653231124548999866554133314567799999999997334678655555568167776523699996678899
	H:Helix; S:Strand; C:Coil

Predicted Solvent Accessibility

Sequence	20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| LGVAVILQSSDKTVLLTRRARTLSVSPNLWVPPGGHVELEEELLDGGLRELWEESGLHLPQGQFSWVPLGLWEIVLYLLVISQESQQQLQARIQPNPNEVSALMWLTPDVAAAVAAAEDGTETPGLLPQDLPPSVLAVELEEDGRARPLVLHMSTLLRMIPTMAEDKERVSTGTKFALKLWLQHLGRTPPPCKSAAYLDPGPAKEEWNMDPLPPNQGSGK
Prediction	4000000126732000011275354243200000030347141230020003001404054541332233323212000000112354162505145610441342415203410445544402520365024402234246534434252424302530453464353034002200220053027333334332414455356447454136755678
	Values range from 0 (buried residue) to 8 (highly exposed residue)

Predicted Contact, Hydrogen and Distance Map Used in D-I-TASSER simulation

Contact Map

Distance Map

Hydrogen bond networks

D-I-TASSER simulation is guided by the consensus contact map (left figure), distance map (middle figure) and Hydrogen bond network (right figure) derived based on confidence scores of AttentionPotential. In the contact, distance map and hydrogen bond networks, the axes mark the residue index along the sequence. For the contact map, each dot represents a residue pair with predicted contact, while for the distance map and hydrogen bond network, a color scale represents a distance of 1-20+ angstroms or a angle of 0-180 degree.

Top 10 threading templates used by D-I-TASSER

Rank

PDB
hit

ID1

ID2

Cov

Norm.
Zscore

Download
alignment

                  20                  40                  60                  80                 100                 120                 140                 160                 180                 200                 220

                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |

SS
Seq

CSSSSSSSSCCCSSSSSSSCCCCCCCCCCSSCCCCSCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCSSCCCSSSSSSCCCCCCSSSSSSSSSSSSSCCCCCSCCCCCHHHSSSSCCHHHHHHHHHCCCCHHHHHHHHHHCCHHHHHHSSCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHCCCCCHHHHCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCCCC
LGVAVILQSSDKTVLLTRRARTLSVSPNLWVPPGGHVELEEELLDGGLRELWEESGLHLPQGQFSWVPLGLWEIVLYLLVISQESQQQLQARIQPNPNEVSALMWLTPDVAAAVAAAEDGTETPGLLPQDLPPSVLAVELEEDGRARPLVLHMSTLLRMIPTMAEDKERVSTGTKFALKLWLQHLGRTPPPCKSAAYLDPGPAKEEWNMDPLPPNQGSGK

5lf8A

0.75

0.47

13.40

1.00

DEthreader

LGVAVILQSSDKTVLLTRRARTLSVSPNLWVPPGGHVELEEELLDGGLRELWEESGLHLQFSWVPLGLWESAHIVLYLLVISQESQQQLQARIQPNPNEVSALMWLTPDVAAAVAALRMIPEDKRVSTKFALKLWLQHL---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

5lf8A

0.92

0.69

19.40

1.64

SPARKS-K

LGVAVILQSSDKTVLLTRRARTLSVSPNLWVPPGGHVELEEELLDGGLRELWEESGLHLPQGQFSWVPPKYHHIVLYLLVISQESQQQLQARIQPNPNEVSALMWLTPDVAAAVAALPQDLPSV--------------------RARPLVLHMSTLLRMIPTMAEDKERVSTGTKFALKLWLQHL-----------------------------------

5lf8A

0.82

0.61

17.19

0.82

MapAlign

LGVAVILQSSDKTVLLTRRARTLSVSPNLWVPPGGHVELEEELLDGGLRELWEESGLHLFSWVPLGLWESYHHIVLYLLVISQESQQQLQARIQPNPNEVSALMWLTPDVAAAVA------------------ALPQDLPSVRARPLVLHM--STLLRMIPTMAEDKERVSTGTKFALKLWLQH------------------------------------

5lf8A

0.84

0.63

17.69

0.52

CEthreader

LGVAVILQSSDKTVLLTRRARTLSVSPNLWVPPGGHVELEEELLDGGLRELWEESGLHLFSWVPLGLWESAHHIVLYLLVISQESQQQLQARIQPNPNEVSALMWLTPDVAAAVAALPQDLPSVRARPLV--------------------LHMSTLLRMIPTMAEDKERVSTGTKFALKLWLQHL-----------------------------------

5lf8A

0.93

0.70

19.65

1.06

MUSTER

LGVAVILQSSDKTVLLTRRARTLSVSPNLWVPPGGHVELEEELLDGGLRELWEESGLHLPQGQFSWVPLGYHHIVLYLLVISQESQQQLQARIQPNPNEVSALMWLTPDVAAAVAALPQDLPSV--------------------RARPLVLHMSTLLRMIPTMAEDKERVSTGTKFALKLWLQHL-----------------------------------

5lf8A

0.93

0.70

19.65

1.98

HHsearch

LGVAVILQSSDKTVLLTRRARTLSVSPNLWVPPGGHVELEEELLDGGLRELWEESGLHLPQGQFLGLWESYHHIVLYLLVISQESQQQLQARIQPNPNEVSALMWLTPDVAAAVAA----------LPQDLP----------SVRARPLVLHMSTLLRMIPTMAEDKERVSTGTKFALKLWLQHL-----------------------------------

5lf8A

0.95

0.71

20.02

1.83

FFAS-3D

LGVAVILQSSDKTVLLTRRARTLSVSPNLWVPPGGHVELEEELLDGGLRELWEESGLHLPQGQFSWVPPKYHHIVLYLLVISQESQQQLQARIQPNPNEVSALMWLTPDVAAAVA----------ALPQDLP----------SVRARPLVLHMSTLLRMIPTMAEDKERVSTGTKFALKLWLQHL-----------------------------------

5t3pA

0.18

0.14

4.58

0.92

EigenThreader

YNSVLLPLVG--KLHFTVRSEKLRRAPGEVCFPGGRDPTDMDDAATALREAQEEVGLRPHQVEVVCCLVPCLILITPFVGLIDH-----NFQAQPNPAEVKDVFVPLAYFL--------------HPQLGHRFINHIFEYTEDGVTYQIKG---------------------MTANLAVLVAFIILEKKPTFEVQFNLNDVLASSEELFLKVH-------

5lf8A

0.92

0.69

19.28

1.94

CNFpred

LGVAVILQSSDKTVLLTRRARTLSVSPNLWVPPGGHVELEEELLDGGLRELWEESGLHLFSWVPLGLWESAHHIVLYLLVISQESQQQLQARIQPNPNEVSALMWLTPDVAAAVAA----------LPQDL-PSV---------RARPLVLHMSTLLRMIPTMAEDKERVSTGTKFALKLWLQHL-----------------------------------

2pnyA

0.17

0.11

3.73

0.83

DEthreader

RAFSVVLFNTKNRILIQQRSDTKVTFPGYFTDCSSHPLYNEGVRRAAQRRLQAELGIQISDIVFMTIYHHKHEICYLLLVRK--N---V--TLNPDPSETKSILYLSQEELWELLEREARGVKVTPWLRTIAEFLYRWWPHLDDVTPFVE-HRV------------------------------------------------------------------

(a)	ID1 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by number of aligned residues.
(b)	ID2 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by query sequence length.
(c)	Cov is equal the number of aligned template residues divided by query sequence length.
(d)	Norm. Zscore is the normalized Z-score of the threading alignments. A Normalized Z-score >1 means a good alignment and is highlighted in bold.
(e)	Download alignment lists the threading program used to identify the template, and provide the 3D structure of aligned regions of threading templates (threading[1-10].pdb.gz).
(f)	Template residues identical to query sequence are highlighted in color.

Top 1 final models from D-I-TASSER

Click to view	Rank^a	Download	Estimated TM-score^b
	1	model1.pdb.gz	0.6873

(a)

D-I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, i.e. decoys. These decoys are clustered by SPICKER based on pairwise structure similarity to report up to five final models from the five largest clusters. Models are ranked in descending order of cluster size. If the simulations converge well, it is possible to have less than 5 models generated, which is usually an indication of good model quality.

(b)

The model confidence is quantitatified by estimated TM-score (eTM-score), calculated based on significance of threading template alignments, contact map satisfaction rate, mean absolute error between distance of model and distance of AttentionPotential, and convergence of D-I-TASSER simulations. eTM-score is typically in the range of [0, 1], with higher eTM-score signifies higher model confidence.

Proteins with similar structure

Top 10 structural analogs in PDB (as identified by TM-align)

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	Download Alignment
1	5lf8A	0.64	2.07	0.841	0.686	model1_5lf8A.pdb.gz
2	5t3pA	0.64	3.57	0.152	0.777	model1_5t3pA.pdb.gz
3	3dupA	0.58	2.57	0.121	0.677	model1_3dupA.pdb.gz
4	2pnyA	0.57	2.74	0.166	0.654	model1_2pnyA.pdb.gz
5	2i6kA	0.56	2.81	0.168	0.650	model1_2i6kA.pdb.gz
6	5lf9A	0.56	2.34	0.221	0.636	model1_5lf9A.pdb.gz
7	2qkmB	0.55	3.34	0.136	0.682	model1_2qkmB.pdb.gz
8	5bonA	0.54	2.61	0.213	0.623	model1_5bonA.pdb.gz
9	2fmlA	0.54	3.02	0.145	0.641	model1_2fmlA.pdb.gz
10	1nfsB	0.54	2.06	0.182	0.596	model1_1nfsB.pdb.gz

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Gene Ontology (GO) Terms

Molecular Function (MF)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0003824	0.99	catalytic activity
GO:0016787	0.96	hydrolase activity
GO:0016818	0.93	hydrolase activity, acting on acid anhydrides, in phosphorus-containing anhydrides
GO:0016462	0.92	pyrophosphatase activity
GO:0046872	0.78	metal ion binding
GO:0047429	0.60	nucleoside-triphosphate diphosphatase activity
GO:1901363	0.55	heterocyclic compound binding
GO:0097159	0.55	organic cyclic compound binding
GO:0017110	0.53	nucleoside-diphosphatase activity

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Molecular Function. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Biological Process (BP)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0071704	0.99	organic substance metabolic process
GO:0044237	0.99	cellular metabolic process
GO:0044238	0.98	primary metabolic process
GO:0006139	0.96	nucleobase-containing compound metabolic process
GO:0044699	0.90	single-organism process
GO:1901575	0.89	organic substance catabolic process
GO:0044248	0.89	cellular catabolic process
GO:0044710	0.88	single-organism metabolic process
GO:0034655	0.88	nucleobase-containing compound catabolic process
GO:0044763	0.87	single-organism cellular process
GO:0044281	0.84	small molecule metabolic process
GO:0055086	0.81	nucleobase-containing small molecule metabolic process
GO:0019637	0.79	organophosphate metabolic process
GO:0006796	0.79	phosphate-containing compound metabolic process
GO:0044712	0.76	single-organism catabolic process
GO:1901135	0.75	carbohydrate derivative metabolic process
GO:0006753	0.74	nucleoside phosphate metabolic process
GO:1901564	0.73	organonitrogen compound metabolic process
GO:1901292	0.73	nucleoside phosphate catabolic process
GO:0009117	0.73	nucleotide metabolic process
GO:0009166	0.72	nucleotide catabolic process
GO:0006163	0.72	purine nucleotide metabolic process
GO:1901136	0.71	carbohydrate derivative catabolic process
GO:0006195	0.71	purine nucleotide catabolic process
GO:0009155	0.69	purine deoxyribonucleotide catabolic process
GO:0044260	0.68	cellular macromolecule metabolic process
GO:0090304	0.63	nucleic acid metabolic process
GO:0046066	0.55	dGDP metabolic process
GO:0044282	0.55	small molecule catabolic process
GO:0009184	0.55	purine deoxyribonucleoside diphosphate catabolic process
GO:0046128	0.50	purine ribonucleoside metabolic process
GO:0009150	0.50	purine ribonucleotide metabolic process

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Biological Process. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Cellular Component (CC)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0044424	1.00	intracellular part
GO:0044444	0.98	cytoplasmic part
GO:0005829	0.87	cytosol
GO:0043226	0.68	organelle
GO:0043229	0.67	intracellular organelle
GO:0005737	0.62	cytoplasm
GO:0043231	0.59	intracellular membrane-bounded organelle

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Cellular Component. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Predicted Enzyme Commission (EC) Numbers

Top 5 enzyme homologs in PDB

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	EC Number	Predicted Active Site Residues
1	0.308	2yvmA	0.514	2.40	0.201	0.591	3.6.1.-	21,99
2	0.196	1v8mA	0.500	2.75	0.208	0.586	3.6.1.13	21
3	0.191	1xsbA	0.496	2.31	0.258	0.564	3.6.1.17	36,44,48,54
4	0.180	2pnyA	0.570	2.74	0.166	0.654	5.3.3.2	27,56
5	0.066	1viuB	0.500	2.56	0.167	0.573	3.6.1.-	147

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted active site residues.
(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the Enzyme Commission (EC) number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Ligand Binding Sites

Template proteins with similar binding site:

Rank	Cscore^LB	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	BS-score	Lig. Name	Download Complex	Predicted binding site residues
1	0.37	1ow2A	0.535	2.11	0.188	0.596	0.91	EIP	complex1.pdb.gz	3,19,23,34,35,36,50,54,73,75,173
2	0.34	2a8qA	0.534	2.54	0.154	0.618	1.16	POP	complex2.pdb.gz	5,19,34,35,36,54
3	0.16	1sz3A	0.510	2.64	0.224	0.596	1.06	GNP	complex3.pdb.gz	2,31,34,35,36,54,72,73,75
4	0.15	1su2A	0.515	3.08	0.226	0.618	0.95	ATP	complex4.pdb.gz	2,4,34,70,72,73,75,77
5	0.15	2a8qA	0.534	2.54	0.154	0.618	1.29	MN	complex5.pdb.gz	34,50,54
6	0.15	2a8sA	0.540	2.52	0.153	0.623	1.14	GTP	complex6.pdb.gz	5,19,32,34,35,36,50,53,54,76,99,171,173,174,177
7	0.14	2a8qB	0.536	2.59	0.154	0.623	1.02	MN	complex7.pdb.gz	3,34,35,54
8	0.14	3qsjA	0.547	2.61	0.186	0.627	0.95	CA	complex8.pdb.gz	34,47,53
9	0.07	2a8pA	0.539	2.53	0.153	0.623	0.82	MN	complex9.pdb.gz	35,36,46,50

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted binding site and residues.
(a)	Cscore^LB is the confidence score of predicted binding site. Cscore^LB values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable ligand-binding site prediction.
(b)	BS-score is a measure of local similarity (sequence & structure) between template binding site and predicted binding site in the query structure. Based on large scale benchmarking analysis, we have observed that a BS-score >1 reflects a significant local match between the predicted and template binding site.
(c)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(d)	RMSD^a the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(e)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(f)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

References:
1.	Wei Zheng, Chengxin Zhang, Yang Li, Robin Pearce, Eric W. Bell, Yang Zhang. Folding non-homology proteins by coupling deep-learning contact maps with I-TASSER assembly simulations. In preparation, 2020.