Differences in the predictions by I-TASSER web server and standalone package
Posted: Mon Apr 18, 2022 7:43 pm
Hi,
I used I-TASSER to make predictions on a protein of interest and observe significant differences in predictions made by the web-server and the standalone package.
The predictions made by the webserver are shown below. As you will notice, the best predicted structure (Model 1) has a TM-score of 0.56 and C-score of -1.25, both of which are good.
The following image shows predictions for the same sequence from the standalone package installed on the Biowulf cluster.
As you will notice, the best model from Biowulf has a TM-score of 0.35 and C-score of -3.24, which is significantly different from the values observed for the webserver models. Even you will notice that the PDB templates are different for the two cases. I am not sure why. It does look like the webserver version of I-TASSER gives superior results than the standalone version.
Please advise.
Thanks,
Sambit Mishra.
I used I-TASSER to make predictions on a protein of interest and observe significant differences in predictions made by the web-server and the standalone package.
The predictions made by the webserver are shown below. As you will notice, the best predicted structure (Model 1) has a TM-score of 0.56 and C-score of -1.25, both of which are good.
The following image shows predictions for the same sequence from the standalone package installed on the Biowulf cluster.
As you will notice, the best model from Biowulf has a TM-score of 0.35 and C-score of -3.24, which is significantly different from the values observed for the webserver models. Even you will notice that the PDB templates are different for the two cases. I am not sure why. It does look like the webserver version of I-TASSER gives superior results than the standalone version.
Please advise.
Thanks,
Sambit Mishra.