Search found 10 matches
- Mon Dec 11, 2023 1:15 pm
- Forum: Main Forum
- Topic: Windows executable for USalign or MMalign
- Replies: 2
- Views: 23806
Re: Windows executable for USalign or MMalign
It seems to be solved. For reference, I used the source code from (https://github.com/pylelab/USalign/) with a different version and setup of MinGW (gcc version 9.2.0) and they both compiled successfully.
- Mon Dec 11, 2023 1:00 am
- Forum: Main Forum
- Topic: Windows executable for USalign or MMalign
- Replies: 2
- Views: 23806
Windows executable for USalign or MMalign
Is there any way to compile MMalign or USalign source code into a windows executable? This is possible for TMalign, but in USalign and MMalign there are headers that do not exist in Windows and thus the compiling fails. Example: #include <sys/wait.h> // for waitpid() #include <sys/ioctl.h> // for ...
- Wed Oct 04, 2023 1:14 pm
- Forum: Main Forum
- Topic: BioLiP mismatch with updated PDB atom records (ligand residue name & identifier)
- Replies: 2
- Views: 46891
Re: BioLiP mismatch with updated PDB atom records (ligand residue name & identifier)
Thank you for the reply. The atom records section you quoted is where I got the hint for the revisions. Unfortunately, these records are not used from molecular visualization applications or parsers (they can only "see" the revised ligand). I understand it is impractical to rebuild the database ...
- Mon Oct 02, 2023 1:37 pm
- Forum: Main Forum
- Topic: BioLiP mismatch with updated PDB atom records (ligand residue name & identifier)
- Replies: 2
- Views: 46891
BioLiP mismatch with updated PDB atom records (ligand residue name & identifier)
Hello, I have recently detected a small number of mismatches in i) ligand residue name identifiers and ii) ligand residue index identifiers. This is most likely because PDB has revised the mmCIF atom records between BioLiP releases. I provide here a few examples I came across: pdb_code ligand_chain ...
- Thu Mar 02, 2023 2:11 pm
- Forum: Main Forum
- Topic: TM-align rotation matrix
- Replies: 5
- Views: 18067
Re: TM-align rotation matrix
It looks like the 4th (missing) row in the matrix represents "pre-rotation and post-rotation translation vectors respectively". When the matrix is extended by [0,0,0,1], it will be successfully read by PyMOL and the object will be transformed.
- Thu Mar 02, 2023 11:21 am
- Forum: Main Forum
- Topic: TM-align rotation matrix
- Replies: 5
- Views: 18067
Re: TM-align rotation matrix
Thank you, this is what I am currently doing. The reason I want to avoid saving the aligned structures is file size. At scale, this will create plenty of data, whereas the matrix alone is much smaller.
- Wed Mar 01, 2023 4:07 pm
- Forum: Main Forum
- Topic: TM-align rotation matrix
- Replies: 5
- Views: 18067
Re: TM-align rotation matrix
Thank you. I have saved the rotation matrix into a separate txt file. My goal is to apply this transformation matrix on the particular structure to recreate the alignment (without having to re-align). I am using PyMOL which supports transformation of objects but seems to expect a 4x4 matrix whereas ...
- Fri Feb 24, 2023 1:59 pm
- Forum: Main Forum
- Topic: TM-align rotation matrix
- Replies: 5
- Views: 18067
TM-align rotation matrix
Hello,
Is there a way to capture and save the rotation matrix for an alignment in TM-align, in a way that can be applied to the two structures later to replicate the exact superposition (without the need to realign them)? I am referring to the last/best alignment.
Is there a way to capture and save the rotation matrix for an alignment in TM-align, in a way that can be applied to the two structures later to replicate the exact superposition (without the need to realign them)? I am referring to the last/best alignment.
- Sat Feb 11, 2023 2:04 pm
- Forum: Main Forum
- Topic: BioLiP inquiry
- Replies: 5
- Views: 26194
Re: BioLiP inquiry
Thank you!
- Sat Feb 11, 2023 1:07 pm
- Forum: Main Forum
- Topic: BioLiP inquiry
- Replies: 5
- Views: 26194
Re: BioLiP inquiry
Does this refer to the fact that a ligand in a single structure could bind two different UniProt IDs, or bind two or more different chains, within that structure? I guess there are multiple perspectives to ligand redundancy, I assume here it is defined on the receptor side, on the level of chains ...