D-I-TASSER Q9Y4D2

D-I-TASSER results for Q9Y4D2

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

Summary of the Protein

Uniprot ID: Q9Y4D2
Protein Name: Sn1-specific diacylglycerol lipase alpha
Gene Name: DAGLA

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>Q9Y4D2 (1042 residues)
MPGIVVFRRRWSVGSDDLVLPAIFLFLLHTTWFVILSVVLFGLVYNPHEACSLNLVDHGR
GYLGILLSCMIAEMAIIWLSMRGGILYTEPRDSMQYVLYVRLAILVIEFIYAIVGIVWLT
QYYTSCNDLTAKNVTLGMVVCNWVVILSVCITVLCVFDPTGRTFVKLRATKRRQRNLRTY
NLRHRLEEGQATSWSRRLKVFLCCTRTKDSQSDAYSEIAYLFAEFFRDLDIVPSDIIAGL
VLLRQRQRAKRNAVLDEANNDILAFLSGMPVTRNTKYLDLKNSQEMLRYKEVCYYMLFAL
AAYGWPMYLMRKPACGLCQLARSCSCCLCPARPRFAPGVTIEEDNCCGCNAIAIRRHFLD
ENMTAVDIVYTSCHDAVYETPFYVAVDHDKKKVVISIRGTLSPKDALTDLTGDAERLPVE
GHHGTWLGHKGMVLSAEYIKKKLEQEMVLSQAFGRDLGRGTKHYGLIVVGHSLGAGTAAI
LSFLLRPQYPTLKCFAYSPPGGLLSEDAMEYSKEFVTAVVLGKDLVPRIGLSQLEGFRRQ
LLDVLQRSTKPKWRIIVGATKCIPKSELPEEVEVTTLASTRLWTHPSDLTIALSASTPLY
PPGRIIHVVHNHPAEQCCCCEQEEPTYFAIWGDNKAFNEVIISPAMLHEHLPYVVMEGLN
KVLENYNKGKTALLSAAKVMVSPTEVDLTPELIFQQQPLPTGPPMPTGLALELPTADHRN
SSVRSKSQSEMSLEGFSEGRLLSPVVAAAARQDPVELLLLSTQERLAAELQARRAPLATM
ESLSDTESLYSFDSRRSSGFRSIRGSPSLHAVLERDEGHLFYIDPAIPEENPSLSSRTEL
LAADSLSKHSQDTQPLEAALGSGGVTPERPPSAAANDEEEEVGGGGGGPASRGELALHNG
RLGDSPSPQVLEFAEFIDSLFNLDSKSSSFQDLYCMVVPESPTSDYAEGPKSPSQQEILL
RAQFEPNLVPKPPRLFAGSADPSSGISLSPSFPLSSSGELMDLTPTGLSSQECLAADKIR
TSTPTGHGASPAKQDELVISAR

Predicted Contact and Distance Map Used in D-I-TASSER simulation

Contact Map

Distance Map

D-I-TASSER simulation is guided by the consensus contact map (left figure) and distance map (right figure) derived based on confidence scores of AttentionPotential. In the contact, distance map and hydrogen bond networks, the axes mark the residue index along the sequence. For the contact map, each dot represents a residue pair with predicted contact, while for the distance map and hydrogen bond network, a color scale represents a distance of 1-20+ angstroms or a angle of 0-180 degree.

Information of Domain

No. of Domain	Domain	Domain Boundary	Length of Domain	Models of Domain	Sequence
1	Q9Y4D2-D1	1-752	752		MPGIVVFRRRWSVGSDDLVLPAIFLFLLHTTWFVILSVVLFGLVYNPHEACSLNLVDHGRGYLGILLSCMIAEMAIIWLSMRGGILYTEPRDSMQYVLYVRLAILVIEFIYAIVGIVWLTQYYTSCNDLTAKNVTLGMVVCNWVVILSVCITVLCVFDPTGRTFVKLRATKRRQRNLRTYNLRHRLEEGQATSWSRRLKVFLCCTRTKDSQSDAYSEIAYLFAEFFRDLDIVPSDIIAGLVLLRQRQRAKRNAVLDEANNDILAFLSGMPVTRNTKYLDLKNSQEMLRYKEVCYYMLFALAAYGWPMYLMRKPACGLCQLARSCSCCLCPARPRFAPGVTIEEDNCCGCNAIAIRRHFLDENMTAVDIVYTSCHDAVYETPFYVAVDHDKKKVVISIRGTLSPKDALTDLTGDAERLPVEGHHGTWLGHKGMVLSAEYIKKKLEQEMVLSQAFGRDLGRGTKHYGLIVVGHSLGAGTAAILSFLLRPQYPTLKCFAYSPPGGLLSEDAMEYSKEFVTAVVLGKDLVPRIGLSQLEGFRRQLLDVLQRSTKPKWRIIVGATKCIPKSELPEEVEVTTLASTRLWTHPSDLTIALSASTPLYPPGRIIHVVHNHPAEQCCCCEQEEPTYFAIWGDNKAFNEVIISPAMLHEHLPYVVMEGLNKVLENYNKGKTALLSAAKVMVSPTEVDLTPELIFQQQPLPTGPPMPTGLALELPTADHRNSSVRSKSQSEMSLEGFSEGRLLSPVVAAAARQ
2	Q9Y4D2-D2	753-1042	290		DPVELLLLSTQERLAAELQARRAPLATMESLSDTESLYSFDSRRSSGFRSIRGSPSLHAVLERDEGHLFYIDPAIPEENPSLSSRTELLAADSLSKHSQDTQPLEAALGSGGVTPERPPSAAANDEEEEVGGGGGGPASRGELALHNGRLGDSPSPQVLEFAEFIDSLFNLDSKSSSFQDLYCMVVPESPTSDYAEGPKSPSQQEILLRAQFEPNLVPKPPRLFAGSADPSSGISLSPSFPLSSSGELMDLTPTGLSSQECLAADKIRTSTPTGHGASPAKQDELVISAR

Top 1 final models from D-I-TASSER

Click to view	Rank^a	Download	Estimated TM-score^b
	1	model1.pdb.gz	0.37

(a)

D-I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, i.e. decoys. These decoys are clustered by SPICKER based on pairwise structure similarity to report up to five final models from the five largest clusters. Models are ranked in descending order of cluster size. If the simulations converge well, it is possible to have less than 5 models generated, which is usually an indication of good model quality.

(b)

The model confidence is quantitatified by estimated TM-score (eTM-score), calculated based on significance of threading template alignments, contact map satisfaction rate, mean absolute error between distance of model and distance of AttentionPotential, and convergence of D-I-TASSER simulations. eTM-score is typically in the range of [0, 1], with higher eTM-score signifies higher model confidence.

Proteins with similar structure

Top 10 structural analogs in PDB (as identified by TM-align)

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	Download Alignment
1	6r9tA	0.33	9.01	0.047	0.507	model1_6r9tA.pdb.gz
2	4bedB	0.32	9.33	0.038	0.503	model1_4bedB.pdb.gz
3	5ikyA	0.31	9.17	0.051	0.489	model1_5ikyA.pdb.gz
4	6sytA	0.31	9.35	0.039	0.493	model1_6sytA.pdb.gz
5	6g2dC	0.31	8.42	0.040	0.455	model1_6g2dC.pdb.gz
6	5i6fA	0.31	9.05	0.047	0.478	model1_5i6fA.pdb.gz
7	4bedA	0.31	9.50	0.035	0.497	model1_4bedA.pdb.gz
8	6z2wE	0.30	9.10	0.033	0.467	model1_6z2wE.pdb.gz
9	6ez8A	0.30	9.12	0.037	0.477	model1_6ez8A.pdb.gz
10	6vr4A	0.30	9.28	0.029	0.476	model1_6vr4A.pdb.gz

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Gene Ontology (GO) Terms

Molecular Function (MF)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0052689	1.00	carboxylic ester hydrolase activity
GO:0016298	1.00	lipase activity
GO:0004806	0.59	triglyceride lipase activity
GO:0004465	0.58	lipoprotein lipase activity

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Molecular Function. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Biological Process (BP)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0065007	0.96	biological regulation
GO:0044699	0.83	single-organism process
GO:0008152	0.80	metabolic process
GO:0009987	0.79	cellular process
GO:0071704	0.78	organic substance metabolic process
GO:0044238	0.77	primary metabolic process
GO:0044763	0.75	single-organism cellular process
GO:0044710	0.73	single-organism metabolic process
GO:0050789	0.72	regulation of biological process
GO:0044237	0.72	cellular metabolic process
GO:0050794	0.70	regulation of cellular process
GO:0006629	0.70	lipid metabolic process
GO:0044255	0.67	cellular lipid metabolic process
GO:0007165	0.66	signal transduction
GO:0044281	0.64	small molecule metabolic process
GO:0006631	0.61	fatty acid metabolic process
GO:0044249	0.59	cellular biosynthetic process
GO:0019369	0.59	arachidonic acid metabolic process
GO:0065008	0.56	regulation of biological quality
GO:0042136	0.53	neurotransmitter biosynthetic process
GO:0016042	0.53	lipid catabolic process
GO:0046486	0.51	glycerolipid metabolic process
GO:0044242	0.50	cellular lipid catabolic process

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Biological Process. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Cellular Component (CC)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0044464	1.00	cell part
GO:0044424	0.68	intracellular part
GO:0016020	0.54	membrane

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Cellular Component. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Predicted Enzyme Commission (EC) Numbers

Top 5 enzyme homologs in PDB

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	EC Number	Predicted Active Site Residues
1	0.060	2zxqA	0.263	9.40	0.035	0.423	3.2.1.97	NA
2	0.060	1ofdA	0.265	9.08	0.027	0.412	1.4.7.1	NA
3	0.060	2vdcA	0.281	9.16	0.033	0.440	1.4.1.13	NA
4	0.060	2vumB	0.245	9.26	0.034	0.387	2.7.7.6	477,493
5	0.060	1j0mA	0.264	8.67	0.051	0.400	4.2.2.12	NA

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted active site residues.
(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the Enzyme Commission (EC) number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Ligand Binding Sites

Template proteins with similar binding site:

Rank	Cscore^LB	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	BS-score	Lig. Name	Download Complex	Predicted binding site residues
1	0.01	2fh8A	0.286	9.15	0.043	0.450	0.22	UUU	complex1.pdb.gz	380,381,382
2	0.01	1xmvA	0.161	5.20	0.060	0.193	0.14	ADP	complex2.pdb.gz	295,467,469,470
3	0.01	3cmvE	0.270	9.37	0.039	0.431	0.26	ANP	complex3.pdb.gz	431,432,433
4	0.01	3cmvG	0.262	9.40	0.039	0.421	0.11	ANP	complex4.pdb.gz	293,294,295,296,297
5	0.01	2fhcA	0.286	9.52	0.041	0.460	0.12	GLC	complex5.pdb.gz	409,412,602
6	0.01	2vdcB	0.283	9.38	0.033	0.454	0.15	AKG	complex6.pdb.gz	303,470,475
7	0.01	1ea0B	0.256	9.46	0.043	0.412	0.15	AKG	complex7.pdb.gz	303,397,398,471
8	0.01	2vdcA	0.281	9.16	0.033	0.440	0.15	AKG	complex8.pdb.gz	304,400,471
9	0.01	3sfzA	0.243	8.91	0.028	0.372	0.20	ADP	complex9.pdb.gz	299,303,304,472,476
10	0.01	1ea0A	0.257	9.50	0.037	0.415	0.24	FMN	complex10.pdb.gz	298,299,300,303,474,496

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted binding site and residues.
(a)	Cscore^LB is the confidence score of predicted binding site. Cscore^LB values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable ligand-binding site prediction.
(b)	BS-score is a measure of local similarity (sequence & structure) between template binding site and predicted binding site in the query structure. Based on large scale benchmarking analysis, we have observed that a BS-score >1 reflects a significant local match between the predicted and template binding site.
(c)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(d)	RMSD^a the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(e)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(f)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

References:
1.	Wei Zheng, Chengxin Zhang, Yang Li, Robin Pearce, Eric W. Bell, Yang Zhang. Folding non-homology proteins by coupling deep-learning contact maps with I-TASSER assembly simulations. In preparation, 2020.