D-I-TASSER Q9UQC9

D-I-TASSER results for Q9UQC9

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

Summary of the Protein

Uniprot ID: Q9UQC9
Protein Name: Calcium-activated chloride channel regulator 2
Gene Name: CLCA2

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>Q9UQC9 (943 residues)
MTQRSIAGPICNLKFVTLLVALSSELPFLGAGVQLQDNGYNGLLIAINPQVPENQNLISN
IKEMITEASFYLFNATKRRVFFRNIKILIPATWKANNNSKIKQESYEKANVIVTDWYGAH
GDDPYTLQYRGCGKEGKYIHFTPNFLLNDNLTAGYGSRGRVFVHEWAHLRWGVFDEYNND
KPFYINGQNQIKVTRCSSDITGIFVCEKGPCPQENCIISKLFKEGCTFIYNSTQNATASI
MFMQSLSSVVEFCNASTHNQEAPNLQNQMCSLRSAWDVITDSADFHHSFPMNGTELPPPP
TFSLVQAGDKVVCLVLDVSSKMAEADRLLQLQQAAEFYLMQIVEIHTFVGIASFDSKGEI
RAQLHQINSNDDRKLLVSYLPTTVSAKTDISICSGLKKGFEVVEKLNGKAYGSVMILVTS
GDDKLLGNCLPTVLSSGSTIHSIALGSSAAPNLEELSRLTGGLKFFVPDISNSNSMIDAF
SRISSGTGDIFQQHIQLESTGENVKPHHQLKNTVTVDNTVGNDTMFLVTWQASGPPEIIL
FDPDGRKYYTNNFITNLTFRTASLWIPGTAKPGHWTYTLNNTHHSLQALKVTVTSRASNS
AVPPATVEAFVERDSLHFPHPVMIYANVKQGFYPILNATVTATVEPETGDPVTLRLLDDG
AGADVIKNDGIYSRYFFSFAANGRYSLKVHVNHSPSISTPAHSIPGSHAMYVPGYTANGN
IQMNAPRKSVGRNEEERKWGFSRVSSGGSFSVLGVPAGPHPDVFPPCKIIDLEAVKVEEE
LTLSWTAPGEDFDQGQATSYEIRMSKSLQNIQDDFNNAILVNTSKRNPQQAGIREIFTFS
PQISTNGPEHQPNGETHESHRIYVAIRAMDRNSLQSAVSNIAQAPLFIPPNSDPVPARDY
LILKGVLTAMGLIGIICLIIVVTHHTLSRKKRADKKENGTKLL

Predicted Contact and Distance Map Used in D-I-TASSER simulation

Contact Map

Distance Map

D-I-TASSER simulation is guided by the consensus contact map (left figure) and distance map (right figure) derived based on confidence scores of AttentionPotential. In the contact, distance map and hydrogen bond networks, the axes mark the residue index along the sequence. For the contact map, each dot represents a residue pair with predicted contact, while for the distance map and hydrogen bond network, a color scale represents a distance of 1-20+ angstroms or a angle of 0-180 degree.

Information of Domain

No. of Domain	Domain	Domain Boundary	Length of Domain	Models of Domain	Sequence
1	Q9UQC9-D1	1-488,602-943	830		MTQRSIAGPICNLKFVTLLVALSSELPFLGAGVQLQDNGYNGLLIAINPQVPENQNLISNIKEMITEASFYLFNATKRRVFFRNIKILIPATWKANNNSKIKQESYEKANVIVTDWYGAHGDDPYTLQYRGCGKEGKYIHFTPNFLLNDNLTAGYGSRGRVFVHEWAHLRWGVFDEYNNDKPFYINGQNQIKVTRCSSDITGIFVCEKGPCPQENCIISKLFKEGCTFIYNSTQNATASIMFMQSLSSVVEFCNASTHNQEAPNLQNQMCSLRSAWDVITDSADFHHSFPMNGTELPPPPTFSLVQAGDKVVCLVLDVSSKMAEADRLLQLQQAAEFYLMQIVEIHTFVGIASFDSKGEIRAQLHQINSNDDRKLLVSYLPTTVSAKTDISICSGLKKGFEVVEKLNGKAYGSVMILVTSGDDKLLGNCLPTVLSSGSTIHSIALGSSAAPNLEELSRLTGGLKFFVPDISNSNSMIDAFSRISSGTGVPPATVEAFVERDSLHFPHPVMIYANVKQGFYPILNATVTATVEPETGDPVTLRLLDDGAGADVIKNDGIYSRYFFSFAANGRYSLKVHVNHSPSISTPAHSIPGSHAMYVPGYTANGNIQMNAPRKSVGRNEEERKWGFSRVSSGGSFSVLGVPAGPHPDVFPPCKIIDLEAVKVEEELTLSWTAPGEDFDQGQATSYEIRMSKSLQNIQDDFNNAILVNTSKRNPQQAGIREIFTFSPQISTNGPEHQPNGETHESHRIYVAIRAMDRNSLQSAVSNIAQAPLFIPPNSDPVPARDYLILKGVLTAMGLIGIICLIIVVTHHTLSRKKRADKKENGTKLL
2	Q9UQC9-D2	489-601	113		DIFQQHIQLESTGENVKPHHQLKNTVTVDNTVGNDTMFLVTWQASGPPEIILFDPDGRKYYTNNFITNLTFRTASLWIPGTAKPGHWTYTLNNTHHSLQALKVTVTSRASNSA

Top 1 final models from D-I-TASSER

Click to view	Rank^a	Download	Estimated TM-score^b
	1	model1.pdb.gz	0.56

(a)

D-I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, i.e. decoys. These decoys are clustered by SPICKER based on pairwise structure similarity to report up to five final models from the five largest clusters. Models are ranked in descending order of cluster size. If the simulations converge well, it is possible to have less than 5 models generated, which is usually an indication of good model quality.

(b)

The model confidence is quantitatified by estimated TM-score (eTM-score), calculated based on significance of threading template alignments, contact map satisfaction rate, mean absolute error between distance of model and distance of AttentionPotential, and convergence of D-I-TASSER simulations. eTM-score is typically in the range of [0, 1], with higher eTM-score signifies higher model confidence.

Proteins with similar structure

Top 10 structural analogs in PDB (as identified by TM-align)

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	Download Alignment
1	7cpxA	0.32	8.97	0.047	0.503	model1_7cpxA.pdb.gz
2	5d06A	0.32	8.42	0.053	0.475	model1_5d06A.pdb.gz
3	6rc9A	0.31	8.52	0.054	0.476	model1_6rc9A.pdb.gz
4	6vr4A	0.31	9.17	0.026	0.502	model1_6vr4A.pdb.gz
5	6rutB	0.30	9.00	0.040	0.479	model1_6rutB.pdb.gz
6	5a22A	0.30	9.21	0.048	0.492	model1_5a22A.pdb.gz
7	1llwA	0.30	8.45	0.047	0.451	model1_1llwA.pdb.gz
8	7lhtA	0.30	9.13	0.030	0.477	model1_7lhtA.pdb.gz
9	6l7iF	0.30	9.12	0.049	0.474	model1_6l7iF.pdb.gz
10	6reyc	0.29	9.03	0.038	0.467	model1_6reyc.pdb.gz

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Gene Ontology (GO) Terms

Molecular Function (MF)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0005215	1.00	transporter activity
GO:0015075	0.99	ion transmembrane transporter activity
GO:0005254	0.98	chloride channel activity
GO:0022836	0.74	gated channel activity
GO:0022839	0.57	ion gated channel activity
GO:0005229	0.56	intracellular calcium activated chloride channel activity

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Molecular Function. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Biological Process (BP)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0006811	0.98	ion transport
GO:0006821	0.88	chloride transport
GO:0055085	0.71	transmembrane transport
GO:0034220	0.68	ion transmembrane transport
GO:1902476	0.58	chloride transmembrane transport

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Biological Process. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Cellular Component (CC)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0044464	1.00	cell part
GO:0031226	0.99	intrinsic component of plasma membrane
GO:0044424	0.57	intracellular part
GO:0016021	0.56	integral component of membrane
GO:0005887	0.55	integral component of plasma membrane

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Cellular Component. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Predicted Enzyme Commission (EC) Numbers

Top 5 enzyme homologs in PDB

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	EC Number	Predicted Active Site Residues
1	0.060	1gl9B	0.259	8.30	0.049	0.388	5.99.1.3	NA
2	0.060	2rd0A	0.269	9.45	0.049	0.451	2.7.1.153	NA
3	0.060	3iydC	0.257	8.82	0.052	0.406	2.7.7.6	NA
4	0.060	2cseW	0.259	8.54	0.045	0.397	3.6.4.13	NA
5	0.060	2e28A	0.253	7.83	0.044	0.371	2.7.1.40	NA

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted active site residues.
(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the Enzyme Commission (EC) number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Ligand Binding Sites

Template proteins with similar binding site:

Rank	Cscore^LB	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	BS-score	Lig. Name	Download Complex	Predicted binding site residues
1	0.01	2dqsA	0.257	8.78	0.028	0.398	0.12	ACP	complex1.pdb.gz	338,351,352
2	0.01	2vz9B	0.231	9.08	0.025	0.370	0.11	NAP	complex2.pdb.gz	88,102,103,310,311,347,348,437,439
3	0.01	1ofdA	0.299	8.55	0.052	0.459	0.15	FMN	complex3.pdb.gz	311,312,350,351
4	0.01	1ofdA	0.299	8.55	0.052	0.459	0.13	AKG	complex4.pdb.gz	313,349,415
5	0.01	3ar9A	0.235	9.36	0.033	0.389	0.17	TM1	complex5.pdb.gz	410,437,438,439

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted binding site and residues.
(a)	Cscore^LB is the confidence score of predicted binding site. Cscore^LB values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable ligand-binding site prediction.
(b)	BS-score is a measure of local similarity (sequence & structure) between template binding site and predicted binding site in the query structure. Based on large scale benchmarking analysis, we have observed that a BS-score >1 reflects a significant local match between the predicted and template binding site.
(c)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(d)	RMSD^a the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(e)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(f)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

References:
1.	Wei Zheng, Chengxin Zhang, Yang Li, Robin Pearce, Eric W. Bell, Yang Zhang. Folding non-homology proteins by coupling deep-learning contact maps with I-TASSER assembly simulations. In preparation, 2020.