D-I-TASSER Q9UJ72

D-I-TASSER results for Q9UJ72

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

Summary of the Protein

Uniprot ID: Q9UJ72
Protein Name: Annexin A10
Gene Name: ANXA10

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>Q9UJ72 (324 residues)
MFCGDYVQGTIFPAPNFNPIMDAQMLGGALQGFDCDKDMLINILTQRCNAQRMMIAEAYQ
SMYGRDLIGDMREQLSDHFKDVMAGLMYPPPLYDAHELWHAMKGVGTDENCLIEILASRT
NGEIFQMREAYCLQYSNNLQEDIYSETSGHFRDTLMNLVQGTREEGYTDPAMAAQDAMVL
WEACQQKTGEHKTMLQMILCNKSYQQLRLVFQEFQNISGQDMVDAINECYDGYFQELLVA
IVLCVRDKPAYFAYRLYSAIHDFGFHNKTVIRILIARSEIDLLTIRKRYKERYGKSLFHD
IRNFASGHYKKALLAICAGDAEDY

Predicted Contact and Distance Map Used in D-I-TASSER simulation

Contact Map

Distance Map

D-I-TASSER simulation is guided by the consensus contact map (left figure) and distance map (right figure) derived based on confidence scores of AttentionPotential. In the contact, distance map and hydrogen bond networks, the axes mark the residue index along the sequence. For the contact map, each dot represents a residue pair with predicted contact, while for the distance map and hydrogen bond network, a color scale represents a distance of 1-20+ angstroms or a angle of 0-180 degree.

Information of Domain

No. of Domain	Domain	Domain Boundary	Length of Domain	Models of Domain	Sequence
1	Q9UJ72-D1	1-88	88		MFCGDYVQGTIFPAPNFNPIMDAQMLGGALQGFDCDKDMLINILTQRCNAQRMMIAEAYQSMYGRDLIGDMREQLSDHFKDVMAGLMY
2	Q9UJ72-D2	89-162	74		PPPLYDAHELWHAMKGVGTDENCLIEILASRTNGEIFQMREAYCLQYSNNLQEDIYSETSGHFRDTLMNLVQGT
3	Q9UJ72-D3	163-247	85		REEGYTDPAMAAQDAMVLWEACQQKTGEHKTMLQMILCNKSYQQLRLVFQEFQNISGQDMVDAINECYDGYFQELLVAIVLCVRD
4	Q9UJ72-D4	248-324	77		KPAYFAYRLYSAIHDFGFHNKTVIRILIARSEIDLLTIRKRYKERYGKSLFHDIRNFASGHYKKALLAICAGDAEDY

Top 1 final models from D-I-TASSER

Click to view	Rank^a	Download	Estimated TM-score^b
	1	model1.pdb.gz	0.89

(a)

D-I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, i.e. decoys. These decoys are clustered by SPICKER based on pairwise structure similarity to report up to five final models from the five largest clusters. Models are ranked in descending order of cluster size. If the simulations converge well, it is possible to have less than 5 models generated, which is usually an indication of good model quality.

(b)

The model confidence is quantitatified by estimated TM-score (eTM-score), calculated based on significance of threading template alignments, contact map satisfaction rate, mean absolute error between distance of model and distance of AttentionPotential, and convergence of D-I-TASSER simulations. eTM-score is typically in the range of [0, 1], with higher eTM-score signifies higher model confidence.

Proteins with similar structure

Top 10 structural analogs in PDB (as identified by TM-align)

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	Download Alignment
1	1axnA	0.95	1.66	0.427	0.982	model1_1axnA.pdb.gz
2	6tu2A	0.93	1.35	0.412	0.966	model1_6tu2A.pdb.gz
3	1m9iA	0.93	1.64	0.428	0.969	model1_1m9iA.pdb.gz
4	1xjlA	0.93	1.87	0.375	0.975	model1_1xjlA.pdb.gz
5	1dm5A	0.92	1.51	0.373	0.963	model1_1dm5A.pdb.gz
6	6t58A	0.92	2.34	0.371	0.978	model1_6t58A.pdb.gz
7	1w45A	0.92	1.93	0.363	0.975	model1_1w45A.pdb.gz
8	1hm6A	0.91	1.79	0.365	0.960	model1_1hm6A.pdb.gz
9	2zhjA	0.90	1.74	0.433	0.960	model1_2zhjA.pdb.gz
10	1bc0A	0.90	2.05	0.391	0.969	model1_1bc0A.pdb.gz

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Gene Ontology (GO) Terms

Molecular Function (MF)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0005543	0.64	phospholipid binding
GO:0043169	0.58	cation binding
GO:0046872	0.56	metal ion binding
GO:0005544	0.52	calcium-dependent phospholipid binding

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Molecular Function. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Biological Process (BP)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0044699	0.92	single-organism process
GO:0009987	0.89	cellular process
GO:0065007	0.83	biological regulation
GO:0050789	0.81	regulation of biological process
GO:0044763	0.81	single-organism cellular process
GO:0050794	0.79	regulation of cellular process
GO:0016043	0.75	cellular component organization
GO:0065008	0.64	regulation of biological quality
GO:0051239	0.63	regulation of multicellular organismal process
GO:0007165	0.61	signal transduction
GO:0050896	0.60	response to stimulus
GO:0006810	0.60	transport
GO:0032879	0.55	regulation of localization
GO:0048519	0.54	negative regulation of biological process
GO:0032502	0.54	developmental process
GO:0042221	0.53	response to chemical
GO:0022607	0.53	cellular component assembly
GO:0048523	0.52	negative regulation of cellular process
GO:0044765	0.52	single-organism transport
GO:0042592	0.52	homeostatic process
GO:0065009	0.51	regulation of molecular function
GO:0055074	0.51	calcium ion homeostasis
GO:0051259	0.51	protein oligomerization
GO:0044767	0.51	single-organism developmental process
GO:0048518	0.50	positive regulation of biological process

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Biological Process. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Cellular Component (CC)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0044464	0.97	cell part
GO:0044424	0.93	intracellular part
GO:0043226	0.86	organelle
GO:0043227	0.78	membrane-bounded organelle
GO:0016020	0.76	membrane
GO:0044444	0.75	cytoplasmic part
GO:0044422	0.70	organelle part
GO:0044446	0.66	intracellular organelle part
GO:0031982	0.66	vesicle
GO:0044421	0.62	extracellular region part
GO:0043229	0.61	intracellular organelle
GO:0031988	0.60	membrane-bounded vesicle
GO:0005737	0.56	cytoplasm
GO:0043230	0.55	extracellular organelle
GO:0070062	0.54	extracellular exosome
GO:0043231	0.51	intracellular membrane-bounded organelle
GO:0031090	0.50	organelle membrane
GO:0005886	0.50	plasma membrane

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Cellular Component. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Predicted Enzyme Commission (EC) Numbers

Top 5 enzyme homologs in PDB

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	EC Number	Predicted Active Site Residues
1	0.060	1z1wA	0.400	6.46	0.028	0.670	3.4.11.-	NA
2	0.060	1fw8A	0.409	6.72	0.066	0.698	2.7.2.3	NA
3	0.060	1kblA	0.399	6.72	0.071	0.691	2.7.9.1	NA
4	0.060	2j5wA	0.404	6.89	0.047	0.719	1.16.3.1	NA
5	0.060	1uwkA	0.422	6.14	0.064	0.685	4.2.1.49	NA

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted active site residues.
(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the Enzyme Commission (EC) number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Ligand Binding Sites

Template proteins with similar binding site:

Rank	Cscore^LB	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	BS-score	Lig. Name	Download Complex	Predicted binding site residues
1	0.78	2zhjA	0.903	1.74	0.433	0.960	1.64	NA	complex1.pdb.gz	102,103,104,105,106,107,146
2	0.08	2hyuA	0.908	1.43	0.389	0.941	1.52	UUU	complex2.pdb.gz	78,263,264,304,305,306,307,308,309
3	0.08	1g5nA	0.899	2.07	0.391	0.969	1.41	UUU	complex3.pdb.gz	27,31,32,33,65,72,73
4	0.08	2xo2A	0.897	2.06	0.370	0.969	1.26	NA	complex4.pdb.gz	49,52,85,86,88,90,275

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted binding site and residues.
(a)	Cscore^LB is the confidence score of predicted binding site. Cscore^LB values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable ligand-binding site prediction.
(b)	BS-score is a measure of local similarity (sequence & structure) between template binding site and predicted binding site in the query structure. Based on large scale benchmarking analysis, we have observed that a BS-score >1 reflects a significant local match between the predicted and template binding site.
(c)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(d)	RMSD^a the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(e)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(f)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

References:
1.	Wei Zheng, Chengxin Zhang, Yang Li, Robin Pearce, Eric W. Bell, Yang Zhang. Folding non-homology proteins by coupling deep-learning contact maps with I-TASSER assembly simulations. In preparation, 2020.