D-I-TASSER Q9UGC6

D-I-TASSER results for Q9UGC6

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

Summary of the Protein

Uniprot ID: Q9UGC6
Protein Name: Regulator of G-protein signaling 17
Gene Name: RGS17

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>Q9UGC6 (210 residues)
MRKRQQSQNEGTPAVSQAPGNQRPNNTCCFCWCCCCSCSCLTVRNEERGENAGRPTHTTK
MESIQVLEECQNPTAEEVLSWSQNFDKMMKAPAGRNLFREFLRTEYSEENLLFWLACEDL
KKEQNKKVIEEKARMIYEDYISILSPKEVSLDSRVREVINRNLLDPNPHMYEDAQLQIYT
LMHRDSFPRFLNSQIYKSFVESTAGSSSES

Predicted Contact and Distance Map Used in D-I-TASSER simulation

Contact Map

Distance Map

D-I-TASSER simulation is guided by the consensus contact map (left figure) and distance map (right figure) derived based on confidence scores of DeepPotential. In the contact, distance map and hydrogen bond networks, the axes mark the residue index along the sequence. For the contact map, each dot represents a residue pair with predicted contact, while for the distance map and hydrogen bond network, a color scale represents a distance of 1-20+ angstroms or a angle of 0-180 degree.

Information of Domain

No. of Domain	Domain	Domain Boundary	Length of Domain	Models of Domain	Sequence
1	Q9UGC6-D1	1-210	210		MRKRQQSQNEGTPAVSQAPGNQRPNNTCCFCWCCCCSCSCLTVRNEERGENAGRPTHTTKMESIQVLEECQNPTAEEVLSWSQNFDKMMKAPAGRNLFREFLRTEYSEENLLFWLACEDLKKEQNKKVIEEKARMIYEDYISILSPKEVSLDSRVREVINRNLLDPNPHMYEDAQLQIYTLMHRDSFPRFLNSQIYKSFVESTAGSSSES

Top 1 final models from D-I-TASSER

Click to view	Rank^a	Download	Estimated TM-score^b
	1	model1.pdb.gz	0.665

(a)

D-I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, i.e. decoys. These decoys are clustered by SPICKER based on pairwise structure similarity to report up to five final models from the five largest clusters. Models are ranked in descending order of cluster size. If the simulations converge well, it is possible to have less than 5 models generated, which is usually an indication of good model quality.

(b)

The model confidence is quantitatified by estimated TM-score (eTM-score), calculated based on significance of threading template alignments, contact map satisfaction rate, mean absolute error between distance of model and distance of DeepPotential, and convergence of D-I-TASSER simulations. eTM-score is typically in the range of [0, 1], with higher eTM-score signifies higher model confidence.

Proteins with similar structure

Top 10 structural analogs in PDB (as identified by TM-align)

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	Download Alignment
1	2af0A	0.63	1.86	0.329	0.676	model1_2af0A.pdb.gz
2	2bt2A	0.62	1.53	0.366	0.652	model1_2bt2A.pdb.gz
3	4iguA	0.62	1.44	0.628	0.643	model1_4iguA.pdb.gz
4	1zv4X	0.62	1.80	0.949	0.652	model1_1zv4X.pdb.gz
5	2bv1A	0.61	1.20	0.396	0.633	model1_2bv1A.pdb.gz
6	2odeB	0.61	0.76	0.382	0.624	model1_2odeB.pdb.gz
7	2pbiA	0.61	1.77	0.228	0.657	model1_2pbiA.pdb.gz
8	2dlvA	0.59	1.92	0.393	0.638	model1_2dlvA.pdb.gz
9	2oj4A	0.59	0.83	0.433	0.605	model1_2oj4A.pdb.gz
10	2crpA	0.59	2.24	0.342	0.652	model1_2crpA.pdb.gz

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Gene Ontology (GO) Terms

Molecular Function (MF)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0005096	0.98	GTPase activator activity

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Molecular Function. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Biological Process (BP)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0065007	0.96	biological regulation
GO:0050789	0.96	regulation of biological process
GO:0050794	0.95	regulation of cellular process
GO:0007165	0.86	signal transduction
GO:0009966	0.82	regulation of signal transduction
GO:0044699	0.78	single-organism process
GO:0009987	0.77	cellular process
GO:0048519	0.71	negative regulation of biological process
GO:0048523	0.70	negative regulation of cellular process
GO:0044763	0.70	single-organism cellular process
GO:0009968	0.68	negative regulation of signal transduction
GO:0032501	0.67	multicellular organismal process
GO:0080090	0.66	regulation of primary metabolic process
GO:0050896	0.66	response to stimulus
GO:0031323	0.66	regulation of cellular metabolic process
GO:0060255	0.65	regulation of macromolecule metabolic process
GO:0044707	0.65	single-multicellular organism process
GO:0031326	0.63	regulation of cellular biosynthetic process
GO:0019219	0.63	regulation of nucleobase-containing compound metabolic process
GO:2000112	0.62	regulation of cellular macromolecule biosynthetic process
GO:0048869	0.62	cellular developmental process
GO:0010468	0.62	regulation of gene expression
GO:0051716	0.61	cellular response to stimulus
GO:0042221	0.61	response to chemical
GO:0007166	0.61	cell surface receptor signaling pathway
GO:0006355	0.61	regulation of transcription, DNA-templated
GO:0051223	0.60	regulation of protein transport
GO:0030178	0.60	negative regulation of Wnt signaling pathway
GO:0016055	0.60	Wnt signaling pathway
GO:0090244	0.59	Wnt signaling pathway involved in somitogenesis
GO:0090090	0.59	negative regulation of canonical Wnt signaling pathway
GO:0071407	0.59	cellular response to organic cyclic compound
GO:0035412	0.59	regulation of catenin import into nucleus
GO:0009950	0.59	dorsal/ventral axis specification
GO:0008219	0.58	cell death
GO:0030154	0.54	cell differentiation

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Biological Process. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Cellular Component (CC)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0016020	1.00	membrane
GO:0005737	1.00	cytoplasm
GO:0005886	0.98	plasma membrane
GO:0044444	0.56	cytoplasmic part
GO:0043226	0.54	organelle
GO:0043229	0.53	intracellular organelle
GO:0043227	0.52	membrane-bounded organelle
GO:0043231	0.51	intracellular membrane-bounded organelle

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Cellular Component. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Predicted Enzyme Commission (EC) Numbers

Top 5 enzyme homologs in PDB

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	EC Number	Predicted Active Site Residues
1	0.060	3ge1A	0.440	5.94	0.055	0.771	2.7.1.30	NA
2	0.060	1h7aA	0.441	5.37	0.036	0.729	1.17.4.2	NA
3	0.060	1prhA	0.431	5.53	0.029	0.738	1.14.99.1	NA
4	0.060	2acxA	0.522	3.11	0.121	0.633	2.7.11.16	100
5	0.060	2f89F	0.442	5.38	0.073	0.724	2.5.1.1 2.5.1.10	NA

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted active site residues.
(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the Enzyme Commission (EC) number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Ligand Binding Sites

Template proteins with similar binding site:

Click to view	Rank	Cscore^LB	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	BS-score	Lig. Name	Download Complex	Predicted binding site residues
	1	0.02	3pvwA	0.510	3.58	0.153	0.643	0.25	QRX	complex1.pdb.gz	94,189,190
	2	0.02	3krwA	0.498	3.78	0.155	0.643	0.20	BA1	complex2.pdb.gz	81,93,113,114,182,183,187

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted binding site and residues.
(a)	Cscore^LB is the confidence score of predicted binding site. Cscore^LB values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable ligand-binding site prediction.
(b)	BS-score is a measure of local similarity (sequence & structure) between template binding site and predicted binding site in the query structure. Based on large scale benchmarking analysis, we have observed that a BS-score >1 reflects a significant local match between the predicted and template binding site.
(c)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(d)	RMSD^a the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(e)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(f)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

References:
1.	Wei Zheng, Chengxin Zhang, Yang Li, Robin Pearce, Eric W. Bell, Yang Zhang. Folding non-homology proteins by coupling deep-learning contact maps with I-TASSER assembly simulations. In preparation, 2020.