D-I-TASSER Q9UDX5

D-I-TASSER results for Q9UDX5

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

Summary of the Protein

Uniprot ID: Q9UDX5
Protein Name: Mitochondrial fission process protein 1
Gene Name: MTFP1

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>Q9UDX5 (166 residues)
MSEPQPRGAERDLYRDTWVRYLGYANEVGEAFRSLVPAAVVWLSYGVASSYVLADAIDKG
KKAGEVPSPEAGRSARVTVAVVDTFVWQALASVAIPGFTINRVCAASLYVLGTATRWPLA
VRKWTTTALGLLTIPIIIHPIDRSVDFLLDSSLRKLYPTVGKPSSS

Predicted Contact and Distance Map Used in D-I-TASSER simulation

Contact Map

Distance Map

D-I-TASSER simulation is guided by the consensus contact map (left figure) and distance map (right figure) derived based on confidence scores of AttentionPotential. In the contact, distance map and hydrogen bond networks, the axes mark the residue index along the sequence. For the contact map, each dot represents a residue pair with predicted contact, while for the distance map and hydrogen bond network, a color scale represents a distance of 1-20+ angstroms or a angle of 0-180 degree.

Information of Domain

No. of Domain	Domain	Domain Boundary	Length of Domain	Models of Domain	Sequence
1	Q9UDX5-D1	1-93	93		MSEPQPRGAERDLYRDTWVRYLGYANEVGEAFRSLVPAAVVWLSYGVASSYVLADAIDKGKKAGEVPSPEAGRSARVTVAVVDTFVWQALASV
2	Q9UDX5-D2	94-166	73		AIPGFTINRVCAASLYVLGTATRWPLAVRKWTTTALGLLTIPIIIHPIDRSVDFLLDSSLRKLYPTVGKPSSS

Top 1 final models from D-I-TASSER

Click to view	Rank^a	Download	Estimated TM-score^b
	1	model1.pdb.gz	0.8

(a)

D-I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, i.e. decoys. These decoys are clustered by SPICKER based on pairwise structure similarity to report up to five final models from the five largest clusters. Models are ranked in descending order of cluster size. If the simulations converge well, it is possible to have less than 5 models generated, which is usually an indication of good model quality.

(b)

The model confidence is quantitatified by estimated TM-score (eTM-score), calculated based on significance of threading template alignments, contact map satisfaction rate, mean absolute error between distance of model and distance of AttentionPotential, and convergence of D-I-TASSER simulations. eTM-score is typically in the range of [0, 1], with higher eTM-score signifies higher model confidence.

Proteins with similar structure

Top 10 structural analogs in PDB (as identified by TM-align)

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	Download Alignment
1	4f4cA4	0.64	4.15	0.080	0.928	model1_4f4cA4.pdb.gz
2	3g61A4	0.61	4.01	0.076	0.879	model1_3g61A4.pdb.gz
3	3qf4A	0.54	4.06	0.087	0.747	model1_3qf4A.pdb.gz
4	3b5wA	0.54	3.96	0.044	0.729	model1_3b5wA.pdb.gz
5	2onjA1	0.50	4.33	0.046	0.759	model1_2onjA1.pdb.gz
6	3wmeA	0.49	4.95	0.056	0.837	model1_3wmeA.pdb.gz
7	3qf4B	0.46	5.45	0.049	0.843	model1_3qf4B.pdb.gz
8	4b0rA	0.41	5.54	0.032	0.747	model1_4b0rA.pdb.gz
9	1hizA2	0.33	5.03	0.030	0.506	model1_1hizA2.pdb.gz
10	2vd2A	0.32	5.07	0.033	0.518	model1_2vd2A.pdb.gz

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Gene Ontology (GO) Terms

Molecular Function (MF)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:1901363	0.68	heterocyclic compound binding
GO:0097159	0.68	organic cyclic compound binding
GO:0003824	0.67	catalytic activity
GO:0035639	0.65	purine ribonucleoside triphosphate binding
GO:0032555	0.65	purine ribonucleotide binding
GO:0032550	0.65	purine ribonucleoside binding
GO:0032559	0.61	adenyl ribonucleotide binding
GO:0022857	0.61	transmembrane transporter activity
GO:0016787	0.59	hydrolase activity
GO:0043492	0.58	ATPase activity, coupled to movement of substances
GO:0016820	0.58	hydrolase activity, acting on acid anhydrides, catalyzing transmembrane movement of substances
GO:0015405	0.58	P-P-bond-hydrolysis-driven transmembrane transporter activity

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Molecular Function. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Biological Process (BP)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0009987	1.00	cellular process
GO:0000266	0.99	mitochondrial fission
GO:0044699	0.51	single-organism process

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Biological Process. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Cellular Component (CC)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0044444	1.00	cytoplasmic part
GO:0043229	0.96	intracellular organelle
GO:0043227	0.96	membrane-bounded organelle
GO:0005739	0.95	mitochondrion

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Cellular Component. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Predicted Enzyme Commission (EC) Numbers

Top 5 enzyme homologs in PDB

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	EC Number	Predicted Active Site Residues
1	0.060	2jjpA	0.483	4.79	0.053	0.747	1.14.-.-	98
2	0.060	2wm4A	0.473	5.08	0.079	0.765	1.14.-.-	32
3	0.060	3b8cA	0.505	3.57	0.055	0.693	3.6.3.6	NA
4	0.060	3ixzA	0.493	3.85	0.030	0.681	3.6.3.10	NA
5	0.060	1fo4A	0.434	4.91	0.058	0.723	1.17.1.4	NA

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted active site residues.
(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the Enzyme Commission (EC) number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Ligand Binding Sites

Template proteins with similar binding site:

Rank	Cscore^LB	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	BS-score	Lig. Name	Download Complex	Predicted binding site residues
1	0.02	2w6dB	0.546	4.55	0.079	0.861	0.89	CPL	complex1.pdb.gz	30,32,43,44,46
2	0.02	2w6dA	0.546	4.55	0.079	0.861	0.73	GDP	complex2.pdb.gz	24,25,27,28,45
3	0.01	2w6dB	0.546	4.55	0.079	0.861	0.54	CPL	complex3.pdb.gz	88,89,91,92,94,96,100,101,123,124,127,130
4	0.01	1f31A	0.503	4.25	0.080	0.747	0.43	UUU	complex4.pdb.gz	30,31,101,134,135
5	0.01	2hydA	0.501	4.33	0.046	0.759	0.45	ADP	complex5.pdb.gz	21,22,46,47,48,49,50,51
6	0.01	2hydA	0.501	4.33	0.046	0.759	0.50	ADP	complex6.pdb.gz	101,102,107
7	0.01	2whfA	0.498	4.52	0.049	0.741	0.45	II4	complex7.pdb.gz	41,44,45,48

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted binding site and residues.
(a)	Cscore^LB is the confidence score of predicted binding site. Cscore^LB values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable ligand-binding site prediction.
(b)	BS-score is a measure of local similarity (sequence & structure) between template binding site and predicted binding site in the query structure. Based on large scale benchmarking analysis, we have observed that a BS-score >1 reflects a significant local match between the predicted and template binding site.
(c)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(d)	RMSD^a the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(e)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(f)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

References:
1.	Wei Zheng, Chengxin Zhang, Yang Li, Robin Pearce, Eric W. Bell, Yang Zhang. Folding non-homology proteins by coupling deep-learning contact maps with I-TASSER assembly simulations. In preparation, 2020.