D-I-TASSER Q9P299

D-I-TASSER results for Q9P299

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

Summary of the Protein

Uniprot ID: Q9P299
Protein Name: Coatomer subunit zeta-2
Gene Name: COPZ2

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>Q9P299 (210 residues)
MQRPEAWPRPHPGEGAAAAQAGGPAPPARAGEPSGLRLQEPSLYTIKAVFILDNDGRRLL
AKYYDDTFPSMKEQMVFEKNVFNKTSRTESEIAFFGGMTIVYKNSIDLFLYVVGSSYENE
LMLMSVLTCLFESLNHMLRKNVEKRWLLENMDGAFLVLDEIVDGGVILESDPQQVIQKVN
FRADDGGLTEQSVAQVLQSAKEQIKWSLLK

Predicted Contact and Distance Map Used in D-I-TASSER simulation

Contact Map

Distance Map

D-I-TASSER simulation is guided by the consensus contact map (left figure) and distance map (right figure) derived based on confidence scores of AttentionPotential. In the contact, distance map and hydrogen bond networks, the axes mark the residue index along the sequence. For the contact map, each dot represents a residue pair with predicted contact, while for the distance map and hydrogen bond network, a color scale represents a distance of 1-20+ angstroms or a angle of 0-180 degree.

Information of Domain

No. of Domain	Domain	Domain Boundary	Length of Domain	Models of Domain	Sequence
1	Q9P299-D1	1-210	210		MQRPEAWPRPHPGEGAAAAQAGGPAPPARAGEPSGLRLQEPSLYTIKAVFILDNDGRRLLAKYYDDTFPSMKEQMVFEKNVFNKTSRTESEIAFFGGMTIVYKNSIDLFLYVVGSSYENELMLMSVLTCLFESLNHMLRKNVEKRWLLENMDGAFLVLDEIVDGGVILESDPQQVIQKVNFRADDGGLTEQSVAQVLQSAKEQIKWSLLK

Top 1 final models from D-I-TASSER

Click to view	Rank^a	Download	Estimated TM-score^b
	1	model1.pdb.gz	0.7406

(a)

D-I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, i.e. decoys. These decoys are clustered by SPICKER based on pairwise structure similarity to report up to five final models from the five largest clusters. Models are ranked in descending order of cluster size. If the simulations converge well, it is possible to have less than 5 models generated, which is usually an indication of good model quality.

(b)

The model confidence is quantitatified by estimated TM-score (eTM-score), calculated based on significance of threading template alignments, contact map satisfaction rate, mean absolute error between distance of model and distance of AttentionPotential, and convergence of D-I-TASSER simulations. eTM-score is typically in the range of [0, 1], with higher eTM-score signifies higher model confidence.

Proteins with similar structure

Top 10 structural analogs in PDB (as identified by TM-align)

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	Download Alignment
1	2hf6A	0.68	1.24	0.718	0.710	model1_2hf6A.pdb.gz
2	2jktI	0.62	1.52	0.201	0.662	model1_2jktI.pdb.gz
3	1w63Q	0.61	2.06	0.179	0.676	model1_1w63Q.pdb.gz
4	5mu7B	0.58	2.23	0.141	0.652	model1_5mu7B.pdb.gz
5	2jkrM1	0.57	1.91	0.153	0.624	model1_2jkrM1.pdb.gz
6	1w63M1	0.56	2.16	0.173	0.629	model1_1w63M1.pdb.gz
7	5a1wH1	0.55	2.43	0.112	0.638	model1_5a1wH1.pdb.gz
8	4pmwA	0.35	5.96	0.075	0.624	model1_4pmwA.pdb.gz
9	1prxA	0.35	5.00	0.049	0.533	model1_1prxA.pdb.gz
10	3cuxA	0.33	6.23	0.064	0.619	model1_3cuxA.pdb.gz

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Gene Ontology (GO) Terms

Molecular Function (MF)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0005215	0.59	transporter activity
GO:0004980	0.51	melanocyte-stimulating hormone receptor activity
GO:0008565	0.50	protein transporter activity

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Molecular Function. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Biological Process (BP)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0051179	0.90	localization
GO:0006810	0.89	transport
GO:0016192	0.86	vesicle-mediated transport
GO:0044699	0.74	single-organism process
GO:0051649	0.70	establishment of localization in cell
GO:0051641	0.70	cellular localization
GO:0044765	0.62	single-organism transport
GO:0065007	0.59	biological regulation
GO:0048193	0.59	Golgi vesicle transport
GO:0050789	0.58	regulation of biological process
GO:0044763	0.58	single-organism cellular process
GO:0048489	0.55	synaptic vesicle transport
GO:0050794	0.52	regulation of cellular process
GO:0090037	0.51	positive regulation of protein kinase C signaling
GO:0099643	0.50	signal release from synapse
GO:0099531	0.50	presynaptic process involved in chemical synaptic transmission

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Biological Process. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Cellular Component (CC)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0044464	1.00	cell part
GO:0044424	0.98	intracellular part
GO:0044444	0.94	cytoplasmic part
GO:0044446	0.88	intracellular organelle part
GO:0044431	0.87	Golgi apparatus part
GO:0098796	0.80	membrane protein complex
GO:0044433	0.70	cytoplasmic vesicle part
GO:0030120	0.69	vesicle coat
GO:0030126	0.67	COPI vesicle coat
GO:0016020	0.61	membrane
GO:0005886	0.52	plasma membrane
GO:0005802	0.52	trans-Golgi network

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Cellular Component. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Predicted Enzyme Commission (EC) Numbers

Top 5 enzyme homologs in PDB

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	EC Number	Predicted Active Site Residues
1	0.060	1q8iA	0.402	5.62	0.047	0.700	2.7.7.7	165
2	0.060	2aw5B	0.466	5.23	0.069	0.757	1.1.1.40	NA
3	0.060	1gz3A	0.477	5.16	0.070	0.762	1.1.1.38	NA
4	0.060	1g5aA	0.426	6.09	0.045	0.776	2.4.1.4	NA
5	0.060	1ug9A	0.438	5.73	0.059	0.767	3.2.1.70	NA

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted active site residues.
(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the Enzyme Commission (EC) number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Ligand Binding Sites

Template proteins with similar binding site:

Rank	Cscore^LB	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	BS-score	Lig. Name	Download Complex	Predicted binding site residues
1	0.04	2xa7M	0.590	3.03	0.153	0.691	0.39	III	complex1.pdb.gz	115,123,162,163,166
2	0.03	2jktI	0.616	1.52	0.201	0.662	0.39	III	complex2.pdb.gz	109,155,159,164
3	0.01	3cmvD	0.439	5.40	0.092	0.705	0.15	ANP	complex3.pdb.gz	57,58,59
4	0.01	1do8A	0.474	4.67	0.065	0.719	0.18	NAD	complex4.pdb.gz	57,108,128,131,154,158
5	0.01	1gz3C	0.475	5.12	0.070	0.762	0.20	ATP	complex5.pdb.gz	41,113,114,115,116,118,119,165
6	0.01	1bw8A	0.252	6.42	0.051	0.481	0.30	III	complex6.pdb.gz	64,112,115,165
7	0.01	1do8B	0.451	5.09	0.048	0.724	0.13	NAD	complex7.pdb.gz	114,115,116,165,167
8	0.01	3cmvB	0.423	5.59	0.090	0.714	0.31	ANP	complex8.pdb.gz	76,78,79,80,81
9	0.01	1gz4B	0.452	5.08	0.048	0.719	0.21	ATP	complex9.pdb.gz	114,115,125
10	0.01	3cmvG	0.436	5.32	0.098	0.700	0.13	ANP	complex10.pdb.gz	55,56,57,58,59

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted binding site and residues.
(a)	Cscore^LB is the confidence score of predicted binding site. Cscore^LB values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable ligand-binding site prediction.
(b)	BS-score is a measure of local similarity (sequence & structure) between template binding site and predicted binding site in the query structure. Based on large scale benchmarking analysis, we have observed that a BS-score >1 reflects a significant local match between the predicted and template binding site.
(c)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(d)	RMSD^a the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(e)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(f)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

References:
1.	Wei Zheng, Chengxin Zhang, Yang Li, Robin Pearce, Eric W. Bell, Yang Zhang. Folding non-homology proteins by coupling deep-learning contact maps with I-TASSER assembly simulations. In preparation, 2020.