D-I-TASSER Q9NX05

D-I-TASSER results for Q9NX05

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

Summary of the Protein

Uniprot ID: Q9NX05
Protein Name: Constitutive coactivator of PPAR-gamma-like protein 2
Gene Name: FAM120C

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>Q9NX05 (1096 residues)
MGVQGFQEFLEKRCPGAVVPVDLLKLARTVSRQQQQQHLHRQLPPTAALAPGAPRAARGS
VPLQPPLPPAALGAYSGGAGPIRHHHPAHHFHHHGQAQPGLHPPLPPPPPPQLPGARVLV
DAGSALPRLYGGYQTDWVCGGQWNAMLGYLSALCQACAYPGGDGLELVVMFPGGLGKDRL
AEWGRRCQAERQTAQLIVGHVGNKGTPPPRAWFLPPACLSHCVRLALIRFRVKVFQSLED
HHLEVVAFFRENGFHGLLAHDSEYALYNIPSYYSSHALKLSWNGKNLTTNQFLMQEVAKQ
LGLKRMNFPIFAALLGNHILPDEDLAAFHWSLLGPEHPLASLKVRAHQLVLPPCDVVIKA
VSEYVSSIKDPSNLDVVGKDVFKQSQSRTEDKIERFKKAVEYYSVTTKLSSLPVGPSFLG
FRNNRLGNPPLPRNQVGTISAGKPMFSHQVPQKVKYPPPFPVGPNSSLLFSSHALGESHA
FSEDPMLQNSPFANWAVSYDSSASQFPNYLPSKASPPLGPDSSHSSSSDGDEPNGASSDH
ITEAFHHQPEWGNPNRDRGSWAQPVDTGVSEASLGDGEPHIPSLLSMSTRNHMDITIPPL
PPVAPEVLRVAEHRHRRGLMYPYIYHVLTKGEIKIPVCIEDECNMELPPAALLFRSARQY
VYGVLFSLAETQRKMERLAMRRRLPVEVPSVILKEWSAYKGKSPQTPELVSALTFREWTC
PNLKKLWLGKAVEDKNRRMRAFLACMKSDTPSMLNPANVPTHLLLMCCVLRYMVQWPGGR
ILHRHELDTFLAQAVSTQLYEPDRLQELKIEKLDARGIQLAALFMSGVDTALFANDACGQ
PVPWEHCCPWIYFDGKLFQSKLIKAGRERVSLVELCDGQADLATKVEKMRQSILEGVNMN
HPPPSALLPSPTFVPPMVPSLYPVSLYSRAMGSMPLPPQGRSRGFAGLHPIPPQGGKLEI
AGMVVGQWAGSRSSRGRGSFGMQVVSVGGPGKGHGKEQTGRGSKGHKKGNKQGSSDGVSK
SLELHQGRSRSQVNGNSGALIKEEKSDHRLPAPSQCALSRDSNECNNGNRYLPMNNREKN
HLQEQKLETVAQRKED

Predicted Contact and Distance Map Used in D-I-TASSER simulation

Contact Map

Distance Map

D-I-TASSER simulation is guided by the consensus contact map (left figure) and distance map (right figure) derived based on confidence scores of AttentionPotential. In the contact, distance map and hydrogen bond networks, the axes mark the residue index along the sequence. For the contact map, each dot represents a residue pair with predicted contact, while for the distance map and hydrogen bond network, a color scale represents a distance of 1-20+ angstroms or a angle of 0-180 degree.

Information of Domain

No. of Domain	Domain	Domain Boundary	Length of Domain	Models of Domain	Sequence
1	Q9NX05-D1	1-1096	1096		MGVQGFQEFLEKRCPGAVVPVDLLKLARTVSRQQQQQHLHRQLPPTAALAPGAPRAARGSVPLQPPLPPAALGAYSGGAGPIRHHHPAHHFHHHGQAQPGLHPPLPPPPPPQLPGARVLVDAGSALPRLYGGYQTDWVCGGQWNAMLGYLSALCQACAYPGGDGLELVVMFPGGLGKDRLAEWGRRCQAERQTAQLIVGHVGNKGTPPPRAWFLPPACLSHCVRLALIRFRVKVFQSLEDHHLEVVAFFRENGFHGLLAHDSEYALYNIPSYYSSHALKLSWNGKNLTTNQFLMQEVAKQLGLKRMNFPIFAALLGNHILPDEDLAAFHWSLLGPEHPLASLKVRAHQLVLPPCDVVIKAVSEYVSSIKDPSNLDVVGKDVFKQSQSRTEDKIERFKKAVEYYSVTTKLSSLPVGPSFLGFRNNRLGNPPLPRNQVGTISAGKPMFSHQVPQKVKYPPPFPVGPNSSLLFSSHALGESHAFSEDPMLQNSPFANWAVSYDSSASQFPNYLPSKASPPLGPDSSHSSSSDGDEPNGASSDHITEAFHHQPEWGNPNRDRGSWAQPVDTGVSEASLGDGEPHIPSLLSMSTRNHMDITIPPLPPVAPEVLRVAEHRHRRGLMYPYIYHVLTKGEIKIPVCIEDECNMELPPAALLFRSARQYVYGVLFSLAETQRKMERLAMRRRLPVEVPSVILKEWSAYKGKSPQTPELVSALTFREWTCPNLKKLWLGKAVEDKNRRMRAFLACMKSDTPSMLNPANVPTHLLLMCCVLRYMVQWPGGRILHRHELDTFLAQAVSTQLYEPDRLQELKIEKLDARGIQLAALFMSGVDTALFANDACGQPVPWEHCCPWIYFDGKLFQSKLIKAGRERVSLVELCDGQADLATKVEKMRQSILEGVNMNHPPPSALLPSPTFVPPMVPSLYPVSLYSRAMGSMPLPPQGRSRGFAGLHPIPPQGGKLEIAGMVVGQWAGSRSSRGRGSFGMQVVSVGGPGKGHGKEQTGRGSKGHKKGNKQGSSDGVSKSLELHQGRSRSQVNGNSGALIKEEKSDHRLPAPSQCALSRDSNECNNGNRYLPMNNREKNHLQEQKLETVAQRKED

Top 1 final models from D-I-TASSER

Click to view	Rank^a	Download	Estimated TM-score^b
	1	model1.pdb.gz	0.3585

(a)

D-I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, i.e. decoys. These decoys are clustered by SPICKER based on pairwise structure similarity to report up to five final models from the five largest clusters. Models are ranked in descending order of cluster size. If the simulations converge well, it is possible to have less than 5 models generated, which is usually an indication of good model quality.

(b)

The model confidence is quantitatified by estimated TM-score (eTM-score), calculated based on significance of threading template alignments, contact map satisfaction rate, mean absolute error between distance of model and distance of AttentionPotential, and convergence of D-I-TASSER simulations. eTM-score is typically in the range of [0, 1], with higher eTM-score signifies higher model confidence.

Proteins with similar structure

Top 10 structural analogs in PDB (as identified by TM-align)

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	Download Alignment
1	6sytA	0.23	9.15	0.051	0.360	model1_6sytA.pdb.gz
2	6vr4A	0.23	8.53	0.022	0.346	model1_6vr4A.pdb.gz
3	5x6oC	0.23	9.54	0.053	0.362	model1_5x6oC.pdb.gz
4	6ysgA	0.22	8.93	0.033	0.340	model1_6ysgA.pdb.gz
5	6hzeA	0.22	7.56	0.060	0.304	model1_6hzeA.pdb.gz
6	6emkA	0.21	8.79	0.029	0.319	model1_6emkA.pdb.gz
7	3jcrA	0.21	9.14	0.037	0.329	model1_3jcrA.pdb.gz
8	7c6oA	0.21	9.03	0.047	0.319	model1_7c6oA.pdb.gz
9	5gm6B	0.21	9.12	0.027	0.329	model1_5gm6B.pdb.gz
10	2b39A	0.21	9.56	0.030	0.339	model1_2b39A.pdb.gz

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Gene Ontology (GO) Terms

Molecular Function (MF)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:1901363	0.83	heterocyclic compound binding
GO:0097159	0.83	organic cyclic compound binding
GO:0003676	0.80	nucleic acid binding
GO:0044822	0.78	poly(A) RNA binding

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Molecular Function. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Biological Process (BP)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0009987	0.99	cellular process
GO:0065007	0.92	biological regulation
GO:0050789	0.91	regulation of biological process
GO:0050794	0.89	regulation of cellular process
GO:0008152	0.86	metabolic process
GO:0044260	0.85	cellular macromolecule metabolic process
GO:0044238	0.85	primary metabolic process
GO:0007165	0.83	signal transduction
GO:0048518	0.75	positive regulation of biological process
GO:0051049	0.71	regulation of transport
GO:0043270	0.70	positive regulation of ion transport
GO:0010959	0.70	regulation of metal ion transport
GO:0065009	0.68	regulation of molecular function
GO:0065008	0.68	regulation of biological quality
GO:0006464	0.68	cellular protein modification process
GO:2000021	0.66	regulation of ion homeostasis
GO:0051928	0.66	positive regulation of calcium ion transport
GO:0035556	0.66	intracellular signal transduction
GO:0032414	0.66	positive regulation of ion transmembrane transporter activity
GO:0006468	0.66	protein phosphorylation

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Biological Process. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Cellular Component (CC)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0044424	1.00	intracellular part
GO:0016020	0.64	membrane
GO:0044444	0.58	cytoplasmic part
GO:0043229	0.58	intracellular organelle
GO:0005737	0.55	cytoplasm
GO:0043227	0.50	membrane-bounded organelle

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Cellular Component. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Predicted Enzyme Commission (EC) Numbers

Top 5 enzyme homologs in PDB

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	EC Number	Predicted Active Site Residues
1	0.060	1kqfA	0.187	9.20	0.032	0.291	1.2.1.2	NA
2	0.060	2vumA	0.176	9.98	0.041	0.295	2.7.7.6	NA
3	0.060	1w36C	0.178	8.44	0.044	0.262	3.1.11.5	129
4	0.060	3b9jC	0.139	8.72	0.015	0.210	1.17.3.2 1.17.1.4	NA
5	0.060	1ob2A	0.116	7.31	0.040	0.160	3.6.1.48	NA

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted active site residues.
(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the Enzyme Commission (EC) number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Ligand Binding Sites

Template proteins with similar binding site:

Rank	Cscore^LB	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	BS-score	Lig. Name	Download Complex	Predicted binding site residues
1	0.01	2qkiA	0.138	7.48	0.018	0.190	0.18	III	complex1.pdb.gz	118,120,121,122,123,174
2	0.01	1ob2A	0.116	7.31	0.040	0.160	0.13	GNP	complex2.pdb.gz	120,121,122,123,124,195,196
3	0.01	2pdaA	0.210	8.85	0.036	0.316	0.11	TPP	complex3.pdb.gz	122,171,172,173
4	0.01	1ob2A	0.116	7.31	0.040	0.160	0.18	SUC	complex4.pdb.gz	120,122,123,174,194,198
5	0.01	2hcjB	0.099	6.98	0.047	0.132	0.27	GDP	complex5.pdb.gz	123,125,126
6	0.01	1d8tA	0.107	7.23	0.014	0.146	0.21	III	complex6.pdb.gz	122,123,124,167,168,169,170,171,172,173
7	0.01	1b0pA	0.209	8.79	0.045	0.314	0.19	SF4	complex7.pdb.gz	122,123,198
8	0.01	1ea0A	0.165	9.61	0.028	0.265	0.12	FMN	complex8.pdb.gz	121,171,172
9	0.01	2uzaB	0.201	8.83	0.032	0.302	0.23	SF4	complex9.pdb.gz	121,122,196
10	0.01	1ea0A	0.165	9.61	0.028	0.265	0.20	OMT	complex10.pdb.gz	121,122,173,174

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted binding site and residues.
(a)	Cscore^LB is the confidence score of predicted binding site. Cscore^LB values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable ligand-binding site prediction.
(b)	BS-score is a measure of local similarity (sequence & structure) between template binding site and predicted binding site in the query structure. Based on large scale benchmarking analysis, we have observed that a BS-score >1 reflects a significant local match between the predicted and template binding site.
(c)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(d)	RMSD^a the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(e)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(f)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

References:
1.	Wei Zheng, Chengxin Zhang, Yang Li, Robin Pearce, Eric W. Bell, Yang Zhang. Folding non-homology proteins by coupling deep-learning contact maps with I-TASSER assembly simulations. In preparation, 2020.