D-I-TASSER Q9NW38-D1

D-I-TASSER results for Q9NW38-D1

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>Q9NW38 (106 residues)
MAVTEASLLRQCPLLLPQNRSKTVYEGFISAQGRDFHLRIVLPEDLQLKNARLLCSWQLR
TILSGYHRIVQQRMQHSPDLMSFMMELKMLLEVALKNRQELYALPP

Predicted Secondary Structure

Sequence	20 40 60 80 100 \| \| \| \| \| MAVTEASLLRQCPLLLPQNRSKTVYEGFISAQGRDFHLRIVLPEDLQLKNARLLCSWQLRTILSGYHRIVQQRMQHSPDLMSFMMELKMLLEVALKNRQELYALPP
Prediction	CCCCHHHHHHCCCSSSCCCCCCCSSSSSSSSCCCSSSSSSSCCCCCCCCCSSSSCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCC
Confidence	9731566764197253158998668889987781578999817998722418972899999987379999999993898999999999999999983778899989
	H:Helix; S:Strand; C:Coil

Predicted Solvent Accessibility

Sequence	20 40 60 80 100 \| \| \| \| \| MAVTEASLLRQCPLLLPQNRSKTVYEGFISAQGRDFHLRIVLPEDLQLKNARLLCSWQLRTILSGYHRIVQQRMQHSPDLMSFMMELKMLLEVALKNRQELYALPP
Prediction	7555455124411200023574440201031675503020313755515504040243035205524520452055054143014302410440355357456468
	Values range from 0 (buried residue) to 8 (highly exposed residue)

Predicted Contact, Hydrogen and Distance Map Used in D-I-TASSER simulation

Contact Map

Distance Map

Hydrogen bond networks

D-I-TASSER simulation is guided by the consensus contact map (left figure), distance map (middle figure) and Hydrogen bond network (right figure) derived based on confidence scores of AttentionPotential. In the contact, distance map and hydrogen bond networks, the axes mark the residue index along the sequence. For the contact map, each dot represents a residue pair with predicted contact, while for the distance map and hydrogen bond network, a color scale represents a distance of 1-20+ angstroms or a angle of 0-180 degree.

Top 10 threading templates used by D-I-TASSER

Rank

PDB
hit

ID1

ID2

Cov

Norm.
Zscore

Download
alignment

                  20                  40                  60                  80                 100

                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |

SS
Seq

CCCCHHHHHHCCCSSSCCCCCCCSSSSSSSSCCCSSSSSSSCCCCCCCCCSSSSCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCC
MAVTEASLLRQCPLLLPQNRSKTVYEGFISAQGRDFHLRIVLPEDLQLKNARLLCSWQLRTILSGYHRIVQQRMQHSPDLMSFMMELKMLLEVALKNRQELYALPP

7apkE

0.14

0.13

4.51

1.17

DEthreader

LHKQFASLEHILVKWVTIAHTNLYYMALIERGTAKLQAAVVLNPGYSSIPPIFQLCEKTNDNIRAMEGEVVC-YKELCLLTNQLQRLCVLLDVYLETE--SHK---

6sriq1

0.67

0.62

17.75

1.21

SPARKS-K

-------LLRQCPLLLPQNREGTAYEGFVSAQGRDFHIRILLPTDSQLKNARIECSWHLKKILHGYQHILKQRLHSCPDLVSFVVELKTILEIALKNTQELHVPWP

2hlwA

0.15

0.13

4.47

1.03

MapAlign

--EELEEGQKGTVSWGLEDMTLTRWTGMIIYENRIYSLKIECGPKYPEAPPFVRFV--TKINMNGVNGVVDSVLWNSYSIKVVLQELRRLMMENMKLPQP------

2pwqA

0.09

3.55

0.75

CEthreader

LQKELKDIENEEIDAHIKDSNFFEWVGFIKGPEGHFTLAITIPNDYPYNPPKIKFVTKIWHPNISSLDVLKNEWSPALTIRTALLSIQALLSDPQPDDPQDAEVAK

6sriq1

0.67

0.62

17.75

1.82

MUSTER

-------LLRQCPLLLPQNREGTAYEGFVSAQGRDFHIRILLPTDSQLKNARIECSWHLKKILHGYQHILKQRLHSCPDLVSFVVELKTILEIALKNTQELHVPWP

6sriq1

0.67

0.62

17.74

3.63

HHsearch

-------LLRQCPLLLPQNREGTAYEGFVSAQGRDFHIRILLPTDSQLKNARIECSWHLKKILHGYQHILKQRLHSCPDLVSFVVELKTILEIALKNTQELH-VPW

6sriq1

0.67

0.62

17.75

1.32

FFAS-3D

-------LLRQCPLLLPQNREGTAYEGFVSAQGRDFHIRILLPTDSQLKNARIECSWHLKKILHGYQHILKQRLHSCPDLVSFVVELKTILEIALKNTQELHVPWP

1i7kA

0.09

3.55

0.80

EigenThreader

LQQELMTLMMSGDISAFPEDNLFKWVGTIHGEDLRYKLSLEFPSGYPYNAPTVKFLTPCYHPNNISLDILKEKWSALYDVRTILLSIQSLLGEPPLNTHAAELWKN

3k1lA

0.19

0.17

5.48

0.92

CNFpred

--DVERLLCQKYPGLAAELQGACIIRGVLGSEDTWRRLKLYLPHHPALHGFQLYVQESLEYKLY---TSANLKLQDDWLLEDFLDHLPKILPAQ------KAPTVP

1yrvA

0.11

0.10

3.75

1.17

DEthreader

HFCDLKEN-NYGITAKPVSEDMMEWEVEIEGWGLVFQLTIHFTSEYNYAPPVVKFTIPFHPNVDQPCIDFLNEKWNTNTLSSILLALQVMLSNP--AAILVKDE--

(a)	ID1 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by number of aligned residues.
(b)	ID2 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by query sequence length.
(c)	Cov is equal the number of aligned template residues divided by query sequence length.
(d)	Norm. Zscore is the normalized Z-score of the threading alignments. A Normalized Z-score >1 means a good alignment and is highlighted in bold.
(e)	Download alignment lists the threading program used to identify the template, and provide the 3D structure of aligned regions of threading templates (threading[1-10].pdb.gz).
(f)	Template residues identical to query sequence are highlighted in color.

Top 1 final models from D-I-TASSER

Click to view	Rank^a	Download	Estimated TM-score^b
	1	model1.pdb.gz	0.7731

(a)

D-I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, i.e. decoys. These decoys are clustered by SPICKER based on pairwise structure similarity to report up to five final models from the five largest clusters. Models are ranked in descending order of cluster size. If the simulations converge well, it is possible to have less than 5 models generated, which is usually an indication of good model quality.

(b)

The model confidence is quantitatified by estimated TM-score (eTM-score), calculated based on significance of threading template alignments, contact map satisfaction rate, mean absolute error between distance of model and distance of AttentionPotential, and convergence of D-I-TASSER simulations. eTM-score is typically in the range of [0, 1], with higher eTM-score signifies higher model confidence.

Proteins with similar structure

Top 10 structural analogs in PDB (as identified by TM-align)

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	Download Alignment
1	1pzvA	0.74	2.81	0.075	0.962	model1_1pzvA.pdb.gz
2	6nyaC	0.74	3.19	0.104	0.981	model1_6nyaC.pdb.gz
3	1zdnA	0.74	2.88	0.115	0.962	model1_1zdnA.pdb.gz
4	5a4pA	0.74	3.09	0.106	0.981	model1_5a4pA.pdb.gz
5	5v0rA	0.73	3.16	0.190	0.962	model1_5v0rA.pdb.gz
6	5knlC	0.73	3.08	0.105	0.972	model1_5knlC.pdb.gz
7	2r0jA	0.73	2.94	0.105	0.972	model1_2r0jA.pdb.gz
8	1yrvA	0.73	3.23	0.142	0.972	model1_1yrvA.pdb.gz
9	7apkE	0.73	2.74	0.133	0.953	model1_7apkE.pdb.gz
10	6op8A	0.73	3.01	0.086	0.972	model1_6op8A.pdb.gz

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Gene Ontology (GO) Terms

Molecular Function (MF)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0004842	1.00	ubiquitin-protein transferase activity

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Molecular Function. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Biological Process (BP)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0009987	1.00	cellular process
GO:0008152	0.74	metabolic process
GO:0071704	0.73	organic substance metabolic process
GO:0044238	0.72	primary metabolic process
GO:0044237	0.72	cellular metabolic process
GO:0043170	0.72	macromolecule metabolic process
GO:0044699	0.70	single-organism process
GO:0044260	0.70	cellular macromolecule metabolic process
GO:0034641	0.69	cellular nitrogen compound metabolic process
GO:0090304	0.68	nucleic acid metabolic process
GO:0050896	0.65	response to stimulus
GO:0006259	0.65	DNA metabolic process
GO:0006974	0.63	cellular response to DNA damage stimulus
GO:0044702	0.62	single organism reproductive process
GO:0044267	0.61	cellular protein metabolic process
GO:0006281	0.61	DNA repair
GO:0006464	0.60	cellular protein modification process
GO:0065007	0.59	biological regulation
GO:0016567	0.59	protein ubiquitination
GO:0050789	0.58	regulation of biological process
GO:0006513	0.58	protein monoubiquitination
GO:0050794	0.57	regulation of cellular process

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Biological Process. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Cellular Component (CC)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0044428	1.00	nuclear part
GO:0032991	0.80	macromolecular complex
GO:0043234	0.79	protein complex
GO:0044451	0.76	nucleoplasm part
GO:0043240	0.75	Fanconi anaemia nuclear complex
GO:0005654	0.70	nucleoplasm

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Cellular Component. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Predicted Enzyme Commission (EC) Numbers

Top 5 enzyme homologs in PDB

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	EC Number	Predicted Active Site Residues
1	0.089	2awfA	0.707	2.37	0.118	0.877	6.3.2.19	59
2	0.082	1aakA	0.732	2.85	0.146	0.943	6.3.2.19	90
3	0.072	1wzwA	0.729	3.36	0.104	0.981	6.3.2.19	35,87,105
4	0.072	1zdnB	0.731	2.95	0.133	0.972	6.3.2.19	27
5	0.067	2gmiA	0.722	3.02	0.105	0.972	6.3.2.19	52,54,82

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted active site residues.
(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the Enzyme Commission (EC) number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Ligand Binding Sites

Template proteins with similar binding site:

Rank	Cscore^LB	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	BS-score	Lig. Name	Download Complex	Predicted binding site residues
1	0.04	3k1lA	0.591	3.47	0.162	0.868	0.57	MAL	complex1.pdb.gz	38,56,59,60
2	0.03	1m4pA	0.658	3.15	0.090	0.934	0.59	III	complex2.pdb.gz	26,29,31,36,37,38,39
3	0.03	3fshB	0.732	2.74	0.086	0.953	0.69	III	complex3.pdb.gz	5,14,30,33,35
4	0.03	3rz3A	0.726	3.32	0.096	0.962	0.52	U94	complex4.pdb.gz	14,27,28,29,30,33,34,37,88,91,92
5	0.02	3p9gA	0.672	3.02	0.071	0.915	0.59	III	complex5.pdb.gz	14,16,26,27,28,33,34,35,36,105

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted binding site and residues.
(a)	Cscore^LB is the confidence score of predicted binding site. Cscore^LB values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable ligand-binding site prediction.
(b)	BS-score is a measure of local similarity (sequence & structure) between template binding site and predicted binding site in the query structure. Based on large scale benchmarking analysis, we have observed that a BS-score >1 reflects a significant local match between the predicted and template binding site.
(c)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(d)	RMSD^a the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(e)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(f)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

References:
1.	Wei Zheng, Chengxin Zhang, Yang Li, Robin Pearce, Eric W. Bell, Yang Zhang. Folding non-homology proteins by coupling deep-learning contact maps with I-TASSER assembly simulations. In preparation, 2020.