D-I-TASSER Q9NSA2

D-I-TASSER results for Q9NSA2

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

Summary of the Protein

Uniprot ID: Q9NSA2
Protein Name: Potassium voltage-gated channel subfamily D member 1
Gene Name: KCND1

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>Q9NSA2 (647 residues)
MAAGLATWLPFARAAAVGWLPLAQQPLPPAPGVKASRGDEVLVVNVSGRRFETWKNTLDR
YPDTLLGSSEKEFFYDADSGEYFFDRDPDMFRHVLNFYRTGRLHCPRQECIQAFDEELAF
YGLVPELVGDCCLEEYRDRKKENAERLAEDEEAEQAGDGPALPAGSSLRQRLWRAFENPH
TSTAALVFYYVTGFFIAVSVIANVVETIPCRGSARRSSREQPCGERFPQAFFCMDTACVL
IFTGEYLLRLFAAPSRCRFLRSVMSLIDVVAILPYYIGLLVPKNDDVSGAFVTLRVFRVF
RIFKFSRHSQGLRILGYTLKSCASELGFLLFSLTMAIIIFATVMFYAEKGTNKTNFTSIP
AAFWYTIVTMTTLGYGDMVPSTIAGKIFGSICSLSGVLVIALPVPVIVSNFSRIYHQNQR
ADKRRAQQKVRLARIRLAKSGTTNAFLQYKQNGGLEDSGSGEEQALCVRNRSAFEQQHHH
LLHCLEKTTCHEFTDELTFSEALGAVSPGGRTSRSTSVSSQPVGPGSLLSSCCPRRAKRR
AIRLANSTASVSRGSMQELDMLAGLRRSHAPQSRSSLNAKPHDSLDLNCDSRDFVAAIIS
IPTPPANTPDESQPSSPGGGGRAGSTLRNSSLGTPCLFPETVKISSL

Predicted Contact and Distance Map Used in D-I-TASSER simulation

Contact Map

Distance Map

D-I-TASSER simulation is guided by the consensus contact map (left figure) and distance map (right figure) derived based on confidence scores of AttentionPotential. In the contact, distance map and hydrogen bond networks, the axes mark the residue index along the sequence. For the contact map, each dot represents a residue pair with predicted contact, while for the distance map and hydrogen bond network, a color scale represents a distance of 1-20+ angstroms or a angle of 0-180 degree.

Information of Domain

No. of Domain	Domain	Domain Boundary	Length of Domain	Models of Domain	Sequence
1	Q9NSA2-D1	1-308	308		MAAGLATWLPFARAAAVGWLPLAQQPLPPAPGVKASRGDEVLVVNVSGRRFETWKNTLDRYPDTLLGSSEKEFFYDADSGEYFFDRDPDMFRHVLNFYRTGRLHCPRQECIQAFDEELAFYGLVPELVGDCCLEEYRDRKKENAERLAEDEEAEQAGDGPALPAGSSLRQRLWRAFENPHTSTAALVFYYVTGFFIAVSVIANVVETIPCRGSARRSSREQPCGERFPQAFFCMDTACVLIFTGEYLLRLFAAPSRCRFLRSVMSLIDVVAILPYYIGLLVPKNDDVSGAFVTLRVFRVFRIFKFSRH
2	Q9NSA2-D2	309-487	179		SQGLRILGYTLKSCASELGFLLFSLTMAIIIFATVMFYAEKGTNKTNFTSIPAAFWYTIVTMTTLGYGDMVPSTIAGKIFGSICSLSGVLVIALPVPVIVSNFSRIYHQNQRADKRRAQQKVRLARIRLAKSGTTNAFLQYKQNGGLEDSGSGEEQALCVRNRSAFEQQHHHLLHCLEK
3	Q9NSA2-D3	488-647	160		TTCHEFTDELTFSEALGAVSPGGRTSRSTSVSSQPVGPGSLLSSCCPRRAKRRAIRLANSTASVSRGSMQELDMLAGLRRSHAPQSRSSLNAKPHDSLDLNCDSRDFVAAIISIPTPPANTPDESQPSSPGGGGRAGSTLRNSSLGTPCLFPETVKISSL

Top 1 final models from D-I-TASSER

Click to view	Rank^a	Download	Estimated TM-score^b
	1	model1.pdb.gz	0.46

(a)

D-I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, i.e. decoys. These decoys are clustered by SPICKER based on pairwise structure similarity to report up to five final models from the five largest clusters. Models are ranked in descending order of cluster size. If the simulations converge well, it is possible to have less than 5 models generated, which is usually an indication of good model quality.

(b)

The model confidence is quantitatified by estimated TM-score (eTM-score), calculated based on significance of threading template alignments, contact map satisfaction rate, mean absolute error between distance of model and distance of AttentionPotential, and convergence of D-I-TASSER simulations. eTM-score is typically in the range of [0, 1], with higher eTM-score signifies higher model confidence.

Proteins with similar structure

Top 10 structural analogs in PDB (as identified by TM-align)

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	Download Alignment
1	2r9rB	0.44	3.48	0.305	0.487	model1_2r9rB.pdb.gz
2	6mu1A	0.36	8.01	0.034	0.587	model1_6mu1A.pdb.gz
3	5cskA	0.36	7.79	0.054	0.566	model1_5cskA.pdb.gz
4	4zhjA	0.36	8.55	0.059	0.607	model1_4zhjA.pdb.gz
5	7cunG	0.36	7.69	0.069	0.559	model1_7cunG.pdb.gz
6	5twvB	0.35	7.41	0.049	0.532	model1_5twvB.pdb.gz
7	7abiU	0.35	8.30	0.027	0.589	model1_7abiU.pdb.gz
8	4bedB	0.35	7.93	0.046	0.561	model1_4bedB.pdb.gz
9	7ckmA	0.35	8.05	0.057	0.569	model1_7ckmA.pdb.gz
10	7nurA	0.35	7.70	0.049	0.552	model1_7nurA.pdb.gz

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Gene Ontology (GO) Terms

Molecular Function (MF)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0046873	0.99	metal ion transmembrane transporter activity
GO:0022836	0.99	gated channel activity
GO:0005261	0.99	cation channel activity
GO:0005267	0.98	potassium channel activity
GO:0005244	0.98	voltage-gated ion channel activity
GO:0022843	0.97	voltage-gated cation channel activity
GO:0005249	0.96	voltage-gated potassium channel activity
GO:0005251	0.91	delayed rectifier potassium channel activity

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Molecular Function. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Biological Process (BP)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0044699	0.86	single-organism process
GO:0051179	0.84	localization
GO:0006810	0.83	transport
GO:0006811	0.81	ion transport
GO:0009987	0.78	cellular process
GO:0030001	0.77	metal ion transport
GO:0006813	0.76	potassium ion transport
GO:0065007	0.75	biological regulation
GO:0044763	0.73	single-organism cellular process
GO:0050789	0.61	regulation of biological process
GO:0055085	0.54	transmembrane transport
GO:0034220	0.50	ion transmembrane transport

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Biological Process. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Cellular Component (CC)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0044425	0.97	membrane part
GO:0031224	0.91	intrinsic component of membrane
GO:0016021	0.90	integral component of membrane
GO:0044464	0.84	cell part
GO:0016020	0.51	membrane

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Cellular Component. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Predicted Enzyme Commission (EC) Numbers

Top 5 enzyme homologs in PDB

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	EC Number	Predicted Active Site Residues
1	0.060	2fhcA	0.322	7.91	0.051	0.510	3.2.1.41	NA
2	0.060	1ea0A	0.335	8.49	0.038	0.567	1.4.1.13	NA
3	0.060	2w00B	0.310	8.20	0.031	0.512	3.1.21.3	409
4	0.060	2e8yA	0.309	8.23	0.029	0.507	3.2.1.41	NA
5	0.060	2pdaA	0.307	8.32	0.028	0.519	1.2.7.1	67

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted active site residues.
(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the Enzyme Commission (EC) number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Ligand Binding Sites

Template proteins with similar binding site:

Rank	Cscore^LB	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	BS-score	Lig. Name	Download Complex	Predicted binding site residues
1	0.01	3rf3A	0.171	5.41	0.019	0.223	0.13	III	complex1.pdb.gz	57,58,97,114
2	0.01	1rke1	0.154	4.28	0.032	0.182	0.14	III	complex2.pdb.gz	59,89,90,93,96,97,101
3	0.01	1ofdA	0.327	8.52	0.045	0.558	0.30	F3S	complex3.pdb.gz	47,48,49,50,51,89,94,95
4	0.01	1t01A	0.168	4.87	0.042	0.207	0.11	III	complex4.pdb.gz	8,94,102
5	0.01	1u6hA	0.185	5.85	0.034	0.249	0.11	III	complex5.pdb.gz	13,16,49
6	0.01	1jr32	0.206	6.54	0.040	0.292	0.16	III	complex6.pdb.gz	87,88,90,91,94,95,98,101
7	0.01	1zw2A	0.166	4.75	0.043	0.203	0.13	III	complex7.pdb.gz	91,95,98
8	0.01	1rkcA	0.176	5.49	0.033	0.226	0.11	III	complex8.pdb.gz	44,45,46
9	0.01	3s90A	0.162	4.68	0.037	0.198	0.12	III	complex9.pdb.gz	90,94,97,98

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted binding site and residues.
(a)	Cscore^LB is the confidence score of predicted binding site. Cscore^LB values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable ligand-binding site prediction.
(b)	BS-score is a measure of local similarity (sequence & structure) between template binding site and predicted binding site in the query structure. Based on large scale benchmarking analysis, we have observed that a BS-score >1 reflects a significant local match between the predicted and template binding site.
(c)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(d)	RMSD^a the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(e)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(f)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

References:
1.	Wei Zheng, Chengxin Zhang, Yang Li, Robin Pearce, Eric W. Bell, Yang Zhang. Folding non-homology proteins by coupling deep-learning contact maps with I-TASSER assembly simulations. In preparation, 2020.