D-I-TASSER Q9NQ38

D-I-TASSER results for Q9NQ38

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

Summary of the Protein

Uniprot ID: Q9NQ38
Protein Name: Serine protease inhibitor Kazal-type 5
Gene Name: SPINK5

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>Q9NQ38 (1064 residues)
MKIATVSVLLPLALCLIQDAASKNEDQEMCHEFQAFMKNGKLFCPQDKKFFQSLDGIMFI
NKCATCKMILEKEAKSQKRARHLARAPKATAPTELNCDDFKKGERDGDFICPDYYEAVCG
TDGKTYDNRCALCAENAKTGSQIGVKSEGECKSSNPEQDVCSAFRPFVRDGRLGCTREND
PVLGPDGKTHGNKCAMCAELFLKEAENAKREGETRIRRNAEKDFCKEYEKQVRNGRLFCT
RESDPVRGPDGRMHGNKCALCAEIFKQRFSEENSKTDQNLGKAEEKTKVKREIVKLCSQY
QNQAKNGILFCTRENDPIRGPDGKMHGNLCSMCQAYFQAENEEKKKAEARARNKRESGKA
TSYAELCSEYRKLVRNGKLACTRENDPIQGPDGKVHGNTCSMCEVFFQAEEEEKKKKEGK
SRNKRQSKSTASFEELCSEYRKSRKNGRLFCTRENDPIQGPDGKMHGNTCSMCEAFFQQE
ERARAKAKREAAKEICSEFRDQVRNGTLICTREHNPVRGPDGKMHGNKCAMCASVFKLEE
EEKKNDKEEKGKVEAEKVKREAVQELCSEYRHYVRNGRLPCTRENDPIEGLDGKIHGNTC
SMCEAFFQQEAKEKERAEPRAKVKREAEKETCDEFRRLLQNGKLFCTRENDPVRGPDGKT
HGNKCAMCKAVFQKENEERKRKEEEDQRNAAGHGSSGGGGGNTQDECAEYREQMKNGRLS
CTRESDPVRDADGKSYNNQCTMCKAKLEREAERKNEYSRSRSNGTGSESGKDTCDEFRSQ
MKNGKLICTRESDPVRGPDGKTHGNKCTMCKEKLEREAAEKKKKEDEDRSNTGERSNTGE
RSNDKEDLCREFRSMQRNGKLICTRENNPVRGPYGKMHINKCAMCQSIFDREANERKKKD
EEKSSSKPSNNAKDECSEFRNYIRNNELICPRENDPVHGADGKFYTNKCYMCRAVFLTEA
LERAKLQEKPSHVRASQEEDSPDSFSSLDSEMCKDYRVLPRIGYLCPKDLKPVCGDDGQT
YNNPCMLCHENLIRQTNTHIRSTGKCEESSTPGTTAASMPPSDE

Predicted Contact and Distance Map Used in D-I-TASSER simulation

Contact Map

Distance Map

D-I-TASSER simulation is guided by the consensus contact map (left figure) and distance map (right figure) derived based on confidence scores of AttentionPotential. In the contact, distance map and hydrogen bond networks, the axes mark the residue index along the sequence. For the contact map, each dot represents a residue pair with predicted contact, while for the distance map and hydrogen bond network, a color scale represents a distance of 1-20+ angstroms or a angle of 0-180 degree.

Information of Domain

No. of Domain	Domain	Domain Boundary	Length of Domain	Models of Domain	Sequence
1	Q9NQ38-D1	1-227	227		MKIATVSVLLPLALCLIQDAASKNEDQEMCHEFQAFMKNGKLFCPQDKKFFQSLDGIMFINKCATCKMILEKEAKSQKRARHLARAPKATAPTELNCDDFKKGERDGDFICPDYYEAVCGTDGKTYDNRCALCAENAKTGSQIGVKSEGECKSSNPEQDVCSAFRPFVRDGRLGCTRENDPVLGPDGKTHGNKCAMCAELFLKEAENAKREGETRIRRNAEKDFCKE
2	Q9NQ38-D2	228-358	131		YEKQVRNGRLFCTRESDPVRGPDGRMHGNKCALCAEIFKQRFSEENSKTDQNLGKAEEKTKVKREIVKLCSQYQNQAKNGILFCTRENDPIRGPDGKMHGNLCSMCQAYFQAENEEKKKAEARARNKRESG
3	Q9NQ38-D3	359-420	62		KATSYAELCSEYRKLVRNGKLACTRENDPIQGPDGKVHGNTCSMCEVFFQAEEEEKKKKEGK
4	Q9NQ38-D4	421-486	66		SRNKRQSKSTASFEELCSEYRKSRKNGRLFCTRENDPIQGPDGKMHGNTCSMCEAFFQQEERARAK
5	Q9NQ38-D5	487-634	148		AKREAAKEICSEFRDQVRNGTLICTREHNPVRGPDGKMHGNKCAMCASVFKLEEEEKKNDKEEKGKVEAEKVKREAVQELCSEYRHYVRNGRLPCTRENDPIEGLDGKIHGNTCSMCEAFFQQEAKEKERAEPRAKVKREAEKETCDE
6	Q9NQ38-D6	635-1064	430		FRRLLQNGKLFCTRENDPVRGPDGKTHGNKCAMCKAVFQKENEERKRKEEEDQRNAAGHGSSGGGGGNTQDECAEYREQMKNGRLSCTRESDPVRDADGKSYNNQCTMCKAKLEREAERKNEYSRSRSNGTGSESGKDTCDEFRSQMKNGKLICTRESDPVRGPDGKTHGNKCTMCKEKLEREAAEKKKKEDEDRSNTGERSNTGERSNDKEDLCREFRSMQRNGKLICTRENNPVRGPYGKMHINKCAMCQSIFDREANERKKKDEEKSSSKPSNNAKDECSEFRNYIRNNELICPRENDPVHGADGKFYTNKCYMCRAVFLTEALERAKLQEKPSHVRASQEEDSPDSFSSLDSEMCKDYRVLPRIGYLCPKDLKPVCGDDGQTYNNPCMLCHENLIRQTNTHIRSTGKCEESSTPGTTAASMPPSDE

Top 1 final models from D-I-TASSER

Click to view	Rank^a	Download	Estimated TM-score^b
	1	model1.pdb.gz	0.37

(a)

D-I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, i.e. decoys. These decoys are clustered by SPICKER based on pairwise structure similarity to report up to five final models from the five largest clusters. Models are ranked in descending order of cluster size. If the simulations converge well, it is possible to have less than 5 models generated, which is usually an indication of good model quality.

(b)

The model confidence is quantitatified by estimated TM-score (eTM-score), calculated based on significance of threading template alignments, contact map satisfaction rate, mean absolute error between distance of model and distance of AttentionPotential, and convergence of D-I-TASSER simulations. eTM-score is typically in the range of [0, 1], with higher eTM-score signifies higher model confidence.

Proteins with similar structure

Top 10 structural analogs in PDB (as identified by TM-align)

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	Download Alignment
1	5ganA	0.27	9.30	0.042	0.418	model1_5ganA.pdb.gz
2	3jb9A	0.26	8.97	0.033	0.398	model1_3jb9A.pdb.gz
3	6vr4A	0.25	9.10	0.027	0.389	model1_6vr4A.pdb.gz
4	6mu1A	0.24	9.30	0.037	0.378	model1_6mu1A.pdb.gz
5	7aavA	0.24	9.27	0.032	0.372	model1_7aavA.pdb.gz
6	7dxjA	0.24	9.14	0.019	0.369	model1_7dxjA.pdb.gz
7	3jcrA	0.24	9.36	0.035	0.373	model1_3jcrA.pdb.gz
8	6mfzA	0.23	9.04	0.032	0.356	model1_6mfzA.pdb.gz
9	7bc4B	0.23	9.15	0.052	0.358	model1_7bc4B.pdb.gz
10	7e7iA	0.22	9.33	0.023	0.351	model1_7e7iA.pdb.gz

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Gene Ontology (GO) Terms

Molecular Function (MF)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0098772	0.97	molecular function regulator
GO:0030234	0.96	enzyme regulator activity
GO:0004857	0.94	enzyme inhibitor activity
GO:0004867	0.93	serine-type endopeptidase inhibitor activity

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Molecular Function. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Biological Process (BP)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0065007	0.86	biological regulation
GO:0050789	0.85	regulation of biological process
GO:0044699	0.84	single-organism process
GO:0050794	0.82	regulation of cellular process
GO:0009987	0.82	cellular process
GO:0044763	0.80	single-organism cellular process
GO:0048519	0.75	negative regulation of biological process
GO:0048869	0.69	cellular developmental process
GO:0080090	0.62	regulation of primary metabolic process
GO:0060255	0.62	regulation of macromolecule metabolic process
GO:0031323	0.62	regulation of cellular metabolic process
GO:0009913	0.60	epidermal cell differentiation
GO:0051336	0.59	regulation of hydrolase activity
GO:0048523	0.59	negative regulation of cellular process
GO:0032268	0.58	regulation of cellular protein metabolic process
GO:0043086	0.55	negative regulation of catalytic activity
GO:0051346	0.54	negative regulation of hydrolase activity
GO:0032269	0.54	negative regulation of cellular protein metabolic process
GO:0030162	0.54	regulation of proteolysis
GO:0010466	0.53	negative regulation of peptidase activity
GO:1902572	0.52	negative regulation of serine-type peptidase activity

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Biological Process. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Cellular Component (CC)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0044464	0.98	cell part
GO:0044424	0.94	intracellular part
GO:0043227	0.93	membrane-bounded organelle
GO:0044444	0.92	cytoplasmic part
GO:0005576	0.88	extracellular region
GO:0044421	0.87	extracellular region part
GO:0043231	0.87	intracellular membrane-bounded organelle
GO:0016020	0.83	membrane
GO:0005737	0.80	cytoplasm
GO:0044446	0.79	intracellular organelle part
GO:0044425	0.78	membrane part
GO:0031982	0.77	vesicle
GO:0031988	0.74	membrane-bounded vesicle
GO:0005829	0.74	cytosol
GO:0005783	0.74	endoplasmic reticulum
GO:0005789	0.73	endoplasmic reticulum membrane
GO:0097708	0.72	intracellular vesicle
GO:0048471	0.72	perinuclear region of cytoplasm
GO:0005938	0.72	cell cortex
GO:0030141	0.69	secretory granule
GO:0070062	0.63	extracellular exosome
GO:0097209	0.57	epidermal lamellar body

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Cellular Component. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Predicted Enzyme Commission (EC) Numbers

Top 5 enzyme homologs in PDB

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	EC Number	Predicted Active Site Residues
1	0.060	1bgxT	0.165	8.96	0.031	0.255	2.7.7.7	NA
2	0.060	2pffB	0.161	9.20	0.016	0.252	2.3.1.86	216
3	0.060	3hkzJ	0.173	9.67	0.018	0.279	2.7.7.6	NA
4	0.060	2e1qA	0.172	9.20	0.025	0.269	1.17.3.2 1.17.1.4	NA
5	0.060	2vkzG	0.222	9.36	0.026	0.351	2.3.1.38 3.1.2.14	NA

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted active site residues.
(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the Enzyme Commission (EC) number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Ligand Binding Sites

Template proteins with similar binding site:

No Binding sites was predicted

Click to view	Rank	Cscore^LB	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	BS-score	Lig. Name	Download Complex	Predicted binding site residues

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted binding site and residues.
(a)	Cscore^LB is the confidence score of predicted binding site. Cscore^LB values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable ligand-binding site prediction.
(b)	BS-score is a measure of local similarity (sequence & structure) between template binding site and predicted binding site in the query structure. Based on large scale benchmarking analysis, we have observed that a BS-score >1 reflects a significant local match between the predicted and template binding site.
(c)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(d)	RMSD^a the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(e)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(f)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

References:
1.	Wei Zheng, Chengxin Zhang, Yang Li, Robin Pearce, Eric W. Bell, Yang Zhang. Folding non-homology proteins by coupling deep-learning contact maps with I-TASSER assembly simulations. In preparation, 2020.