D-I-TASSER results for Q9HC16-D2

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>Q9HC16 (188 residues)
MDPPTFTFNFNNEPWVRGRHETYLCYEVERMHNDTWVLLNQRRGFLCNQAPHKHGFLEGR
HAELCFLDVIPFWKLDLDQDYRVTCFTSWSPCFSCAQEMAKFISKNKHVSLCIFTARIYD
DQGRCQEGLRTLAEAGAKISIMTYSEFKHCWDTFVDHQGCPFQPWDGLDEHSQDLSGRLR
AILQNQEN

Predicted Secondary Structure

                  20                  40                  60                  80                 100                 120                 140                 160                 180
                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |
Sequence
MDPPTFTFNFNNEPWVRGRHETYLCYEVERMHNDTWVLLNQRRGFLCNQAPHKHGFLEGRHAELCFLDVIPFWKLDLDQDYRVTCFTSWSPCFSCAQEMAKFISKNKHVSLCIFTARIYDDQGRCQEGLRTLAEAGAKISIMTYSEFKHCWDTFVDHQGCPFQPWDGLDEHSQDLSGRLRAILQNQEN
Prediction
CCCCSSSSSCCCCCCCCCCCCSSSSSSSSSCCCCCCCCCCCCCCSSSCCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCSSSSSSSSSCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCSSSSSSSSSCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCSSSSCHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCC
Confidence
99753333446753457786079999998458997654301233440466555677778608999999975427898845999999625871999999999998699927999978511326448999999999099289827688778888751489987786211679999999999999852489

H:Helix; S:Strand; C:Coil

Predicted Solvent Accessibility

                  20                  40                  60                  80                 100                 120                 140                 160                 180
                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |
Sequence
MDPPTFTFNFNNEPWVRGRHETYLCYEVERMHNDTWVLLNQRRGFLCNQAPHKHGFLEGRHAELCFLDVIPFWKLDLDQDYRVTCFTSWSPCFSCAQEMAKFISKNKHVSLCIFTARIYDDQGRCQEGLRTLAEAGAKISIMTYSEFKHCWDTFVDHQGCPFQPWDGLDEHSQDLSGRLRAILQNQEN
Prediction
85573052105344305313200000103345673423344432203442454445544100011004304644144634040100001100350053005105724403010000000223662450034037360403004262043005201447753050174045105313530451156588

Values range from 0 (buried residue) to 8 (highly exposed residue)

Predicted Contact, Hydrogen and Distance Map Used in D-I-TASSER simulation

D-I-TASSER simulation is guided by the consensus contact map (left figure), distance map (middle figure) and Hydrogen bond network (right figure) derived based on confidence scores of DeepPotential. In the contact, distance map and hydrogen bond networks, the axes mark the residue index along the sequence. For the contact map, each dot represents a residue pair with predicted contact, while for the distance map and hydrogen bond network, a color scale represents a distance of 1-20+ angstroms or a angle of 0-180 degree.

Top 10 threading templates used by D-I-TASSER

Rank	PDB hit	ID1	ID2	Cov	Norm. Zscore	Download alignment		20                  40                  60                  80                 100                 120                 140                 160                 180                    |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |
							SS	CCCCSSSSSCCCCCCCCCCCCSSSSSSSSSCCCCCCCCCCCCCCSSSCCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCSSSSSSSSSCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCSSSSSSSSSCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCSSSSCHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCC
							Seq	MDPPTFTFNFNNEPWVRGRHETYLCYEVERMHNDTWVLLNQRRGFLCNQAPHKHGFLEGRHAELCFLDVIPFWKLDLDQDYRVTCFTSWSPCFSCAQEMAKFISKNKHVSLCIFTARIYDDQGRCQEGLRTLAEAGAKISIMTYSEFKHCWDTFVDHQGCPFQPWDGLDEHSQDLSGRLRAILQNQEN
1	6wmaA2	0.89	0.85	23.79	1.33	DEthreader		SDAATFTFNFNNVRGR---HETYLCYEVERMHNDTWVKLAQRRGFLANQAKH---LEG-RHAALCFLDVIPFWKLDLDQDYRVTCFTSWSPCFSCAQEMAKFISKNKHVSLCIKTARIYDDKGRAAEGLRTLAEAGAKISIMTYSEFKHCWDTFVDHQGAPFQPWDGLDEHSQDLSGRLRAILQNQ--
2	6wmaA2	0.92	0.89	24.95	3.59	SPARKS-K		MDAATFTFNFNNEPWVRGRHETYLCYEVERMHNDTWVKLAQRRGFLANQAKHLEGR----HAALCFLDVIPFWKLDLDQDYRVTCFTSWSPCFSCAQEMAKFISKNKHVSLCIKTARIYDDKGRAAEGLRTLAEAGAKISIMTYSEFKHCWDTFVDHQGAPFQPWDGLDEHSQDLSGRLRAILQNQ--
3	2kemA	0.97	0.96	26.84	1.24	MapAlign		MDPPTFTFNFNNEPWVRGRHETYLCYEVERMHNDTWVKLNQRRGFLANQAPHKHGFLEGRHAELCFLDVIPFWKLDLDQDYRVTCFTSWSPCFSCAQEMAKFISKNKHVSLCIKTARIYDDQGRAQEGLRTLAEAGAKISIMTYSEFKHCWDTFVDHQGAPFQPWDGLDEHSQDLSGRLRAILQN---
4	2kemA	0.97	0.97	27.28	0.98	CEthreader		MDPPTFTFNFNNEPWVRGRHETYLCYEVERMHNDTWVKLNQRRGFLANQAPHKHGFLEGRHAELCFLDVIPFWKLDLDQDYRVTCFTSWSPCFSCAQEMAKFISKNKHVSLCIKTARIYDDQGRAQEGLRTLAEAGAKISIMTYSEFKHCWDTFVDHQGAPFQPWDGLDEHSQDLSGRLRAILQNQEN
5	2kemA	0.97	0.97	27.28	2.99	MUSTER		MDPPTFTFNFNNEPWVRGRHETYLCYEVERMHNDTWVKLNQRRGFLANQAPHKHGFLEGRHAELCFLDVIPFWKLDLDQDYRVTCFTSWSPCFSCAQEMAKFISKNKHVSLCIKTARIYDDQGRAQEGLRTLAEAGAKISIMTYSEFKHCWDTFVDHQGAPFQPWDGLDEHSQDLSGRLRAILQNQEN
6	6bwyA	0.96	0.90	25.36	3.15	HHsearch		MDPPTFTFNFNNEPWVRGRHETYLCYEVERMHNDTWVKLNQRRGFLANQ--------APRHAELCFLDVIPFWKLDLDQDYRVTCFTSWSPCFSCAQEMAKFISKNKHVSLCIKTARIYDDQGRAQEGLRTLAEAGAKISIMTYSEFKHCWDTFVDHQGAPFQPWDGLDEHSQDLSGRLRAILQN---
7	6wmaA2	0.93	0.90	25.38	2.98	FFAS-3D		MDAATFTFNFNNEPWVRGRHETYLCYEVERMHNDTWVKLAQRRGFLANQAKH----LEGRHAALCFLDVIPFWKLDLDQDYRVTCFTSWSPCFSCAQEMAKFISKNKHVSLCIKTARIYDDKGRAAEGLRTLAEAGAKISIMTYSEFKHCWDTFVDHQGAPFQPWDGLDEHSQDLSGRLRAILQNQ--
8	6wmaA	0.92	0.88	24.65	1.20	EigenThreader		MDAATFTFNFNNEPWVRGRHETYLCYEVERMD-TW-VKLAQRRGFLANQAKH----LEGRHAALCFLDVIPFWKLDLDQDYRVTCFTSWSPCFSCAQEMAKFISKNKHVSLCIKTARIYDDKGRAAEGLRTLAEAGAKISIMTYSEFKHCWDTFVDHQGAPFQPWDGLDEHSQDLSGRLRAILQNQ--
9	4rowA	0.99	0.97	27.26	2.55	CNFpred		MDPPTFTFNFNNEPWVRGRHETYLCYEVERMHNDTWVLLNQRRGFLCNQAPHKHGFLEGRHAELCFLDVIPFWKLDLDQDYRVTCFTSWSPCFSCAQEMAKFISKNKHVSLCIFTARIYDDQGRCQEGLRTLAEAGAKISIMTYSEFKHCWDTFVDHQGCPFQPWDGLDEHSQALSGRLRAILQ----
10	6wmaA	0.89	0.85	23.79	1.33	DEthreader		SDAATFTFNFNNVRGR---HETYLCYEVERMHNDTWVKLAQRRGFLANQAKH---LEG-RHAALCFLDVIPFWKLDLDQDYRVTCFTSWSPCFSCAQEMAKFISKNKHVSLCIKTARIYDDKGRAAEGLRTLAEAGAKISIMTYSEFKHCWDTFVDHQGAPFQPWDGLDEHSQDLSGRLRAILQNQ--


(a) ID1 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by number of aligned residues.
(b) ID2 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by query sequence length.
(c) Cov is equal the number of aligned template residues divided by query sequence length.
(d) Norm. Zscore is the normalized Z-score of the threading alignments. A Normalized Z-score >1 means a good alignment and is highlighted in bold.
(e) Download alignment lists the threading program used to identify the template, and provide the 3D structure of aligned regions of threading templates (threading[1-10].pdb.gz).
(f) Template residues identical to query sequence are highlighted in color.

Top 1 final models from D-I-TASSER

Rank^a	Estimated TM-score^b
1	0.8687


(a) D-I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, i.e. decoys. These decoys are clustered by SPICKER based on pairwise structure similarity to report up to five final models from the five largest clusters. Models are ranked in descending order of cluster size. If the simulations converge well, it is possible to have less than 5 models generated, which is usually an indication of good model quality.
(b) The model confidence is quantitatified by estimated TM-score (eTM-score), calculated based on significance of threading template alignments, contact map satisfaction rate, mean absolute error between distance of model and distance of DeepPotential, and convergence of D-I-TASSER simulations. eTM-score is typically in the range of [0, 1], with higher eTM-score signifies higher model confidence.

Proteins with similar structure

Top 10 structural analogs in PDB (as identified by TM-align)


Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.
1	6wmaA2	0.95	0.67	0.923	0.968
2	6bwyA	0.92	0.86	0.972	0.942
3	6p3xA	0.89	1.98	0.392	0.963
4	5tkmA	0.88	1.83	0.388	0.947
5	5k81A	0.88	1.95	0.399	0.947
6	3vm8A	0.87	1.90	0.421	0.947
7	2m65A	0.86	2.21	0.658	0.979
8	5w3vA	0.82	2.27	0.354	0.931
9	6x91A	0.80	2.07	0.262	0.894
10	2rpzA	0.78	2.81	0.305	0.942



(a) Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b) Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c) RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d) IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e) Cov. represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Gene Ontology (GO) Terms

Molecular Function (MF)


GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0016787	0.92	hydrolase activity
GO:0019239	0.91	deaminase activity
GO:0016814	0.91	hydrolase activity, acting on carbon-nitrogen (but not peptide) bonds, in cyclic amidines
GO:0047844	0.66	deoxycytidine deaminase activity






(a) Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.
(b) The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Molecular Function. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

Biological Process (BP)


GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0009987	0.98	cellular process
GO:0065007	0.95	biological regulation
GO:0050789	0.91	regulation of biological process
GO:0071704	0.90	organic substance metabolic process
GO:0050794	0.90	regulation of cellular process
GO:0044238	0.90	primary metabolic process
GO:0044260	0.89	cellular macromolecule metabolic process
GO:0006139	0.89	nucleobase-containing compound metabolic process
GO:0090304	0.88	nucleic acid metabolic process
GO:0044699	0.87	single-organism process
GO:0006259	0.87	DNA metabolic process
GO:0048523	0.86	negative regulation of cellular process
GO:0044763	0.86	single-organism cellular process
GO:0043412	0.84	macromolecule modification
GO:0006304	0.83	DNA modification
GO:0044710	0.79	single-organism metabolic process
GO:0002376	0.76	immune system process
GO:0050896	0.71	response to stimulus
GO:0010529	0.70	negative regulation of transposition
GO:0043207	0.68	response to external biotic stimulus
GO:0016032	0.68	viral process
GO:0002252	0.68	immune effector process
GO:0006950	0.67	response to stress
GO:0051607	0.66	defense response to virus
GO:0044281	0.62	small molecule metabolic process
GO:0070383	0.61	DNA cytosine deamination
GO:1901575	0.60	organic substance catabolic process
GO:1901564	0.60	organonitrogen compound metabolic process
GO:0055086	0.60	nucleobase-containing small molecule metabolic process
GO:0044248	0.60	cellular catabolic process
GO:1901136	0.59	carbohydrate derivative catabolic process
GO:0072529	0.59	pyrimidine-containing compound catabolic process
GO:0046087	0.59	cytidine metabolic process
GO:0044712	0.59	single-organism catabolic process
GO:0034655	0.59	nucleobase-containing compound catabolic process
GO:0009972	0.58	cytidine deamination






(a) Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.
(b) The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Biological Process. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

Cellular Component (CC)


GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0044424	1.00	intracellular part
GO:0043229	0.93	intracellular organelle
GO:0005737	0.93	cytoplasm
GO:0044444	0.76	cytoplasmic part
GO:0032991	0.75	macromolecular complex
GO:0043232	0.67	intracellular non-membrane-bounded organelle
GO:0030529	0.67	intracellular ribonucleoprotein complex
GO:0000932	0.66	cytoplasmic mRNA processing body






(a) Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.
(b) The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Cellular Component. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

Predicted Enzyme Commission (EC) Numbers

Top 5 enzyme homologs in PDB


Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	EC Number	Predicted Active Site Residues
1	0.060	1tz9A	0.490	5.03	0.056	0.755	4.2.1.8	67,132
2	0.060	3bdkB	0.513	4.82	0.030	0.771	4.2.1.8	NA
3	0.060	1cleA	0.518	4.89	0.041	0.840	3.1.1.3	NA
4	0.060	1vq2A	0.491	3.84	0.140	0.638	3.5.4.12	70,95
5	0.060	1mx9D	0.509	4.66	0.055	0.798	3.1.1.1	NA



(a) Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the Enzyme Commission (EC) number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b) TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c) RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d) IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e) Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Ligand Binding Sites

Template proteins with similar binding site:


Rank	Cscore^LB	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	BS-score	Lig. Name	Predicted binding site residues
1	0.01	2hrrB	0.511	5.07	0.046	0.846	0.46	SUC	129,130,134,139,140
2	0.01	2hrrA	0.515	5.04	0.053	0.835	0.42	SIA	100,131,132,133



(a) Cscore^LB is the confidence score of predicted binding site. Cscore^LB values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable ligand-binding site prediction.
(b) BS-score is a measure of local similarity (sequence & structure) between template binding site and predicted binding site in the query structure. Based on large scale benchmarking analysis, we have observed that a BS-score >1 reflects a significant local match between the predicted and template binding site.
(c) TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(d) RMSD^a the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(e) IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(f) Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

References:
1. Wei Zheng, Chengxin Zhang, Yang Li, Robin Pearce, Eric W. Bell, Yang Zhang. Folding non-homology proteins by coupling deep-learning contact maps with I-TASSER assembly simulations. In preparation, 2020.