D-I-TASSER Q9HB71

D-I-TASSER results for Q9HB71

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

Summary of the Protein

Uniprot ID: Q9HB71
Protein Name: Calcyclin-binding protein
Gene Name: CACYBP

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>Q9HB71 (228 residues)
MASEELQKDLEEVKVLLEKATRKRVRDALTAEKSKIETEIKNKMQQKSQKKAELLDNEKP
AAVVAPITTGYTVKISNYGWDQSDKFVKIYITLTGVHQVPTENVQVHFTERSFDLLVKNL
NGKSYSMIVNNLLKPISVEGSSKKVKTDTVLILCRKKVENTRWDYLTQVEKECKEKEKPS
YDTETDPSEGLMNVLKKIYEDGDDDMKRTINKAWVESREKQAKGDTEF

Predicted Contact and Distance Map Used in D-I-TASSER simulation

Contact Map

Distance Map

D-I-TASSER simulation is guided by the consensus contact map (left figure) and distance map (right figure) derived based on confidence scores of AttentionPotential. In the contact, distance map and hydrogen bond networks, the axes mark the residue index along the sequence. For the contact map, each dot represents a residue pair with predicted contact, while for the distance map and hydrogen bond network, a color scale represents a distance of 1-20+ angstroms or a angle of 0-180 degree.

Information of Domain

No. of Domain	Domain	Domain Boundary	Length of Domain	Models of Domain	Sequence
1	Q9HB71-D1	1-228	228		MASEELQKDLEEVKVLLEKATRKRVRDALTAEKSKIETEIKNKMQQKSQKKAELLDNEKPAAVVAPITTGYTVKISNYGWDQSDKFVKIYITLTGVHQVPTENVQVHFTERSFDLLVKNLNGKSYSMIVNNLLKPISVEGSSKKVKTDTVLILCRKKVENTRWDYLTQVEKECKEKEKPSYDTETDPSEGLMNVLKKIYEDGDDDMKRTINKAWVESREKQAKGDTEF

Top 1 final models from D-I-TASSER

SpinHigh qualityWhite background

Click to view	Rank^a	Download	Estimated TM-score^b
	1	model1.pdb.gz	0.5474

(a)

D-I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, i.e. decoys. These decoys are clustered by SPICKER based on pairwise structure similarity to report up to five final models from the five largest clusters. Models are ranked in descending order of cluster size. If the simulations converge well, it is possible to have less than 5 models generated, which is usually an indication of good model quality.

(b)

The model confidence is quantitatified by estimated TM-score (eTM-score), calculated based on significance of threading template alignments, contact map satisfaction rate, mean absolute error between distance of model and distance of AttentionPotential, and convergence of D-I-TASSER simulations. eTM-score is typically in the range of [0, 1], with higher eTM-score signifies higher model confidence.

Proteins with similar structure

SpinHigh qualityWhite background

Top 10 structural analogs in PDB (as identified by TM-align)

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	Download Alignment
1	4a01A	0.48	5.28	0.040	0.759	model1_4a01A.pdb.gz
2	3dgeA	0.45	4.15	0.059	0.614	model1_3dgeA.pdb.gz
3	4f5cA	0.45	5.67	0.060	0.724	model1_4f5cA.pdb.gz
4	5zi5A	0.44	5.33	0.031	0.689	model1_5zi5A.pdb.gz
5	1x5mA	0.44	1.59	0.833	0.469	model1_1x5mA.pdb.gz
6	2dqmA	0.44	5.36	0.036	0.711	model1_2dqmA.pdb.gz
7	2gtqA	0.44	5.54	0.042	0.706	model1_2gtqA.pdb.gz
8	1wh0A	0.42	3.11	0.155	0.496	model1_1wh0A.pdb.gz
9	1rl1A	0.37	1.88	0.326	0.404	model1_1rl1A.pdb.gz
10	2pffA	0.35	5.31	0.027	0.583	model1_2pffA.pdb.gz

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Gene Ontology (GO) Terms

Molecular Function (MF)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0042802	0.92	identical protein binding
GO:0042803	0.91	protein homodimerization activity

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Molecular Function. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Biological Process (BP)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0009987	0.84	cellular process
GO:0044699	0.82	single-organism process
GO:0065007	0.81	biological regulation
GO:0032502	0.74	developmental process
GO:0048856	0.73	anatomical structure development
GO:0044767	0.73	single-organism developmental process
GO:0007507	0.72	heart development
GO:0050789	0.63	regulation of biological process
GO:0050794	0.61	regulation of cellular process
GO:0044763	0.61	single-organism cellular process
GO:0050896	0.55	response to stimulus
GO:0048518	0.54	positive regulation of biological process
GO:0019222	0.54	regulation of metabolic process
GO:0080090	0.53	regulation of primary metabolic process
GO:0060255	0.53	regulation of macromolecule metabolic process
GO:0051171	0.53	regulation of nitrogen compound metabolic process
GO:0048522	0.53	positive regulation of cellular process
GO:0048519	0.53	negative regulation of biological process
GO:0031323	0.53	regulation of cellular metabolic process
GO:2000112	0.52	regulation of cellular macromolecule biosynthetic process
GO:0070887	0.52	cellular response to chemical stimulus
GO:0048869	0.52	cellular developmental process
GO:0048523	0.52	negative regulation of cellular process
GO:0019219	0.52	regulation of nucleobase-containing compound metabolic process
GO:0009893	0.52	positive regulation of metabolic process
GO:0045935	0.51	positive regulation of nucleobase-containing compound metabolic process
GO:0042692	0.51	muscle cell differentiation
GO:0031328	0.51	positive regulation of cellular biosynthetic process
GO:0010941	0.51	regulation of cell death
GO:0010604	0.51	positive regulation of macromolecule metabolic process
GO:0010033	0.51	response to organic substance
GO:0071277	0.50	cellular response to calcium ion
GO:0060548	0.50	negative regulation of cell death
GO:0060416	0.50	response to growth hormone
GO:0055007	0.50	cardiac muscle cell differentiation
GO:0045740	0.50	positive regulation of DNA replication
GO:0007568	0.50	aging

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Biological Process. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Cellular Component (CC)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0044424	0.99	intracellular part
GO:0044446	0.72	intracellular organelle part
GO:0043226	0.71	organelle
GO:0032991	0.71	macromolecular complex
GO:0005737	0.71	cytoplasm
GO:0043234	0.69	protein complex
GO:0044444	0.68	cytoplasmic part
GO:0043227	0.65	membrane-bounded organelle
GO:0044428	0.55	nuclear part
GO:0005654	0.52	nucleoplasm
GO:0030877	0.51	beta-catenin destruction complex

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Cellular Component. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Predicted Enzyme Commission (EC) Numbers

SpinHigh qualityWhite background

Top 5 enzyme homologs in PDB

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	EC Number	Predicted Active Site Residues
1	0.060	1ay0A	0.407	6.25	0.058	0.737	2.2.1.1	NA
2	0.060	1w6jA	0.402	6.15	0.065	0.741	5.4.99.7	190
3	0.060	1gaxA	0.399	5.54	0.043	0.649	6.1.1.9	NA
4	0.060	1y791	0.402	5.46	0.028	0.662	3.4.15.5	NA
5	0.060	1l2aE	0.402	5.88	0.050	0.693	3.2.1.4	NA

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted active site residues.
(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the Enzyme Commission (EC) number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Ligand Binding Sites

SpinHigh qualityWhite background

Template proteins with similar binding site:

No Binding sites was predicted

Click to view	Rank	Cscore^LB	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	BS-score	Lig. Name	Download Complex	Predicted binding site residues

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted binding site and residues.
(a)	Cscore^LB is the confidence score of predicted binding site. Cscore^LB values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable ligand-binding site prediction.
(b)	BS-score is a measure of local similarity (sequence & structure) between template binding site and predicted binding site in the query structure. Based on large scale benchmarking analysis, we have observed that a BS-score >1 reflects a significant local match between the predicted and template binding site.
(c)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(d)	RMSD^a the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(e)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(f)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

References:
1.	Wei Zheng, Chengxin Zhang, Yang Li, Robin Pearce, Eric W. Bell, Yang Zhang. Folding non-homology proteins by coupling deep-learning contact maps with I-TASSER assembly simulations. In preparation, 2020.