D-I-TASSER Q9HAQ2

D-I-TASSER results for Q9HAQ2

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

Summary of the Protein

Uniprot ID: Q9HAQ2
Protein Name: Kinesin-like protein KIF9
Gene Name: KIF9

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>Q9HAQ2 (790 residues)
MGTRKKVHAFVRVKPTDDFAHEMIRYGDDKRSIDIHLKKDIRRGVVNNQQTDWSFKLDGV
LHDASQDLVYETVAKDVVSQALDGYNGTIMCYGQTGAGKTYTMMGATENYKHRGILPRAL
QQVFRMIEERPTHAITVRVSYLEIYNESLFDLLSTLPYVGPSVTPMTIVENPQGVFIKGL
SVHLTSQEEDAFSLLFEGETNRIIASHTMNKNSSRSHCIFTIYLEAHSRTLSEEKYITSK
INLVDLAGSERLGKSGSEGQVLKEATYINKSLSFLEQAIIALGDQKRDHIPFRQCKLTHA
LKDSLGGNCNMVLVTNIYGEAAQLEETLSSLRFASRMKLVTTEPAINEKYDAERMVKNLE
KELALLKQELAIHDSLTNRTFVTYDPMDEIQIAEINSQVRRYLEGTLDEIDIISLRQIKE
VFNQFRVVLSQQEQEVESTLRRKYTLIDRNDFAAISAIQKAGLVDVDGHLVGEPEGQNFG
LGVAPFSTKPGKKAKSKKTFKEPLSSLARKEGASSPVNGKDLDYVSTSKTQLVPSSKDGD
VKDMLSRDRETSSIEPLPSDSPKEELRPIRPDTPPSKPVAFEEFKNEQGSEINRIFKENK
SILNERRKRASETTQHINAIKREIDVTKEALNFQKSLREKQGKYENKGLMIIDEEEFLLI
LKLKDLKKQYRSEYQDLRDLRAEIQYCQHLVDQCRHRLLMEFDIWYNESFVIPEDMQMAL
KPGGSIRPGMVPVNRIVSLGEDDQDKFSQLQQRVLPEGPDSISFYNAKVKIEQKHNYLKT
MMGLQQAHRK

Predicted Contact and Distance Map Used in D-I-TASSER simulation

Contact Map

Distance Map

D-I-TASSER simulation is guided by the consensus contact map (left figure) and distance map (right figure) derived based on confidence scores of AttentionPotential. In the contact, distance map and hydrogen bond networks, the axes mark the residue index along the sequence. For the contact map, each dot represents a residue pair with predicted contact, while for the distance map and hydrogen bond network, a color scale represents a distance of 1-20+ angstroms or a angle of 0-180 degree.

Information of Domain

No. of Domain	Domain	Domain Boundary	Length of Domain	Models of Domain	Sequence
1	Q9HAQ2-D1	1-436	436		MGTRKKVHAFVRVKPTDDFAHEMIRYGDDKRSIDIHLKKDIRRGVVNNQQTDWSFKLDGVLHDASQDLVYETVAKDVVSQALDGYNGTIMCYGQTGAGKTYTMMGATENYKHRGILPRALQQVFRMIEERPTHAITVRVSYLEIYNESLFDLLSTLPYVGPSVTPMTIVENPQGVFIKGLSVHLTSQEEDAFSLLFEGETNRIIASHTMNKNSSRSHCIFTIYLEAHSRTLSEEKYITSKINLVDLAGSERLGKSGSEGQVLKEATYINKSLSFLEQAIIALGDQKRDHIPFRQCKLTHALKDSLGGNCNMVLVTNIYGEAAQLEETLSSLRFASRMKLVTTEPAINEKYDAERMVKNLEKELALLKQELAIHDSLTNRTFVTYDPMDEIQIAEINSQVRRYLEGTLDEIDIISLRQIKEVFNQFRVVLSQQEQEV
2	Q9HAQ2-D2	437-790	354		ESTLRRKYTLIDRNDFAAISAIQKAGLVDVDGHLVGEPEGQNFGLGVAPFSTKPGKKAKSKKTFKEPLSSLARKEGASSPVNGKDLDYVSTSKTQLVPSSKDGDVKDMLSRDRETSSIEPLPSDSPKEELRPIRPDTPPSKPVAFEEFKNEQGSEINRIFKENKSILNERRKRASETTQHINAIKREIDVTKEALNFQKSLREKQGKYENKGLMIIDEEEFLLILKLKDLKKQYRSEYQDLRDLRAEIQYCQHLVDQCRHRLLMEFDIWYNESFVIPEDMQMALKPGGSIRPGMVPVNRIVSLGEDDQDKFSQLQQRVLPEGPDSISFYNAKVKIEQKHNYLKTMMGLQQAHRK

Top 1 final models from D-I-TASSER

Click to view	Rank^a	Download	Estimated TM-score^b
	1	model1.pdb.gz	0.54

(a)

D-I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, i.e. decoys. These decoys are clustered by SPICKER based on pairwise structure similarity to report up to five final models from the five largest clusters. Models are ranked in descending order of cluster size. If the simulations converge well, it is possible to have less than 5 models generated, which is usually an indication of good model quality.

(b)

The model confidence is quantitatified by estimated TM-score (eTM-score), calculated based on significance of threading template alignments, contact map satisfaction rate, mean absolute error between distance of model and distance of AttentionPotential, and convergence of D-I-TASSER simulations. eTM-score is typically in the range of [0, 1], with higher eTM-score signifies higher model confidence.

Proteins with similar structure

Top 10 structural analogs in PDB (as identified by TM-align)

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	Download Alignment
1	5mioC	0.45	3.17	0.276	0.483	model1_5mioC.pdb.gz
2	3hqdA	0.42	1.03	0.358	0.420	model1_3hqdA.pdb.gz
3	5mm4K	0.41	2.58	0.328	0.434	model1_5mm4K.pdb.gz
4	5m5iC	0.41	2.00	0.349	0.424	model1_5m5iC.pdb.gz
5	3zfcA	0.40	1.53	0.366	0.411	model1_3zfcA.pdb.gz
6	3b6uB	0.40	2.28	0.360	0.413	model1_3b6uB.pdb.gz
7	1gojA	0.39	2.73	0.351	0.416	model1_1gojA.pdb.gz
8	1mkjA	0.39	2.35	0.332	0.404	model1_1mkjA.pdb.gz
9	4bn2A	0.38	2.03	0.376	0.395	model1_4bn2A.pdb.gz
10	6bbnE	0.38	1.92	0.326	0.391	model1_6bbnE.pdb.gz

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Gene Ontology (GO) Terms

Molecular Function (MF)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0003777	0.99	microtubule motor activity
GO:0016887	0.98	ATPase activity
GO:1901363	0.50	heterocyclic compound binding
GO:0097159	0.50	organic cyclic compound binding

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Molecular Function. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Biological Process (BP)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0009987	1.00	cellular process
GO:0044763	0.99	single-organism cellular process
GO:0007018	0.98	microtubule-based movement

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Biological Process. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Cellular Component (CC)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0044424	1.00	intracellular part
GO:0044422	1.00	organelle part
GO:0044430	0.99	cytoskeletal part
GO:0043234	0.98	protein complex
GO:0005871	0.97	kinesin complex

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Cellular Component. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Predicted Enzyme Commission (EC) Numbers

Top 5 enzyme homologs in PDB

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	EC Number	Predicted Active Site Residues
1	0.060	1hn0A	0.225	7.60	0.045	0.328	4.2.2.20	NA
2	0.060	2vz8A	0.223	8.37	0.022	0.352	2.3.1.85	NA
3	0.060	1j0mA	0.221	7.41	0.039	0.320	4.2.2.12	NA
4	0.060	3h0gA	0.217	8.31	0.024	0.342	2.7.7.6	NA
5	0.060	2x0sA	0.236	8.06	0.043	0.359	2.7.9.1	NA

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted active site residues.
(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the Enzyme Commission (EC) number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Ligand Binding Sites

Template proteins with similar binding site:

Click to view	Rank	Cscore^LB	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	BS-score	Lig. Name	Download Complex	Predicted binding site residues
	1	0.76	3b6uA	0.380	2.25	0.373	0.395	1.66	ADP	complex1.pdb.gz	12,14,15,96,97,98,99,100,101
	2	0.02	3kin2	0.108	2.01	0.282	0.111	1.05	III	complex2.pdb.gz	271,272,275,296,297,299,300,301,302,303,304,305,308,309,311,312,313,314,315,316,317,318,319,320,322,323,324,326,328,329,330,331,333,334,335,338,340,341,344

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted binding site and residues.
(a)	Cscore^LB is the confidence score of predicted binding site. Cscore^LB values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable ligand-binding site prediction.
(b)	BS-score is a measure of local similarity (sequence & structure) between template binding site and predicted binding site in the query structure. Based on large scale benchmarking analysis, we have observed that a BS-score >1 reflects a significant local match between the predicted and template binding site.
(c)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(d)	RMSD^a the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(e)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(f)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

References:
1.	Wei Zheng, Chengxin Zhang, Yang Li, Robin Pearce, Eric W. Bell, Yang Zhang. Folding non-homology proteins by coupling deep-learning contact maps with I-TASSER assembly simulations. In preparation, 2020.