D-I-TASSER Q9H8P0

D-I-TASSER results for Q9H8P0

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

Summary of the Protein

Uniprot ID: Q9H8P0
Protein Name: Polyprenol reductase
Gene Name: SRD5A3

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>Q9H8P0 (318 residues)
MAPWAEAEHSALNPLRAVWLTLTAAFLLTLLLQLLPPGLLPGCAIFQDLIRYGKTKCGEP
SRPAACRAFDVPKRYFSHFYIISVLWNGFLLWCLTQSLFLGAPFPSWLHGLLRILGAAQF
QGGELALSAFLVLVFLWLHSLRRLFECLYVSVFSNVMIHVVQYCFGLVYYVLVGLTVLSQ
VPMDGRNAYITGKNLLMQARWFHILGMMMFIWSSAHQYKCHVILGNLRKNKAGVVIHCNH
RIPFGDWFEYVSSPNYLAELMIYVSMAVTFGFHNLTWWLVVTNVFFNQALSAFLSHQFYK
SKFVSYPKHRKAFLPFLF

Predicted Contact and Distance Map Used in D-I-TASSER simulation

Contact Map

Distance Map

D-I-TASSER simulation is guided by the consensus contact map (left figure) and distance map (right figure) derived based on confidence scores of AttentionPotential. In the contact, distance map and hydrogen bond networks, the axes mark the residue index along the sequence. For the contact map, each dot represents a residue pair with predicted contact, while for the distance map and hydrogen bond network, a color scale represents a distance of 1-20+ angstroms or a angle of 0-180 degree.

Information of Domain

No. of Domain	Domain	Domain Boundary	Length of Domain	Models of Domain	Sequence
1	Q9H8P0-D1	1-199	199		MAPWAEAEHSALNPLRAVWLTLTAAFLLTLLLQLLPPGLLPGCAIFQDLIRYGKTKCGEPSRPAACRAFDVPKRYFSHFYIISVLWNGFLLWCLTQSLFLGAPFPSWLHGLLRILGAAQFQGGELALSAFLVLVFLWLHSLRRLFECLYVSVFSNVMIHVVQYCFGLVYYVLVGLTVLSQVPMDGRNAYITGKNLLMQA
2	Q9H8P0-D2	200-318	119		RWFHILGMMMFIWSSAHQYKCHVILGNLRKNKAGVVIHCNHRIPFGDWFEYVSSPNYLAELMIYVSMAVTFGFHNLTWWLVVTNVFFNQALSAFLSHQFYKSKFVSYPKHRKAFLPFLF

Top 1 final models from D-I-TASSER

Click to view	Rank^a	Download	Estimated TM-score^b
	1	model1.pdb.gz	0.8

(a)

D-I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, i.e. decoys. These decoys are clustered by SPICKER based on pairwise structure similarity to report up to five final models from the five largest clusters. Models are ranked in descending order of cluster size. If the simulations converge well, it is possible to have less than 5 models generated, which is usually an indication of good model quality.

(b)

The model confidence is quantitatified by estimated TM-score (eTM-score), calculated based on significance of threading template alignments, contact map satisfaction rate, mean absolute error between distance of model and distance of AttentionPotential, and convergence of D-I-TASSER simulations. eTM-score is typically in the range of [0, 1], with higher eTM-score signifies higher model confidence.

Proteins with similar structure

Top 10 structural analogs in PDB (as identified by TM-align)

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	Download Alignment
1	7c83A	0.68	2.81	0.206	0.777	model1_7c83A.pdb.gz
2	7bw1A	0.66	2.94	0.249	0.755	model1_7bw1A.pdb.gz
3	4quvA	0.57	4.12	0.089	0.726	model1_4quvA.pdb.gz
4	5v7pA	0.50	4.13	0.071	0.635	model1_5v7pA.pdb.gz
5	6zmqA	0.47	5.30	0.083	0.673	model1_6zmqA.pdb.gz
6	4a2nB	0.46	3.30	0.099	0.544	model1_4a2nB.pdb.gz
7	1no3A	0.45	6.48	0.036	0.752	model1_1no3A.pdb.gz
8	3ayfA2	0.45	6.03	0.051	0.711	model1_3ayfA2.pdb.gz
9	3mk7A	0.42	5.74	0.066	0.654	model1_3mk7A.pdb.gz
10	4g32A2	0.41	6.17	0.064	0.660	model1_4g32A2.pdb.gz

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Gene Ontology (GO) Terms

Molecular Function (MF)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0016491	1.00	oxidoreductase activity
GO:0016627	0.98	oxidoreductase activity, acting on the CH-CH group of donors
GO:0003865	0.93	3-oxo-5-alpha-steroid 4-dehydrogenase activity
GO:0016628	0.78	oxidoreductase activity, acting on the CH-CH group of donors, NAD or NADP as acceptor

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Molecular Function. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Biological Process (BP)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0008152	0.99	metabolic process
GO:0009987	0.97	cellular process
GO:0044237	0.96	cellular metabolic process
GO:0044699	0.95	single-organism process
GO:0044710	0.94	single-organism metabolic process
GO:0009058	0.94	biosynthetic process
GO:0071704	0.93	organic substance metabolic process
GO:0044238	0.92	primary metabolic process
GO:0006629	0.90	lipid metabolic process
GO:0044763	0.89	single-organism cellular process
GO:1901576	0.86	organic substance biosynthetic process
GO:0044281	0.86	small molecule metabolic process
GO:0044711	0.85	single-organism biosynthetic process
GO:0044255	0.84	cellular lipid metabolic process
GO:1901615	0.80	organic hydroxy compound metabolic process
GO:0016042	0.79	lipid catabolic process
GO:0006720	0.79	isoprenoid metabolic process
GO:0006066	0.78	alcohol metabolic process
GO:0019348	0.77	dolichol metabolic process
GO:0016095	0.77	polyprenol catabolic process
GO:0006488	0.77	dolichol-linked oligosaccharide biosynthetic process

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Biological Process. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Cellular Component (CC)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0044464	1.00	cell part
GO:0044424	0.99	intracellular part
GO:0044444	0.98	cytoplasmic part
GO:0043231	0.90	intracellular membrane-bounded organelle
GO:0005783	0.85	endoplasmic reticulum
GO:0044446	0.59	intracellular organelle part
GO:0016020	0.53	membrane

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Cellular Component. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Predicted Enzyme Commission (EC) Numbers

Top 5 enzyme homologs in PDB

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	EC Number	Predicted Active Site Residues
1	0.060	3b8eA	0.389	6.76	0.051	0.679	3.6.3.9	NA
2	0.060	2jg0A	0.396	6.46	0.030	0.670	3.2.1.28	NA
3	0.060	1eulA	0.409	6.20	0.074	0.660	3.6.3.8	NA
4	0.060	1uzrB	0.403	5.13	0.057	0.582	1.17.4.1	NA
5	0.060	2iukB	0.325	6.51	0.035	0.544	1.13.11.12	173,177

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted active site residues.
(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the Enzyme Commission (EC) number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Ligand Binding Sites

Template proteins with similar binding site:

Rank	Cscore^LB	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	BS-score	Lig. Name	Download Complex	Predicted binding site residues
1	0.04	3ehbA	0.406	6.50	0.063	0.673	0.15	HEA	complex1.pdb.gz	135,136,140,144,166
2	0.01	1qleA	0.414	6.50	0.060	0.701	0.11	HEA	complex2.pdb.gz	207,211,214,218,219,221,222,225
3	0.01	3fyeA	0.429	5.66	0.061	0.654	0.15	HEA	complex3.pdb.gz	130,134,135,137,138,140,141,171,174,175
4	0.01	3hb3A	0.408	6.63	0.057	0.685	0.17	HEA	complex4.pdb.gz	203,207,210,214
5	0.01	3om3A	0.430	5.85	0.070	0.679	0.15	HEA	complex5.pdb.gz	135,138,139,142,146,149,207,208
6	0.01	3omaC	0.386	6.60	0.057	0.638	0.21	DMU	complex6.pdb.gz	168,172,176
7	0.01	1m56G	0.429	5.86	0.050	0.670	0.11	HEA	complex7.pdb.gz	209,214,217
8	0.01	1ik3A	0.350	6.01	0.051	0.531	0.25	13S	complex8.pdb.gz	135,138,139,143,147,165,170,174,260,287,288
9	0.01	3omaA	0.432	5.86	0.074	0.676	0.21	HEA	complex9.pdb.gz	203,207,210,214
10	0.01	1m56A	0.430	5.86	0.050	0.670	0.40	PEH	complex10.pdb.gz	164,165,172

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted binding site and residues.
(a)	Cscore^LB is the confidence score of predicted binding site. Cscore^LB values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable ligand-binding site prediction.
(b)	BS-score is a measure of local similarity (sequence & structure) between template binding site and predicted binding site in the query structure. Based on large scale benchmarking analysis, we have observed that a BS-score >1 reflects a significant local match between the predicted and template binding site.
(c)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(d)	RMSD^a the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(e)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(f)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

References:
1.	Wei Zheng, Chengxin Zhang, Yang Li, Robin Pearce, Eric W. Bell, Yang Zhang. Folding non-homology proteins by coupling deep-learning contact maps with I-TASSER assembly simulations. In preparation, 2020.