D-I-TASSER Q9H6Z9-D1

D-I-TASSER results for Q9H6Z9-D1

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>Q9H6Z9 (239 residues)
MPLGHIMRLDLEKIALEYIVPCLHEVGFCYLDNFLGEVVGDCVLERVKQLHCTGALRDGQ
LAGPRAGVSKRHLRGDQITWIGGNEEGCEAISFLLSLIDRLVLYCGSRLGKYYVKERSKA
MVACYPGNGTGYVRHVDNPNGDGRCITCIYYLNKNWDAKLHGGILRIFPEGKSFIADVEP
IFDRLLFFWSDRRNPHEVQPSYATRYAMTVWYFDAEERAEAKKKFRNLTRKTESALTED

Predicted Secondary Structure

Sequence	20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| MPLGHIMRLDLEKIALEYIVPCLHEVGFCYLDNFLGEVVGDCVLERVKQLHCTGALRDGQLAGPRAGVSKRHLRGDQITWIGGNEEGCEAISFLLSLIDRLVLYCGSRLGKYYVKERSKAMVACYPGNGTGYVRHVDNPNGDGRCITCIYYLNKNWDAKLHGGILRIFPEGKSFIADVEPIFDRLLFFWSDRRNPHEVQPSYATRYAMTVWYFDAEERAEAKKKFRNLTRKTESALTED
Prediction	CCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCSSSSCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCSCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCSSSSSCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCSSSSSSSCCCCCCSCCCCCCCCCCCSSSSSSSSSCCCCCCCCCCCSSSSSCCCCCSSSSSSCCCCSSSSSSCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCSSSSSSSSCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCCC
Confidence	99854456896789999999999745989968999999999999999998752787666221466664455412436999669874448999999999999999987505554555311468885589973324445789997389999997599887788752999369996279971279989999569986554567998658999970488612668887652022211121359
	H:Helix; S:Strand; C:Coil

Predicted Solvent Accessibility

Sequence	20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| MPLGHIMRLDLEKIALEYIVPCLHEVGFCYLDNFLGEVVGDCVLERVKQLHCTGALRDGQLAGPRAGVSKRHLRGDQITWIGGNEEGCEAISFLLSLIDRLVLYCGSRLGKYYVKERSKAMVACYPGNGTGYVRHVDNPNGDGRCITCIYYLNKNWDAKLHGGILRIFPEGKSFIADVEPIFDRLLFFWSDRRNPHEVQPSYATRYAMTVWYFDAEERAEAKKKFRNLTRKTESALTED
Prediction	65446425250433104300410273000000100356004301510450355541452421456643456403402020024644315104301510330043025403422234432120021345342021012226454010000000044345632100000123636222404033100000107432202232573400000000134653451474255145765463588
	Values range from 0 (buried residue) to 8 (highly exposed residue)

Predicted Contact, Hydrogen and Distance Map Used in D-I-TASSER simulation

Contact Map

Distance Map

Hydrogen bond networks

D-I-TASSER simulation is guided by the consensus contact map (left figure), distance map (middle figure) and Hydrogen bond network (right figure) derived based on confidence scores of AttentionPotential. In the contact, distance map and hydrogen bond networks, the axes mark the residue index along the sequence. For the contact map, each dot represents a residue pair with predicted contact, while for the distance map and hydrogen bond network, a color scale represents a distance of 1-20+ angstroms or a angle of 0-180 degree.

Top 10 threading templates used by D-I-TASSER

Rank

PDB
hit

ID1

ID2

Cov

Norm.
Zscore

Download
alignment

                  20                  40                  60                  80                 100                 120                 140                 160                 180                 200                 220

                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |

SS
Seq

CCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCSSSSCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCSCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCSSSSSCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCSSSSSSSCCCCCCSCCCCCCCCCCCSSSSSSSSSCCCCCCCCCCCSSSSSCCCCCSSSSSSCCCCSSSSSSCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCSSSSSSSSCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCCC
MPLGHIMRLDLEKIALEYIVPCLHEVGFCYLDNFLGEVVGDCVLERVKQLHCTGALRDGQLAGPRAGVSKRHLRGDQITWIGGNEEGCEAISFLLSLIDRLVLYCGSRLGKYYVKERSKAMVACYPGNGTGYVRHVDNPNGDGRCITCIYYLNKNWDAKLHGGILRIFPEGKSFIADVEPIFDRLLFFWSDRRNPHEVQPSYATRYAMTVWYFDAEERAEAKKKFRNLTRKTESALTED

2hbtA

0.67

0.58

16.58

1.33

DEthreader

--------LPALKLALEYIVPCMNKHGICVVDDFLGKETGQQIGDEVRALHDTGKFTDG-----------QLVRGDKITWIEGKEPGCETIGLLMSSMDDLIRHCNGKLGSYKINGRTKAMVACYPGNGTGYVRHVDNPNGDGRCVTCIYYLNKDWDAKVSGGILRIFPEGKAQFADIEPKFDRLLFFWSDRRNPHEVQPAYATRYAITVWYFDADERARAKVKYLK--R---------

2hbtA

0.63

0.59

16.98

2.47

SPARKS-K

--------LPALKLALEYIVPCMNKHGICVVDDFLGKETGQQIGDEVRALHDTGKFTDGQLVSQ-KSDSSKDIRGDKITWIEGKEPGCETIGLLMSSMDDLIRHCNGKLGSYKINGRTKAMVACYPGNGTGYVRHVDNPNGDGRCVTCIYYLNKDWDAKVSGGILRIFPEGKAQFADIEPKFDRLLFFWSDRRNPHEVQPAYATRYAITVWYFDADERARAKVKYLKGVRVEL------

2hbtA

0.62

0.57

16.28

0.89

MapAlign

--------LPALKLALEYIVPCMNKHGICVVDDFLGKETGQQIGDEVRALHDTGKFTGQLSQKSDSSKDIR---GDKITWIEGKEPGCETIGLLMSSMDDLIRHCNGKLGSYKINGRTKAMVACYPGNGTGYVRHVDNPNGDGRCVTCIYYLNKDWDAKVSGGILRIFPEGKAQFADIEPKFDRLLFFWSDRRNPHEVQPAYATRYAITVWYFDADERARAKVKYLKGV----------

2hbtA

0.63

0.59

16.98

0.70

CEthreader

--------LPALKLALEYIVPCMNKHGICVVDDFLGKETGQQIGDEVRALHDTGKFTDGQLVSQ-KSDSSKDIRGDKITWIEGKEPGCETIGLLMSSMDDLIRHCNGKLGSYKINGRTKAMVACYPGNGTGYVRHVDNPNGDGRCVTCIYYLNKDWDAKVSGGILRIFPEGKAQFADIEPKFDRLLFFWSDRRNPHEVQPAYATRYAITVWYFDADERARAKVKYLKGVRVEL------

2hbtA

0.63

0.59

16.86

1.94

MUSTER

--------LPALKLALEYIVPCMNKHGICVVDDFLGKETGQQIGDEVRALHDTGKFTDGQLVSQKSD-SSKDIRGDKITWIEGKEPGCETIGLLMSSMDDLIRHCNGKLGSYKINGRTKAMVACYPGNGTGYVRHVDNPNGDGRCVTCIYYLNKDWDAKVSGGILRIFPEGKAQFADIEPKFDRLLFFWSDRRNPHEVQPAYATRYAITVWYFDADERARAKVKYL-------KGVRVE

2hbtA

0.63

0.59

16.87

2.03

HHsearch

--------LPALKLALEYIVPCMNKHGICVVDDFLGKETGQQIGDEVRALHDTGKFTDGQLVSQKS-DSSKDIRGDKITWIEGKEPGCETIGLLMSSMDDLIRHCNGKLGSYKINGRTKAMVACYPGNGTGYVRHVDNPNGDGRCVTCIYYLNKDWDAKVSGGILRIFPEGKAQFADIEPKFDRLLFFWSDRRNPHEVQPAYATRYAITVWYFDADERARAKVKYLKG--VRVEL----

2hbtA

0.64

0.59

16.97

2.87

FFAS-3D

--------LPALKLALEYIVPCMNKHGICVVDDFLGKETGQQIGDEVRALHDTGKFTDGQLVSQKSD-SSKDIRGDKITWIEGKEPGCETIGLLMSSMDDLIRHCNGKLGSYKINGRTKAMVACYPGNGTGYVRHVDNPNGDGRCVTCIYYLNKDWDAKVSGGILRIFPEGKAQFADIEPKFDRLLFFWSDRRNPHEVQPAYATRYAITVWYFDADERARAKVKYLKGVR---------

2hbtA

0.63

0.58

16.63

1.23

EigenThreader

--------LPALKLALEYIVPCMNKHGICVVDDFLGKETGQQIGDEVRALHDTGKFTDGQSQKSDSSKD---IRGDKITWIEGKEPGCETIGLLMSSMDDLIRHCNGKLGSYKINGRTKAMVACYPGNGTGYVRHVDNPNGDGRCVTCIYYLNKDWDAKVSGGILRIFPEGKAQFADIEPKFDRLLFFWSDRRNPHEVQPAYATRYAITVWYFDADERARAKVKY-------LKGVRVE

3hqrA

0.65

0.59

16.84

2.54

CNFpred

------------KLALEYIVPCMNKHGICVVDDFLGKETGQQIGDEVRALHDTGKFTDGQLVSQKSDSSK-DIRGDKITWIEGKEPGCETIGLLMSSMDDLIRHCNGKLGSYKINGRTKAMVACYPGNGTGYVRHVDNPNGDGRCVTCIYYLNKDWDAKVSGGILRIFPEGKAQFADIEPKFDRLLFFWSDRRNPHEVQPAYATRYAITVWYFDADERAAAKVKYLTGEK---------

6ey1A

0.50

0.43

12.50

1.33

DEthreader

CDKL-EKWQLKNERLSNMVVNQLNTNGFCIINNFLGSSCSTEVLQQVLNLYQSGVFSNG-------------IRGDKIAWIGGDERGCEAIKYLSSCVDSLISRCNGRLGNYMITGRTKCMVACYPGSGLGYIRHIDNPNRDGRCVTVLYYLNPNWNSQDCGGQLWLYPNNENKVVKIDPIFDRLLLFWSDRRNPHEVKPAYAMRYAITLWYFDEKERAL-S-----------------

(a)	ID1 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by number of aligned residues.
(b)	ID2 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by query sequence length.
(c)	Cov is equal the number of aligned template residues divided by query sequence length.
(d)	Norm. Zscore is the normalized Z-score of the threading alignments. A Normalized Z-score >1 means a good alignment and is highlighted in bold.
(e)	Download alignment lists the threading program used to identify the template, and provide the 3D structure of aligned regions of threading templates (threading[1-10].pdb.gz).
(f)	Template residues identical to query sequence are highlighted in color.

Top 1 final models from D-I-TASSER

Click to view	Rank^a	Download	Estimated TM-score^b
	1	model1.pdb.gz	0.8637

(a)

D-I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, i.e. decoys. These decoys are clustered by SPICKER based on pairwise structure similarity to report up to five final models from the five largest clusters. Models are ranked in descending order of cluster size. If the simulations converge well, it is possible to have less than 5 models generated, which is usually an indication of good model quality.

(b)

The model confidence is quantitatified by estimated TM-score (eTM-score), calculated based on significance of threading template alignments, contact map satisfaction rate, mean absolute error between distance of model and distance of AttentionPotential, and convergence of D-I-TASSER simulations. eTM-score is typically in the range of [0, 1], with higher eTM-score signifies higher model confidence.

Proteins with similar structure

Top 10 structural analogs in PDB (as identified by TM-align)

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	Download Alignment
1	2hbtA	0.92	0.69	0.632	0.933	model1_2hbtA.pdb.gz
2	6ey1A	0.83	1.67	0.493	0.866	model1_6ey1A.pdb.gz
3	5v1bA	0.83	1.88	0.563	0.879	model1_5v1bA.pdb.gz
4	4iw3A	0.74	1.95	0.293	0.799	model1_4iw3A.pdb.gz
5	6iuqA1	0.73	2.34	0.217	0.807	model1_6iuqA1.pdb.gz
6	6t8mA	0.72	2.44	0.284	0.799	model1_6t8mA.pdb.gz
7	3kt4A2	0.71	3.35	0.143	0.875	model1_3kt4A2.pdb.gz
8	4nhxA1	0.70	2.83	0.170	0.812	model1_4nhxA1.pdb.gz
9	1qyaB	0.30	5.74	0.041	0.498	model1_1qyaB.pdb.gz
10	4u2aA	0.29	5.39	0.025	0.456	model1_4u2aA.pdb.gz

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Gene Ontology (GO) Terms

Molecular Function (MF)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0003824	0.92	catalytic activity
GO:0016491	0.90	oxidoreductase activity
GO:0016706	0.89	oxidoreductase activity, acting on paired donors, with incorporation or reduction of molecular oxygen, 2-oxoglutarate as one donor, and incorporation of one atom each of oxygen into both donors
GO:0031543	0.79	peptidyl-proline dioxygenase activity
GO:0031545	0.72	peptidyl-proline 4-dioxygenase activity

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Molecular Function. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Biological Process (BP)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0065007	0.98	biological regulation
GO:0050789	0.98	regulation of biological process
GO:0050794	0.95	regulation of cellular process
GO:0009987	0.92	cellular process
GO:0044699	0.91	single-organism process
GO:0044763	0.89	single-organism cellular process
GO:0008152	0.77	metabolic process
GO:0048518	0.76	positive regulation of biological process
GO:0071704	0.75	organic substance metabolic process
GO:0050896	0.74	response to stimulus
GO:0044238	0.74	primary metabolic process
GO:0044237	0.74	cellular metabolic process
GO:0043170	0.73	macromolecule metabolic process
GO:0044260	0.72	cellular macromolecule metabolic process
GO:0006950	0.72	response to stress
GO:0044710	0.71	single-organism metabolic process
GO:0006807	0.71	nitrogen compound metabolic process
GO:0001666	0.71	response to hypoxia
GO:0044281	0.70	small molecule metabolic process
GO:0019538	0.70	protein metabolic process
GO:1901564	0.69	organonitrogen compound metabolic process
GO:0080090	0.69	regulation of primary metabolic process
GO:0006464	0.69	cellular protein modification process
GO:1901605	0.68	alpha-amino acid metabolic process
GO:0060255	0.68	regulation of macromolecule metabolic process
GO:0018193	0.68	peptidyl-amino acid modification
GO:0006575	0.68	cellular modified amino acid metabolic process
GO:0018401	0.67	peptidyl-proline hydroxylation to 4-hydroxy-L-proline
GO:0048522	0.64	positive regulation of cellular process
GO:0031323	0.64	regulation of cellular metabolic process
GO:0010941	0.63	regulation of cell death
GO:1901214	0.62	regulation of neuron death
GO:0042981	0.56	regulation of apoptotic process
GO:0010604	0.54	positive regulation of macromolecule metabolic process
GO:0065009	0.52	regulation of molecular function

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Biological Process. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Cellular Component (CC)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0044424	1.00	intracellular part
GO:0043226	0.72	organelle
GO:0043229	0.71	intracellular organelle
GO:0043231	0.69	intracellular membrane-bounded organelle
GO:0005634	0.66	nucleus
GO:0044446	0.52	intracellular organelle part

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Cellular Component. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Predicted Enzyme Commission (EC) Numbers

Top 5 enzyme homologs in PDB

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	EC Number	Predicted Active Site Residues
1	0.107	1w9yA	0.642	4.20	0.128	0.854	1.14.17.4	NA
2	0.067	2a1xA	0.634	3.80	0.101	0.799	1.14.11.18	NA
3	0.060	1rtvA	0.427	3.83	0.046	0.552	5.1.3.13	183
4	0.060	3ms5A	0.498	2.93	0.108	0.586	1.14.11.1	183
5	0.060	1qf6A	0.432	5.91	0.062	0.720	6.1.1.3	NA

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted active site residues.
(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the Enzyme Commission (EC) number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Ligand Binding Sites

Template proteins with similar binding site:

Rank	Cscore^LB	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	BS-score	Lig. Name	Download Complex	Predicted binding site residues
1	0.58	2g19A	0.894	0.64	0.653	0.904	1.67	UUU	complex1.pdb.gz	76,78,121,125,132,135,137,149,151,165,196,198,205
2	0.11	3hqrA	0.854	2.23	0.626	0.912	1.28	III	complex2.pdb.gz	80,98,102,116,117,119,132,134,135,136,137,139,142,144,192,211,212,213,218
3	0.09	3purA	0.610	4.10	0.115	0.816	0.61	UUU	complex3.pdb.gz	75,132,135,137,196,198

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted binding site and residues.
(a)	Cscore^LB is the confidence score of predicted binding site. Cscore^LB values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable ligand-binding site prediction.
(b)	BS-score is a measure of local similarity (sequence & structure) between template binding site and predicted binding site in the query structure. Based on large scale benchmarking analysis, we have observed that a BS-score >1 reflects a significant local match between the predicted and template binding site.
(c)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(d)	RMSD^a the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(e)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(f)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

References:
1.	Wei Zheng, Chengxin Zhang, Yang Li, Robin Pearce, Eric W. Bell, Yang Zhang. Folding non-homology proteins by coupling deep-learning contact maps with I-TASSER assembly simulations. In preparation, 2020.