D-I-TASSER Q9C0H9

D-I-TASSER results for Q9C0H9

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

Summary of the Protein

Uniprot ID: Q9C0H9
Protein Name: SRC kinase signaling inhibitor 1
Gene Name: SRCIN1

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>Q9C0H9 (1183 residues)
MGNAPSQDPERSSPPMLSADDAEYPREYRTLGGGGGGGSGGRRFSNVGLVHTSERRHTVI
AAQSLEALSGLQKADADRKRDAFMDHLKSKYPQHALALRGQQDRMREQPNYWSFKTRSSR
HTQGAQPGLADQAAKLSYASAESLETMSEAELPLGFSRMNRFRQSLPLSRSASQTKLRSP
GVLFLQFGEETRRVHITHEVSSLDTLHALIAHMFPQKLTMGMLKSPNTAILIKDEARNVF
YELEDVRDIQDRSIIKIYRKEPLYAAFPGSHLTNGDLRREMVYASRESSPTRRLNNLSPA
PHLASGSPPPGLPSGLPSGLQSGSPSRSRLSYAGGRPPSYAGSPVHHAAERLGGAPAAQG
VSPSPSAILERRDVKPDEDLASKAGGMVLVKGEGLYADPYGLLHEGRLSLAAAAGDPFAY
PGAGGLYKRGSVRSLSTYSAAALQSDLEDSLYKAAGGGGPLYGDGYGFRLPPSSPQKLAD
VAAPPGGPPPPHSPYSGPPSRGSPVRQSFRKDSGSSSVFAESPGGKTRSAGSASTAGAPP
SELFPGPGERSLVGFGPPVPAKDTETRERMEAMEKQIASLTGLVQSALLRGSEPETPSEK
IEGSNGAATPSAPCGSGGRSSGATPVSGPPPPSASSTPAGQPTAVSRLQMQLHLRGLQNS
ASDLRGQLQQLRKLQLQNQESVRALLKRTEAELSMRVSEAARRQEDPLQRQRTLVEEERL
RYLNDEELITQQLNDLEKSVEKIQRDVSHNHRLVPGPELEEKALVLKQLGETLTELKAHF
PGLQSKMRVVLRVEVEAVKFLKEEPQRLDGLLKRCRGVTDTLAQIRRQVDEGVWPPPNNL
LSQSPKKVTAETDFNKSVDFEMPPPSPPLNLHELSGPAEGASLTPKGGNPTKGLDTPGKR
SVDKAVSVEAAERDWEEKRAALTQYSAKDINRLLEETQAELLKAIPDLDCASKAHPGPAP
TPDHKPPKAPHGQKAAPRTEPSGRRGSDELTVPRYRTEKPSKSPPPPPPRRSFPSSHGLT
TTRTGEVVVTSKKDSAFIKKAESEELEVQKPQVKLRRAVSEVARPASTPPIMASAIKDED
DEDRIIAELESGGGSVPPMKVVTPGASRLKAAQGQAGSPDKSKHGKQRAEYMRIQAQQQA
TKPSKEMSGSNETSSPVSEKPSASRTSIPVLTSFGARNSSISF

Predicted Contact and Distance Map Used in D-I-TASSER simulation

Contact Map

Distance Map

D-I-TASSER simulation is guided by the consensus contact map (left figure) and distance map (right figure) derived based on confidence scores of AttentionPotential. In the contact, distance map and hydrogen bond networks, the axes mark the residue index along the sequence. For the contact map, each dot represents a residue pair with predicted contact, while for the distance map and hydrogen bond network, a color scale represents a distance of 1-20+ angstroms or a angle of 0-180 degree.

Information of Domain

No. of Domain	Domain	Domain Boundary	Length of Domain	Models of Domain	Sequence
1	Q9C0H9-D1	1-1183	1183		MGNAPSQDPERSSPPMLSADDAEYPREYRTLGGGGGGGSGGRRFSNVGLVHTSERRHTVIAAQSLEALSGLQKADADRKRDAFMDHLKSKYPQHALALRGQQDRMREQPNYWSFKTRSSRHTQGAQPGLADQAAKLSYASAESLETMSEAELPLGFSRMNRFRQSLPLSRSASQTKLRSPGVLFLQFGEETRRVHITHEVSSLDTLHALIAHMFPQKLTMGMLKSPNTAILIKDEARNVFYELEDVRDIQDRSIIKIYRKEPLYAAFPGSHLTNGDLRREMVYASRESSPTRRLNNLSPAPHLASGSPPPGLPSGLPSGLQSGSPSRSRLSYAGGRPPSYAGSPVHHAAERLGGAPAAQGVSPSPSAILERRDVKPDEDLASKAGGMVLVKGEGLYADPYGLLHEGRLSLAAAAGDPFAYPGAGGLYKRGSVRSLSTYSAAALQSDLEDSLYKAAGGGGPLYGDGYGFRLPPSSPQKLADVAAPPGGPPPPHSPYSGPPSRGSPVRQSFRKDSGSSSVFAESPGGKTRSAGSASTAGAPPSELFPGPGERSLVGFGPPVPAKDTETRERMEAMEKQIASLTGLVQSALLRGSEPETPSEKIEGSNGAATPSAPCGSGGRSSGATPVSGPPPPSASSTPAGQPTAVSRLQMQLHLRGLQNSASDLRGQLQQLRKLQLQNQESVRALLKRTEAELSMRVSEAARRQEDPLQRQRTLVEEERLRYLNDEELITQQLNDLEKSVEKIQRDVSHNHRLVPGPELEEKALVLKQLGETLTELKAHFPGLQSKMRVVLRVEVEAVKFLKEEPQRLDGLLKRCRGVTDTLAQIRRQVDEGVWPPPNNLLSQSPKKVTAETDFNKSVDFEMPPPSPPLNLHELSGPAEGASLTPKGGNPTKGLDTPGKRSVDKAVSVEAAERDWEEKRAALTQYSAKDINRLLEETQAELLKAIPDLDCASKAHPGPAPTPDHKPPKAPHGQKAAPRTEPSGRRGSDELTVPRYRTEKPSKSPPPPPPRRSFPSSHGLTTTRTGEVVVTSKKDSAFIKKAESEELEVQKPQVKLRRAVSEVARPASTPPIMASAIKDEDDEDRIIAELESGGGSVPPMKVVTPGASRLKAAQGQAGSPDKSKHGKQRAEYMRIQAQQQATKPSKEMSGSNETSSPVSEKPSASRTSIPVLTSFGARNSSISF

Top 1 final models from D-I-TASSER

Click to view	Rank^a	Download	Estimated TM-score^b
	1	model1.pdb.gz	0.3763

(a)

D-I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, i.e. decoys. These decoys are clustered by SPICKER based on pairwise structure similarity to report up to five final models from the five largest clusters. Models are ranked in descending order of cluster size. If the simulations converge well, it is possible to have less than 5 models generated, which is usually an indication of good model quality.

(b)

The model confidence is quantitatified by estimated TM-score (eTM-score), calculated based on significance of threading template alignments, contact map satisfaction rate, mean absolute error between distance of model and distance of AttentionPotential, and convergence of D-I-TASSER simulations. eTM-score is typically in the range of [0, 1], with higher eTM-score signifies higher model confidence.

Proteins with similar structure

Top 10 structural analogs in PDB (as identified by TM-align)

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	Download Alignment
1	6mu1A	0.24	9.18	0.055	0.364	model1_6mu1A.pdb.gz
2	6ar6A	0.22	9.36	0.040	0.338	model1_6ar6A.pdb.gz
3	3javA	0.22	9.63	0.045	0.346	model1_3javA.pdb.gz
4	6w2dJ	0.22	9.53	0.042	0.340	model1_6w2dJ.pdb.gz
5	6eqoA	0.21	9.33	0.054	0.326	model1_6eqoA.pdb.gz
6	6b43A	0.21	9.78	0.034	0.331	model1_6b43A.pdb.gz
7	6yxuD	0.21	9.11	0.033	0.315	model1_6yxuD.pdb.gz
8	6reyc	0.21	9.53	0.032	0.320	model1_6reyc.pdb.gz
9	6b434	0.21	9.90	0.051	0.327	model1_6b434.pdb.gz
10	5vkuL	0.21	9.69	0.050	0.325	model1_5vkuL.pdb.gz

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Gene Ontology (GO) Terms

Molecular Function (MF)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0019899	0.77	enzyme binding
GO:0019901	0.75	protein kinase binding

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Molecular Function. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Biological Process (BP)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0032502	0.95	developmental process
GO:0065007	0.88	biological regulation
GO:0050789	0.88	regulation of biological process
GO:0050794	0.87	regulation of cellular process
GO:0009987	0.87	cellular process
GO:0044699	0.85	single-organism process
GO:0044763	0.82	single-organism cellular process
GO:0048518	0.81	positive regulation of biological process
GO:0051128	0.79	regulation of cellular component organization
GO:0048523	0.79	negative regulation of cellular process
GO:0048522	0.79	positive regulation of cellular process
GO:0016043	0.79	cellular component organization
GO:0080090	0.77	regulation of primary metabolic process
GO:0051239	0.77	regulation of multicellular organismal process
GO:0044767	0.77	single-organism developmental process
GO:0031324	0.77	negative regulation of cellular metabolic process
GO:0010605	0.77	negative regulation of macromolecule metabolic process
GO:2000026	0.76	regulation of multicellular organismal development
GO:0009653	0.76	anatomical structure morphogenesis
GO:0098602	0.75	single organism cell adhesion
GO:0065009	0.75	regulation of molecular function
GO:0051960	0.75	regulation of nervous system development
GO:0048869	0.75	cellular developmental process
GO:0032879	0.75	regulation of localization
GO:0031325	0.75	positive regulation of cellular metabolic process
GO:0010604	0.75	positive regulation of macromolecule metabolic process
GO:0001933	0.75	negative regulation of protein phosphorylation
GO:0061099	0.74	negative regulation of protein tyrosine kinase activity
GO:0061098	0.74	positive regulation of protein tyrosine kinase activity
GO:0061001	0.74	regulation of dendritic spine morphogenesis
GO:0034446	0.74	substrate adhesion-dependent cell spreading
GO:0030334	0.74	regulation of cell migration

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Biological Process. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Cellular Component (CC)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0044464	1.00	cell part
GO:0044424	0.99	intracellular part
GO:0005737	0.91	cytoplasm
GO:0043226	0.82	organelle
GO:0043229	0.81	intracellular organelle
GO:0097458	0.75	neuron part
GO:0043232	0.74	intracellular non-membrane-bounded organelle
GO:0044456	0.73	synapse part
GO:0043005	0.73	neuron projection
GO:0005856	0.73	cytoskeleton
GO:0045202	0.72	synapse
GO:0030425	0.72	dendrite
GO:0030424	0.72	axon
GO:0015629	0.72	actin cytoskeleton
GO:0014069	0.72	postsynaptic density
GO:0030054	0.54	cell junction

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Cellular Component. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Predicted Enzyme Commission (EC) Numbers

Top 5 enzyme homologs in PDB

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	EC Number	Predicted Active Site Residues
1	0.060	3ikmD	0.171	9.10	0.033	0.257	2.7.7.7	NA
2	0.060	1gthA	0.165	9.91	0.020	0.266	1.3.1.2	291
3	0.060	1n1hA	0.160	9.13	0.043	0.242	2.7.7.48	NA
4	0.060	2jfdA	0.088	7.20	0.052	0.117	2.3.1.85	NA
5	0.060	1qhaA	0.134	9.33	0.039	0.207	2.7.1.1	NA

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted active site residues.
(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the Enzyme Commission (EC) number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Ligand Binding Sites

Template proteins with similar binding site:

No Binding sites was predicted

Click to view	Rank	Cscore^LB	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	BS-score	Lig. Name	Download Complex	Predicted binding site residues

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted binding site and residues.
(a)	Cscore^LB is the confidence score of predicted binding site. Cscore^LB values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable ligand-binding site prediction.
(b)	BS-score is a measure of local similarity (sequence & structure) between template binding site and predicted binding site in the query structure. Based on large scale benchmarking analysis, we have observed that a BS-score >1 reflects a significant local match between the predicted and template binding site.
(c)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(d)	RMSD^a the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(e)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(f)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

References:
1.	Wei Zheng, Chengxin Zhang, Yang Li, Robin Pearce, Eric W. Bell, Yang Zhang. Folding non-homology proteins by coupling deep-learning contact maps with I-TASSER assembly simulations. In preparation, 2020.