D-I-TASSER Q9BYX4-D1

D-I-TASSER results for Q9BYX4-D1

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>Q9BYX4 (103 residues)
MSNGYSTDENFRYLISCFRARVKMYIQVEPVLDYLTFLPAEVKEQIQRTVATSGNMQAVE
LLLSTLEKGVWHLGWTREFVEALRRTGSPLAARYMNPELTDLP

Predicted Secondary Structure

Sequence	20 40 60 80 100 \| \| \| \| \| MSNGYSTDENFRYLISCFRARVKMYIQVEPVLDYLTFLPAEVKEQIQRTVATSGNMQAVELLLSTLEKGVWHLGWTREFVEALRRTGSPLAARYMNPELTDLP
Prediction	CCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCHSSHHHCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHCCCHHHHHHHCHHCCCCC
Confidence	9987423589999999999988633011232201235898899999999980496899999999999225899829999999998097899998561035798
	H:Helix; S:Strand; C:Coil

Predicted Solvent Accessibility

Sequence	20 40 60 80 100 \| \| \| \| \| MSNGYSTDENFRYLISCFRARVKMYIQVEPVLDYLTFLPAEVKEQIQRTVATSGNMQAVELLLSTLEKGVWHLGWTREFVEALRRTGSPLAARYMNPELTDLP
Prediction	8675454353022004102520442040431142042047742540455367624250043005203634474411420140047342520052146634748
	Values range from 0 (buried residue) to 8 (highly exposed residue)

Predicted Contact, Hydrogen and Distance Map Used in D-I-TASSER simulation

Contact Map

Distance Map

Hydrogen bond networks

D-I-TASSER simulation is guided by the consensus contact map (left figure), distance map (middle figure) and Hydrogen bond network (right figure) derived based on confidence scores of AttentionPotential. In the contact, distance map and hydrogen bond networks, the axes mark the residue index along the sequence. For the contact map, each dot represents a residue pair with predicted contact, while for the distance map and hydrogen bond network, a color scale represents a distance of 1-20+ angstroms or a angle of 0-180 degree.

Top 10 threading templates used by D-I-TASSER

Rank

PDB
hit

ID1

ID2

Cov

Norm.
Zscore

Download
alignment

                  20                  40                  60                  80                 100

                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |

SS
Seq

CCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCHSSHHHCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHCCCHHHHHHHCHHCCCCC
MSNGYSTDENFRYLISCFRARVKMYIQVEPVLDYLTFLPAEVKEQIQRTVATSGNMQAVELLLSTLEKGVWHLGWTREFVEALRRTGSPLAARYMNPELTDLP

4o9fA

0.20

0.17

5.60

1.33

DEthreader

------MTVAEDKTFQYIRHNF-SRIHVLEILPYLSCLTTSDQDRLRATYERWGNQDTLLELFTSLR-C-RN-GWVHSLIGALRACELSGLADEVARIYH-S-

3j6cA

0.23

0.20

6.41

1.56

SPARKS-K

---MAFAEDKTYKYICRNFSNFC-NVDVVEILPYLPCLTARDQDRLRATCTLSGNRDTLWHLFNTLQRR---PGWVEYFIAALRGCELVDLADEVASVYQ---

2lwdA

0.20

0.17

5.61

1.63

MapAlign

--KKIEKLEEYRLLLKRLQPEFKTRIIPTDIISDLECLINQECEEILQICSTKGMMAGAEKLVECLLR-SDKENWPKTLKLALEKERN-KFSELWV-------

2lwdA

0.20

0.18

5.90

1.10

CEthreader

--KKIEKLEEYRLLLKRLQPEFKTRIIPTDIISDLECLINQECEEILQICSTKGMMAGAEKLVECLLRS-DKENWPKTLKLALEKERN-KFSELWIVEK----

4nqkA1

0.23

0.20

6.41

1.35

MUSTER

M------TTEQRRSLQAFQDYIRKTLDPTYILSYMA-FREEEVQYIQAEKNNKGPMEAATLFLKFLLEL-QEEGWFRGFLDALDHAGYSGLYEAIESWDFK--

4o9fA

0.22

0.20

6.42

2.05

HHsearch

MTV--AEDKTF-QYIRQHHSNF-SRIHVLEILPYLSCLTTSDQDRLRATYERWGNQDTLLELFTSLRCR---NGWVHSLIGALRACELSGLADEVARIYHS--

3j6cA

0.26

0.23

7.19

1.40

FFAS-3D

MA--FAEDKTYKYICRNFSN--FCNVDVVEILPYLPCLTARDQDRLRATCTLSGNRDTLWHLFNTLQRR---PGWVEYFIAALRGCELVDLADEVASVYQ---

3ygsP

0.23

0.21

6.68

1.12

EigenThreader

-----SMDEADRRLLRRCRLRLVEELQVDQLWDVRELFRPHMIEDIQRAG-SGSRRDQARQLIIDLE--TRGSQALPLFISCLEDTGQDMLASFLRTNRQAG-

6bzhA

0.24

0.22

6.94

0.88

CNFpred

--------AEQRQNLQAFRDYIKKILDPTYILSYMSWLEDEEVQYIQAEKNNKGPMEAASLFLQYLLK-LQSEGWFQAFLDALYHAGYCGLCEAIESDFQKIE

3ygsP

0.23

0.21

6.68

1.33

DEthreader

---S-M-DEADRRLLRRCRLRLVEELQVDQLWDVLELFRPHMIEDIQRAG-SGSRRDQARQLIIDLE-T-RGSQALPLFISCLEDTGQDMLASFLRTNRQ-AG

(a)	ID1 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by number of aligned residues.
(b)	ID2 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by query sequence length.
(c)	Cov is equal the number of aligned template residues divided by query sequence length.
(d)	Norm. Zscore is the normalized Z-score of the threading alignments. A Normalized Z-score >1 means a good alignment and is highlighted in bold.
(e)	Download alignment lists the threading program used to identify the template, and provide the 3D structure of aligned regions of threading templates (threading[1-10].pdb.gz).
(f)	Template residues identical to query sequence are highlighted in color.

Top 1 final models from D-I-TASSER

Click to view	Rank^a	Download	Estimated TM-score^b
	1	model1.pdb.gz	0.7915

(a)

D-I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, i.e. decoys. These decoys are clustered by SPICKER based on pairwise structure similarity to report up to five final models from the five largest clusters. Models are ranked in descending order of cluster size. If the simulations converge well, it is possible to have less than 5 models generated, which is usually an indication of good model quality.

(b)

The model confidence is quantitatified by estimated TM-score (eTM-score), calculated based on significance of threading template alignments, contact map satisfaction rate, mean absolute error between distance of model and distance of AttentionPotential, and convergence of D-I-TASSER simulations. eTM-score is typically in the range of [0, 1], with higher eTM-score signifies higher model confidence.

Proteins with similar structure

Top 10 structural analogs in PDB (as identified by TM-align)

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	Download Alignment
1	3j6cA	0.82	1.27	0.226	0.903	model1_3j6cA.pdb.gz
2	4o9fA	0.81	1.51	0.191	0.913	model1_4o9fA.pdb.gz
3	3ygsP	0.79	1.80	0.234	0.913	model1_3ygsP.pdb.gz
4	4nqkA1	0.78	1.47	0.213	0.883	model1_4nqkA1.pdb.gz
5	2lwdA	0.77	1.72	0.189	0.913	model1_2lwdA.pdb.gz
6	2a5yB	0.76	1.87	0.130	0.893	model1_2a5yB.pdb.gz
7	2gf5A2	0.56	3.16	0.120	0.893	model1_2gf5A2.pdb.gz
8	3iytA1	0.40	4.18	0.077	0.718	model1_3iytA1.pdb.gz
9	1rt8A3	0.37	4.16	0.104	0.583	model1_1rt8A3.pdb.gz
10	3f4wA	0.36	4.64	0.076	0.650	model1_3f4wA.pdb.gz

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Gene Ontology (GO) Terms

Molecular Function (MF)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:1901363	0.86	heterocyclic compound binding
GO:0097159	0.86	organic cyclic compound binding
GO:0003676	0.82	nucleic acid binding
GO:0003723	0.81	RNA binding
GO:0003725	0.79	double-stranded RNA binding
GO:0046872	0.60	metal ion binding
GO:0044877	0.58	macromolecular complex binding
GO:0008270	0.58	zinc ion binding
GO:0043021	0.56	ribonucleoprotein complex binding
GO:0003727	0.56	single-stranded RNA binding

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Molecular Function. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Biological Process (BP)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0050896	0.88	response to stimulus
GO:0002376	0.87	immune system process
GO:0065007	0.86	biological regulation
GO:0050789	0.86	regulation of biological process
GO:0045087	0.86	innate immune response
GO:0050794	0.84	regulation of cellular process
GO:0009987	0.75	cellular process
GO:0008152	0.70	metabolic process
GO:0071704	0.69	organic substance metabolic process
GO:0044238	0.69	primary metabolic process
GO:0048518	0.68	positive regulation of biological process
GO:0044237	0.68	cellular metabolic process
GO:0043170	0.68	macromolecule metabolic process
GO:0044260	0.67	cellular macromolecule metabolic process
GO:0007165	0.66	signal transduction
GO:0051239	0.65	regulation of multicellular organismal process
GO:0048583	0.64	regulation of response to stimulus
GO:0001817	0.64	regulation of cytokine production
GO:0080134	0.63	regulation of response to stress
GO:0048584	0.63	positive regulation of response to stimulus
GO:0019538	0.63	protein metabolic process
GO:0016032	0.63	viral process
GO:0002682	0.63	regulation of immune system process
GO:0001819	0.63	positive regulation of cytokine production
GO:0070647	0.62	protein modification by small protein conjugation or removal
GO:0035556	0.62	intracellular signal transduction
GO:0032479	0.62	regulation of type I interferon production
GO:0009615	0.62	response to virus
GO:0002221	0.62	pattern recognition receptor signaling pathway
GO:0039530	0.61	MDA-5 signaling pathway
GO:0032728	0.61	positive regulation of interferon-beta production
GO:0032727	0.61	positive regulation of interferon-alpha production
GO:0016925	0.61	protein sumoylation

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Biological Process. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Cellular Component (CC)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0044424	1.00	intracellular part
GO:0044444	0.73	cytoplasmic part
GO:0005829	0.67	cytosol

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Cellular Component. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Predicted Enzyme Commission (EC) Numbers

Top 5 enzyme homologs in PDB

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	EC Number	Predicted Active Site Residues
1	0.060	2frvD	0.541	3.99	0.050	0.942	1.12.2.1	NA
2	0.060	2w8nA	0.417	4.26	0.047	0.757	1.2.1.24	NA
3	0.060	2d4eC	0.490	4.15	0.096	0.854	1.2.1.60	NA
4	0.060	1frvB	0.543	3.96	0.040	0.922	1.12.2.1	NA
5	0.060	1uwkA	0.495	3.89	0.040	0.825	4.2.1.49	37,66

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted active site residues.
(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the Enzyme Commission (EC) number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Ligand Binding Sites

Template proteins with similar binding site:

Rank	Cscore^LB	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	BS-score	Lig. Name	Download Complex	Predicted binding site residues
1	0.03	1d2z0	0.580	3.05	0.161	0.874	0.50	III	complex1.pdb.gz	35,64,70,71,83
2	0.02	2nsn0	0.612	2.10	0.143	0.748	0.48	III	complex2.pdb.gz	18,21,22,26,86,88
3	0.01	3svhB	0.512	3.56	0.051	0.738	0.54	KRG	complex3.pdb.gz	56,59,83
4	0.01	2rnxA	0.529	3.37	0.012	0.786	0.43	III	complex4.pdb.gz	21,22,29,30,32,35,78,79,81,82,83,84,88

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted binding site and residues.
(a)	Cscore^LB is the confidence score of predicted binding site. Cscore^LB values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable ligand-binding site prediction.
(b)	BS-score is a measure of local similarity (sequence & structure) between template binding site and predicted binding site in the query structure. Based on large scale benchmarking analysis, we have observed that a BS-score >1 reflects a significant local match between the predicted and template binding site.
(c)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(d)	RMSD^a the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(e)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(f)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

References:
1.	Wei Zheng, Chengxin Zhang, Yang Li, Robin Pearce, Eric W. Bell, Yang Zhang. Folding non-homology proteins by coupling deep-learning contact maps with I-TASSER assembly simulations. In preparation, 2020.