D-I-TASSER Q9BXA9-D1

D-I-TASSER results for Q9BXA9-D1

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>Q9BXA9 (131 residues)
MSRRKQAKPQHLKSDEELLPPDGAPEHAAPGEGAEDADSGPESRSGGEETSVCEKCCAEF
FKWADFLEHQRSCTKLPPVLIVHEDAPAPPPEDFPEPSPASSPSERAESEAAEEAGAEGA
EGEARPVEKEA

Predicted Secondary Structure

Sequence	20 40 60 80 100 120 \| \| \| \| \| \| MSRRKQAKPQHLKSDEELLPPDGAPEHAAPGEGAEDADSGPESRSGGEETSVCEKCCAEFFKWADFLEHQRSCTKLPPVLIVHEDAPAPPPEDFPEPSPASSPSERAESEAAEEAGAEGAEGEARPVEKEA
Prediction	CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHCCHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCSSSSCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC
Confidence	98534688754666423566666544567888766655588777778763136888886379999999998644798668856888999975467778778976544455556788988778655433359
	H:Helix; S:Strand; C:Coil

Predicted Solvent Accessibility

Sequence	20 40 60 80 100 120 \| \| \| \| \| \| MSRRKQAKPQHLKSDEELLPPDGAPEHAAPGEGAEDADSGPESRSGGEETSVCEKCCAEFFKWADFLEHQRSCTKLPPVLIVHEDAPAPPPEDFPEPSPASSPSERAESEAAEEAGAEGAEGEARPVEKEA
Prediction	75446454344044557446664446445556457546636564565642430540244134144015135614753210114565745456734754467455644466457557564562655646688
	Values range from 0 (buried residue) to 8 (highly exposed residue)

Predicted Contact, Hydrogen and Distance Map Used in D-I-TASSER simulation

Contact Map

Distance Map

Hydrogen bond networks

D-I-TASSER simulation is guided by the consensus contact map (left figure), distance map (middle figure) and Hydrogen bond network (right figure) derived based on confidence scores of AttentionPotential. In the contact, distance map and hydrogen bond networks, the axes mark the residue index along the sequence. For the contact map, each dot represents a residue pair with predicted contact, while for the distance map and hydrogen bond network, a color scale represents a distance of 1-20+ angstroms or a angle of 0-180 degree.

Top 10 threading templates used by D-I-TASSER

Rank

PDB
hit

ID1

ID2

Cov

Norm.
Zscore

Download
alignment

                  20                  40                  60                  80                 100                 120

                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |

SS
Seq

CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHCCHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCSSSSCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC
MSRRKQAKPQHLKSDEELLPPDGAPEHAAPGEGAEDADSGPESRSGGEETSVCEKCCAEFFKWADFLEHQRSCTKLPPVLIVHEDAPAPPPEDFPEPSPASSPSERAESEAAEEAGAEGAEGEARPVEKEA

1vw4J

0.07

2.85

0.44

CEthreader

FTNVGAKPLKELNLKRFHDKNRLHLQPGEVLDMNKMRKLGLVTGPIKYGVKILAALEASRASAKAIAAIEKAGGKFTARYYTPLGNPQWFLEKRGRVPLQARPTKRRDIDFYSKEEKRGYLVMEKDKLLQD

5wlcLJ

0.05

2.22

0.57

EigenThreader

YNPRTILTHPTHVSDDRVATDYVRYDGLRSSGSTPISPTNNTSNNFNKAVTCMQSALIASSLDGHV--KVFDPLDNFQVAVSPSTAQGNFKWSEALDNAFVPGMAKELTLTVLQELRKRGKVRVALYGRDE

6wkrP1

0.15

0.08

2.56

0.34

FFAS-3D

-----------------------------------------------NIAYNCDQCQACFNSSPDLADHIRSIHVDGQ----RGGVFVCLWKGCKVYNTPSTSQSWLQRHMLTHSG---------------

6em5m

0.08

0.07

2.75

0.95

SPARKS-K

IIPPKKLKEMKEKEKIENYQDSTETNDHVMHAPKLPPPTNEESYNPPEEYL---------LSPEEKEAWENTEYSER-----ERNFIPQKYSALRKVPGYGESIRERFERSLDLYLAPRVRKNKLNIDPNS

5odcB

0.21

0.05

1.70

0.56

CNFpred

--------------------------------------------------NVCPFCHLQFDRGQIEIKEKFGKEYNFPVLHLSQ-----------------------------------------------

5xjcA

0.02

1.30

0.83

DEthreader

ENDIN------VYKWCQNNLQIAEAAHPI----DLIQYLTPDPNNENIVYNNKKCWRRMRVGRFWSFVSLFNMCGFECRI-L--CRTSYEEFTHKVWLRFRVTLLLLVKCENKI--TRIKFYMLSGHVLLI

5fmgJ

0.07

0.06

2.51

0.63

MapAlign

------------------LGMSGSNCVAIACDLRLGANTFTTVSTKFSKIFKMNNVYVGLSIQTLYEILRYRVMDVECFVVGFKYEPYLTAAKCETRDFVVNGVTSEQLFGMCESLYVKDQDENGLFETIS

5y6pC1

0.11

4.09

0.72

MUSTER

QDPLDNAPLRHYVPRPVETYEDRGFATILPREGETNTIGAGDIEPVTKKVPVDAASTGAFVEYARMMKEERAQALADQARRNSAPTSGRPTCGETEGTEFVSNARPILVDGVKVVEYWGVPNGPVPRLFGG

1fu9A

0.20

0.05

1.71

0.95

HHsearch

------------------------------------------GSAAEVMKKYCSTCDISFNYVKTYLAHKQYCKNKP------------------------------------------------------

5lpiD

0.09

0.08

3.18

0.44

CEthreader

------------PHMDEHYLDNLCIFCGERSEEFTEEGLDLHYWKHCLMLTRCDHCKQVVEISSLTEHLLTECDKKDGFGKCYRCSEAVFKEELPRHIKHKDCNPAKPEKLANRCPLCHENFSPGEEAWKA

(a)	ID1 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by number of aligned residues.
(b)	ID2 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by query sequence length.
(c)	Cov is equal the number of aligned template residues divided by query sequence length.
(d)	Norm. Zscore is the normalized Z-score of the threading alignments. A Normalized Z-score >1 means a good alignment and is highlighted in bold.
(e)	Download alignment lists the threading program used to identify the template, and provide the 3D structure of aligned regions of threading templates (threading[1-10].pdb.gz).
(f)	Template residues identical to query sequence are highlighted in color.

Top 1 final models from D-I-TASSER

Click to view	Rank^a	Download	Estimated TM-score^b
	1	model1.pdb.gz	0.5159

(a)

D-I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, i.e. decoys. These decoys are clustered by SPICKER based on pairwise structure similarity to report up to five final models from the five largest clusters. Models are ranked in descending order of cluster size. If the simulations converge well, it is possible to have less than 5 models generated, which is usually an indication of good model quality.

(b)

The model confidence is quantitatified by estimated TM-score (eTM-score), calculated based on significance of threading template alignments, contact map satisfaction rate, mean absolute error between distance of model and distance of AttentionPotential, and convergence of D-I-TASSER simulations. eTM-score is typically in the range of [0, 1], with higher eTM-score signifies higher model confidence.

Proteins with similar structure

Top 10 structural analogs in PDB (as identified by TM-align)

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	Download Alignment
1	5n4aA	0.46	4.90	0.042	0.878	model1_5n4aA.pdb.gz
2	2bihA	0.46	4.80	0.050	0.855	model1_2bihA.pdb.gz
3	4pw3A	0.46	4.73	0.041	0.824	model1_4pw3A.pdb.gz
4	2xtsA	0.45	4.72	0.067	0.801	model1_2xtsA.pdb.gz
5	1soxA	0.45	4.96	0.058	0.840	model1_1soxA.pdb.gz
6	1ogpA	0.44	4.89	0.074	0.832	model1_1ogpA.pdb.gz
7	2blfA	0.43	4.94	0.066	0.794	model1_2blfA.pdb.gz
8	1xdqC	0.37	5.24	0.089	0.725	model1_1xdqC.pdb.gz
9	1ia7A	0.36	5.19	0.043	0.679	model1_1ia7A.pdb.gz
10	5e6rA1	0.35	5.26	0.060	0.664	model1_5e6rA1.pdb.gz

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Gene Ontology (GO) Terms

Molecular Function (MF)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0003677	0.95	DNA binding
GO:0044212	0.94	transcription regulatory region DNA binding
GO:0043565	0.94	sequence-specific DNA binding
GO:0003700	0.94	transcription factor activity, sequence-specific DNA binding

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Molecular Function. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Biological Process (BP)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0044699	0.99	single-organism process
GO:0050794	0.98	regulation of cellular process
GO:0009987	0.95	cellular process
GO:0006355	0.95	regulation of transcription, DNA-templated
GO:0032774	0.90	RNA biosynthetic process
GO:0006351	0.89	transcription, DNA-templated
GO:0006366	0.88	transcription from RNA polymerase II promoter
GO:0007165	0.85	signal transduction
GO:0032502	0.63	developmental process
GO:0044767	0.61	single-organism developmental process
GO:0044763	0.61	single-organism cellular process
GO:0048869	0.57	cellular developmental process
GO:0048856	0.54	anatomical structure development
GO:0030154	0.53	cell differentiation

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Biological Process. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Cellular Component (CC)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0043229	1.00	intracellular organelle
GO:0005634	0.99	nucleus

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Cellular Component. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Predicted Enzyme Commission (EC) Numbers

Top 5 enzyme homologs in PDB

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	EC Number	Predicted Active Site Residues
1	0.060	2jjdF	0.411	5.07	0.049	0.748	3.1.3.48	NA
2	0.060	2biiA	0.455	4.84	0.041	0.840	1.7.1.3	NA
3	0.060	1larA	0.419	4.74	0.044	0.733	3.1.3.48	NA
4	0.060	1djoA	0.424	4.77	0.065	0.733	3.5.1.38	NA
5	0.060	2fy3A	0.414	4.81	0.009	0.741	2.3.1.6	NA

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted active site residues.
(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the Enzyme Commission (EC) number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Ligand Binding Sites

Template proteins with similar binding site:

Click to view	Rank	Cscore^LB	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	BS-score	Lig. Name	Download Complex	Predicted binding site residues
	1	0.01	1zj9A	0.450	4.80	0.049	0.817	0.36	SF4	complex1.pdb.gz	108,111,118,122,124,126,127

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted binding site and residues.
(a)	Cscore^LB is the confidence score of predicted binding site. Cscore^LB values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable ligand-binding site prediction.
(b)	BS-score is a measure of local similarity (sequence & structure) between template binding site and predicted binding site in the query structure. Based on large scale benchmarking analysis, we have observed that a BS-score >1 reflects a significant local match between the predicted and template binding site.
(c)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(d)	RMSD^a the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(e)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(f)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

References:
1.	Wei Zheng, Chengxin Zhang, Yang Li, Robin Pearce, Eric W. Bell, Yang Zhang. Folding non-homology proteins by coupling deep-learning contact maps with I-TASSER assembly simulations. In preparation, 2020.