D-I-TASSER Q9BSJ2

D-I-TASSER results for Q9BSJ2

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

Summary of the Protein

Uniprot ID: Q9BSJ2
Protein Name: Gamma-tubulin complex component 2
Gene Name: TUBGCP2

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>Q9BSJ2 (902 residues)
MSEFRIHHDVNELLSLLRVHGGDGAEVYIDLLQKNRTPYVTTTVSAHSAKVKIAEFSRTP
EDFLKKYDELKSKNTRNLDPLVYLLSKLTEDKETLQYLQQNAKERAELAAAAVGSSTTSI
NVPAAASKISMQELEELRKQLGSVATGSTLQQSLELKRKMLRDKQNKKNSGQHLPIFPAW
VYERPALIGDFLIGAGISTDTALPIGTLPLASQESAVVEDLLYVLVGVDGRYVSAQPLAG
RQSRTFLVDPNLDLSIRELVHRILPVAASYSAVTRFIEEKSSFEYGQVNHALAAAMRTLV
KEHLILVSQLEQLHRQGLLSLQKLWFYIQPAMRTMDILASLATSVDKGECLGGSTLSLLH
DRSFSYTGDSQAQELCLYLTKAASAPYFEVLEKWIYRGIIHDPYSEFMVEEHELRKERIQ
EDYNDKYWDQRYTIVQQQIPSFLQKMADKILSTGKYLNVVRECGHDVTCPVAKEIIYTLK
ERAYVEQIEKAFNYASKVLLDFLMEEKELVAHLRSIKRYFLMDQGDFFVHFMDLAEEELR
KPVEDITPPRLEALLELALRMSTANTDPFKDDLKIDLMPHDLITQLLRVLAIETKQEKAM
AHADPTELALSGLEAFSFDYIVKWPLSLIINRKALTRYQMLFRHMFYCKHVERQLCSVWI
SNKTAKQHSLHSAQWFAGAFTLRQRMLNFVQNIQYYMMFEVMEPTWHILEKNLKSASNID
DVLGHHTGFLDTCLKDCMLTNPELLKVFSKLMSVCVMFTNCMQKFTQSMKLDGELGGQTL
EHSTVLGLPAGAEERARKELARKHLAEHADTVQLVSGFEATINKFDKNFSAHLLDLLARL
SIYSTSDCEHGMASVISRLDFNGFYTERLERLSAERSQKATPQVPVLRGPPAPAPRVAVT
AQ

Predicted Contact and Distance Map Used in D-I-TASSER simulation

Contact Map

Distance Map

D-I-TASSER simulation is guided by the consensus contact map (left figure) and distance map (right figure) derived based on confidence scores of AttentionPotential. In the contact, distance map and hydrogen bond networks, the axes mark the residue index along the sequence. For the contact map, each dot represents a residue pair with predicted contact, while for the distance map and hydrogen bond network, a color scale represents a distance of 1-20+ angstroms or a angle of 0-180 degree.

Information of Domain

No. of Domain	Domain	Domain Boundary	Length of Domain	Models of Domain	Sequence
1	Q9BSJ2-D1	1-162	162		MSEFRIHHDVNELLSLLRVHGGDGAEVYIDLLQKNRTPYVTTTVSAHSAKVKIAEFSRTPEDFLKKYDELKSKNTRNLDPLVYLLSKLTEDKETLQYLQQNAKERAELAAAAVGSSTTSINVPAAASKISMQELEELRKQLGSVATGSTLQQSLELKRKMLR
2	Q9BSJ2-D2	163-352	190		DKQNKKNSGQHLPIFPAWVYERPALIGDFLIGAGISTDTALPIGTLPLASQESAVVEDLLYVLVGVDGRYVSAQPLAGRQSRTFLVDPNLDLSIRELVHRILPVAASYSAVTRFIEEKSSFEYGQVNHALAAAMRTLVKEHLILVSQLEQLHRQGLLSLQKLWFYIQPAMRTMDILASLATSVDKGECLG
3	Q9BSJ2-D3	353-508	156		GSTLSLLHDRSFSYTGDSQAQELCLYLTKAASAPYFEVLEKWIYRGIIHDPYSEFMVEEHELRKERIQEDYNDKYWDQRYTIVQQQIPSFLQKMADKILSTGKYLNVVRECGHDVTCPVAKEIIYTLKERAYVEQIEKAFNYASKVLLDFLMEEKE
4	Q9BSJ2-D4	509-667	159		LVAHLRSIKRYFLMDQGDFFVHFMDLAEEELRKPVEDITPPRLEALLELALRMSTANTDPFKDDLKIDLMPHDLITQLLRVLAIETKQEKAMAHADPTELALSGLEAFSFDYIVKWPLSLIINRKALTRYQMLFRHMFYCKHVERQLCSVWISNKTAKQ
5	Q9BSJ2-D5	668-902	235		HSLHSAQWFAGAFTLRQRMLNFVQNIQYYMMFEVMEPTWHILEKNLKSASNIDDVLGHHTGFLDTCLKDCMLTNPELLKVFSKLMSVCVMFTNCMQKFTQSMKLDGELGGQTLEHSTVLGLPAGAEERARKELARKHLAEHADTVQLVSGFEATINKFDKNFSAHLLDLLARLSIYSTSDCEHGMASVISRLDFNGFYTERLERLSAERSQKATPQVPVLRGPPAPAPRVAVTAQ

Top 1 final models from D-I-TASSER

Click to view	Rank^a	Download	Estimated TM-score^b
	1	model1.pdb.gz	0.54

(a)

D-I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, i.e. decoys. These decoys are clustered by SPICKER based on pairwise structure similarity to report up to five final models from the five largest clusters. Models are ranked in descending order of cluster size. If the simulations converge well, it is possible to have less than 5 models generated, which is usually an indication of good model quality.

(b)

The model confidence is quantitatified by estimated TM-score (eTM-score), calculated based on significance of threading template alignments, contact map satisfaction rate, mean absolute error between distance of model and distance of AttentionPotential, and convergence of D-I-TASSER simulations. eTM-score is typically in the range of [0, 1], with higher eTM-score signifies higher model confidence.

Proteins with similar structure

Top 10 structural analogs in PDB (as identified by TM-align)

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	Download Alignment
1	7anzC	0.60	2.69	0.191	0.637	model1_7anzC.pdb.gz
2	7m2wF	0.59	3.47	0.153	0.645	model1_7m2wF.pdb.gz
3	6v6bB	0.58	2.92	0.253	0.623	model1_6v6bB.pdb.gz
4	6v6bC	0.58	1.95	0.972	0.598	model1_6v6bC.pdb.gz
5	7anzD	0.57	3.26	0.154	0.627	model1_7anzD.pdb.gz
6	3ripA	0.56	3.35	0.180	0.606	model1_3ripA.pdb.gz
7	5flzA	0.54	3.69	0.150	0.601	model1_5flzA.pdb.gz
8	5flzB	0.54	3.80	0.148	0.605	model1_5flzB.pdb.gz
9	6v6cL	0.51	3.02	0.215	0.548	model1_6v6cL.pdb.gz
10	6v69J	0.48	2.96	0.176	0.515	model1_6v69J.pdb.gz

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Gene Ontology (GO) Terms

Molecular Function (MF)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0051011	0.99	microtubule minus-end binding
GO:0043015	0.99	gamma-tubulin binding
GO:0005200	0.99	structural constituent of cytoskeleton

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Molecular Function. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Biological Process (BP)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0044763	1.00	single-organism cellular process
GO:0006996	1.00	organelle organization
GO:0090307	0.99	mitotic spindle assembly
GO:0051415	0.99	interphase microtubule nucleation by interphase microtubule organizing center
GO:0051298	0.99	centrosome duplication
GO:0031122	0.99	cytoplasmic microtubule organization
GO:0007126	0.99	meiotic nuclear division

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Biological Process. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Cellular Component (CC)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0044430	1.00	cytoskeletal part
GO:0005813	0.99	centrosome
GO:0000930	0.99	gamma-tubulin complex
GO:0000923	0.98	equatorial microtubule organizing center
GO:0005816	0.97	spindle pole body
GO:0008275	0.79	gamma-tubulin small complex

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Cellular Component. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Predicted Enzyme Commission (EC) Numbers

Top 5 enzyme homologs in PDB

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	EC Number	Predicted Active Site Residues
1	0.060	2e1qA	0.286	8.44	0.032	0.438	1.17.3.2 1.17.1.4	NA
2	0.060	3eqlM	0.273	8.38	0.029	0.419	2.7.7.6	NA
3	0.060	1ug9A	0.248	9.00	0.021	0.398	3.2.1.70	NA
4	0.060	2pffD	0.286	8.70	0.019	0.445	2.3.1.86	NA
5	0.060	2vuaA	0.170	6.98	0.031	0.234	3.4.24.69	264,304

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted active site residues.
(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the Enzyme Commission (EC) number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Ligand Binding Sites

Template proteins with similar binding site:

Rank	Cscore^LB	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	BS-score	Lig. Name	Download Complex	Predicted binding site residues
1	0.01	2y0pA	0.249	8.32	0.031	0.384	0.12	ACO	complex1.pdb.gz	215,218,228,312
2	0.01	3cmtA	0.305	9.09	0.045	0.500	0.17	ALF	complex2.pdb.gz	219,220,223
3	0.01	2y0pA	0.249	8.32	0.031	0.384	0.11	TD7	complex3.pdb.gz	218,227,228
4	0.01	2xt6A	0.300	8.21	0.046	0.449	0.32	TPP	complex4.pdb.gz	222,224,231
5	0.01	2y0pB	0.243	8.68	0.056	0.378	0.14	ACO	complex5.pdb.gz	215,217,229,231,314,315,316
6	0.01	3cmvD	0.248	9.06	0.043	0.404	0.20	ANP	complex6.pdb.gz	221,222,223,224
7	0.01	3cmvG	0.264	8.67	0.041	0.406	0.14	ANP	complex7.pdb.gz	216,217,229
8	0.01	3cmvE	0.261	8.26	0.040	0.395	0.15	ANP	complex8.pdb.gz	219,220,222,223,224,225
9	0.01	3k6sC	0.211	9.02	0.064	0.342	0.31	CA	complex9.pdb.gz	217,219,222

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted binding site and residues.
(a)	Cscore^LB is the confidence score of predicted binding site. Cscore^LB values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable ligand-binding site prediction.
(b)	BS-score is a measure of local similarity (sequence & structure) between template binding site and predicted binding site in the query structure. Based on large scale benchmarking analysis, we have observed that a BS-score >1 reflects a significant local match between the predicted and template binding site.
(c)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(d)	RMSD^a the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(e)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(f)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

References:
1.	Wei Zheng, Chengxin Zhang, Yang Li, Robin Pearce, Eric W. Bell, Yang Zhang. Folding non-homology proteins by coupling deep-learning contact maps with I-TASSER assembly simulations. In preparation, 2020.