D-I-TASSER Q96PC5-D1

D-I-TASSER results for Q96PC5-D1

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>Q96PC5 (112 residues)
MAKFGVHRILLLAISLTKCLESTKLLADLKKCGDLECEALINRVSAMRDYRGPDCRYLNF
TKGEEISVYVKLAGEREDLWAGSKGKEFGYFPRDAVQIEEVFISEEIQMSTK

Predicted Secondary Structure

Sequence	20 40 60 80 100 \| \| \| \| \| MAKFGVHRILLLAISLTKCLESTKLLADLKKCGDLECEALINRVSAMRDYRGPDCRYLNFTKGEEISVYVKLAGEREDLWAGSKGKEFGYFPRDAVQIEEVFISEEIQMSTK
Prediction	CCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCHHHHHCCCSSCCCCCCCSSSSSSSSSSSCCCCCCSSSCCCCCSSSSSSSSCCCCCCCCSSSSCCCSSSCCHHHHSSSSSCCCCCSSCCCC
Confidence	9740245899999997436674013310340088223733559999756369999755127992999999745899982058978926660136612543105774105899
	H:Helix; S:Strand; C:Coil

Predicted Solvent Accessibility

Sequence	20 40 60 80 100 \| \| \| \| \| MAKFGVHRILLLAISLTKCLESTKLLADLKKCGDLECEALINRVSAMRDYRGPDCRYLNFTKGEEISVYVKLAGEREDLWAGSKGKEFGYFPRDAVQIEEVFISEEIQMSTK
Prediction	6443423311111010133364243035334032670431023030334242744430404563402010213564751131245563021124204335424776361658
	Values range from 0 (buried residue) to 8 (highly exposed residue)

Predicted Contact, Hydrogen and Distance Map Used in D-I-TASSER simulation

Contact Map

Distance Map

Hydrogen bond networks

D-I-TASSER simulation is guided by the consensus contact map (left figure), distance map (middle figure) and Hydrogen bond network (right figure) derived based on confidence scores of AttentionPotential. In the contact, distance map and hydrogen bond networks, the axes mark the residue index along the sequence. For the contact map, each dot represents a residue pair with predicted contact, while for the distance map and hydrogen bond network, a color scale represents a distance of 1-20+ angstroms or a angle of 0-180 degree.

Top 10 threading templates used by D-I-TASSER

Rank

PDB
hit

ID1

ID2

Cov

Norm.
Zscore

Download
alignment

                  20                  40                  60                  80                 100

                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |

SS
Seq

CCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCHHHHHCCCSSCCCCCCCSSSSSSSSSSSCCCCCCSSSCCCCCSSSSSSSSCCCCCCCCSSSSCCCSSSCCHHHHSSSSSCCCCCSSCCCC
MAKFGVHRILLLAISLTKCLESTKLLADLKKCGDLECEALINRVSAMRDYRGPDCRYLNFTKGEEISVYVKLAGEREDLWAGSKGKEFGYFPRDAVQIEEVFISEEIQMSTK

1k0xA

0.29

0.20

5.99

1.00

DEthreader

---------------------K--D--RKLCADQECSH-PISMAVALQDYMAPDCRFLTIHRGQVVYVFSKLKGRGRLFWGGSVQARLGYFPSSIVREDQTLK---------

1k0xA

0.33

0.28

8.30

2.13

SPARKS-K

-------------------MGPMPKLADRKLCADQECSHPISMAVALQDYMAPDCRFLTIHRGQVVYVFSKLKGRGRLFWGGSVQARLGYFPSSIVREDQTLKPGKVDVKTD

2de0X

0.10

0.09

3.29

0.61

MapAlign

SQTDGAGDWREKEAKDLTELVQRRITYLQLDDIYYFGGQNAHNQIAIYAHQPRTADEIPMEPGDIIGVAGNH---WDGYSKGVNRGRTGLYPSYKVREKIE-----------

1k0xA

0.33

0.28

8.30

0.39

CEthreader

-------------------MGPMPKLADRKLCADQECSHPISMAVALQDYMAPDCRFLTIHRGQVVYVFSKLKGRGRLFWGGSVQARLGYFPSSIVREDQTLKPGKVDVKTD

1k0xA

0.33

0.28

8.30

1.71

MUSTER

-------------------MGPMPKLADRKLCADQECSHPISMAVALQDYMAPDCRFLTIHRGQVVYVFSKLKGRGRLFWGGSVQARLGYFPSSIVREDQTLKPGKVDVKTD

1k0xA

0.33

0.28

8.30

1.12

HHsearch

-------------------MGPMPKLADRKLCADQECSHPISMAVALQDYMAPDCRFLTIHRGQVVYVFSKLKGRGRLFWGGSVQARLGYFPSSIVREDQTLKPGKVDVKTD

1k0xA

0.34

0.28

8.28

1.64

FFAS-3D

----------------------MPKLADRKLCADQECSHPISMAVALQDYMAPDCRFLTIHRGQVVYVFSKLKGRGRLFWGGSVAARLGYFPSSIVREDQTLKPGKVDVKTD

2dybA

0.20

0.19

6.01

0.85

EigenThreader

KQEIAEMRIPALNAYMKSLLSLPVWVLMDEDVRIFFYQMAAPRAEALFDFTGNSKLELNFKAGDVIFLLSRIN---KDWLEGTVRGATGIFPLSFVKILKDFPE---EDDPT

1i1jA

0.35

0.28

8.26

1.44

CNFpred

------------------------KLADRKLCADQECSHPISMAVALQDYMAPDCRFLTIHRGQVVYVFSKLKGRGRLFWGGSVAARLGYFPSSIVREDQTLKPGKVDVKTD

2dvjA

0.21

0.16

5.09

1.00

DEthreader

GDQE-YHYLDTTTLI---------SG--VIL--R-QEE--AEYVRALFDFNGNDEEDLPFKKGDILRIRDKPE---EQWWNAEDSGKRGMIPVPYVEKYRASVS--------

(a)	ID1 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by number of aligned residues.
(b)	ID2 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by query sequence length.
(c)	Cov is equal the number of aligned template residues divided by query sequence length.
(d)	Norm. Zscore is the normalized Z-score of the threading alignments. A Normalized Z-score >1 means a good alignment and is highlighted in bold.
(e)	Download alignment lists the threading program used to identify the template, and provide the 3D structure of aligned regions of threading templates (threading[1-10].pdb.gz).
(f)	Template residues identical to query sequence are highlighted in color.

Top 1 final models from D-I-TASSER

Click to view	Rank^a	Download	Estimated TM-score^b
	1	model1.pdb.gz	0.6615

(a)

D-I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, i.e. decoys. These decoys are clustered by SPICKER based on pairwise structure similarity to report up to five final models from the five largest clusters. Models are ranked in descending order of cluster size. If the simulations converge well, it is possible to have less than 5 models generated, which is usually an indication of good model quality.

(b)

The model confidence is quantitatified by estimated TM-score (eTM-score), calculated based on significance of threading template alignments, contact map satisfaction rate, mean absolute error between distance of model and distance of AttentionPotential, and convergence of D-I-TASSER simulations. eTM-score is typically in the range of [0, 1], with higher eTM-score signifies higher model confidence.

Proteins with similar structure

Top 10 structural analogs in PDB (as identified by TM-align)

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	Download Alignment
1	1k0xA	0.69	2.23	0.319	0.812	model1_1k0xA.pdb.gz
2	2dvjA	0.56	2.92	0.175	0.714	model1_2dvjA.pdb.gz
3	2gtjA	0.55	3.29	0.161	0.741	model1_2gtjA.pdb.gz
4	7csoA	0.55	3.68	0.083	0.732	model1_7csoA.pdb.gz
5	1udlA	0.55	2.97	0.230	0.696	model1_1udlA.pdb.gz
6	3qwxX	0.54	3.03	0.195	0.661	model1_3qwxX.pdb.gz
7	1wx6A	0.54	2.33	0.165	0.625	model1_1wx6A.pdb.gz
8	2eyzA	0.53	3.24	0.175	0.688	model1_2eyzA.pdb.gz
9	1ng2A	0.53	2.78	0.152	0.643	model1_1ng2A.pdb.gz
10	2lqnA	0.53	4.14	0.146	0.786	model1_2lqnA.pdb.gz

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Gene Ontology (GO) Terms

Molecular Function (MF)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0042954	1.00	lipoprotein transporter activity

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Molecular Function. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Biological Process (BP)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0009987	0.92	cellular process
GO:0044699	0.90	single-organism process
GO:0044763	0.82	single-organism cellular process
GO:0016043	0.80	cellular component organization
GO:0006810	0.74	transport
GO:0071702	0.72	organic substance transport
GO:0045184	0.72	establishment of protein localization
GO:0033036	0.72	macromolecule localization
GO:0046907	0.71	intracellular transport
GO:0016192	0.69	vesicle-mediated transport
GO:0022607	0.68	cellular component assembly
GO:0042953	0.67	lipoprotein transport
GO:0035459	0.67	cargo loading into vesicle
GO:0006888	0.67	ER to Golgi vesicle-mediated transport
GO:0008152	0.55	metabolic process

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Biological Process. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Cellular Component (CC)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0044464	0.97	cell part
GO:0044424	0.96	intracellular part
GO:0044444	0.91	cytoplasmic part
GO:0044446	0.84	intracellular organelle part
GO:0044432	0.76	endoplasmic reticulum part
GO:0070971	0.73	endoplasmic reticulum exit site
GO:0043226	0.62	organelle
GO:0043229	0.55	intracellular organelle
GO:0016020	0.54	membrane
GO:0043227	0.53	membrane-bounded organelle

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Cellular Component. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Predicted Enzyme Commission (EC) Numbers

Top 5 enzyme homologs in PDB

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	EC Number	Predicted Active Site Residues
1	0.224	1m27C	0.464	1.57	0.254	0.509	2.7.10.2	50,63,90
2	0.137	2rf0D	0.478	1.38	0.224	0.518	2.7.11.25	NA
3	0.121	1ywpA	0.469	1.96	0.262	0.536	3.1.4.11	NA
4	0.060	1opjB	0.320	4.98	0.020	0.607	2.7.10.2 2.7.1.112	23,72
5	0.060	2ofuA	0.310	5.25	0.040	0.679	2.7.10.2	NA

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted active site residues.
(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the Enzyme Commission (EC) number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Ligand Binding Sites

Template proteins with similar binding site:

Rank	Cscore^LB	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	BS-score	Lig. Name	Download Complex	Predicted binding site residues
1	0.51	2semA	0.474	1.51	0.241	0.518	1.34	III	complex1.pdb.gz	48,53,57,78,79,92,94,95
2	0.26	2j7iA	0.478	1.26	0.241	0.518	1.15	III	complex2.pdb.gz	47,53,56,76,77,79,90,96
3	0.19	1bbzA	0.454	1.79	0.190	0.509	1.15	III	complex3.pdb.gz	47,49,52,54,56,57,72,78,79,90,92,95
4	0.19	1aboB	0.467	1.77	0.190	0.518	1.08	III	complex4.pdb.gz	48,50,55,77,78,90,92,94,95
5	0.03	1bbzA	0.454	1.79	0.190	0.509	1.04	III	complex5.pdb.gz	44,47,72,78,93,94,96,97,98
6	0.03	2v1rA	0.494	1.67	0.180	0.545	0.82	III	complex6.pdb.gz	43,45,62

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted binding site and residues.
(a)	Cscore^LB is the confidence score of predicted binding site. Cscore^LB values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable ligand-binding site prediction.
(b)	BS-score is a measure of local similarity (sequence & structure) between template binding site and predicted binding site in the query structure. Based on large scale benchmarking analysis, we have observed that a BS-score >1 reflects a significant local match between the predicted and template binding site.
(c)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(d)	RMSD^a the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(e)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(f)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

References:
1.	Wei Zheng, Chengxin Zhang, Yang Li, Robin Pearce, Eric W. Bell, Yang Zhang. Folding non-homology proteins by coupling deep-learning contact maps with I-TASSER assembly simulations. In preparation, 2020.