D-I-TASSER Q96KT7-D3

D-I-TASSER results for Q96KT7-D3

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>Q96KT7 (61 residues)
HPALVCAVLHSEVVVALILQYYMLHETVALSDIMGAGVVLGSIAIITARNLSCERTGKVE
E

Predicted Secondary Structure

Sequence	20 40 60 \| \| \| HPALVCAVLHSEVVVALILQYYMLHETVALSDIMGAGVVLGSIAIITARNLSCERTGKVEE
Prediction	CCCSSSSHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCHHHHCCCCSSSSSSSSSSSCCCCCCCCCCCCC
Confidence	9614542144479999999999998624755514653476457888712232124687789
	H:Helix; S:Strand; C:Coil

Predicted Solvent Accessibility

Sequence	20 40 60 \| \| \| HPALVCAVLHSEVVVALILQYYMLHETVALSDIMGAGVVLGSIAIITARNLSCERTGKVEE
Prediction	7311001124441101021333223422434423422233331121225514165646478
	Values range from 0 (buried residue) to 8 (highly exposed residue)

Predicted Contact, Hydrogen and Distance Map Used in D-I-TASSER simulation

Contact Map

Distance Map

Hydrogen bond networks

D-I-TASSER simulation is guided by the consensus contact map (left figure), distance map (middle figure) and Hydrogen bond network (right figure) derived based on confidence scores of AttentionPotential. In the contact, distance map and hydrogen bond networks, the axes mark the residue index along the sequence. For the contact map, each dot represents a residue pair with predicted contact, while for the distance map and hydrogen bond network, a color scale represents a distance of 1-20+ angstroms or a angle of 0-180 degree.

Top 10 threading templates used by D-I-TASSER

Rank

PDB
hit

ID1

ID2

Cov

Norm.
Zscore

Download
alignment

                  20                  40                  60

                   |                   |                   |

SS
Seq

CCCSSSSHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCHHHHCCCCSSSSSSSSSSSCCCCCCCCCCCCC
HPALVCAVLHSEVVVALILQYYMLHETVALSDIMGAGVVLGSIAIITARNLSCERTGKVEE

5iitA

0.10

3.66

1.33

DEthreader

KVKHSEVFRRVKEVQEQVQHTVRLLNPPTQLDFEILEEELSDIIADVHDLAKFSRLNYTGQ

5ogeA2

0.07

2.70

1.14

SPARKS-K

SSTTYSMVGALNKLPIALSGLIFFDAPRNFLSILSIFIGFLSGIIYAVAKQKKQQAQ----

5ogeA2

0.07

2.70

1.01

MUSTER

SSTTYSMVGALNKLPIALSGLIFFDAPRNFLSILSIFIGFLSGIIYAVAKQKKQQAQ----

5i20A

0.13

0.11

4.00

1.35

HHsearch

DVRLLGVLSYAAPVLSTLLLVVAGFAAPSGALAIACALIVGGAAVATLLARRLES------

5iitA1

0.10

3.66

1.33

DEthreader

KVKHSEVFRRVKEVQEQVQHTVRLLNPPTQLDFEILEEELSDIIADVHDLAKFSRLNYTGQ

6ukjA

0.13

4.54

1.06

SPARKS-K

TGNIQSFVLQLSIPINMFFCFLILRYRYHLYNYLGAVIIVVTIALVEMKLSFTQEENSIIF

3v5sA1

0.03

1.87

0.68

MapAlign

VGYFLLGLILLYYGSDWFVLGSERIVFS-LVLLIIGLIGVLVGAELFVDGAKKIALALDIS

3v5sA1

0.03

1.89

0.49

CEthreader

VGYFLLGLILLYYGSDWFVLGSERIVVFSLVLLIIGLIGVLVGAELFVDGAKKIALALDIS

1p49A1

0.15

0.13

4.39

0.85

MUSTER

TGFKRLVFLPLQIVGVTLLTLAALNLHVPLGVFFSLLFLAALILTLFLGFLH---------

6i1rA

0.07

2.69

1.31

HHsearch

DNIVKVYSTSMAMLLTMVLSIYLFSVKATIQLFLGIIICIISLQMYFMPVHMLIEL-----

(a)	ID1 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by number of aligned residues.
(b)	ID2 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by query sequence length.
(c)	Cov is equal the number of aligned template residues divided by query sequence length.
(d)	Norm. Zscore is the normalized Z-score of the threading alignments. A Normalized Z-score >1 means a good alignment and is highlighted in bold.
(e)	Download alignment lists the threading program used to identify the template, and provide the 3D structure of aligned regions of threading templates (threading[1-10].pdb.gz).
(f)	Template residues identical to query sequence are highlighted in color.

Top 1 final models from D-I-TASSER

Click to view	Rank^a	Download	Estimated TM-score^b
	1	model1.pdb.gz	0.5911

(a)

D-I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, i.e. decoys. These decoys are clustered by SPICKER based on pairwise structure similarity to report up to five final models from the five largest clusters. Models are ranked in descending order of cluster size. If the simulations converge well, it is possible to have less than 5 models generated, which is usually an indication of good model quality.

(b)

The model confidence is quantitatified by estimated TM-score (eTM-score), calculated based on significance of threading template alignments, contact map satisfaction rate, mean absolute error between distance of model and distance of AttentionPotential, and convergence of D-I-TASSER simulations. eTM-score is typically in the range of [0, 1], with higher eTM-score signifies higher model confidence.

Proteins with similar structure

Top 10 structural analogs in PDB (as identified by TM-align)

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	Download Alignment
1	2jbsC2	0.82	1.36	0.049	0.951	model1_2jbsC2.pdb.gz
2	4ci6B	0.82	1.72	0.034	0.951	model1_4ci6B.pdb.gz
3	5lvuA	0.81	1.34	0.083	0.951	model1_5lvuA.pdb.gz
4	2ozbE2	0.79	1.64	0.017	0.951	model1_2ozbE2.pdb.gz
5	2rfqA2	0.72	1.78	0.100	0.951	model1_2rfqA2.pdb.gz
6	2or0B2	0.71	1.86	0.033	0.951	model1_2or0B2.pdb.gz
7	2nnwA	0.71	2.15	0.082	0.967	model1_2nnwA.pdb.gz
8	4irnA	0.66	1.88	0.017	0.918	model1_4irnA.pdb.gz
9	2pg0A	0.65	1.98	0.119	0.902	model1_2pg0A.pdb.gz
10	2h7oA1	0.60	2.30	0.034	0.918	model1_2h7oA1.pdb.gz

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Gene Ontology (GO) Terms

Molecular Function (MF)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0003824	0.48	catalytic activity
GO:0097159	0.47	organic cyclic compound binding
GO:1901363	0.46	heterocyclic compound binding
GO:0036094	0.43	small molecule binding
GO:0000166	0.42	nucleotide binding
GO:0048037	0.41	cofactor binding
GO:0016491	0.41	oxidoreductase activity
GO:0097367	0.40	carbohydrate derivative binding
GO:0050660	0.40	flavin adenine dinucleotide binding
GO:0016740	0.40	transferase activity
GO:0016627	0.40	oxidoreductase activity, acting on the CH-CH group of donors
GO:0035639	0.39	purine ribonucleoside triphosphate binding
GO:0032559	0.39	adenyl ribonucleotide binding
GO:0032550	0.39	purine ribonucleoside binding
GO:0016773	0.36	phosphotransferase activity, alcohol group as acceptor
GO:0016712	0.34	oxidoreductase activity, acting on paired donors, with incorporation or reduction of molecular oxygen, reduced flavin or flavoprotein as one donor, and incorporation of one atom of oxygen

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Molecular Function. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Biological Process (BP)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0009987	0.63	cellular process
GO:0044699	0.62	single-organism process
GO:0008152	0.57	metabolic process
GO:0071704	0.53	organic substance metabolic process
GO:0044238	0.51	primary metabolic process
GO:0044237	0.50	cellular metabolic process

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Biological Process. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Cellular Component (CC)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0005886	1.00	plasma membrane
GO:0005794	1.00	Golgi apparatus
GO:0044425	0.62	membrane part
GO:0031224	0.58	intrinsic component of membrane
GO:0016021	0.57	integral component of membrane
GO:0044459	0.55	plasma membrane part
GO:0005887	0.53	integral component of plasma membrane

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Cellular Component. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Predicted Enzyme Commission (EC) Numbers

Top 5 enzyme homologs in PDB

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	EC Number	Predicted Active Site Residues
1	0.209	1qleD	0.462	2.11	0.024	0.557	1.9.3.1	37,41
2	0.156	1urfA	0.638	2.14	0.102	0.934	2.7.11.13	13,46
3	0.100	3brvC	0.482	1.35	0.057	0.525	2.7.11.10	NA
4	0.095	1cxzB	0.706	1.85	0.000	0.918	2.7.11.13	17,19
5	0.067	1vp7B	0.651	1.93	0.068	0.836	3.1.11.6	7,13

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted active site residues.
(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the Enzyme Commission (EC) number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Ligand Binding Sites

Template proteins with similar binding site:

Rank	Cscore^LB	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	BS-score	Lig. Name	Download Complex	Predicted binding site residues
1	0.20	2f661	0.710	1.55	0.059	0.836	0.90	III	complex1.pdb.gz	18,30,32,33,36,37,40,41,44,45,48,49,52
2	0.03	3mgnA	0.456	2.12	0.028	0.525	1.30	III	complex2.pdb.gz	34,37,40,41,44
3	0.02	3mgnD	0.448	1.90	0.029	0.508	1.30	UUU	complex3.pdb.gz	37,40,41,45,46,49
4	0.01	2r5bB	0.445	1.84	0.029	0.508	1.29	III	complex4.pdb.gz	37,40,43,44
5	0.01	2r5dC	0.452	1.75	0.029	0.508	1.29	III	complex5.pdb.gz	35,38,39,42,46
6	0.01	2r5bA	0.452	1.88	0.027	0.508	1.23	III	complex6.pdb.gz	38,41,42,45

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted binding site and residues.
(a)	Cscore^LB is the confidence score of predicted binding site. Cscore^LB values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable ligand-binding site prediction.
(b)	BS-score is a measure of local similarity (sequence & structure) between template binding site and predicted binding site in the query structure. Based on large scale benchmarking analysis, we have observed that a BS-score >1 reflects a significant local match between the predicted and template binding site.
(c)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(d)	RMSD^a the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(e)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(f)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

References:
1.	Wei Zheng, Chengxin Zhang, Yang Li, Robin Pearce, Eric W. Bell, Yang Zhang. Folding non-homology proteins by coupling deep-learning contact maps with I-TASSER assembly simulations. In preparation, 2020.