D-I-TASSER Q96IJ6-D1

D-I-TASSER results for Q96IJ6-D1

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>Q96IJ6 (250 residues)
MLKAVILIGGPQKGTRFRPLSFEVPKPLFPVAGVPMIQHHIEACAQVPGMQEILLIGFYQ
PDEPLTQFLEAAQQEFNLPVRYLQEFAPLGTGGGLYHFRDQILAGSPEAFFVLNADVCSD
FPLSAMLEAHRRQRHPFLLLGTTANRTQSLNYGCIVENPQTHEVLHYVEKPSTFISDIIN
CGIYLFSPEALKPLRDVFQRNQQDGQLEDSPGLWPGAGTIRLEQDVFSALAGQGQIYVHL
TDGIWSQIKS

Predicted Secondary Structure

Sequence	20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| MLKAVILIGGPQKGTRFRPLSFEVPKPLFPVAGVPMIQHHIEACAQVPGMQEILLIGFYQPDEPLTQFLEAAQQEFNLPVRYLQEFAPLGTGGGLYHFRDQILAGSPEAFFVLNADVCSDFPLSAMLEAHRRQRHPFLLLGTTANRTQSLNYGCIVENPQTHEVLHYVEKPSTFISDIINCGIYLFSPEALKPLRDVFQRNQQDGQLEDSPGLWPGAGTIRLEQDVFSALAGQGQIYVHLTDGIWSQIKS
Prediction	CCSSSSSCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCSSCCSCHSHHHHHHHHHHCCCCSSSSSCCCCCHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCSSSSSSCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCSSSSSCCCSSSCCCHHHHHHHHHHCCCCSSSSSSSCCCCCCCCCSSSSSSCCCCCSSSSSSCCCCCCCCSSSSSSSSSCHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCSSCCCHHHHHHCCCCSSHHHHHHHHHHCCCSSSSSCCCSSSSCCC
Confidence	9289998289999941565569998533245991201999999898579968999878891248999836953224868999974899970689999999852489984999948165099989999999973998899999939920048418999799990999986799998874898999978899999986287756652121104443102872112778999985298899964892771499
	H:Helix; S:Strand; C:Coil

Predicted Solvent Accessibility

Sequence	20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| MLKAVILIGGPQKGTRFRPLSFEVPKPLFPVAGVPMIQHHIEACAQVPGMQEILLIGFYQPDEPLTQFLEAAQQEFNLPVRYLQEFAPLGTGGGLYHFRDQILAGSPEAFFVLNADVCSDFPLSAMLEAHRRQRHPFLLLGTTANRTQSLNYGCIVENPQTHEVLHYVEKPSTFISDIINCGIYLFSPEALKPLRDVFQRNQQDGQLEDSPGLWPGAGTIRLEQDVFSALAGQGQIYVHLTDGIWSQIKS
Prediction	6020004013344011010014731220021031000110032026124040000001144640263025224660404031140642221010021035104756411000000200123404400520474522000001305444436100000127633033134327623411000000001440052057245454442312423432276440401340044017634020032651336358
	Values range from 0 (buried residue) to 8 (highly exposed residue)

Predicted Contact, Hydrogen and Distance Map Used in D-I-TASSER simulation

Contact Map

Distance Map

Hydrogen bond networks

D-I-TASSER simulation is guided by the consensus contact map (left figure), distance map (middle figure) and Hydrogen bond network (right figure) derived based on confidence scores of AttentionPotential. In the contact, distance map and hydrogen bond networks, the axes mark the residue index along the sequence. For the contact map, each dot represents a residue pair with predicted contact, while for the distance map and hydrogen bond network, a color scale represents a distance of 1-20+ angstroms or a angle of 0-180 degree.

Top 10 threading templates used by D-I-TASSER

Rank

PDB
hit

ID1

ID2

Cov

Norm.
Zscore

Download
alignment

                  20                  40                  60                  80                 100                 120                 140                 160                 180                 200                 220                 240

                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |

SS
Seq

CCSSSSSCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCSSCCSCHSHHHHHHHHHHCCCCSSSSSCCCCCHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCSSSSSSCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCSSSSSCCCSSSCCCHHHHHHHHHHCCCCSSSSSSSCCCCCCCCCSSSSSSCCCCCSSSSSSCCCCCCCCSSSSSSSSSCHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCSSCCCHHHHHHCCCCSSHHHHHHHHHHCCCSSSSSCCCSSSSCCC
MLKAVILIGGPQKGTRFRPLSFEVPKPLFPVAGVPMIQHHIEACAQVPGMQEILLIGFYQPDEPLTQFLEAAQQEFNLPVRYLQEFAPLGTGGGLYHFRDQILAGSPEAFFVLNADVCSDFPLSAMLEAHRRQRHPFLLLGTTANRTQSLNYGCIVENPQTHEVLHYVEKPSTFISDIINCGIYLFSPEALKPLRDVFQRNQQDGQLEDSPGLWPGAGTIRLEQDVFSALAGQGQIYVHLTDGIWSQIKS

1yp3C

0.20

0.18

5.87

1.33

DEthreader

SVLGIILGGG-A-GTRLYPLTKKRAKPAVPLGNYRLIDIPVSNCLNSN-ISKIYVLTQF-NSASLNRHLSRAYAS-EGFVEVLAAQWFQGTADAVRQYLWLFEEHTVLEYLILAGDHLYRMDYEKFIQAHRETDADITVAALPMDEKRATAFGLMKID-EEGRIIEFAEKPQGLMKFIASMGIYVISKDVMNLLRDKFP-G-----------------ANDFGSEVIPGATSGMRVQAYLYDGYWEDIGF

3hl3A

0.21

0.18

5.86

1.49

SPARKS-K

AMKGIILAGG--TGSRLYPITKVTNKHLLPVGRYPMIYHAVYKLKQC-DITDIMIITGKEHMGDVVSFLGSG-QEFGVSFTYRVQDKAGGIAQALGLCEDFVGN---DRMVVILGDNIFSDDIRPYVEEFTNQKEGAKVLLQSVD--DPERFGVANIQNR--KIIEIEEKPKEPKSSYAVTGIYLYDSKVFSYIKELKPSARGELE----------------ITDINNWYLKRGVLTYNEMSGWWTDAGT

3jujA

0.20

0.18

5.76

0.76

MapAlign

IKKCLFPAAGY--GTRFLPITKTIPKEMLPIVDKPLIQYAVEEAMEA-GCEVMAIVTGRNK-RSLEDYFLKSIRNIKCCFSYVRQKQMKGLGHAILTGEALIG---NEPFAVILADDLCIV-LKQMTSLYQKYQC-SIVAIEEVALEEVSKYGVIRGEEGVYEIKDMVEKPEDAPSNLAVIGRYILTPDIFEILSET---------------KPGKNNEIQI-TDALRTQAKRKRIIAYQFKGKRYDCG-

5i1fA

0.23

0.21

6.63

0.52

CEthreader

VTKAVFPVAG--LGTRFLPATKASPKEMLPVVDKPLIQYAVEEAIEA-GITEMIFVTGR-SKRAIEDHFDKSYEIEAVDCFYVRQAEALGLGHAVLCAEKLVG---DNPFAVILADDLLDGPLRQMIDVFDHYHA-SVIGVEEIAPADSKSYGVIDGKRDLFKLSGIVEKPEQAPSNFGVVGRYVLKPKIFKHLRGL---------------KPGAGGELQLTDA-IQSLLTDEQVLAYRYDGTRFDCGS

3hl3A

0.20

0.18

5.75

1.48

MUSTER

AMKGIILAGG--TGSRLYPITKVTNKHLLPVGRYPMIYHAVYKLKQC-DITDIMIITGKEHMGDVVSFLGS-GQEFGVSFTYRVQDKAGGIAQALGLCEDFVG---NDRMVVILGDNIFSDDIRPYVEEFTNQKEGAKVLLQSVDDPER---FGVANIQN-RKIIEIEEKPKEPKSSYAVTGIYLYDSKVFSYIKELKPSARGELE----------------ITDINNWYLKRGVLTYNEMSGWWTDAGT

3d8vA

0.22

0.20

6.19

1.68

HHsearch

DTAVLVLAAG--PGTRMRS---DTPKVLHTLAGRSMLSHVLHAI-AKLAPQRLIVVLGHD-HQRIAPLVGELADTLGRTIDVALQDRPLGTGHAVLCGLSALPDDYAGNVVVTSGDTLDADTLADLIATHRAVSAAVTVLTTTLD--DPFGYGRILRTQ-DHEVMAIVEQTDAREIREVNAGVYAFDIAARSALSRLSSNN--------------AQQELYL-TDVIAILRSDGTVHASHVDDSALVAGN

3hl3A

0.19

0.17

5.54

2.39

FFAS-3D

AMKGIILAGG--TGSRLYPITKVTNKHLLPVGRYPMIYHAVYKLKQCDITDIMIITGKEHMGDVVSFL--GSGQEFGVSFTYRVQDKAGGIAQALGLCEDFV---GNDRMVVILGDNIFSDDIRPYVEEFTNQKEGAKVLLQSV--DDPERFGVANIQNR--KIIEIEEKPKEPKSSYAVTGIYLYDSKVFSYIKELKPSARGELEITD----------------INNWYLKRGVLTYNEMSGWWTDAGT

3hl3A

0.19

0.16

5.31

0.98

EigenThreader

AMKGIILAGGTGSRLYPI--TKVTNKHLLPVGRYPMIYHAVYKLKQC-DITDIMIITGKEHMGDVVSFLGSGQ--EFGVSFTYRVQKAGGIAQALGLCEDFVG---NDRMVVILGDNIFSDDIRPYVEEFTNQKEGAKVLLQSVDDPER--FGVANIQR---KIIEIEEKPKEPKSSYAVTGIYLYDSKVFSYIKE---------------LKPSARGEL-EITDINNWYLKRGVLTYNEMSGWWTDAGT

3hl3A

0.21

0.18

5.86

1.92

CNFpred

AMKGIILAGG--TGSRLYPITKVTNKHLLPVGRYPMIYHAVYKLKQC-DITDIMIITGKEHMGDVVSFLGSGQ-EFGVSFTYRVQDKAGGIAQALGLCEDFVG---NDRMVVILGDNIFSDDIRPYVEEFTNQKEGAKVLLQSVD--DPERFGVANIQ--NRKIIEIEEKPKEPKSSYAVTGIYLYDSKVFSYIKELKPSARGELEI----------------TDINNWYLKRGVLTYNEMSGWWTDAGT

1yp3C1

0.20

0.18

5.87

1.33

DEthreader

SVLGIILGGG-A-GTRLYPLTKKRAKPAVPLGNYRLIDIPVSNCLNSN-ISKIYVLTQF-NSASLNRHLSRAYAS-EGFVEVLAAQWFQGTADAVRQYLWLFEEHTVLEYLILAGDHLYRMDYEKFIQAHRETDADITVAALPMDEKRATAFGLMKID-EEGRIIEFAEKPQGLMKFIASMGIYVISKDVMNLLRDKFP-G-----------------ANDFGSEVIPGATSGMRVQAYLYDGYWEDIGF

(a)	ID1 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by number of aligned residues.
(b)	ID2 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by query sequence length.
(c)	Cov is equal the number of aligned template residues divided by query sequence length.
(d)	Norm. Zscore is the normalized Z-score of the threading alignments. A Normalized Z-score >1 means a good alignment and is highlighted in bold.
(e)	Download alignment lists the threading program used to identify the template, and provide the 3D structure of aligned regions of threading templates (threading[1-10].pdb.gz).
(f)	Template residues identical to query sequence are highlighted in color.

Top 1 final models from D-I-TASSER

Click to view	Rank^a	Download	Estimated TM-score^b
	1	model1.pdb.gz	0.9

(a)

D-I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, i.e. decoys. These decoys are clustered by SPICKER based on pairwise structure similarity to report up to five final models from the five largest clusters. Models are ranked in descending order of cluster size. If the simulations converge well, it is possible to have less than 5 models generated, which is usually an indication of good model quality.

(b)

The model confidence is quantitatified by estimated TM-score (eTM-score), calculated based on significance of threading template alignments, contact map satisfaction rate, mean absolute error between distance of model and distance of AttentionPotential, and convergence of D-I-TASSER simulations. eTM-score is typically in the range of [0, 1], with higher eTM-score signifies higher model confidence.

Proteins with similar structure

Top 10 structural analogs in PDB (as identified by TM-align)

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	Download Alignment
1	2pa4B	0.85	1.63	0.203	0.908	model1_2pa4B.pdb.gz
2	3hl3A	0.84	1.58	0.211	0.892	model1_3hl3A.pdb.gz
3	5i1fA	0.84	1.78	0.230	0.904	model1_5i1fA.pdb.gz
4	3jujA	0.84	1.78	0.204	0.904	model1_3jujA.pdb.gz
5	5l6sA	0.84	1.73	0.200	0.900	model1_5l6sA.pdb.gz
6	1yp3C1	0.84	1.79	0.204	0.904	model1_1yp3C1.pdb.gz
7	3d8vA	0.83	1.90	0.213	0.900	model1_3d8vA.pdb.gz
8	6ikxA	0.82	1.87	0.217	0.884	model1_6ikxA.pdb.gz
9	1lvwA	0.82	1.92	0.193	0.892	model1_1lvwA.pdb.gz
10	2e3dC	0.82	2.03	0.198	0.888	model1_2e3dC.pdb.gz

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Gene Ontology (GO) Terms

Molecular Function (MF)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0003824	0.82	catalytic activity
GO:0016740	0.74	transferase activity
GO:0016779	0.71	nucleotidyltransferase activity

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Molecular Function. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Biological Process (BP)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0008152	0.92	metabolic process
GO:0009987	0.90	cellular process
GO:0071704	0.86	organic substance metabolic process
GO:0044238	0.84	primary metabolic process
GO:0044237	0.83	cellular metabolic process
GO:0044699	0.74	single-organism process
GO:0009058	0.64	biosynthetic process
GO:1901576	0.63	organic substance biosynthetic process
GO:0044249	0.60	cellular biosynthetic process
GO:0044710	0.58	single-organism metabolic process
GO:0044763	0.57	single-organism cellular process
GO:0006807	0.54	nitrogen compound metabolic process
GO:0043170	0.52	macromolecule metabolic process
GO:0005975	0.52	carbohydrate metabolic process

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Biological Process. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Cellular Component (CC)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0044464	0.98	cell part
GO:0044424	0.95	intracellular part
GO:0044444	0.80	cytoplasmic part
GO:0043226	0.57	organelle
GO:0043227	0.55	membrane-bounded organelle
GO:0005829	0.52	cytosol

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Cellular Component. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Predicted Enzyme Commission (EC) Numbers

Top 5 enzyme homologs in PDB

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	EC Number	Predicted Active Site Residues
1	0.493	2e3dC	0.819	2.03	0.198	0.888	2.7.7.9	16
2	0.486	2ux8G	0.806	2.35	0.248	0.904	2.7.7.9	16
3	0.468	3hl3A	0.842	1.58	0.211	0.892	2.7.7.24	16
4	0.461	1h5sB	0.811	2.13	0.210	0.896	2.7.7.24	16
5	0.456	1mc3A	0.832	1.75	0.179	0.892	2.7.7.24	16

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted active site residues.
(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the Enzyme Commission (EC) number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Ligand Binding Sites

Template proteins with similar binding site:

Rank	Cscore^LB	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	BS-score	Lig. Name	Download Complex	Predicted binding site residues
1	0.61	3dj4A	0.822	2.05	0.227	0.900	1.15	UD1	complex1.pdb.gz	7,8,9,10,26,85,88,90,91,94,114,115,116,152,153,169,180,181,221,224,249
2	0.61	1fxoE	0.810	2.07	0.224	0.892	1.25	TMP	complex2.pdb.gz	7,9,10,26,85,88,89,90,91,116
3	0.58	2qkxA	0.816	2.07	0.209	0.900	1.26	GN1	complex3.pdb.gz	91,152,153,169,180,181,221,223
4	0.40	1yp4A	0.835	1.70	0.205	0.896	1.18	ADP	complex4.pdb.gz	7,9,10,56,89,91,94,114,115,116,221
5	0.38	3pkpA	0.830	1.81	0.210	0.896	1.25	DTP	complex5.pdb.gz	7,9,10,13,14,15,16,26,27,85,87,88,115,116
6	0.37	1g0rC	0.813	2.03	0.220	0.892	0.94	G1P	complex6.pdb.gz	91,117,152,153,169,170,180,215,224,245

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted binding site and residues.
(a)	Cscore^LB is the confidence score of predicted binding site. Cscore^LB values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable ligand-binding site prediction.
(b)	BS-score is a measure of local similarity (sequence & structure) between template binding site and predicted binding site in the query structure. Based on large scale benchmarking analysis, we have observed that a BS-score >1 reflects a significant local match between the predicted and template binding site.
(c)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(d)	RMSD^a the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(e)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(f)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

References:
1.	Wei Zheng, Chengxin Zhang, Yang Li, Robin Pearce, Eric W. Bell, Yang Zhang. Folding non-homology proteins by coupling deep-learning contact maps with I-TASSER assembly simulations. In preparation, 2020.