D-I-TASSER Q96DS6

D-I-TASSER results for Q96DS6

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

Summary of the Protein

Uniprot ID: Q96DS6
Protein Name: Membrane-spanning 4-domains subfamily A member 6E
Gene Name: MS4A6E

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>Q96DS6 (147 residues)
MTSQPISNETIIMLPSNVINFSQAEKPEPTNQGQDSLKKRLQAKVKVIGVHSSLAGSILS
ALSALVGFILLSVNPAALNPASLQCKLDEKDIPTRLLLSYDYHSPYTMDCHRAKASLAGT
LSLMLVSTVLEFCLAVLTAVLQWKQTV

Predicted Contact and Distance Map Used in D-I-TASSER simulation

Contact Map

Distance Map

D-I-TASSER simulation is guided by the consensus contact map (left figure) and distance map (right figure) derived based on confidence scores of AttentionPotential. In the contact, distance map and hydrogen bond networks, the axes mark the residue index along the sequence. For the contact map, each dot represents a residue pair with predicted contact, while for the distance map and hydrogen bond network, a color scale represents a distance of 1-20+ angstroms or a angle of 0-180 degree.

Information of Domain

No. of Domain	Domain	Domain Boundary	Length of Domain	Models of Domain	Sequence
1	Q96DS6-D1	1-147	147		MTSQPISNETIIMLPSNVINFSQAEKPEPTNQGQDSLKKRLQAKVKVIGVHSSLAGSILSALSALVGFILLSVNPAALNPASLQCKLDEKDIPTRLLLSYDYHSPYTMDCHRAKASLAGTLSLMLVSTVLEFCLAVLTAVLQWKQTV

Top 1 final models from D-I-TASSER

Click to view	Rank^a	Download	Estimated TM-score^b
	1	model1.pdb.gz	0.6068

(a)

D-I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, i.e. decoys. These decoys are clustered by SPICKER based on pairwise structure similarity to report up to five final models from the five largest clusters. Models are ranked in descending order of cluster size. If the simulations converge well, it is possible to have less than 5 models generated, which is usually an indication of good model quality.

(b)

The model confidence is quantitatified by estimated TM-score (eTM-score), calculated based on significance of threading template alignments, contact map satisfaction rate, mean absolute error between distance of model and distance of AttentionPotential, and convergence of D-I-TASSER simulations. eTM-score is typically in the range of [0, 1], with higher eTM-score signifies higher model confidence.

Proteins with similar structure

Top 10 structural analogs in PDB (as identified by TM-align)

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	Download Alignment
1	6el1O	0.70	3.54	0.049	0.952	model1_6el1O.pdb.gz
2	1ciiA	0.69	3.65	0.034	0.946	model1_1ciiA.pdb.gz
3	6ek7A	0.69	3.52	0.049	0.952	model1_6ek7A.pdb.gz
4	6yvuB	0.68	3.13	0.082	0.884	model1_6yvuB.pdb.gz
5	6gy6B	0.68	3.89	0.082	0.980	model1_6gy6B.pdb.gz
6	5xg2A	0.68	3.21	0.054	0.878	model1_5xg2A.pdb.gz
7	4tkoB	0.67	3.12	0.105	0.864	model1_4tkoB.pdb.gz
8	5nenA	0.66	3.23	0.056	0.864	model1_5nenA.pdb.gz
9	3hhmB	0.66	2.78	0.028	0.809	model1_3hhmB.pdb.gz
10	2i1kA	0.65	3.83	0.056	0.946	model1_2i1kA.pdb.gz

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Gene Ontology (GO) Terms

Molecular Function (MF)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0044877	0.51	macromolecular complex binding
GO:0032403	0.50	protein complex binding
GO:0003824	0.50	catalytic activity

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Molecular Function. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Biological Process (BP)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0050896	0.89	response to stimulus
GO:0050794	0.84	regulation of cellular process
GO:0009987	0.80	cellular process
GO:0007165	0.79	signal transduction
GO:0002376	0.75	immune system process
GO:0044699	0.74	single-organism process
GO:0044763	0.71	single-organism cellular process
GO:0007166	0.66	cell surface receptor signaling pathway
GO:0006955	0.64	immune response
GO:0048583	0.61	regulation of response to stimulus
GO:0050776	0.60	regulation of immune response
GO:0048518	0.56	positive regulation of biological process
GO:0032879	0.56	regulation of localization
GO:0051050	0.55	positive regulation of transport
GO:0048522	0.55	positive regulation of cellular process
GO:0060341	0.54	regulation of cellular localization
GO:0050790	0.54	regulation of catalytic activity
GO:0006810	0.53	transport
GO:0065008	0.52	regulation of biological quality
GO:0032388	0.52	positive regulation of intracellular transport
GO:0071704	0.50	organic substance metabolic process

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Biological Process. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Cellular Component (CC)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0044464	0.98	cell part
GO:0044425	0.94	membrane part
GO:0031224	0.90	intrinsic component of membrane
GO:0016021	0.89	integral component of membrane
GO:0016020	0.88	membrane
GO:0044424	0.80	intracellular part
GO:0031226	0.69	intrinsic component of plasma membrane
GO:0043227	0.68	membrane-bounded organelle
GO:0005887	0.68	integral component of plasma membrane
GO:0043231	0.60	intracellular membrane-bounded organelle
GO:0044444	0.54	cytoplasmic part
GO:0005886	0.53	plasma membrane
GO:0032991	0.50	macromolecular complex

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Cellular Component. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Predicted Enzyme Commission (EC) Numbers

Top 5 enzyme homologs in PDB

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	EC Number	Predicted Active Site Residues
1	0.060	2o6yA	0.528	3.61	0.030	0.742	4.3.1.-	NA
2	0.060	2fonB	0.423	3.29	0.060	0.571	1.3.3.6	131
3	0.060	3lssB	0.490	3.26	0.068	0.633	6.1.1.11	NA
4	0.060	2pfmA	0.476	3.23	0.066	0.612	4.3.2.2	NA
5	0.060	1z0hB	0.263	4.28	0.024	0.401	3.4.24.69	NA

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted active site residues.
(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the Enzyme Commission (EC) number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Ligand Binding Sites

Template proteins with similar binding site:

Rank	Cscore^LB	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	BS-score	Lig. Name	Download Complex	Predicted binding site residues
1	0.01	2yktA	0.568	4.79	0.062	0.932	0.55	III	complex1.pdb.gz	121,123,124,125,127,131
2	0.01	2w6dA	0.573	4.02	0.043	0.837	0.63	GDP	complex2.pdb.gz	70,71,73,74,122
3	0.01	1kmi1	0.586	3.61	0.056	0.809	0.51	III	complex3.pdb.gz	52,54,57,59,60,61,63,64,68
4	0.01	2w6dB	0.583	4.12	0.043	0.850	0.57	CPL	complex4.pdb.gz	72,73,74,121,122,124
5	0.01	1ujw1	0.519	3.44	0.037	0.721	0.86	III	complex5.pdb.gz	82,86,87,88,109,110,111,112,113,115,116,118,119,120,123
6	0.01	3c3rA	0.330	5.11	0.047	0.599	0.54	III	complex6.pdb.gz	58,61,62,66,132,135

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted binding site and residues.
(a)	Cscore^LB is the confidence score of predicted binding site. Cscore^LB values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable ligand-binding site prediction.
(b)	BS-score is a measure of local similarity (sequence & structure) between template binding site and predicted binding site in the query structure. Based on large scale benchmarking analysis, we have observed that a BS-score >1 reflects a significant local match between the predicted and template binding site.
(c)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(d)	RMSD^a the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(e)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(f)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

References:
1.	Wei Zheng, Chengxin Zhang, Yang Li, Robin Pearce, Eric W. Bell, Yang Zhang. Folding non-homology proteins by coupling deep-learning contact maps with I-TASSER assembly simulations. In preparation, 2020.