D-I-TASSER Q96CE8

D-I-TASSER results for Q96CE8

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

Summary of the Protein

Uniprot ID: Q96CE8
Protein Name: Transmembrane 4 L6 family member 18
Gene Name: TM4SF18

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>Q96CE8 (201 residues)
MGSRKCGGCLSCLLIPLALWSIIVNILLYFPNGQTSYASSNKLTNYVWYFEGICFSGIMM
LIVTTVLLVLENNNNYKCCQSENCSKKYVTLLSIIFSSLGIAFSGYCLVISALGLVQGPY
CRTLDGWEYAFEGTAGRFLTDSSIWIQCLEPAHVVEWNIILFSILITLSGLQVIICLIRV
VMQLSKILCGSYSVIFQPGII

Predicted Contact and Distance Map Used in D-I-TASSER simulation

Contact Map

Distance Map

D-I-TASSER simulation is guided by the consensus contact map (left figure) and distance map (right figure) derived based on confidence scores of AttentionPotential. In the contact, distance map and hydrogen bond networks, the axes mark the residue index along the sequence. For the contact map, each dot represents a residue pair with predicted contact, while for the distance map and hydrogen bond network, a color scale represents a distance of 1-20+ angstroms or a angle of 0-180 degree.

Information of Domain

No. of Domain	Domain	Domain Boundary	Length of Domain	Models of Domain	Sequence
1	Q96CE8-D1	1-201	201		MGSRKCGGCLSCLLIPLALWSIIVNILLYFPNGQTSYASSNKLTNYVWYFEGICFSGIMMLIVTTVLLVLENNNNYKCCQSENCSKKYVTLLSIIFSSLGIAFSGYCLVISALGLVQGPYCRTLDGWEYAFEGTAGRFLTDSSIWIQCLEPAHVVEWNIILFSILITLSGLQVIICLIRVVMQLSKILCGSYSVIFQPGII

Top 1 final models from D-I-TASSER

Click to view	Rank^a	Download	Estimated TM-score^b
	1	model1.pdb.gz	0.7614

(a)

D-I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, i.e. decoys. These decoys are clustered by SPICKER based on pairwise structure similarity to report up to five final models from the five largest clusters. Models are ranked in descending order of cluster size. If the simulations converge well, it is possible to have less than 5 models generated, which is usually an indication of good model quality.

(b)

The model confidence is quantitatified by estimated TM-score (eTM-score), calculated based on significance of threading template alignments, contact map satisfaction rate, mean absolute error between distance of model and distance of AttentionPotential, and convergence of D-I-TASSER simulations. eTM-score is typically in the range of [0, 1], with higher eTM-score signifies higher model confidence.

Proteins with similar structure

Top 10 structural analogs in PDB (as identified by TM-align)

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	Download Alignment
1	1qoyA	0.68	3.53	0.066	0.895	model1_1qoyA.pdb.gz
2	4k1pA	0.67	3.80	0.071	0.895	model1_4k1pA.pdb.gz
3	5vjsA	0.67	3.35	0.080	0.851	model1_5vjsA.pdb.gz
4	6w1wA	0.67	3.62	0.054	0.881	model1_6w1wA.pdb.gz
5	6grjG	0.66	3.59	0.060	0.876	model1_6grjG.pdb.gz
6	6w08A	0.64	3.75	0.054	0.881	model1_6w08A.pdb.gz
7	2nrjA	0.64	3.81	0.055	0.871	model1_2nrjA.pdb.gz
8	7nmqA	0.63	4.24	0.048	0.920	model1_7nmqA.pdb.gz
9	5h1qA	0.62	4.19	0.063	0.866	model1_5h1qA.pdb.gz
10	5lp2B	0.62	3.84	0.073	0.846	model1_5lp2B.pdb.gz

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Gene Ontology (GO) Terms

Molecular Function (MF)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0003824	0.27	catalytic activity
GO:0042802	0.23	identical protein binding
GO:0035639	0.18	purine ribonucleoside triphosphate binding
GO:0032555	0.18	purine ribonucleotide binding
GO:0032550	0.18	purine ribonucleoside binding
GO:0016740	0.18	transferase activity
GO:0004872	0.16	receptor activity
GO:0042803	0.15	protein homodimerization activity
GO:0008168	0.11	methyltransferase activity
GO:0005524	0.11	ATP binding

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Molecular Function. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Biological Process (BP)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0048856	1.00	anatomical structure development
GO:0044767	1.00	single-organism developmental process
GO:0009987	0.86	cellular process
GO:0065007	0.81	biological regulation
GO:0050794	0.75	regulation of cellular process
GO:0044763	0.69	single-organism cellular process
GO:2000227	0.65	negative regulation of pancreatic A cell differentiation
GO:2000077	0.65	negative regulation of type B pancreatic cell development
GO:0090104	0.65	pancreatic epsilon cell differentiation
GO:0031018	0.65	endocrine pancreas development

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Biological Process. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Cellular Component (CC)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0016021	1.00	integral component of membrane
GO:0044464	0.62	cell part
GO:0016020	0.51	membrane

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Cellular Component. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Predicted Enzyme Commission (EC) Numbers

Top 5 enzyme homologs in PDB

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	EC Number	Predicted Active Site Residues
1	0.060	3e04D	0.572	4.13	0.071	0.811	4.2.1.2	NA
2	0.060	3no9A	0.541	4.32	0.067	0.806	4.2.1.2	NA
3	0.060	3d2rB	0.542	3.26	0.077	0.677	2.7.11.2	NA
4	0.060	1is2A	0.530	4.15	0.074	0.731	1.3.3.6	2
5	0.060	1w27A	0.547	4.49	0.039	0.786	4.3.1.24	NA

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted active site residues.
(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the Enzyme Commission (EC) number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Ligand Binding Sites

Template proteins with similar binding site:

Rank	Cscore^LB	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	BS-score	Lig. Name	Download Complex	Predicted binding site residues
1	0.04	2bu8A	0.546	3.52	0.089	0.697	0.83	TF4	complex1.pdb.gz	19,57,100,101,104,165,168,169,172
2	0.02	1y8pA	0.573	2.72	0.067	0.682	0.46	ATP	complex2.pdb.gz	52,55,56,59,60,106,107,108
3	0.02	1y8oA	0.572	2.90	0.066	0.687	0.50	RED	complex3.pdb.gz	52,55,100
4	0.02	1y8nA	0.572	2.73	0.067	0.682	0.47	RED	complex4.pdb.gz	52,103,104
5	0.02	1cc1L	0.566	3.93	0.038	0.756	0.68	H2S	complex5.pdb.gz	54,56,57,103
6	0.01	2bu6A	0.553	2.75	0.060	0.667	0.46	TF2	complex6.pdb.gz	57,62,100,103,104
7	0.01	2yyjA	0.548	4.23	0.047	0.771	0.77	4HP	complex7.pdb.gz	46,113,116
8	0.01	2bu7A	0.557	2.86	0.066	0.672	0.47	TF3	complex8.pdb.gz	28,53,104,107,108,111,164
9	0.01	1jm6A	0.519	2.97	0.073	0.632	0.43	ADP	complex9.pdb.gz	56,59,60,101,105,107,108
10	0.01	2bu2A	0.553	2.76	0.060	0.667	0.40	ATP	complex10.pdb.gz	57,60,61,103,106,107,108

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted binding site and residues.
(a)	Cscore^LB is the confidence score of predicted binding site. Cscore^LB values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable ligand-binding site prediction.
(b)	BS-score is a measure of local similarity (sequence & structure) between template binding site and predicted binding site in the query structure. Based on large scale benchmarking analysis, we have observed that a BS-score >1 reflects a significant local match between the predicted and template binding site.
(c)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(d)	RMSD^a the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(e)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(f)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

References:
1.	Wei Zheng, Chengxin Zhang, Yang Li, Robin Pearce, Eric W. Bell, Yang Zhang. Folding non-homology proteins by coupling deep-learning contact maps with I-TASSER assembly simulations. In preparation, 2020.