D-I-TASSER Q92990-D1

D-I-TASSER results for Q92990-D1

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>Q92990 (113 residues)
MAVEELQSIIKRCQILEEQDFKEEDFGLFQLAGQRCIEEGHTDQLLEIIQNEKNKVIIKN
MGWNLVGPVVRCLLCKDKEDSKRKVYFLIFDLLVKLCNPKELLLGLLELIEEP

Predicted Secondary Structure

Sequence	20 40 60 80 100 \| \| \| \| \| MAVEELQSIIKRCQILEEQDFKEEDFGLFQLAGQRCIEEGHTDQLLEIIQNEKNKVIIKNMGWNLVGPVVRCLLCKDKEDSKRKVYFLIFDLLVKLCNPKELLLGLLELIEEP
Prediction	CCHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCHHHHHHHHHCCCCHHHHHHCCCCHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCHHHHHHHHHHHHCCC
Confidence	96899999999997265013882336899999999997076899999998565157666526521368889875277432137999999999999659679999999985179
	H:Helix; S:Strand; C:Coil

Predicted Solvent Accessibility

Sequence	20 40 60 80 100 \| \| \| \| \| MAVEELQSIIKRCQILEEQDFKEEDFGLFQLAGQRCIEEGHTDQLLEIIQNEKNKVIIKNMGWNLVGPVVRCLLCKDKEDSKRKVYFLIFDLLVKLCNPKELLLGLLELIEEP
Prediction	75374045005405416576156532420331044016554153014104566242104212131012004201444665542530240042015304244102201542578
	Values range from 0 (buried residue) to 8 (highly exposed residue)

Predicted Contact, Hydrogen and Distance Map Used in D-I-TASSER simulation

Contact Map

Distance Map

Hydrogen bond networks

D-I-TASSER simulation is guided by the consensus contact map (left figure), distance map (middle figure) and Hydrogen bond network (right figure) derived based on confidence scores of AttentionPotential. In the contact, distance map and hydrogen bond networks, the axes mark the residue index along the sequence. For the contact map, each dot represents a residue pair with predicted contact, while for the distance map and hydrogen bond network, a color scale represents a distance of 1-20+ angstroms or a angle of 0-180 degree.

Top 10 threading templates used by D-I-TASSER

Rank

PDB
hit

ID1

ID2

Cov

Norm.
Zscore

Download
alignment

                  20                  40                  60                  80                 100

                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |

SS
Seq

CCHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCHHHHHHHHHCCCCHHHHHHCCCCHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCHHHHHHHHHHHHCCC
MAVEELQSIIKRCQILEEQDFKEEDFGLFQLAGQRCIEEGHTDQLLEIIQNEKNKVIIKNMGWNLVGPVVRCLLCKDKEDSKRKVYFLIFDLLVKLCNPKELLLGLLELIEEP

4f52E

0.97

0.89

25.05

1.17

DEthreader

MAVEELQSIIKRCQ-IL-E-------GLFQLAGQRCIEEGHTDQLLEIIQNEKNKVIIKNMGWNLVGPVVRCLLCKDKEDSKRKVYFLIFDLLVKLCNPKELLLGLLELIEEP

4f52E

0.98

0.90

25.29

1.17

SPARKS-K

MAVEELQSIIKRCQILEGL---------FQLAGQRCIEEGHTDQLLEIIQNEKNKVIIKNMGWNLVGPVVRCLLCKDKEDSKRKVYFLIFDLLVKLCNPKELLLGLLELIEEP

4f52E

1.00

0.92

25.77

1.24

MUSTER

MAVEELQSIIKRCQILE---------GLFQLAGQRCIEEGHTDQLLEIIQNEKNKVIIKNMGWNLVGPVVRCLLCKDKEDSKRKVYFLIFDLLVKLCNPKELLLGLLELIEEP

4f52E

1.00

0.92

25.77

2.87

HHsearch

MAVEELQSIIKRCQILE---------GLFQLAGQRCIEEGHTDQLLEIIQNEKNKVIIKNMGWNLVGPVVRCLLCKDKEDSKRKVYFLIFDLLVKLCNPKELLLGLLELIEEP

4f52E

0.99

0.90

25.28

1.28

FFAS-3D

MAVEELQSIIKRCQILEG---------LFQLAGQRCIEEGHTDQLLEIIQNEKNKVIIKNMGWNLVGPVVRCLLCKDKEDSKRKVYFLIFDLLVKLCNPKELLLGLLELIEE-

3fgaB2

0.14

0.13

4.52

1.17

DEthreader

KEVMFLNELEEILDVIEPSEFVKIMEPLFRQLAKCVSSHFQAERALYYWNNEYIMSLISNILPIMFPSLYRNSK--THWNKIHGLIYNALKLFMEM-NQ--KLF--DDCTQFK

3fgaB

0.14

0.13

4.52

1.17

DEthreader

KEVMFLNELEEILDVIEPSEFVKIMEPLFRQLAKCVSSHFQAERALYYWNNEYIMSLISNILPIMFPSLYRNSK--THWNKIHGLIYNALKLFMEM-NQ--KLF--DDCTQFK

5cwjA

0.11

3.87

0.72

SPARKS-K

GTEESLRQAIEDVAQLAKKSQDSEVLEEAIRVILRIAKESGSEEALRQAIRAVAEIAKESEVLEEAIRVILRIAKESGSEEALRQAIRAVAEIAKEAQDPRVLEEAIRVIRQI

3j7jA

0.06

2.65

0.66

MapAlign

-KQPALDVLYDVMKSKKHRTWQKIHEPIMLKYLELCVDLRKSHLAKEGLY--QYKKSLEDVVRAYLKMAEEKTEAAKEETPWVKFLWESYRQCLDLLLYHDIAQQAFKFCLQY

4f52E

0.99

0.91

25.53

0.56

CEthreader

MAVEELQSIIKRCQILEG---------LFQLAGQRCIEEGHTDQLLEIIQNEKNKVIIKNMGWNLVGPVVRCLLCKDKEDSKRKVYFLIFDLLVKLCNPKELLLGLLELIEEP

(a)	ID1 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by number of aligned residues.
(b)	ID2 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by query sequence length.
(c)	Cov is equal the number of aligned template residues divided by query sequence length.
(d)	Norm. Zscore is the normalized Z-score of the threading alignments. A Normalized Z-score >1 means a good alignment and is highlighted in bold.
(e)	Download alignment lists the threading program used to identify the template, and provide the 3D structure of aligned regions of threading templates (threading[1-10].pdb.gz).
(f)	Template residues identical to query sequence are highlighted in color.

Top 1 final models from D-I-TASSER

Click to view	Rank^a	Download	Estimated TM-score^b
	1	model1.pdb.gz	0.7759

(a)

D-I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, i.e. decoys. These decoys are clustered by SPICKER based on pairwise structure similarity to report up to five final models from the five largest clusters. Models are ranked in descending order of cluster size. If the simulations converge well, it is possible to have less than 5 models generated, which is usually an indication of good model quality.

(b)

The model confidence is quantitatified by estimated TM-score (eTM-score), calculated based on significance of threading template alignments, contact map satisfaction rate, mean absolute error between distance of model and distance of AttentionPotential, and convergence of D-I-TASSER simulations. eTM-score is typically in the range of [0, 1], with higher eTM-score signifies higher model confidence.

Proteins with similar structure

Top 10 structural analogs in PDB (as identified by TM-align)

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	Download Alignment
1	4f52E	0.83	1.46	0.971	0.920	model1_4f52E.pdb.gz
2	5a7dL	0.70	2.69	0.065	0.920	model1_5a7dL.pdb.gz
3	3fgaB2	0.68	2.89	0.142	0.938	model1_3fgaB2.pdb.gz
4	5hb1A2	0.68	3.17	0.071	0.974	model1_5hb1A2.pdb.gz
5	6reyc	0.67	3.12	0.101	0.965	model1_6reyc.pdb.gz
6	5mdtA	0.66	3.03	0.064	0.947	model1_5mdtA.pdb.gz
7	6vp9B3	0.66	2.83	0.071	0.867	model1_6vp9B3.pdb.gz
8	5yfpB	0.66	3.26	0.045	0.974	model1_5yfpB.pdb.gz
9	6tc0C3	0.65	3.51	0.063	0.929	model1_6tc0C3.pdb.gz
10	6bq1A	0.65	3.00	0.107	0.903	model1_6bq1A.pdb.gz

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Gene Ontology (GO) Terms

Molecular Function (MF)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0055105	1.00	ubiquitin-protein transferase inhibitor activity

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Molecular Function. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Biological Process (BP)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0050715	1.00	positive regulation of cytokine secretion
GO:0045086	1.00	positive regulation of interleukin-2 biosynthetic process
GO:0042692	1.00	muscle cell differentiation
GO:0042327	1.00	positive regulation of phosphorylation
GO:0042130	1.00	negative regulation of T cell proliferation
GO:0040029	1.00	regulation of gene expression, epigenetic
GO:0032434	1.00	regulation of proteasomal ubiquitin-dependent protein catabolic process
GO:0001570	1.00	vasculogenesis

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Biological Process. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Cellular Component (CC)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0005737	1.00	cytoplasm
GO:0032991	0.55	macromolecular complex
GO:0043234	0.52	protein complex

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Cellular Component. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Predicted Enzyme Commission (EC) Numbers

Top 5 enzyme homologs in PDB

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	EC Number	Predicted Active Site Residues
1	0.060	2z72A	0.559	3.80	0.120	0.876	3.1.3.48	NA
2	0.060	3gzkA	0.550	3.63	0.042	0.850	3.2.1.4	NA
3	0.060	1dceA	0.557	3.27	0.046	0.805	2.5.1.60	NA
4	0.060	1d8dA	0.547	3.97	0.137	0.894	2.5.1.58	NA
5	0.060	2q1fA	0.567	4.15	0.064	0.894	4.2.2.21	NA

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted active site residues.
(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the Enzyme Commission (EC) number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Ligand Binding Sites

Template proteins with similar binding site:

Rank	Cscore^LB	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	BS-score	Lig. Name	Download Complex	Predicted binding site residues
1	0.21	3d9kA	0.583	3.43	0.147	0.876	0.46	III	complex1.pdb.gz	30,64,67,68
2	0.06	3g2wB	0.608	3.46	0.057	0.894	0.84	III	complex2.pdb.gz	62,63,64,67,70,71,101,104
3	0.04	1jplC	0.615	3.55	0.057	0.903	0.50	III	complex3.pdb.gz	26,27,30,33,34,64,67,71
4	0.03	1jplB	0.613	3.55	0.057	0.903	0.41	III	complex4.pdb.gz	27,30,31,57,64,65,68
5	0.02	1juqA	0.614	3.53	0.047	0.903	0.47	III	complex5.pdb.gz	61,64,67,68,101,108
6	0.02	3gs30	0.606	3.46	0.104	0.920	0.50	III	complex6.pdb.gz	62,66,90,94,97
7	0.02	1ujkA	0.613	3.54	0.047	0.903	0.43	III	complex7.pdb.gz	22,23,24,27,30,31,64
8	0.02	1ujkB	0.617	3.42	0.057	0.894	0.41	III	complex8.pdb.gz	31,34,37,38,64
9	0.01	1h2u0	0.604	4.07	0.073	0.974	0.47	III	complex9.pdb.gz	62,66,67

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted binding site and residues.
(a)	Cscore^LB is the confidence score of predicted binding site. Cscore^LB values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable ligand-binding site prediction.
(b)	BS-score is a measure of local similarity (sequence & structure) between template binding site and predicted binding site in the query structure. Based on large scale benchmarking analysis, we have observed that a BS-score >1 reflects a significant local match between the predicted and template binding site.
(c)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(d)	RMSD^a the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(e)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(f)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

References:
1.	Wei Zheng, Chengxin Zhang, Yang Li, Robin Pearce, Eric W. Bell, Yang Zhang. Folding non-homology proteins by coupling deep-learning contact maps with I-TASSER assembly simulations. In preparation, 2020.