D-I-TASSER Q92482-D2

D-I-TASSER results for Q92482-D2

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>Q92482 (144 residues)
TYPSGHLDMINGFFDQFIGTASLIVCVLAIVDPYNNPVPRGLEAFTVGLVVLVIGTSMGF
NSGYAVNPARDFGPRLFTALAGWGSAVFTTGQHWWWVPIVSPLLGSIAGVFVYQLMIGCH
LEQPPPSNEEENVKLAHVKHKEQI

Predicted Secondary Structure

Sequence	20 40 60 80 100 120 140 \| \| \| \| \| \| \| TYPSGHLDMINGFFDQFIGTASLIVCVLAIVDPYNNPVPRGLEAFTVGLVVLVIGTSMGFNSGYAVNPARDFGPRLFTALAGWGSAVFTTGQHWWWVPIVSPLLGSIAGVFVYQLMIGCHLEQPPPSNEEENVKLAHVKHKEQI
Prediction	CCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHSSCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCHHCHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCCCSSSSHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHCC
Confidence	999998866889999999999999999950358888888761789999999999997024457725711025799999981555223568986176212488999999999999998328888876541444334424566429
	H:Helix; S:Strand; C:Coil

Predicted Solvent Accessibility

Sequence	20 40 60 80 100 120 140 \| \| \| \| \| \| \| TYPSGHLDMINGFFDQFIGTASLIVCVLAIVDPYNNPVPRGLEAFTVGLVVLVIGTSMGFNSGYAVNPARDFGPRLFTALAGWGSAVFTTGQHWWWVPIVSPLLGSIAGVFVYQLMIGCHLEQPPPSNEEENVKLAHVKHKEQI
Prediction	843456234130232023333332310000003444543521102211331333011323311210000223011201111423443255432000001011330021013102200224256555566765264554646666
	Values range from 0 (buried residue) to 8 (highly exposed residue)

Predicted Contact, Hydrogen and Distance Map Used in D-I-TASSER simulation

Contact Map

Distance Map

Hydrogen bond networks

D-I-TASSER simulation is guided by the consensus contact map (left figure), distance map (middle figure) and Hydrogen bond network (right figure) derived based on confidence scores of AttentionPotential. In the contact, distance map and hydrogen bond networks, the axes mark the residue index along the sequence. For the contact map, each dot represents a residue pair with predicted contact, while for the distance map and hydrogen bond network, a color scale represents a distance of 1-20+ angstroms or a angle of 0-180 degree.

Top 10 threading templates used by D-I-TASSER

Rank

PDB
hit

ID1

ID2

Cov

Norm.
Zscore

Download
alignment

                  20                  40                  60                  80                 100                 120                 140

                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |

SS
Seq

CCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHSSCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCHHCHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCCCSSSSHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHCC
TYPSGHLDMINGFFDQFIGTASLIVCVLAIVDPYNNPVPRGLEAFTVGLVVLVIGTSMGFNSGYAVNPARDFGPRLFTALAGWGSAVFTTGQHWWWVPIVSPLLGSIAGVFVYQLMIGCHLEQPPPSNEEENVKLAHVKHKEQI

1ldfA

0.43

0.36

10.59

1.33

DEthreader

TYPNPHINFVQAFAVEMVITAILMGLILALTDDGNGVPRGPLAPLLIGLLIAVIGASMGPLTGTAMNPARDFGPKVFAWLAGWGNVAFTGGIPYFLVPLFGPIVGAIVGAFAYRKLIGRHL-----------------------

3c02A

0.30

0.26

7.79

1.44

SPARKS-K

TSRNPSISLTGAFFNELILTGILLLVILVVVDEICGKFHILKLSSVVGLIILCIGITFGGNTGFALNPSRDLGSRFLSLIAYGKD-TFTKDNFYFWVPLVAPCVGSVVFCQFYDKVICPLVDLA--------------------

1ldfA

0.42

0.35

10.40

0.89

MapAlign

TYPNPHINFVQAFAVEMVITAILMGLILALTDDGNGVPRGPLAPLLIGLLIAVIGASMGPLTGTAMNPARDFGPKVFAWLAGWGNVAFTGDIPYFLVPLFGPIVGAIVGAFAYRKLIGRHL-----------------------

1ldfA

0.42

0.35

10.40

0.77

CEthreader

TYPNPHINFVQAFAVEMVITAILMGLILALTDDGNGVPRGPLAPLLIGLLIAVIGASMGPLTGTAMNPARDFGPKVFAWLAGWGNVAFTGDIPYFLVPLFGPIVGAIVGAFAYRKLIGRHL-----------------------

6n1gA

0.46

0.39

11.34

1.02

MUSTER

TYLPDHMTLWRGFLNEAWLTGMLQLCLFAITDQENNPALPGTEALVIGILVVIIGVSLGMNTGYAINPSRDLPPRIFTFIAGWGKQVFSNGENWWWVPVVAPLLGAYLGGIIYLVFIGSTI-----------------------

6n1gA

0.46

0.39

11.34

2.53

HHsearch

TYLPDHMTLWRGFLNEAWLTGMLQLCLFAITDQENNPALPGTEALVIGILVVIIGVSLGMNTGYAINPSRDLPPRIFTFIAGWGKQVFSNGENWWWVPVVAPLLGAYLGGIIYLVFIGSTI-----------------------

6n1gA

0.46

0.39

11.34

1.71

FFAS-3D

TYLPDHMTLWRGFLNEAWLTGMLQLCLFAITDQENNPALPGTEALVIGILVVIIGVSLGMNTGYAINPSRDLPPRIFTFIAGWGKQVFSNGENWWWVPVVAPLLGAYLGGIIYLVFIGSTI-----------------------

6n1gA

0.46

0.39

11.34

1.00

EigenThreader

TYLPDHMTLWRGFLNEAWLTGMLQLCLFAITDQENNPALPGTEALVIGILVVIIGVSLGMNTGYAINPSRDLPPRIFTFIAGWGKQVFSNGENWWWVPVVAPLLGAYLGGIIYLVFIGSTI-----------------------

1fx8A

0.42

0.34

10.01

1.17

CNFpred

TYPNPHINFVQAFAVEMVITAILMGLILALTDDGNGVPRGPLAPLLIGLLIAVIGASMGPLTGFAMNPARDFGPKVFAWLAGWGNVAFTRDIPYFLVPLFGPIVGAIVGAFAYRKLIG--------------------------

6n1gA

0.46

0.39

11.34

1.33

DEthreader

TYLPDHMTLWRGFLNEAWLTGMLQLCLFAITDQENNPALPGTEALVIGILVVIIGVSLGMNTGYAINPSRDLPPRIFTFIAGWGKQVFSNGENWWWVPVVAPLLGAYLGGIIYLVFIGSTI-----------------------

(a)	ID1 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by number of aligned residues.
(b)	ID2 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by query sequence length.
(c)	Cov is equal the number of aligned template residues divided by query sequence length.
(d)	Norm. Zscore is the normalized Z-score of the threading alignments. A Normalized Z-score >1 means a good alignment and is highlighted in bold.
(e)	Download alignment lists the threading program used to identify the template, and provide the 3D structure of aligned regions of threading templates (threading[1-10].pdb.gz).
(f)	Template residues identical to query sequence are highlighted in color.

Top 1 final models from D-I-TASSER

Click to view	Rank^a	Download	Estimated TM-score^b
	1	model1.pdb.gz	0.6997

(a)

D-I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, i.e. decoys. These decoys are clustered by SPICKER based on pairwise structure similarity to report up to five final models from the five largest clusters. Models are ranked in descending order of cluster size. If the simulations converge well, it is possible to have less than 5 models generated, which is usually an indication of good model quality.

(b)

The model confidence is quantitatified by estimated TM-score (eTM-score), calculated based on significance of threading template alignments, contact map satisfaction rate, mean absolute error between distance of model and distance of AttentionPotential, and convergence of D-I-TASSER simulations. eTM-score is typically in the range of [0, 1], with higher eTM-score signifies higher model confidence.

Proteins with similar structure

Top 10 structural analogs in PDB (as identified by TM-align)

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	Download Alignment
1	1ldfA	0.81	0.98	0.421	0.840	model1_1ldfA.pdb.gz
2	6n1gA	0.80	1.01	0.463	0.840	model1_6n1gA.pdb.gz
3	3c02A	0.80	1.29	0.309	0.854	model1_3c02A.pdb.gz
4	6f7hA	0.78	1.39	0.529	0.840	model1_6f7hA.pdb.gz
5	2f2bA	0.71	1.36	0.245	0.764	model1_2f2bA.pdb.gz
6	4nefA	0.70	1.90	0.220	0.778	model1_4nefA.pdb.gz
7	2w2eA	0.69	2.05	0.239	0.778	model1_2w2eA.pdb.gz
8	3d9sA	0.69	1.80	0.216	0.757	model1_3d9sA.pdb.gz
9	2b6pA	0.69	1.94	0.203	0.757	model1_2b6pA.pdb.gz
10	2o9dB	0.68	1.57	0.183	0.757	model1_2o9dB.pdb.gz

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Gene Ontology (GO) Terms

Molecular Function (MF)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0022891	1.00	substrate-specific transmembrane transporter activity
GO:0005372	0.99	water transmembrane transporter activity
GO:0015168	0.97	glycerol transmembrane transporter activity
GO:0022838	0.94	substrate-specific channel activity
GO:0015250	0.93	water channel activity
GO:0015254	0.91	glycerol channel activity
GO:0015204	0.60	urea transmembrane transporter activity

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Molecular Function. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Biological Process (BP)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0044699	1.00	single-organism process
GO:0009987	0.98	cellular process
GO:0065008	0.97	regulation of biological quality
GO:0051234	0.97	establishment of localization
GO:0044763	0.97	single-organism cellular process
GO:0016043	0.97	cellular component organization
GO:0009992	0.96	cellular water homeostasis
GO:0006810	0.96	transport
GO:0055085	0.94	transmembrane transport
GO:0006811	0.94	ion transport
GO:0034220	0.92	ion transmembrane transport
GO:0071702	0.61	organic substance transport
GO:0071705	0.58	nitrogen compound transport
GO:0019755	0.56	one-carbon compound transport
GO:0015840	0.54	urea transport
GO:0071918	0.53	urea transmembrane transport

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Biological Process. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Cellular Component (CC)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0044464	1.00	cell part
GO:0044459	0.99	plasma membrane part
GO:0005887	0.97	integral component of plasma membrane
GO:0044424	0.59	intracellular part

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Cellular Component. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Predicted Enzyme Commission (EC) Numbers

Top 5 enzyme homologs in PDB

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	EC Number	Predicted Active Site Residues
1	0.060	2bffA	0.466	4.03	0.080	0.681	1.2.4.4	NA
2	0.060	2isvA	0.478	4.75	0.015	0.819	4.1.2.13	NA
3	0.060	1qs0A	0.491	3.79	0.026	0.701	1.2.4.4	NA
4	0.060	3c56A	0.471	4.69	0.023	0.799	4.1.2.13	67
5	0.060	1rsrB	0.493	4.32	0.051	0.771	1.17.4.1	49

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted active site residues.
(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the Enzyme Commission (EC) number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Ligand Binding Sites

Template proteins with similar binding site:

Rank	Cscore^LB	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	BS-score	Lig. Name	Download Complex	Predicted binding site residues
1	0.25	1fx8A	0.803	1.02	0.421	0.840	1.30	GOL	complex1.pdb.gz	2,3,4,5,59,60,63
2	0.07	2b6oA	0.685	2.05	0.215	0.764	0.85	MC3	complex2.pdb.gz	14,18,21,104,105
3	0.07	2b6oA	0.685	2.05	0.215	0.764	0.74	MC3	complex3.pdb.gz	9,10,13,14,101,104
4	0.04	2b6oA	0.685	2.05	0.215	0.764	0.64	MC3	complex4.pdb.gz	89,96,99,100,103

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted binding site and residues.
(a)	Cscore^LB is the confidence score of predicted binding site. Cscore^LB values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable ligand-binding site prediction.
(b)	BS-score is a measure of local similarity (sequence & structure) between template binding site and predicted binding site in the query structure. Based on large scale benchmarking analysis, we have observed that a BS-score >1 reflects a significant local match between the predicted and template binding site.
(c)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(d)	RMSD^a the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(e)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(f)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

References:
1.	Wei Zheng, Chengxin Zhang, Yang Li, Robin Pearce, Eric W. Bell, Yang Zhang. Folding non-homology proteins by coupling deep-learning contact maps with I-TASSER assembly simulations. In preparation, 2020.