D-I-TASSER Q8WZA9

D-I-TASSER results for Q8WZA9

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

Summary of the Protein

Uniprot ID: Q8WZA9
Protein Name: Immunity-related GTPase family Q protein
Gene Name: IRGQ

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>Q8WZA9 (623 residues)
MPPPQGDVTALFLGPPGLGKSALIAALCDKDVETLEAPEGRPDSGVPSLRAAGPGLFLGE
LSCPPAAPGPWAAEANVLVLVLPGPEGNGEPLAPALGEAALAALARGTPLLAVRNLRPGD
SQTAAQARDQTAALLNSAGLGAADLFVLPANCGSSDGCEELERLRAALQSQAEALRRLLP
PAQDGFEVLGAAELEAVREAFETGGLEAALSWVRSGLERLGSARLDLAVAGKADVGLVVD
MLLGLDPGDPGAAPASVPTAPTPFPAPERPNVVLWTVPLGHTGTATTAAAASHPTHYDAL
ILVTPGAPTEKDWAQVQALLLPDAPLVCVRTDGEGEDPECLGEGKMENPKGESLKNAGGG
GLENALSKGREKCSAGSQKAGSGEGPGKAGSEGLQQVVGMKKSGGGDSERAAALSPEDET
WEVLEEAPPPVFPLRPGGLPGLCEWLRRALPPAQAGALLLALPPASPSAARTKAAALRAG
AWRPALLASLAAAAAPLPGLGWACDVALLRGQLAEWRRGLGLEPTALARRERALGLASGE
LAARAHFPGPVTRAEVEARLGAWAGEGTAGGAALGALSFLWPAGGAAATGGLGYRAAHGV
LLQALDEMRADAEAVLAPPEPAQ

Predicted Contact and Distance Map Used in D-I-TASSER simulation

Contact Map

Distance Map

D-I-TASSER simulation is guided by the consensus contact map (left figure) and distance map (right figure) derived based on confidence scores of AttentionPotential. In the contact, distance map and hydrogen bond networks, the axes mark the residue index along the sequence. For the contact map, each dot represents a residue pair with predicted contact, while for the distance map and hydrogen bond network, a color scale represents a distance of 1-20+ angstroms or a angle of 0-180 degree.

Information of Domain

No. of Domain	Domain	Domain Boundary	Length of Domain	Models of Domain	Sequence
1	Q8WZA9-D1	1-298,450-465	314		MPPPQGDVTALFLGPPGLGKSALIAALCDKDVETLEAPEGRPDSGVPSLRAAGPGLFLGELSCPPAAPGPWAAEANVLVLVLPGPEGNGEPLAPALGEAALAALARGTPLLAVRNLRPGDSQTAAQARDQTAALLNSAGLGAADLFVLPANCGSSDGCEELERLRAALQSQAEALRRLLPPAQDGFEVLGAAELEAVREAFETGGLEAALSWVRSGLERLGSARLDLAVAGKADVGLVVDMLLGLDPGDPGAAPASVPTAPTPFPAPERPNVVLWTVPLGHTGTATTAAAASHPTHYDLPPAQAGALLLALPPA
2	Q8WZA9-D2	299-449	151		ALILVTPGAPTEKDWAQVQALLLPDAPLVCVRTDGEGEDPECLGEGKMENPKGESLKNAGGGGLENALSKGREKCSAGSQKAGSGEGPGKAGSEGLQQVVGMKKSGGGDSERAAALSPEDETWEVLEEAPPPVFPLRPGGLPGLCEWLRRA
3	Q8WZA9-D3	466-623	158		SPSAARTKAAALRAGAWRPALLASLAAAAAPLPGLGWACDVALLRGQLAEWRRGLGLEPTALARRERALGLASGELAARAHFPGPVTRAEVEARLGAWAGEGTAGGAALGALSFLWPAGGAAATGGLGYRAAHGVLLQALDEMRADAEAVLAPPEPAQ

Top 1 final models from D-I-TASSER

Click to view	Rank^a	Download	Estimated TM-score^b
	1	model1.pdb.gz	0.56

(a)

D-I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, i.e. decoys. These decoys are clustered by SPICKER based on pairwise structure similarity to report up to five final models from the five largest clusters. Models are ranked in descending order of cluster size. If the simulations converge well, it is possible to have less than 5 models generated, which is usually an indication of good model quality.

(b)

The model confidence is quantitatified by estimated TM-score (eTM-score), calculated based on significance of threading template alignments, contact map satisfaction rate, mean absolute error between distance of model and distance of AttentionPotential, and convergence of D-I-TASSER simulations. eTM-score is typically in the range of [0, 1], with higher eTM-score signifies higher model confidence.

Proteins with similar structure

Top 10 structural analogs in PDB (as identified by TM-align)

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	Download Alignment
1	1tq6A	0.41	3.97	0.099	0.469	model1_1tq6A.pdb.gz
2	6eqoA	0.40	7.74	0.062	0.636	model1_6eqoA.pdb.gz
3	7c3kA	0.39	4.68	0.110	0.462	model1_7c3kA.pdb.gz
4	4kxfK	0.37	8.06	0.062	0.607	model1_4kxfK.pdb.gz
5	5ikyA	0.36	7.65	0.074	0.565	model1_5ikyA.pdb.gz
6	6f2pA	0.36	8.03	0.033	0.586	model1_6f2pA.pdb.gz
7	5yz0A	0.36	7.64	0.043	0.568	model1_5yz0A.pdb.gz
8	6zpnA	0.36	7.83	0.044	0.575	model1_6zpnA.pdb.gz
9	6hqvA	0.36	7.78	0.072	0.570	model1_6hqvA.pdb.gz
10	5a22A	0.36	7.51	0.033	0.557	model1_5a22A.pdb.gz

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Gene Ontology (GO) Terms

Molecular Function (MF)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0016787	0.99	hydrolase activity
GO:0017111	0.95	nucleoside-triphosphatase activity
GO:0003924	0.93	GTPase activity
GO:1901363	0.77	heterocyclic compound binding
GO:0097159	0.77	organic cyclic compound binding
GO:1901265	0.71	nucleoside phosphate binding
GO:0036094	0.71	small molecule binding
GO:0035639	0.50	purine ribonucleoside triphosphate binding
GO:0032555	0.50	purine ribonucleotide binding
GO:0032550	0.50	purine ribonucleoside binding

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Molecular Function. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Biological Process (BP)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0009987	0.89	cellular process
GO:0050896	0.87	response to stimulus
GO:0006955	0.60	immune response
GO:0006952	0.58	defense response

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Biological Process. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Cellular Component (CC)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0005737	1.00	cytoplasm
GO:0043226	0.90	organelle
GO:0043227	0.81	membrane-bounded organelle
GO:0044444	0.80	cytoplasmic part
GO:0043229	0.80	intracellular organelle
GO:0044446	0.72	intracellular organelle part
GO:0043231	0.72	intracellular membrane-bounded organelle
GO:0005634	0.59	nucleus

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Cellular Component. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Predicted Enzyme Commission (EC) Numbers

Top 5 enzyme homologs in PDB

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	EC Number	Predicted Active Site Residues
1	0.060	2ckjA	0.320	8.10	0.063	0.530	1.17.1.4 1.17.3.2	NA
2	0.060	1yq2A	0.327	7.76	0.050	0.531	3.2.1.23	NA
3	0.060	1sliA	0.317	8.03	0.041	0.522	4.2.2.15 3.2.1.18	NA
4	0.060	2vdcF	0.338	8.36	0.060	0.570	1.4.1.13	NA
5	0.060	1z0hB	0.238	7.69	0.041	0.384	3.4.24.69	388

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted active site residues.
(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the Enzyme Commission (EC) number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Ligand Binding Sites

Template proteins with similar binding site:

Rank	Cscore^LB	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	BS-score	Lig. Name	Download Complex	Predicted binding site residues
1	0.01	2eauA	0.305	7.26	0.061	0.459	0.49	PTY	complex1.pdb.gz	237,278,282
2	0.01	1ea0A	0.343	8.17	0.055	0.573	0.76	F3S	complex2.pdb.gz	237,243,244,245,246,252,257
3	0.01	3ar3A	0.298	7.80	0.032	0.483	0.51	PTY	complex3.pdb.gz	236,239,240
4	0.01	3ar3A	0.298	7.80	0.032	0.483	0.47	PTY	complex4.pdb.gz	236,239,243
5	0.01	3ar4A	0.299	7.82	0.032	0.486	0.43	PTY	complex5.pdb.gz	231,239,243
6	0.01	3fgoB	0.290	8.29	0.045	0.496	0.42	CZA	complex6.pdb.gz	236,237,239,245,255,261
7	0.01	2dqsA	0.298	7.78	0.036	0.483	0.48	PTY	complex7.pdb.gz	231,236,243
8	0.01	2vdcA	0.349	8.17	0.055	0.583	0.76	F3S	complex8.pdb.gz	237,243,244,245,246,252,257
9	0.01	1tq2A	0.410	3.97	0.101	0.467	0.42	GNP	complex9.pdb.gz	231,232,234,236,237,238,256

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted binding site and residues.
(a)	Cscore^LB is the confidence score of predicted binding site. Cscore^LB values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable ligand-binding site prediction.
(b)	BS-score is a measure of local similarity (sequence & structure) between template binding site and predicted binding site in the query structure. Based on large scale benchmarking analysis, we have observed that a BS-score >1 reflects a significant local match between the predicted and template binding site.
(c)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(d)	RMSD^a the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(e)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(f)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

References:
1.	Wei Zheng, Chengxin Zhang, Yang Li, Robin Pearce, Eric W. Bell, Yang Zhang. Folding non-homology proteins by coupling deep-learning contact maps with I-TASSER assembly simulations. In preparation, 2020.