D-I-TASSER Q8WYQ3-D1

D-I-TASSER results for Q8WYQ3-D1

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>Q8WYQ3 (142 residues)
MPRGSRSAASRPASRPAAPSAHPPAHPPPSAAAPAPAPSGQPGLMAQMATTAAGVAVGSA
VGHVMGSALTGAFSGGSSEPSQPAVQQAPTPAAPQPLQMGPCAYEIRQFLDCSTTQSDLS
LCEGFSEALKQCKYYHGLSSLP

Predicted Secondary Structure

Sequence	20 40 60 80 100 120 140 \| \| \| \| \| \| \| MPRGSRSAASRPASRPAAPSAHPPAHPPPSAAAPAPAPSGQPGLMAQMATTAAGVAVGSAVGHVMGSALTGAFSGGSSEPSQPAVQQAPTPAAPQPLQMGPCAYEIRQFLDCSTTQSDLSLCEGFSEALKQCKYYHGLSSLP
Prediction	CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCC
Confidence	9899999999999999999999999999999999988888653356778766543334477666523113578898766566775545655554432369818999999999842797126589999999999995987799
	H:Helix; S:Strand; C:Coil

Predicted Solvent Accessibility

Sequence	20 40 60 80 100 120 140 \| \| \| \| \| \| \| MPRGSRSAASRPASRPAAPSAHPPAHPPPSAAAPAPAPSGQPGLMAQMATTAAGVAVGSAVGHVMGSALTGAFSGGSSEPSQPAVQQAPTPAAPQPLQMGPCAYEIRQFLDCSTTQSDLSLCEGFSEALKQCKYYHGLSSLP
Prediction	7546646564545555464565446544554544444445444344423333333333322133223213222435555546554545554444444444303421430350366553153053034004302643536538
	Values range from 0 (buried residue) to 8 (highly exposed residue)

Predicted Contact, Hydrogen and Distance Map Used in D-I-TASSER simulation

Contact Map

Distance Map

Hydrogen bond networks

D-I-TASSER simulation is guided by the consensus contact map (left figure), distance map (middle figure) and Hydrogen bond network (right figure) derived based on confidence scores of AttentionPotential. In the contact, distance map and hydrogen bond networks, the axes mark the residue index along the sequence. For the contact map, each dot represents a residue pair with predicted contact, while for the distance map and hydrogen bond network, a color scale represents a distance of 1-20+ angstroms or a angle of 0-180 degree.

Top 10 threading templates used by D-I-TASSER

Rank

PDB
hit

ID1

ID2

Cov

Norm.
Zscore

Download
alignment

                  20                  40                  60                  80                 100                 120                 140

                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |

SS
Seq

CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCC
MPRGSRSAASRPASRPAAPSAHPPAHPPPSAAAPAPAPSGQPGLMAQMATTAAGVAVGSAVGHVMGSALTGAFSGGSSEPSQPAVQQAPTPAAPQPLQMGPCAYEIRQFLDCSTTQSDLSLCEGFSEALKQCKYYHGLSSLP

6z9lA

0.04

1.82

1.00

DEthreader

------------------E-QQTAKQAKELKEAVEKEAKAENKQKEEAKAKDQKTKDDQAVADQQTVVTTSQEKVTAKATAAQLTAKENALKDKQAATKQAQNTLDNSKEELKGHKGSKEELQQEIASNQEKLATAQQAESQ

2lqtA

0.21

0.06

2.01

1.82

HHsearch

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------NPCLSESDASTRCLDENYDRERCSTYFLRYKNCRRFWNSIFMP

3sf4A2

0.11

0.07

2.56

0.48

CEthreader

------------------------------------------GEFPEEVRDALQAAVDFYEENLSLVTALGDRAAQGR------AFGNLGNTHYLLGNFRDAVIAHEQRLLIAKEFGDKAAERRAYSNLGNAYIFLGEFETA

2v0oA

0.05

2.33

0.57

EigenThreader

FVRERATIEEAYSRSMTKLAKSASNYSQLGTFDVFKTSTEKLANCHLDLVRKLQELIKEVQKYGEEQVKSHKKTKEEVAGTLEAVQTIQSITQALQKSKENYNAKCVEQERLKKEGATQREIEKAAVKSKKATDTYKLYVEK

6y79U

0.18

0.13

4.13

0.56

FFAS-3D

-PREAAAHWV---------PFEDKANMPDNVPDVVEVGATSAPLLSASYFIGAKLKEGRRVTRCAVSVIED--------------------------INKSCLDEFRLHWQCLENNHQLSGCRKAEALLNKCVFTK------

6w2wA2

0.12

0.09

3.24

0.90

SPARKS-K

--------ENEAAKECLKAVRAALEAALLALLLLAKHPGSQAAQDAVQLATAALRAVEAACQLAKQY-------------------------PNSDIAKKCIKAASEAAEEASKAAEEAQRSQKARDEIKEASQKAEEVKER

2veqA

0.12

0.06

1.99

0.58

CNFpred

-----------------------------------------------MVMQTITRVVSFISFYQIFVESAA----------------------------KQLLVDLTELTANLPFGSKLDKLVYLTERLSKLKLLWDKVQLL

6z9lA4

0.06

0.05

2.09

1.00

DEthreader

-------------------------------AEAKVKKAAKAELANKQKEEAKAKDQKTKDDQAVADQQ-TVVTSQEKVTKAAKQADLTAKENALKDKQAATKQAQNTLDNSKEELHKLQEIASNQEKLATAQQ-A-ESDQQ

4xydA

0.05

2.33

0.74

MapAlign

SNLALDKMYWWYVVHLWVEGTWELVMASVLAFLMLKLTGVDREIIEKWLYLIVATALFSGILGTGHNKAALLWSLGCATLAFFGAGVWGFLHTLHGINYYTHGTQITAAHGHLAAGGMTFMTFVLTFAGTVQTHAQRVQGDY

2k3pA

0.10

3.61

0.64

MUSTER

SQNFGRIAPVTGGTAGISVGVPGYLRTPSSTILAPSNAQIISLGLQTTLAPVLSSASASARVSSLAQSLASALSTSRGTLSLSTFLNLLSSISSEIRALDGTQATVEVLLEALAALLQVIN-PSVNAALVSALVA-------

(a)	ID1 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by number of aligned residues.
(b)	ID2 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by query sequence length.
(c)	Cov is equal the number of aligned template residues divided by query sequence length.
(d)	Norm. Zscore is the normalized Z-score of the threading alignments. A Normalized Z-score >1 means a good alignment and is highlighted in bold.
(e)	Download alignment lists the threading program used to identify the template, and provide the 3D structure of aligned regions of threading templates (threading[1-10].pdb.gz).
(f)	Template residues identical to query sequence are highlighted in color.

Top 1 final models from D-I-TASSER

Click to view	Rank^a	Download	Estimated TM-score^b
	1	model1.pdb.gz	0.4248

(a)

D-I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, i.e. decoys. These decoys are clustered by SPICKER based on pairwise structure similarity to report up to five final models from the five largest clusters. Models are ranked in descending order of cluster size. If the simulations converge well, it is possible to have less than 5 models generated, which is usually an indication of good model quality.

(b)

The model confidence is quantitatified by estimated TM-score (eTM-score), calculated based on significance of threading template alignments, contact map satisfaction rate, mean absolute error between distance of model and distance of AttentionPotential, and convergence of D-I-TASSER simulations. eTM-score is typically in the range of [0, 1], with higher eTM-score signifies higher model confidence.

Proteins with similar structure

Top 10 structural analogs in PDB (as identified by TM-align)

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	Download Alignment
1	1rx0A	0.54	3.67	0.085	0.747	model1_1rx0A.pdb.gz
2	4n5fA	0.54	3.75	0.056	0.747	model1_4n5fA.pdb.gz
3	4l1fA	0.53	3.77	0.085	0.747	model1_4l1fA.pdb.gz
4	3r7kA	0.53	3.93	0.062	0.775	model1_3r7kA.pdb.gz
5	5af7A	0.53	3.76	0.042	0.747	model1_5af7A.pdb.gz
6	1jqiA	0.53	3.83	0.063	0.747	model1_1jqiA.pdb.gz
7	3swoA	0.53	3.96	0.056	0.761	model1_3swoA.pdb.gz
8	2rfqA	0.53	4.11	0.070	0.782	model1_2rfqA.pdb.gz
9	1bucA	0.53	3.78	0.070	0.747	model1_1bucA.pdb.gz
10	5lvuA	0.53	3.84	0.078	0.768	model1_5lvuA.pdb.gz

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Gene Ontology (GO) Terms

Molecular Function (MF)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:1901363	0.94	heterocyclic compound binding
GO:0097159	0.94	organic cyclic compound binding
GO:0003676	0.89	nucleic acid binding
GO:0003677	0.87	DNA binding
GO:0043565	0.50	sequence-specific DNA binding
GO:0003824	0.50	catalytic activity

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Molecular Function. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Biological Process (BP)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0065007	0.86	biological regulation
GO:0009987	0.84	cellular process
GO:0044699	0.81	single-organism process
GO:0008152	0.81	metabolic process
GO:0044237	0.75	cellular metabolic process
GO:0044763	0.74	single-organism cellular process
GO:0044710	0.71	single-organism metabolic process
GO:0071704	0.70	organic substance metabolic process
GO:0044238	0.69	primary metabolic process
GO:0034641	0.66	cellular nitrogen compound metabolic process
GO:0006091	0.65	generation of precursor metabolites and energy
GO:1901576	0.64	organic substance biosynthetic process
GO:0044281	0.64	small molecule metabolic process
GO:0006139	0.64	nucleobase-containing compound metabolic process
GO:0044271	0.63	cellular nitrogen compound biosynthetic process
GO:1901564	0.61	organonitrogen compound metabolic process
GO:0034654	0.61	nucleobase-containing compound biosynthetic process
GO:1901566	0.60	organonitrogen compound biosynthetic process
GO:0046128	0.59	purine ribonucleoside metabolic process
GO:0016043	0.59	cellular component organization
GO:0009205	0.59	purine ribonucleoside triphosphate metabolic process
GO:0009150	0.59	purine ribonucleotide metabolic process
GO:0065009	0.58	regulation of molecular function
GO:0046129	0.58	purine ribonucleoside biosynthetic process
GO:0009206	0.58	purine ribonucleoside triphosphate biosynthetic process
GO:0009152	0.58	purine ribonucleotide biosynthetic process
GO:0006996	0.58	organelle organization
GO:0006119	0.58	oxidative phosphorylation
GO:2000984	0.57	negative regulation of ATP citrate synthase activity
GO:0007005	0.57	mitochondrion organization
GO:0006754	0.57	ATP biosynthetic process

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Biological Process. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Cellular Component (CC)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0044424	1.00	intracellular part
GO:0044444	0.96	cytoplasmic part
GO:0044422	0.87	organelle part
GO:0043229	0.87	intracellular organelle
GO:0043227	0.87	membrane-bounded organelle
GO:0043231	0.86	intracellular membrane-bounded organelle
GO:0044446	0.83	intracellular organelle part
GO:0005739	0.77	mitochondrion
GO:0044429	0.63	mitochondrial part
GO:0070013	0.59	intracellular organelle lumen
GO:0005758	0.57	mitochondrial intermembrane space

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Cellular Component. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Predicted Enzyme Commission (EC) Numbers

Top 5 enzyme homologs in PDB

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	EC Number	Predicted Active Site Residues
1	0.060	1kwgA	0.482	4.29	0.064	0.753	3.2.1.23	NA
2	0.060	1xjjA	0.473	5.15	0.104	0.810	1.17.4.1	NA
3	0.060	3mddA	0.516	3.86	0.063	0.747	1.3.99.3	NA
4	0.060	1jqiA	0.528	3.83	0.063	0.747	1.3.99.2	54,123
5	0.060	1t9gC	0.520	3.70	0.056	0.739	1.3.99.3	123

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted active site residues.
(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the Enzyme Commission (EC) number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Ligand Binding Sites

Template proteins with similar binding site:

Rank	Cscore^LB	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	BS-score	Lig. Name	Download Complex	Predicted binding site residues
1	0.02	3pfdA	0.519	4.31	0.100	0.789	0.54	FDA	complex1.pdb.gz	67,73,111,112,114
2	0.01	2rfqC	0.527	4.18	0.063	0.782	0.69	1PS	complex2.pdb.gz	108,109,126
3	0.01	2rfqD	0.529	4.21	0.062	0.789	0.51	1PS	complex3.pdb.gz	124,126,129
4	0.01	3r7kA	0.531	3.93	0.062	0.775	0.44	FDA	complex4.pdb.gz	67,73,74,111,112,114
5	0.01	3swoA	0.527	3.96	0.056	0.761	0.47	FDA	complex5.pdb.gz	71,114,115,119,122
6	0.01	2ix6A	0.524	3.91	0.061	0.775	0.40	FAD	complex6.pdb.gz	39,45,127,128
7	0.01	2ix5B	0.485	4.60	0.071	0.789	0.41	FAD	complex7.pdb.gz	39,45,127,128,130
8	0.01	1ivhC	0.524	3.73	0.035	0.747	0.50	FAD	complex8.pdb.gz	75,76,114,115

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted binding site and residues.
(a)	Cscore^LB is the confidence score of predicted binding site. Cscore^LB values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable ligand-binding site prediction.
(b)	BS-score is a measure of local similarity (sequence & structure) between template binding site and predicted binding site in the query structure. Based on large scale benchmarking analysis, we have observed that a BS-score >1 reflects a significant local match between the predicted and template binding site.
(c)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(d)	RMSD^a the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(e)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(f)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

References:
1.	Wei Zheng, Chengxin Zhang, Yang Li, Robin Pearce, Eric W. Bell, Yang Zhang. Folding non-homology proteins by coupling deep-learning contact maps with I-TASSER assembly simulations. In preparation, 2020.