D-I-TASSER Q8TET4

D-I-TASSER results for Q8TET4

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

Summary of the Protein

Uniprot ID: Q8TET4
Protein Name: Neutral alpha-glucosidase C
Gene Name: GANC

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>Q8TET4 (914 residues)
MEAAVKEEISLEDEAVDKNIFRDCNKIAFYRRQKQWLSKKSTYQALLDSVTTDEDSTRFQ
IINEASKVPLLAEIYGIEGNIFRLKINEETPLKPRFEVPDVLTSKPSTVRLISCSGDTGS
LILADGKGDLKCHITANPFKVDLVSEEEVVISINSLGQLYFEHLQILHKQRAAKENEEET
SVDTSQENQEDLGLWEEKFGKFVDIKANGPSSIGLDFSLHGFEHLYGIPQHAESHQLKNT
GDGDAYRLYNLDVYGYQIYDKMGIYGSVPYLLAHKLGRTIGIFWLNASETLVEINTEPAV
EYTLTQMGPVAAKQKVRSRTHVHWMSESGIIDVFLLTGPTPSDVFKQYSHLTGTQAMPPL
FSLGYHQCRWNYEDEQDVKAVDAGFDEHDIPYDAMWLDIEHTEGKRYFTWDKNRFPNPKR
MQELLRSKKRKLVVISDPHIKIDPDYSVYVKAKDQGFFVKNQEGEDFEGVCWPGLSSYLD
FTNPKVREWYSSLFAFPVYQGSTDILFLWNDMNEPSVFRGPEQTMQKNAIHHGNWEHREL
HNIYGFYHQMATAEGLIKRSKGKERPFVLTRSFFAGSQKYGAVWTGDNTAEWSNLKISIP
MLLTLSITGISFCGADIGGFIGNPETELLVRWYQAGAYQPFFRGHATMNTKRREPWLFGE
EHTRLIREAIRERYGLLPYWYSLFYHAHVASQPVMRPLWVEFPDELKTFDMEDEYMLGSA
LLVHPVTEPKATTVDVFLPGSNEVWYDYKTFAHWEGGCTVKIPVALDTIPVFQRGGSVIP
IKTTVGKSTGWMTESSYGLRVALSTKGSSVGELYLDDGHSFQYLHQKQFLHRKFSFCSSV
LINSFADQRGHYPSKCVVEKILVLGFRKEPSSVTTHSSDGKDQPVAFTYCAKTSILSLEK
LSLNIATDWEVRII

Predicted Contact and Distance Map Used in D-I-TASSER simulation

Contact Map

Distance Map

D-I-TASSER simulation is guided by the consensus contact map (left figure) and distance map (right figure) derived based on confidence scores of AttentionPotential. In the contact, distance map and hydrogen bond networks, the axes mark the residue index along the sequence. For the contact map, each dot represents a residue pair with predicted contact, while for the distance map and hydrogen bond network, a color scale represents a distance of 1-20+ angstroms or a angle of 0-180 degree.

Information of Domain

No. of Domain	Domain	Domain Boundary	Length of Domain	Models of Domain	Sequence
1	Q8TET4-D1	1-354	354		MEAAVKEEISLEDEAVDKNIFRDCNKIAFYRRQKQWLSKKSTYQALLDSVTTDEDSTRFQIINEASKVPLLAEIYGIEGNIFRLKINEETPLKPRFEVPDVLTSKPSTVRLISCSGDTGSLILADGKGDLKCHITANPFKVDLVSEEEVVISINSLGQLYFEHLQILHKQRAAKENEEETSVDTSQENQEDLGLWEEKFGKFVDIKANGPSSIGLDFSLHGFEHLYGIPQHAESHQLKNTGDGDAYRLYNLDVYGYQIYDKMGIYGSVPYLLAHKLGRTIGIFWLNASETLVEINTEPAVEYTLTQMGPVAAKQKVRSRTHVHWMSESGIIDVFLLTGPTPSDVFKQYSHLTGT
2	Q8TET4-D2	355-829	475		QAMPPLFSLGYHQCRWNYEDEQDVKAVDAGFDEHDIPYDAMWLDIEHTEGKRYFTWDKNRFPNPKRMQELLRSKKRKLVVISDPHIKIDPDYSVYVKAKDQGFFVKNQEGEDFEGVCWPGLSSYLDFTNPKVREWYSSLFAFPVYQGSTDILFLWNDMNEPSVFRGPEQTMQKNAIHHGNWEHRELHNIYGFYHQMATAEGLIKRSKGKERPFVLTRSFFAGSQKYGAVWTGDNTAEWSNLKISIPMLLTLSITGISFCGADIGGFIGNPETELLVRWYQAGAYQPFFRGHATMNTKRREPWLFGEEHTRLIREAIRERYGLLPYWYSLFYHAHVASQPVMRPLWVEFPDELKTFDMEDEYMLGSALLVHPVTEPKATTVDVFLPGSNEVWYDYKTFAHWEGGCTVKIPVALDTIPVFQRGGSVIPIKTTVGKSTGWMTESSYGLRVALSTKGSSVGELYLDDGHSFQYLHQKQF
3	Q8TET4-D3	830-914	85		LHRKFSFCSSVLINSFADQRGHYPSKCVVEKILVLGFRKEPSSVTTHSSDGKDQPVAFTYCAKTSILSLEKLSLNIATDWEVRII

Top 1 final models from D-I-TASSER

Click to view	Rank^a	Download	Estimated TM-score^b
	1	model1.pdb.gz	0.87

(a)

D-I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, i.e. decoys. These decoys are clustered by SPICKER based on pairwise structure similarity to report up to five final models from the five largest clusters. Models are ranked in descending order of cluster size. If the simulations converge well, it is possible to have less than 5 models generated, which is usually an indication of good model quality.

(b)

The model confidence is quantitatified by estimated TM-score (eTM-score), calculated based on significance of threading template alignments, contact map satisfaction rate, mean absolute error between distance of model and distance of AttentionPotential, and convergence of D-I-TASSER simulations. eTM-score is typically in the range of [0, 1], with higher eTM-score signifies higher model confidence.

Proteins with similar structure

Top 10 structural analogs in PDB (as identified by TM-align)

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	Download Alignment
1	5dkxA	0.94	1.34	0.400	0.957	model1_5dkxA.pdb.gz
2	5f0eA	0.93	0.79	0.522	0.938	model1_5f0eA.pdb.gz
3	2x2hA	0.84	2.79	0.184	0.888	model1_2x2hA.pdb.gz
4	3l4uA	0.83	2.14	0.276	0.864	model1_3l4uA.pdb.gz
5	3lpoA	0.83	2.20	0.271	0.864	model1_3lpoA.pdb.gz
6	3tonA	0.82	2.47	0.260	0.862	model1_3tonA.pdb.gz
7	5kzwA	0.82	2.15	0.297	0.848	model1_5kzwA.pdb.gz
8	3w37A	0.81	2.19	0.286	0.840	model1_3w37A.pdb.gz
9	6jr6A	0.81	2.59	0.246	0.848	model1_6jr6A.pdb.gz
10	4b9yA	0.78	2.66	0.206	0.827	model1_4b9yA.pdb.gz

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Gene Ontology (GO) Terms

Molecular Function (MF)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0003824	0.96	catalytic activity
GO:0004553	0.94	hydrolase activity, hydrolyzing O-glycosyl compounds
GO:0015926	0.87	glucosidase activity
GO:0090599	0.78	alpha-glucosidase activity
GO:0004558	0.64	alpha-1,4-glucosidase activity

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Molecular Function. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Biological Process (BP)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0008152	0.91	metabolic process
GO:0071704	0.89	organic substance metabolic process
GO:0044699	0.89	single-organism process
GO:0044238	0.88	primary metabolic process
GO:0005975	0.84	carbohydrate metabolic process
GO:0009987	0.83	cellular process
GO:0044710	0.76	single-organism metabolic process
GO:0044237	0.73	cellular metabolic process
GO:0044723	0.71	single-organism carbohydrate metabolic process
GO:0043170	0.68	macromolecule metabolic process
GO:0044260	0.65	cellular macromolecule metabolic process
GO:0044763	0.60	single-organism cellular process
GO:0044262	0.60	cellular carbohydrate metabolic process
GO:0005976	0.57	polysaccharide metabolic process
GO:0044264	0.56	cellular polysaccharide metabolic process
GO:0044042	0.50	glucan metabolic process

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Biological Process. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Cellular Component (CC)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0044464	1.00	cell part
GO:0044424	0.92	intracellular part
GO:0043227	0.90	membrane-bounded organelle
GO:0044444	0.83	cytoplasmic part
GO:0016020	0.74	membrane
GO:0044421	0.73	extracellular region part
GO:0031988	0.72	membrane-bounded vesicle
GO:0070062	0.71	extracellular exosome
GO:0043231	0.65	intracellular membrane-bounded organelle
GO:0044425	0.59	membrane part
GO:0005886	0.55	plasma membrane
GO:0031224	0.53	intrinsic component of membrane
GO:0016021	0.52	integral component of membrane
GO:0044459	0.51	plasma membrane part
GO:0016324	0.50	apical plasma membrane

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Cellular Component. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Predicted Enzyme Commission (EC) Numbers

Top 5 enzyme homologs in PDB

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	EC Number	Predicted Active Site Residues
1	0.162	2g3mF	0.703	1.98	0.285	0.727	3.2.1.20	546
2	0.060	1ea9C	0.377	5.83	0.062	0.473	3.2.1.54	NA
3	0.060	2vncB	0.333	5.24	0.052	0.403	3.2.1.-	NA
4	0.060	1d7fA	0.367	5.44	0.084	0.452	2.4.1.19	231
5	0.060	2ze0A	0.353	4.63	0.070	0.415	3.2.1.20	NA

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted active site residues.
(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the Enzyme Commission (EC) number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Ligand Binding Sites

Template proteins with similar binding site:

Rank	Cscore^LB	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	BS-score	Lig. Name	Download Complex	Predicted binding site residues
1	0.08	2f2hE	0.761	3.24	0.180	0.823	0.13	XTG	complex1.pdb.gz	226,344,577
2	0.08	3mkkA	0.650	2.31	0.261	0.679	0.14	UUU	complex2.pdb.gz	227,229,605
3	0.08	3topA	0.824	2.49	0.262	0.863	0.14	ACR	complex3.pdb.gz	226,228,604
4	0.08	2x2jA	0.838	2.78	0.185	0.888	0.12	NOJ	complex4.pdb.gz	267,269,270
5	0.06	2f2hF	0.759	3.29	0.182	0.822	0.13	XTG	complex5.pdb.gz	281,284,324,327
6	0.04	3topB	0.824	2.49	0.262	0.863	0.12	ACR	complex6.pdb.gz	509,511,571,584
7	0.04	2x2iD	0.837	2.81	0.184	0.888	0.32	QPS	complex7.pdb.gz	29,209,210,211,212,328
8	0.03	2f2hF	0.759	3.29	0.182	0.822	0.28	XTG	complex8.pdb.gz	250,266,267,268,611
9	0.01	1vb9A	0.383	5.59	0.061	0.470	0.14	GLC	complex9.pdb.gz	231,267,268,692
10	0.01	1uh3A	0.388	5.19	0.058	0.466	0.30	GLC	complex10.pdb.gz	227,270,281,283

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted binding site and residues.
(a)	Cscore^LB is the confidence score of predicted binding site. Cscore^LB values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable ligand-binding site prediction.
(b)	BS-score is a measure of local similarity (sequence & structure) between template binding site and predicted binding site in the query structure. Based on large scale benchmarking analysis, we have observed that a BS-score >1 reflects a significant local match between the predicted and template binding site.
(c)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(d)	RMSD^a the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(e)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(f)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

References:
1.	Wei Zheng, Chengxin Zhang, Yang Li, Robin Pearce, Eric W. Bell, Yang Zhang. Folding non-homology proteins by coupling deep-learning contact maps with I-TASSER assembly simulations. In preparation, 2020.