D-I-TASSER Q8TBQ9

D-I-TASSER results for Q8TBQ9

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

Summary of the Protein

Uniprot ID: Q8TBQ9
Protein Name: Protein kish-A
Gene Name: TMEM167A

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>Q8TBQ9 (72 residues)
MSAIFNFQSLLTVILLLICTCAYIRSLAPSLLDRNKTGLLGIFWKCARIGERKSPYVAVC
CIVMAFSILFIQ

Predicted Contact and Distance Map Used in D-I-TASSER simulation

Contact Map

Distance Map

D-I-TASSER simulation is guided by the consensus contact map (left figure) and distance map (right figure) derived based on confidence scores of AttentionPotential. In the contact, distance map and hydrogen bond networks, the axes mark the residue index along the sequence. For the contact map, each dot represents a residue pair with predicted contact, while for the distance map and hydrogen bond network, a color scale represents a distance of 1-20+ angstroms or a angle of 0-180 degree.

Information of Domain

No. of Domain	Domain	Domain Boundary	Length of Domain	Models of Domain	Sequence
1	Q8TBQ9-D1	1-72	72		MSAIFNFQSLLTVILLLICTCAYIRSLAPSLLDRNKTGLLGIFWKCARIGERKSPYVAVCCIVMAFSILFIQ

Top 1 final models from D-I-TASSER

Click to view	Rank^a	Download	Estimated TM-score^b
	1	model1.pdb.gz	0.6627

(a)

D-I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, i.e. decoys. These decoys are clustered by SPICKER based on pairwise structure similarity to report up to five final models from the five largest clusters. Models are ranked in descending order of cluster size. If the simulations converge well, it is possible to have less than 5 models generated, which is usually an indication of good model quality.

(b)

The model confidence is quantitatified by estimated TM-score (eTM-score), calculated based on significance of threading template alignments, contact map satisfaction rate, mean absolute error between distance of model and distance of AttentionPotential, and convergence of D-I-TASSER simulations. eTM-score is typically in the range of [0, 1], with higher eTM-score signifies higher model confidence.

Proteins with similar structure

Top 10 structural analogs in PDB (as identified by TM-align)

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	Download Alignment
1	3qsgA	0.69	2.12	0.113	0.917	model1_3qsgA.pdb.gz
2	1i36A2	0.65	2.74	0.028	0.944	model1_1i36A2.pdb.gz
3	6dhvA	0.64	2.86	0.045	0.903	model1_6dhvA.pdb.gz
4	1orsC	0.63	3.11	0.060	0.917	model1_1orsC.pdb.gz
5	4yj6A	0.63	2.97	0.060	0.917	model1_4yj6A.pdb.gz
6	2w1zB	0.63	3.11	0.030	0.917	model1_2w1zB.pdb.gz
7	5chsA1	0.62	3.26	0.057	0.944	model1_5chsA1.pdb.gz
8	3a1iA2	0.61	2.93	0.014	0.972	model1_3a1iA2.pdb.gz
9	3a2pA	0.57	2.84	0.078	0.875	model1_3a2pA.pdb.gz
10	2dc0A	0.57	2.61	0.061	0.875	model1_2dc0A.pdb.gz

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Gene Ontology (GO) Terms

Molecular Function (MF)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0003824	0.47	catalytic activity
GO:1901363	0.38	heterocyclic compound binding
GO:0097159	0.38	organic cyclic compound binding
GO:0016874	0.36	ligase activity
GO:0016879	0.35	ligase activity, forming carbon-nitrogen bonds

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Molecular Function. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Biological Process (BP)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0006810	1.00	transport
GO:0009987	0.79	cellular process
GO:0044699	0.73	single-organism process
GO:0044763	0.64	single-organism cellular process
GO:0015031	0.63	protein transport
GO:0046907	0.60	intracellular transport
GO:0044765	0.57	single-organism transport
GO:0009306	0.56	protein secretion
GO:0008152	0.54	metabolic process

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Biological Process. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Cellular Component (CC)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0005783	1.00	endoplasmic reticulum
GO:0005794	0.68	Golgi apparatus

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Cellular Component. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Predicted Enzyme Commission (EC) Numbers

Top 5 enzyme homologs in PDB

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	EC Number	Predicted Active Site Residues
1	0.060	2azkA	0.530	3.48	0.031	0.833	2.5.1.1 2.5.1.29 2.5.1.10	24
2	0.060	1mhlC	0.543	3.62	0.087	0.944	1.11.1.7	NA
3	0.060	2dh4A	0.552	3.31	0.062	0.889	2.5.1.29	NA
4	0.060	1unlA	0.529	3.86	0.094	0.889	2.7.11.22	NA
5	0.060	2f8zF	0.539	3.90	0.030	0.889	2.5.1.10 2.5.1.1	15,32

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted active site residues.
(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the Enzyme Commission (EC) number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Ligand Binding Sites

Template proteins with similar binding site:

Rank	Cscore^LB	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	BS-score	Lig. Name	Download Complex	Predicted binding site residues
1	0.02	2d3tA	0.548	3.07	0.118	0.861	0.25	NAD	complex1.pdb.gz	18,19,39,42
2	0.01	3bqoA	0.604	3.68	0.069	0.972	0.22	III	complex2.pdb.gz	5,10,13,16,17,20,21,31
3	0.01	3h2zA	0.459	3.91	0.072	0.861	0.35	PO4	complex3.pdb.gz	40,43,44
4	0.01	3a1iA	0.613	2.93	0.014	0.972	0.20	UNU	complex4.pdb.gz	40,42,43
5	0.01	2e8uB	0.543	3.38	0.061	0.889	0.20	IPE	complex5.pdb.gz	21,24,28
6	0.01	2e8tB	0.528	3.37	0.046	0.875	0.15	FPS	complex6.pdb.gz	17,21,22,24
7	0.01	2pg30	0.563	2.91	0.063	0.764	0.14	III	complex7.pdb.gz	9,10,14,15,18,19,22,23,25,26,41,45
8	0.01	2e8xB	0.508	3.42	0.065	0.861	0.20	GPP	complex8.pdb.gz	43,44,47,50
9	0.01	1i36A	0.615	3.16	0.014	0.972	0.10	NAP	complex9.pdb.gz	38,40,47
10	0.01	2e93A	0.460	3.98	0.077	0.875	0.14	B29	complex10.pdb.gz	13,14,17,20,21,24

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted binding site and residues.
(a)	Cscore^LB is the confidence score of predicted binding site. Cscore^LB values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable ligand-binding site prediction.
(b)	BS-score is a measure of local similarity (sequence & structure) between template binding site and predicted binding site in the query structure. Based on large scale benchmarking analysis, we have observed that a BS-score >1 reflects a significant local match between the predicted and template binding site.
(c)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(d)	RMSD^a the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(e)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(f)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

References:
1.	Wei Zheng, Chengxin Zhang, Yang Li, Robin Pearce, Eric W. Bell, Yang Zhang. Folding non-homology proteins by coupling deep-learning contact maps with I-TASSER assembly simulations. In preparation, 2020.