D-I-TASSER Q8TAM1-D2

D-I-TASSER results for Q8TAM1-D2

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>Q8TAM1 (112 residues)
FLSIFSSAKERTLCRSSLELLLEAYFCGRVGRNNHKFISQLMCDYFFKCMTCKSGIGVFE
LVDDHFVELNVGVTGLPVSDSRIVLCGPVHGLIEQHEDALHGALKMLRQLFK

Predicted Secondary Structure

Sequence	20 40 60 80 100 \| \| \| \| \| FLSIFSSAKERTLCRSSLELLLEAYFCGRVGRNNHKFISQLMCDYFFKCMTCKSGIGVFELVDDHFVELNVGVTGLPVSDSRIVLCGPVHGLIEQHEDALHGALKMLRQLFK
Prediction	CCCSSCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCSHHHHHHHHHHHHSSSSCCCCCCCCSSSSSCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHC
Confidence	9531125665503477999999997315337756999999999999975225787321436766544322013144257856999625144799999999999999999859
	H:Helix; S:Strand; C:Coil

Predicted Solvent Accessibility

Sequence	20 40 60 80 100 \| \| \| \| \| FLSIFSSAKERTLCRSSLELLLEAYFCGRVGRNNHKFISQLMCDYFFKCMTCKSGIGVFELVDDHFVELNVGVTGLPVSDSRIVLCGPVHGLIEQHEDALHGALKMLRQLFK
Prediction	7442235456441244204310422112322444451033000320130244753331141036213403140343326423010112032115424512320141044228
	Values range from 0 (buried residue) to 8 (highly exposed residue)

Predicted Contact, Hydrogen and Distance Map Used in D-I-TASSER simulation

Contact Map

Distance Map

Hydrogen bond networks

D-I-TASSER simulation is guided by the consensus contact map (left figure), distance map (middle figure) and Hydrogen bond network (right figure) derived based on confidence scores of AttentionPotential. In the contact, distance map and hydrogen bond networks, the axes mark the residue index along the sequence. For the contact map, each dot represents a residue pair with predicted contact, while for the distance map and hydrogen bond network, a color scale represents a distance of 1-20+ angstroms or a angle of 0-180 degree.

Top 10 threading templates used by D-I-TASSER

Rank

PDB
hit

ID1

ID2

Cov

Norm.
Zscore

Download
alignment

                  20                  40                  60                  80                 100

                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |

SS
Seq

CCCSSCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCSHHHHHHHHHHHHSSSSCCCCCCCCSSSSSCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHC
FLSIFSSAKERTLCRSSLELLLEAYFCGRVGRNNHKFISQLMCDYFFKCMTCKSGIGVFELVDDHFVELNVGVTGLPVSDSRIVLCGPVHGLIEQHEDALHGALKMLRQLFK

3rceA

0.06

0.05

2.31

1.00

DEthreader

-----QNFTNNYTIILIAFAFSVLCRLYWTLYMSTFFASLIVVPIILIAREYKLTTYGFIAALLGIANYYNRTYYDTDM-LVLV--------IM-EVGLRFTIYAVPVMALG

1a6eB3

0.08

0.07

2.86

0.74

CEthreader

--------KIGADEKALLLKMAQTSLNSKSASVAKDKLAEISYEAVKSVAELRDGKYYVDFDNIQVVKQGGAIDDTQLINGSILVRGETEHVVDEMERSITDSLHVVASALE

3hwcA2

0.04

2.21

0.62

EigenThreader

QRIFDWVHYHILIRQVLRAELIVGLAILITEHIGRVAKLVAFHLAMQAHLNPLIYDFGRAHFLDLAGRSSLMINNGPKGNPRERVQIGRVIRDLYLTDWGGRQFMFEVFAAT

7lumJ3

0.14

0.13

4.54

0.53

FFAS-3D

-------SAKNLRDIDEVSSLLRTSIMSKQ-YGNEVFLAKLIAQACVSIFPDSGHFNVDNIRVCKIISSSSVLHGKEDGAITIVLRGSTDNLMDDIERAVDDGVNTFKVLTR

5cwjA

0.11

0.10

3.55

0.62

SPARKS-K

ILKEARKSGTEESLRQAIEDVAQLAKKSQ-DSEVLEEAIRVILRIAKESGSE----EALRQAIRAVAEIAKE-----AQDSEVLEEAIIAKESG-SEEALRQAIRAVAEIAK

4hb3C

0.12

0.09

3.15

0.60

CNFpred

--------------PAAFKLFVDAICWAFKHRDVEVNGLQIALDLVKNIERMGNVPFANEFHKNYFFIFVSE----------TFFVLTD-----DHKSGFSKQALLLMKLIS

6hd8B

0.10

0.08

3.00

1.00

DEthreader

------TRIETSDAFALAITLLVLS-ST-RDVIPFAICVALIIVIWYQHYIFFLINTLLFVLLVYVYPLKFLAFSIY-----------RFGEYSQNLKLLMVYGLGAFAIFL

1q3rA2

0.11

3.88

0.74

MapAlign

EILDEIAIRVDPDDEETLLKIAATSITGKNAESHKELLAKLAVEAVKQVAEKKKYVVDLDNIKFEKKAGEGVSELVNPKAVTILIRGGTEHVIDEVERALEDAVKVVKDVM-

3iygQ2

0.12

0.11

3.77

0.49

MUSTER

------CSAKNLRDVDEVSSLLHTSVMSKQ-YGNEVFLAKLIAQACVSIFPDSGH------FNVDNIRVCK-ILGSGVHSSSVLHTIVLRGSTDNIERAVDDGVNTFKVLTR

7lumK2

0.19

0.16

5.21

0.63

HHsearch

AVTVKKAD--KVEQRKLLEKCAMTALSSKLISQQKAFFAKMVVDAVMM-------------LDDLLQLKMIKVQGGALEDSQLVKTCTFILRGGETERSLHDAIMIVRRAIK

(a)	ID1 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by number of aligned residues.
(b)	ID2 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by query sequence length.
(c)	Cov is equal the number of aligned template residues divided by query sequence length.
(d)	Norm. Zscore is the normalized Z-score of the threading alignments. A Normalized Z-score >1 means a good alignment and is highlighted in bold.
(e)	Download alignment lists the threading program used to identify the template, and provide the 3D structure of aligned regions of threading templates (threading[1-10].pdb.gz).
(f)	Template residues identical to query sequence are highlighted in color.

Top 1 final models from D-I-TASSER

Click to view	Rank^a	Download	Estimated TM-score^b
	1	model1.pdb.gz	0.6068

(a)

D-I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, i.e. decoys. These decoys are clustered by SPICKER based on pairwise structure similarity to report up to five final models from the five largest clusters. Models are ranked in descending order of cluster size. If the simulations converge well, it is possible to have less than 5 models generated, which is usually an indication of good model quality.

(b)

The model confidence is quantitatified by estimated TM-score (eTM-score), calculated based on significance of threading template alignments, contact map satisfaction rate, mean absolute error between distance of model and distance of AttentionPotential, and convergence of D-I-TASSER simulations. eTM-score is typically in the range of [0, 1], with higher eTM-score signifies higher model confidence.

Proteins with similar structure

Top 10 structural analogs in PDB (as identified by TM-align)

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	Download Alignment
1	3k07A	0.61	3.34	0.045	0.875	model1_3k07A.pdb.gz
2	3aqpA2	0.61	3.55	0.054	0.893	model1_3aqpA2.pdb.gz
3	2j8sA	0.60	3.15	0.045	0.866	model1_2j8sA.pdb.gz
4	4mt1A	0.60	3.43	0.045	0.875	model1_4mt1A.pdb.gz
5	4k0eA	0.49	4.55	0.064	0.866	model1_4k0eA.pdb.gz
6	3aq1B3	0.46	4.35	0.135	0.768	model1_3aq1B3.pdb.gz
7	3axgA	0.42	5.28	0.057	0.804	model1_3axgA.pdb.gz
8	3vw4A	0.37	3.54	0.032	0.554	model1_3vw4A.pdb.gz
9	4iilA1	0.37	4.11	0.038	0.536	model1_4iilA1.pdb.gz
10	1sffA2	0.37	3.54	0.029	0.554	model1_1sffA2.pdb.gz

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Gene Ontology (GO) Terms

Molecular Function (MF)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0001103	1.00	RNA polymerase II repressing transcription factor binding

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Molecular Function. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Biological Process (BP)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0044767	1.00	single-organism developmental process
GO:0051131	0.77	chaperone-mediated protein complex assembly
GO:0045494	0.77	photoreceptor cell maintenance
GO:0043254	0.77	regulation of protein complex assembly
GO:0035058	0.77	nonmotile primary cilium assembly
GO:0001895	0.77	retina homeostasis

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Biological Process. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Cellular Component (CC)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0016020	0.87	membrane
GO:0016021	0.80	integral component of membrane
GO:0044464	0.67	cell part
GO:0005886	0.53	plasma membrane

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Cellular Component. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Predicted Enzyme Commission (EC) Numbers

Top 5 enzyme homologs in PDB

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	EC Number	Predicted Active Site Residues
1	0.060	1xrhC	0.459	3.92	0.104	0.696	1.1.1.154	NA
2	0.060	3cqlA	0.500	3.97	0.070	0.812	3.2.1.14	NA
3	0.060	1r1jA	0.502	4.25	0.037	0.884	3.4.24.11	78
4	0.060	1bibA	0.493	3.58	0.045	0.768	6.3.4.15	NA
5	0.060	1iduA	0.505	4.36	0.036	0.857	1.11.1.10	NA

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted active site residues.
(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the Enzyme Commission (EC) number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Ligand Binding Sites

Template proteins with similar binding site:

Rank	Cscore^LB	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	BS-score	Lig. Name	Download Complex	Predicted binding site residues
1	0.21	2bx8A	0.574	3.82	0.112	0.848	0.42	AZQ	complex1.pdb.gz	25,69,70,72
2	0.07	3cx9A	0.570	3.82	0.112	0.830	0.52	MYR	complex2.pdb.gz	26,30,35
3	0.07	1e7bB	0.577	3.93	0.112	0.848	0.48	HLT	complex3.pdb.gz	26,34,37,38,81
4	0.07	1bkeA	0.572	3.89	0.112	0.839	0.48	B3I	complex4.pdb.gz	29,35,42
5	0.06	2bxpA	0.573	3.98	0.112	0.848	0.44	MYR	complex5.pdb.gz	25,29,32
6	0.05	2vdbA	0.546	3.87	0.106	0.812	0.45	NPS	complex6.pdb.gz	25,35,38,70
7	0.05	2bxmA	0.574	3.88	0.112	0.839	0.51	IMN	complex7.pdb.gz	18,21,22,25,26,38
8	0.02	2xvvA	0.570	4.06	0.111	0.857	0.42	9DN	complex8.pdb.gz	26,35,38,73
9	0.02	1e7cA	0.566	3.91	0.102	0.839	0.78	HLT	complex9.pdb.gz	27,32,35,36,39
10	0.02	3b9mA	0.572	3.68	0.093	0.830	0.41	SAL	complex10.pdb.gz	30,35,75

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted binding site and residues.
(a)	Cscore^LB is the confidence score of predicted binding site. Cscore^LB values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable ligand-binding site prediction.
(b)	BS-score is a measure of local similarity (sequence & structure) between template binding site and predicted binding site in the query structure. Based on large scale benchmarking analysis, we have observed that a BS-score >1 reflects a significant local match between the predicted and template binding site.
(c)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(d)	RMSD^a the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(e)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(f)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

References:
1.	Wei Zheng, Chengxin Zhang, Yang Li, Robin Pearce, Eric W. Bell, Yang Zhang. Folding non-homology proteins by coupling deep-learning contact maps with I-TASSER assembly simulations. In preparation, 2020.