D-I-TASSER Q8NFZ6

D-I-TASSER results for Q8NFZ6

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

Summary of the Protein

Uniprot ID: Q8NFZ6
Protein Name: Vomeronasal type-1 receptor 2
Gene Name: VN1R2

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>Q8NFZ6 (395 residues)
MTHTLYPTPFALYPINISAAWHLGPLPVSCFVSNKYQCSLAFGATTGLRVLVVVVPQTQL
SFLSSLCLVSLFLHSLVSAHGEKPTKPVGLDPTLFQVVVGILGNFSLLYYYMFLYFRGYK
PRSTDLILRHLTVADSLVILSKRIPETMATFGLKHFDNYFGCKFLLYAHRVGRGVSIGST
CLLSVFQVITINPRNSRWAEMKVKAPTYIGLSNILCWAFHMLVNAIFPIYTTGKWSNNNI
TKKGDLGYCSAPLSDEVTKSVYAALTSFHDVLCLGLMLWASSSIVLVLYRHKQQVQHICR
NNLYPNSSPGNRAIQSILALVSTFALCYALSFITYVYLALFDNSSWWLVNTAALIIACFP
TISPFVLMCRDPSRSRLCSICCRRNRRFFHDFRKM

Predicted Contact and Distance Map Used in D-I-TASSER simulation

Contact Map

Distance Map

D-I-TASSER simulation is guided by the consensus contact map (left figure) and distance map (right figure) derived based on confidence scores of AttentionPotential. In the contact, distance map and hydrogen bond networks, the axes mark the residue index along the sequence. For the contact map, each dot represents a residue pair with predicted contact, while for the distance map and hydrogen bond network, a color scale represents a distance of 1-20+ angstroms or a angle of 0-180 degree.

Information of Domain

No. of Domain	Domain	Domain Boundary	Length of Domain	Models of Domain	Sequence
1	Q8NFZ6-D1	1-87	87		MTHTLYPTPFALYPINISAAWHLGPLPVSCFVSNKYQCSLAFGATTGLRVLVVVVPQTQLSFLSSLCLVSLFLHSLVSAHGEKPTKP
2	Q8NFZ6-D2	88-395	308		VGLDPTLFQVVVGILGNFSLLYYYMFLYFRGYKPRSTDLILRHLTVADSLVILSKRIPETMATFGLKHFDNYFGCKFLLYAHRVGRGVSIGSTCLLSVFQVITINPRNSRWAEMKVKAPTYIGLSNILCWAFHMLVNAIFPIYTTGKWSNNNITKKGDLGYCSAPLSDEVTKSVYAALTSFHDVLCLGLMLWASSSIVLVLYRHKQQVQHICRNNLYPNSSPGNRAIQSILALVSTFALCYALSFITYVYLALFDNSSWWLVNTAALIIACFPTISPFVLMCRDPSRSRLCSICCRRNRRFFHDFRKM

Top 1 final models from D-I-TASSER

Click to view	Rank^a	Download	Estimated TM-score^b
	1	model1.pdb.gz	0.57

(a)

D-I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, i.e. decoys. These decoys are clustered by SPICKER based on pairwise structure similarity to report up to five final models from the five largest clusters. Models are ranked in descending order of cluster size. If the simulations converge well, it is possible to have less than 5 models generated, which is usually an indication of good model quality.

(b)

The model confidence is quantitatified by estimated TM-score (eTM-score), calculated based on significance of threading template alignments, contact map satisfaction rate, mean absolute error between distance of model and distance of AttentionPotential, and convergence of D-I-TASSER simulations. eTM-score is typically in the range of [0, 1], with higher eTM-score signifies higher model confidence.

Proteins with similar structure

Top 10 structural analogs in PDB (as identified by TM-align)

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	Download Alignment
1	4n6hA	0.69	2.62	0.120	0.744	model1_4n6hA.pdb.gz
2	5zbhA	0.69	2.62	0.144	0.752	model1_5zbhA.pdb.gz
3	7ddzA	0.69	2.41	0.131	0.734	model1_7ddzA.pdb.gz
4	4djhA	0.68	2.59	0.148	0.734	model1_4djhA.pdb.gz
5	4rnbA	0.68	2.36	0.126	0.722	model1_4rnbA.pdb.gz
6	5vblB	0.67	2.66	0.139	0.734	model1_5vblB.pdb.gz
7	4zwjA	0.67	3.99	0.091	0.792	model1_4zwjA.pdb.gz
8	6ko5A	0.67	2.72	0.091	0.729	model1_6ko5A.pdb.gz
9	2ks9A	0.66	3.43	0.115	0.749	model1_2ks9A.pdb.gz
10	6e59A	0.66	2.37	0.137	0.719	model1_6e59A.pdb.gz

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Gene Ontology (GO) Terms

Molecular Function (MF)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0004872	0.99	receptor activity
GO:0004888	0.95	transmembrane signaling receptor activity
GO:0004930	0.85	G-protein coupled receptor activity
GO:0003824	0.55	catalytic activity

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Molecular Function. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Biological Process (BP)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0050896	0.82	response to stimulus
GO:0065007	0.74	biological regulation
GO:0050789	0.73	regulation of biological process
GO:0044699	0.68	single-organism process
GO:0010033	0.68	response to organic substance
GO:0050794	0.66	regulation of cellular process
GO:0008152	0.65	metabolic process
GO:0009987	0.64	cellular process
GO:0007165	0.59	signal transduction
GO:0071704	0.55	organic substance metabolic process
GO:0007186	0.55	G-protein coupled receptor signaling pathway
GO:0032501	0.54	multicellular organismal process
GO:0044057	0.53	regulation of system process
GO:0051930	0.51	regulation of sensory perception of pain
GO:0044763	0.51	single-organism cellular process
GO:0044710	0.51	single-organism metabolic process

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Biological Process. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Cellular Component (CC)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0044464	1.00	cell part
GO:0016021	1.00	integral component of membrane
GO:0016020	1.00	membrane
GO:0005887	0.95	integral component of plasma membrane
GO:0005886	0.89	plasma membrane
GO:0044424	0.85	intracellular part
GO:0044444	0.62	cytoplasmic part
GO:0043226	0.57	organelle
GO:0097458	0.54	neuron part
GO:0043227	0.52	membrane-bounded organelle
GO:0042995	0.52	cell projection
GO:0043229	0.50	intracellular organelle

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Cellular Component. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Predicted Enzyme Commission (EC) Numbers

Top 5 enzyme homologs in PDB

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	EC Number	Predicted Active Site Residues
1	0.060	2hvgA	0.379	5.70	0.031	0.544	4.3.2.2	NA
2	0.060	1w27A	0.402	6.81	0.047	0.666	4.3.1.24	NA
3	0.060	2pfmA	0.368	6.05	0.083	0.554	4.3.2.2	NA
4	0.060	2ohyB	0.370	6.60	0.058	0.598	5.4.3.6	NA
5	0.060	1xmeA	0.414	6.35	0.080	0.643	1.9.3.1	NA

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted active site residues.
(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the Enzyme Commission (EC) number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Ligand Binding Sites

Template proteins with similar binding site:

Rank	Cscore^LB	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	BS-score	Lig. Name	Download Complex	Predicted binding site residues
1	0.03	2rh1A	0.651	3.11	0.128	0.719	0.58	CLR	complex1.pdb.gz	126,129,133,168,171
2	0.01	2q9eB	0.187	5.64	0.065	0.273	0.51	MTN	complex2.pdb.gz	100,104,134
3	0.01	1xepA	0.185	5.77	0.058	0.273	0.56	CAQ	complex3.pdb.gz	100,103,104
4	0.01	1c61A	0.175	4.84	0.020	0.238	0.58	KR	complex4.pdb.gz	97,100,101,104,139
5	0.01	1c6gA	0.167	5.19	0.055	0.233	0.52	KR	complex5.pdb.gz	172,175,179,182,217
6	0.01	1owyA	0.185	5.67	0.065	0.271	0.52	PRY	complex6.pdb.gz	131,134,135,172,175,179,182,216
7	0.01	3htfA	0.175	4.80	0.020	0.238	0.56	JZ6	complex7.pdb.gz	133,174,179,183
8	0.01	1c61A	0.175	4.84	0.020	0.238	0.54	KR	complex8.pdb.gz	98,101,102,105,140
9	0.01	1c6fA	0.177	4.77	0.014	0.238	0.71	AR	complex9.pdb.gz	100,103,134
10	0.01	1l83A	0.166	5.19	0.062	0.233	0.59	BNZ	complex10.pdb.gz	101,104,132,138,360

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted binding site and residues.
(a)	Cscore^LB is the confidence score of predicted binding site. Cscore^LB values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable ligand-binding site prediction.
(b)	BS-score is a measure of local similarity (sequence & structure) between template binding site and predicted binding site in the query structure. Based on large scale benchmarking analysis, we have observed that a BS-score >1 reflects a significant local match between the predicted and template binding site.
(c)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(d)	RMSD^a the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(e)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(f)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

References:
1.	Wei Zheng, Chengxin Zhang, Yang Li, Robin Pearce, Eric W. Bell, Yang Zhang. Folding non-homology proteins by coupling deep-learning contact maps with I-TASSER assembly simulations. In preparation, 2020.