D-I-TASSER Q8N8R5

D-I-TASSER results for Q8N8R5

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

Summary of the Protein

Uniprot ID: Q8N8R5
Protein Name: UPF0565 protein C2orf69
Gene Name: C2orf69

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>Q8N8R5 (385 residues)
MWGFRLLRSPPLLLLLPQLGIGNASSCSQARTMNPGGSGGARCSLSAEVRRRQCLQLSTV
PGADPQRSNELLLLAAAGEGLERQDLPGDPAKEEPQPPPQHHVLYFPGDVQNYHEIMTRH
PENYQWENWSLENVATILAHRFPNSYIWVIKCSRMHLHKFSCYDNFVKSNMFGAPEHNTD
FGAFKHLYMLLVNAFNLSQNSLSKKSLNVWNKDSIASNCRSSPSHTTNGCQGEKVRTCEK
SDESAMSFYPPSLNDASFTLIGFSKGCVVLNQLLFELKEAKKDKNIDAFIKSIRTMYWLD
GGHSGGSNTWVTYPEVLKEFAQTGIIVHTHVTPYQVRDPMRSWIGKEHKKFVQILGDLGM
QVTSQIHFTKEAPSIENHFRVHEVF

Predicted Contact and Distance Map Used in D-I-TASSER simulation

Contact Map

Distance Map

D-I-TASSER simulation is guided by the consensus contact map (left figure) and distance map (right figure) derived based on confidence scores of AttentionPotential. In the contact, distance map and hydrogen bond networks, the axes mark the residue index along the sequence. For the contact map, each dot represents a residue pair with predicted contact, while for the distance map and hydrogen bond network, a color scale represents a distance of 1-20+ angstroms or a angle of 0-180 degree.

Information of Domain

No. of Domain	Domain	Domain Boundary	Length of Domain	Models of Domain	Sequence
1	Q8N8R5-D1	1-385	385		MWGFRLLRSPPLLLLLPQLGIGNASSCSQARTMNPGGSGGARCSLSAEVRRRQCLQLSTVPGADPQRSNELLLLAAAGEGLERQDLPGDPAKEEPQPPPQHHVLYFPGDVQNYHEIMTRHPENYQWENWSLENVATILAHRFPNSYIWVIKCSRMHLHKFSCYDNFVKSNMFGAPEHNTDFGAFKHLYMLLVNAFNLSQNSLSKKSLNVWNKDSIASNCRSSPSHTTNGCQGEKVRTCEKSDESAMSFYPPSLNDASFTLIGFSKGCVVLNQLLFELKEAKKDKNIDAFIKSIRTMYWLDGGHSGGSNTWVTYPEVLKEFAQTGIIVHTHVTPYQVRDPMRSWIGKEHKKFVQILGDLGMQVTSQIHFTKEAPSIENHFRVHEVF

Top 1 final models from D-I-TASSER

Click to view	Rank^a	Download	Estimated TM-score^b
	1	model1.pdb.gz	0.7274

(a)

D-I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, i.e. decoys. These decoys are clustered by SPICKER based on pairwise structure similarity to report up to five final models from the five largest clusters. Models are ranked in descending order of cluster size. If the simulations converge well, it is possible to have less than 5 models generated, which is usually an indication of good model quality.

(b)

The model confidence is quantitatified by estimated TM-score (eTM-score), calculated based on significance of threading template alignments, contact map satisfaction rate, mean absolute error between distance of model and distance of AttentionPotential, and convergence of D-I-TASSER simulations. eTM-score is typically in the range of [0, 1], with higher eTM-score signifies higher model confidence.

Proteins with similar structure

Top 10 structural analogs in PDB (as identified by TM-align)

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	Download Alignment
1	1aknA	0.52	4.38	0.073	0.654	model1_1aknA.pdb.gz
2	5txcA	0.51	4.66	0.068	0.657	model1_5txcA.pdb.gz
3	1ac5A	0.51	4.77	0.083	0.670	model1_1ac5A.pdb.gz
4	2wqzA	0.51	4.64	0.077	0.657	model1_2wqzA.pdb.gz
5	5jrlA	0.51	4.85	0.081	0.662	model1_5jrlA.pdb.gz
6	7c72A	0.51	4.66	0.049	0.657	model1_7c72A.pdb.gz
7	4be4A	0.51	4.40	0.077	0.644	model1_4be4A.pdb.gz
8	1ve6A	0.51	4.65	0.102	0.649	model1_1ve6A.pdb.gz
9	5a2gA	0.50	4.44	0.087	0.636	model1_5a2gA.pdb.gz
10	1mx9D	0.50	4.66	0.092	0.652	model1_1mx9D.pdb.gz

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Gene Ontology (GO) Terms

Molecular Function (MF)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0003824	0.55	catalytic activity
GO:0016787	0.51	hydrolase activity

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Molecular Function. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Biological Process (BP)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0046331	1.00	lateral inhibition

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Biological Process. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Cellular Component (CC)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0044464	0.98	cell part
GO:0044424	0.95	intracellular part
GO:0044421	0.84	extracellular region part
GO:0005615	0.83	extracellular space
GO:0043226	0.82	organelle
GO:0043227	0.76	membrane-bounded organelle
GO:0045202	0.75	synapse
GO:0043229	0.75	intracellular organelle
GO:0044425	0.69	membrane part
GO:0043231	0.68	intracellular membrane-bounded organelle
GO:0031224	0.68	intrinsic component of membrane
GO:0009986	0.67	cell surface
GO:0030054	0.62	cell junction
GO:0016021	0.59	integral component of membrane
GO:0016020	0.59	membrane
GO:0044456	0.58	synapse part
GO:0005887	0.58	integral component of plasma membrane
GO:0005886	0.58	plasma membrane
GO:0044444	0.55	cytoplasmic part

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Cellular Component. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Predicted Enzyme Commission (EC) Numbers

Top 5 enzyme homologs in PDB

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	EC Number	Predicted Active Site Residues
1	0.066	3f67A	0.455	3.77	0.070	0.553	3.1.1.-	NA
2	0.066	1jjfA	0.452	4.37	0.091	0.571	3.2.1.8	132
3	0.066	3i6yA	0.482	4.21	0.085	0.603	3.1.1.2	NA
4	0.066	3c6bA	0.478	4.57	0.077	0.618	3.1.2.12	303
5	0.066	2o7vA	0.500	3.95	0.089	0.610	3.4.23.16	164

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted active site residues.
(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the Enzyme Commission (EC) number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Ligand Binding Sites

Template proteins with similar binding site:

Rank	Cscore^LB	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	BS-score	Lig. Name	Download Complex	Predicted binding site residues
1	0.10	1mx1C	0.502	4.68	0.108	0.652	0.35	THA	complex1.pdb.gz	108,110,265,266
2	0.08	1mx1E	0.502	4.67	0.104	0.652	0.15	THA	complex2.pdb.gz	129,263,302,335
3	0.07	3k9bC	0.489	4.56	0.093	0.629	0.20	WW2	complex3.pdb.gz	107,108,109,302
4	0.07	1mx5A	0.505	4.56	0.093	0.647	0.18	HTQ	complex4.pdb.gz	110,148,149,187,268,269,272
5	0.02	2hrrC	0.503	4.65	0.104	0.652	0.34	SUC	complex5.pdb.gz	108,157,158,160,173
6	0.01	1ya8C	0.503	4.54	0.109	0.644	0.20	MVB	complex6.pdb.gz	108,161,301
7	0.01	1k4yA	0.493	4.70	0.123	0.636	0.11	UUU	complex7.pdb.gz	108,109,112
8	0.01	1mx1F	0.505	4.62	0.101	0.649	0.27	THA	complex8.pdb.gz	108,109,186,187
9	0.01	1mx9J	0.504	4.63	0.105	0.649	0.21	NLX	complex9.pdb.gz	107,108,110,150,300,301
10	0.01	2h7cC	0.503	4.61	0.112	0.649	0.14	COA	complex10.pdb.gz	109,268,300,302

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted binding site and residues.
(a)	Cscore^LB is the confidence score of predicted binding site. Cscore^LB values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable ligand-binding site prediction.
(b)	BS-score is a measure of local similarity (sequence & structure) between template binding site and predicted binding site in the query structure. Based on large scale benchmarking analysis, we have observed that a BS-score >1 reflects a significant local match between the predicted and template binding site.
(c)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(d)	RMSD^a the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(e)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(f)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

References:
1.	Wei Zheng, Chengxin Zhang, Yang Li, Robin Pearce, Eric W. Bell, Yang Zhang. Folding non-homology proteins by coupling deep-learning contact maps with I-TASSER assembly simulations. In preparation, 2020.