D-I-TASSER Q8N8L6-D1

D-I-TASSER results for Q8N8L6-D1

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>Q8N8L6 (244 residues)
MAPRPLGPLVLALGGAAAVLGSVLFILWKTYFGRGRERRWDRGEAWWGAEAARLPEWDEW
DPEDEEDEEPALEELEQREVLVLGLDGAGKSTFLRVLSGKPPLEGHIPTWGFNSVRLPTK
DFEVDLLEIGGSQNLRFYWKEFVSEVDVLVFVVDSADRLRLPWARQELHKLLDKDPDLPV
VVVANKQDLSEAMSMGELQRELGLQAIDNQREVFLLAASIAPAGPTFEEPGTVHIWKLLL
ELLS

Predicted Secondary Structure

Sequence	20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| MAPRPLGPLVLALGGAAAVLGSVLFILWKTYFGRGRERRWDRGEAWWGAEAARLPEWDEWDPEDEEDEEPALEELEQREVLVLGLDGAGKSTFLRVLSGKPPLEGHIPTWGFNSVRLPTKDFEVDLLEIGGSQNLRFYWKEFVSEVDVLVFVVDSADRLRLPWARQELHKLLDKDPDLPVVVVANKQDLSEAMSMGELQRELGLQAIDNQREVFLLAASIAPAGPTFEEPGTVHIWKLLLELLS
Prediction	CCCCCCCCSSSSSCCHHHHHHCCHHHCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCSSSSSSSCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCSCCCCCCSSSSSSSCCSSSSSSSCCCCHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCSSSSSSSCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCSSSSSSSCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHCCHHHHCCCCCSSSSSCSCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHC
Confidence	9987777616752433665413022113334565431111254212222013453333456555433333356774589999878998579999999549976650687174589999899999987589981266789975046854899972671679999999999866513998399998655787899999999995985452589728998335489987444799999999999859
	H:Helix; S:Strand; C:Coil

Predicted Solvent Accessibility

Sequence	20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| MAPRPLGPLVLALGGAAAVLGSVLFILWKTYFGRGRERRWDRGEAWWGAEAARLPEWDEWDPEDEEDEEPALEELEQREVLVLGLDGAGKSTFLRVLSGKPPLEGHIPTWGFNSVRLPTKDFEVDLLEIGGSQNLRFYWKEFVSEVDVLVFVVDSADRLRLPWARQELHKLLDKDPDLPVVVVANKQDLSEAMSMGELQRELGLQAIDNQREVFLLAASIAPAGPTFEEPGTVHIWKLLLELLS
Prediction	7654424301110323232112102201332264446442464542243445444634544466365445404635401000000330100000210355342742301311203304356130202100214301300232144331000001023320022024003402552540000000012126621427303730506504754410000002035153042003310240035128
	Values range from 0 (buried residue) to 8 (highly exposed residue)

Predicted Contact, Hydrogen and Distance Map Used in D-I-TASSER simulation

Contact Map

Distance Map

Hydrogen bond networks

D-I-TASSER simulation is guided by the consensus contact map (left figure), distance map (middle figure) and Hydrogen bond network (right figure) derived based on confidence scores of AttentionPotential. In the contact, distance map and hydrogen bond networks, the axes mark the residue index along the sequence. For the contact map, each dot represents a residue pair with predicted contact, while for the distance map and hydrogen bond network, a color scale represents a distance of 1-20+ angstroms or a angle of 0-180 degree.

Top 10 threading templates used by D-I-TASSER

Rank

PDB
hit

ID1

ID2

Cov

Norm.
Zscore

Download
alignment

                  20                  40                  60                  80                 100                 120                 140                 160                 180                 200                 220                 240

                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |

SS
Seq

CCCCCCCCSSSSSCCHHHHHHCCHHHCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCSSSSSSSCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCSCCCCCCSSSSSSSCCSSSSSSSCCCCHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCSSSSSSSCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCSSSSSSSCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHCCHHHHCCCCCSSSSSCSCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHC
MAPRPLGPLVLALGGAAAVLGSVLFILWKTYFGRGRERRWDRGEAWWGAEAARLPEWDEWDPEDEEDEEPALEELEQREVLVLGLDGAGKSTFLRVLSGKPPLEGHIPTWGFNSVRLPTKDFEVDLLEIGGSQNLRFYWKEFVSEVDVLVFVVDSADRLRLPWARQELHKLLDKDPDLPVVVVANKQDLSEAMSMGELQRELGLQAIDNQREVFLLAASIAPAGPTFEEPGTVHIWKLLLELLS

2j69A

0.17

0.14

4.45

1.00

DEthreader

-----------------QVATDRFIQDLERVAQVRSEVC------------------------------S-NLQQGVFRLLVLGDMKRGKSTFLNALIGENLLPSDNCTAVLTVLRYTLLQKGIEIVDSPGLNDTEARSLGYVNNCHAILFVMRASQP-CTLGERRYLENYIK-GRGLTVFFLVNAWDQVSERLRQVFNANLAEYCTVEGQIYRVFELSSIQARRRNALDGFPKFMDSLNTFLT

6bbpA2

0.31

0.24

7.19

1.44

SPARKS-K

----------------------------------------DPFYDMLATRKRRI-------ANKKGKVLSKIFGNKEMRILMLGLDAAGKTTILYKLKLGQSVT-TIPTVGFNVETVTYKNVKFNVWDVGGLDKIRPLWRHYYTGTQGLIFVVDCADRDRIDEARQELHRIINDMRDAIILIFANKQDLPDAMKPHEIQEKLGLTRI-RDRNWYVQPSC-ATSGDGL-----YEGLTWLTSNYN

6bbpA

0.25

0.24

7.49

0.53

MapAlign

PGEAQKIDRMMEAFASRYVLSFAIIMLNTSLHEEKEEWMKSIKASISRDPFYDMLATRKRRIANKKGKVLSKIFNKEMRILMLGLDAAGKTTILYKLKLGQSV-TTIPTVGFNVETVTYKNVKFNVWDVGGLDKIRPLWRHYYTGTQGLIFVVDCADRDRIDEARQELHRIIREMRDAIILIFANKQDLPDAMKPHEIQEKLGLTRI-RDRNWYVQPSCATS------GDGLYEGLTWLTSNY-

4m9qA

0.29

0.20

6.00

0.36

CEthreader

-------------------------------------------------------------------------GPRKITIALLGLDNAGKTTLLNSIQGEDRD--TTPTFGFNSTTLNEGKYKIEVFDLGGGKNIRGVWKKYLAEVHAIVYVVDAADPGRFEESKMTMAEVLENQRDKPICIFANKQDLPTAAPAAEVVKGLGLATC--RNSHNVFPCTAKMPAGQDVDHRLRDGLKWLVGTVD

3o47A

0.29

0.26

8.00

1.08

MUSTER

MDKKDIELEKMKAGGNAKFREFLES-------QEDYDPCWSLQEKYNSRAAALFRDKVVALAEGRELESWTPPQKKEMRILMVGLDAAGKTTILYKLKLGEIV-TTIPTIGFNVETVEYKNISFTVWDVG-----RPLWRHYFQNTQGLIFVVDSNDRERVNEAREELMRMLAELRDAVLLVFANKQDLPNAMNAAEITDKLGLHSLRHRN--WYIQATCATSGDG-----LYEGLDWLSNQLR

4m9qA

0.30

0.20

6.10

0.88

HHsearch

-------------------------------------------------------------------------GPRKITIALLGLDNAGKTTLLNSIQGEDR--DTTPTFGFNSTTLNEGKYKIEVFDLGGGKNIRGVWKKYLAEVHAIVYVVDAADPGRFEESKMTMAEVLENQRDKPICIFANKQDLPTAAPAAEVVKGLGLATCR--NSHNVFPCT-AKMPAGQDDHRLRDGLKWLVGTVD

5di3A

0.36

0.24

7.08

2.09

FFAS-3D

----------------------------------------------------------------------------EARILVLGLDNAGKTTILKALSEEDITTIT-PTQGFNIKSLSRDGFNLKIWDIGGQKSIRPYWRNYFDQTDALIYVIDSADSKRLSESEFELTELLQEETGVPLLVFANKQDLVGALAADEIASTLDLTSIRDRP--WQIQACSAKQGTGLKEGMEWMMKQVKLE---

5m1jA6

0.12

4.18

0.67

EigenThreader

FDDYLNDDEYDLMNEVFPTLKAQLQ--------DYQGWDNNFDLESTLAELKKTVQRYYKPKKPHDISAFVKSALPHLSFVVLGHVDAGKSTLMGRLLFAWIERERGVTVSICTSHFSTHRANFTIVDAPGHRDFVPNAIMGISQADMAILCVDCSTNAFESGQTKEHMLLASSLGIHNLIIAMNKMDNVDWSFEEIKSKLLPYLVDIGFFEDNIVPISGFSGEGVYKIELMSTLENAAFKISK

1zd9A

0.33

0.22

6.53

1.44

CNFpred

---------------------------------------------------------------------------EEMELTLVGLQYSGKTTFVNVIASGQFNEDMIPTVGFNMRKITKGNVTIKLWDIGGQPRFRSMWERYCRGVSAIVYMVDAADQEKIEASKNELHNLLDKLQGIPVLVLGNKRDLPGALDEKELIEKMNLSAIQ-DREICCYSISCK------EKDNIDITLQWLIQHSK

2j3eA

0.15

0.11

3.87

1.00

DEthreader

----------------PAATQEKLIEFFGKLK-Q------------------------------------KD--MNSMTVLVLGKGGVGKSSTVNSLIGEQVVRVSQEGLRPVMVSRTMGGFTINIIDTPGLNQALELIKGFLVTIDVLLYVDRLDVYAVDELDKQVVIAITQFGKEIKTLLVLTHAFSPPFKRSDSLLKTIRARKEFEDSAIAVVYAENSGRCSKDEKAWIPNLVKAITDVAT

(a)	ID1 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by number of aligned residues.
(b)	ID2 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by query sequence length.
(c)	Cov is equal the number of aligned template residues divided by query sequence length.
(d)	Norm. Zscore is the normalized Z-score of the threading alignments. A Normalized Z-score >1 means a good alignment and is highlighted in bold.
(e)	Download alignment lists the threading program used to identify the template, and provide the 3D structure of aligned regions of threading templates (threading[1-10].pdb.gz).
(f)	Template residues identical to query sequence are highlighted in color.

Top 1 final models from D-I-TASSER

Click to view	Rank^a	Download	Estimated TM-score^b
	1	model1.pdb.gz	0.6821

(a)

D-I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, i.e. decoys. These decoys are clustered by SPICKER based on pairwise structure similarity to report up to five final models from the five largest clusters. Models are ranked in descending order of cluster size. If the simulations converge well, it is possible to have less than 5 models generated, which is usually an indication of good model quality.

(b)

The model confidence is quantitatified by estimated TM-score (eTM-score), calculated based on significance of threading template alignments, contact map satisfaction rate, mean absolute error between distance of model and distance of AttentionPotential, and convergence of D-I-TASSER simulations. eTM-score is typically in the range of [0, 1], with higher eTM-score signifies higher model confidence.

Proteins with similar structure

Top 10 structural analogs in PDB (as identified by TM-align)

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	Download Alignment
1	6bbpA	0.71	2.72	0.243	0.795	model1_6bbpA.pdb.gz
2	2wkpA	0.65	3.06	0.146	0.762	model1_2wkpA.pdb.gz
3	4m9qA	0.65	1.49	0.287	0.684	model1_4m9qA.pdb.gz
4	3jb9B	0.64	3.46	0.143	0.783	model1_3jb9B.pdb.gz
5	3dofA	0.64	1.49	0.299	0.672	model1_3dofA.pdb.gz
6	3lvqE2	0.64	1.29	0.340	0.664	model1_3lvqE2.pdb.gz
7	7abir	0.63	3.25	0.123	0.770	model1_7abir.pdb.gz
8	1r4aA	0.63	1.28	0.348	0.660	model1_1r4aA.pdb.gz
9	2h57B	0.63	1.41	0.272	0.664	model1_2h57B.pdb.gz
10	6u43A1	0.63	3.04	0.126	0.746	model1_6u43A1.pdb.gz

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Gene Ontology (GO) Terms

Molecular Function (MF)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0035639	0.98	purine ribonucleoside triphosphate binding
GO:0032555	0.98	purine ribonucleotide binding
GO:0032550	0.98	purine ribonucleoside binding
GO:0003824	0.98	catalytic activity
GO:0005525	0.97	GTP binding
GO:0003924	0.97	GTPase activity
GO:0098772	0.51	molecular function regulator
GO:0019003	0.51	GDP binding

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Molecular Function. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Biological Process (BP)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0065007	0.97	biological regulation
GO:0050794	0.96	regulation of cellular process
GO:0007165	0.94	signal transduction
GO:0007264	0.93	small GTPase mediated signal transduction
GO:0009987	0.92	cellular process
GO:0051179	0.86	localization
GO:0044699	0.86	single-organism process
GO:0006810	0.84	transport
GO:0044763	0.79	single-organism cellular process
GO:0016192	0.76	vesicle-mediated transport
GO:0048193	0.69	Golgi vesicle transport
GO:0051641	0.68	cellular localization
GO:0016043	0.67	cellular component organization
GO:0006892	0.65	post-Golgi vesicle-mediated transport
GO:0051649	0.64	establishment of localization in cell
GO:0016236	0.64	macroautophagy
GO:0006893	0.64	Golgi to plasma membrane transport
GO:0046907	0.62	intracellular transport
GO:0008104	0.61	protein localization
GO:0006996	0.61	organelle organization
GO:0008152	0.58	metabolic process
GO:0034613	0.55	cellular protein localization
GO:0044237	0.54	cellular metabolic process
GO:1902578	0.53	single-organism localization
GO:0016197	0.53	endosomal transport
GO:0044710	0.52	single-organism metabolic process
GO:0033365	0.52	protein localization to organelle
GO:0051128	0.51	regulation of cellular component organization
GO:0065009	0.50	regulation of molecular function

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Biological Process. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Cellular Component (CC)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0044464	1.00	cell part
GO:0044424	0.99	intracellular part
GO:0044444	0.97	cytoplasmic part
GO:0043226	0.96	organelle
GO:0043227	0.94	membrane-bounded organelle
GO:0043229	0.93	intracellular organelle
GO:0043231	0.91	intracellular membrane-bounded organelle
GO:0016020	0.85	membrane
GO:0044422	0.82	organelle part
GO:0044446	0.81	intracellular organelle part
GO:0031982	0.73	vesicle
GO:0031988	0.70	membrane-bounded vesicle
GO:0031090	0.60	organelle membrane
GO:0098588	0.58	bounding membrane of organelle
GO:0005886	0.54	plasma membrane
GO:0031410	0.53	cytoplasmic vesicle
GO:0005773	0.53	vacuole
GO:0016023	0.51	cytoplasmic, membrane-bounded vesicle
GO:0044431	0.50	Golgi apparatus part
GO:0005737	0.50	cytoplasm

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Cellular Component. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Predicted Enzyme Commission (EC) Numbers

Top 5 enzyme homologs in PDB

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	EC Number	Predicted Active Site Residues
1	0.350	2bmeA	0.606	1.95	0.167	0.664	3.6.5.2	87
2	0.329	3bc1A	0.597	2.05	0.186	0.660	3.6.5.2	87
3	0.165	1m2oB	0.605	1.97	0.340	0.652	3.6.5.-	NA
4	0.138	1e0sA	0.589	2.38	0.287	0.652	3.6.1.47	NA
5	0.066	1rflA	0.466	3.82	0.158	0.594	3.6.-.-	NA

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted active site residues.
(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the Enzyme Commission (EC) number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Ligand Binding Sites

Template proteins with similar binding site:

Click to view	Rank	Cscore^LB	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	BS-score	Lig. Name	Download Complex	Predicted binding site residues
	1	0.78	3pcrB	0.618	1.35	0.348	0.647	1.46	GTP	complex1.pdb.gz	86,87,88,89,90,91,92,106,108,109,130,131,132,185,186,188,189,219,220
	2	0.06	1ksh0	0.631	1.22	0.331	0.656	1.33	III	complex2.pdb.gz	98,99,100,110,111,112,113,114,115,116,125,127,138,141,142

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted binding site and residues.
(a)	Cscore^LB is the confidence score of predicted binding site. Cscore^LB values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable ligand-binding site prediction.
(b)	BS-score is a measure of local similarity (sequence & structure) between template binding site and predicted binding site in the query structure. Based on large scale benchmarking analysis, we have observed that a BS-score >1 reflects a significant local match between the predicted and template binding site.
(c)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(d)	RMSD^a the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(e)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(f)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

References:
1.	Wei Zheng, Chengxin Zhang, Yang Li, Robin Pearce, Eric W. Bell, Yang Zhang. Folding non-homology proteins by coupling deep-learning contact maps with I-TASSER assembly simulations. In preparation, 2020.