D-I-TASSER Q8N0Z9-D3

D-I-TASSER results for Q8N0Z9-D3

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>Q8N0Z9 (88 residues)
YPPPSAPQCWAQMASGSFMLQLTCRWDGGYPDPDFLWIEEPGGVIVGKSKLGVEMLSESQ
LSDGKKFKCVTSHIVGPESGASCMVQIR

Predicted Secondary Structure

Sequence	20 40 60 80 \| \| \| \| YPPPSAPQCWAQMASGSFMLQLTCRWDGGYPDPDFLWIEEPGGVIVGKSKLGVEMLSESQLSDGKKFKCVTSHIVGPESGASCMVQIR
Prediction	CCCCCCCCSSSSCCCCCCSSSSSSSCCCCCCCCCSSSSCCCCCCCCCCCCCSSSSCCCCCCCCCCSSSSSSSSCCCCCCCCCSSSSSC
Confidence	9679997248743789734999976799768974576338975446765010121136545799568998550135678981899959
	H:Helix; S:Strand; C:Coil

Predicted Solvent Accessibility

Sequence	20 40 60 80 \| \| \| \| YPPPSAPQCWAQMASGSFMLQLTCRWDGGYPDPDFLWIEEPGGVIVGKSKLGVEMLSESQLSDGKKFKCVTSHIVGPESGASCMVQIR
Prediction	8647542413244346443030303154232414131445655344553432343344452475440302042334556543040418
	Values range from 0 (buried residue) to 8 (highly exposed residue)

Predicted Contact, Hydrogen and Distance Map Used in D-I-TASSER simulation

Contact Map

Distance Map

Hydrogen bond networks

D-I-TASSER simulation is guided by the consensus contact map (left figure), distance map (middle figure) and Hydrogen bond network (right figure) derived based on confidence scores of AttentionPotential. In the contact, distance map and hydrogen bond networks, the axes mark the residue index along the sequence. For the contact map, each dot represents a residue pair with predicted contact, while for the distance map and hydrogen bond network, a color scale represents a distance of 1-20+ angstroms or a angle of 0-180 degree.

Top 10 threading templates used by D-I-TASSER

Rank

PDB
hit

ID1

ID2

Cov

Norm.
Zscore

Download
alignment

                  20                  40                  60                  80

                   |                   |                   |                   |

SS
Seq

CCCCCCCCSSSSCCCCCCSSSSSSSCCCCCCCCCSSSSCCCCCCCCCCCCCSSSSCCCCCCCCCCSSSSSSSSCCCCCCCCCSSSSSC
YPPPSAPQCWAQMASGSFMLQLTCRWDGGYPDPDFLWIEEPGGVIVGKSKLGVEMLSESQLSDGKKFKCVTSHIVGPESGASCMVQIR

6mvgA3

0.06

2.49

1.33

DEthreader

KSHFDGLKVTPEVA--DKNAKIAVEVFLSEQQLVYQITDAEGVLA-AETKQVNLEITDV-HLWDYLYTATVRLMEVCIDSVSTRFGCR

5xeqB2

0.18

5.91

1.10

SPARKS-K

TNTTAPPALKLSVVNPGENVTVQCLLTGGDPLPQLQWSHGPGPLLGALAQGGTLSIPSVQARDSGYYNCTATNNVGNPAKKTVNLLVR

5zo1A2

0.14

4.67

1.24

FFAS-3D

-VAPENPVVEVRQAVEGGEVELSCLVPRSRPAAVLRWYRDRKELKGVSSGASTVRFRVDRKDDGGIVICEAQNQALPSGHSQTQYVLD

5oj2A

0.20

0.17

5.47

1.49

CNFpred

------------VVNPGDNVTMQCSLTGGDPQPEVLWSHSPGPLPPNSLVGGNLTIWRIRVEDSGYYNCTAINNVGNPAKKTVNLLVR

6mvfA4

0.04

0.03

1.88

1.33

DEthreader

NAHFDGIMVTPKPT-ADGGATFEIKSFVTPFTVMYSIEDPYGCEV-ASAVRISIYVPDA-ELWENLYTVVARLQREAFDEIYANVGV-

5lf5A2

0.15

4.95

1.08

SPARKS-K

-YAPWKPTVNGTVAVEGETVSILCSTQ-SNPDPILTIFKEKQILATIYESQLQLELPAVTPEDDGEYWCVAENQYGQR-ATAFNLSVE

1n26A

0.08

3.11

0.53

MapAlign

---PDPPAITVTAVRNPRWLSVTWQDPSWFYRLRFELRYERSKFTTWMVLQHHCVIHDAWSGLRHVVQLRAQEEFGQGEWSWSEAMGT

3rjdA

0.13

0.12

4.35

0.44

CEthreader

KELFPAPVLNASVLLEGNLVTLSCETKLLLQ-LYFSFYMGSKTL-RGRNTSSEYQILTARREDSGLYWCEAATEDGNVLKRSPELELQ

5xeqB

0.20

6.52

0.93

MUSTER

APPALKLSVETLVVNPGENVTVQCLLTGGDPLPQLQWSHGPGPLPLGLAQGGTLSIPSVQARDSGYYNCTATNNVGNPAKKTVNLLVR

5xnpA

0.22

6.80

0.39

HHsearch

CEPPLITRHTHEMVLEGQRATLRCKAR-GDPEPAIHWISPEGKLISNTYDNGTLDILITTVKDTGAFTCIASNPAGEA-TQIVDLHI-

(a)	ID1 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by number of aligned residues.
(b)	ID2 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by query sequence length.
(c)	Cov is equal the number of aligned template residues divided by query sequence length.
(d)	Norm. Zscore is the normalized Z-score of the threading alignments. A Normalized Z-score >1 means a good alignment and is highlighted in bold.
(e)	Download alignment lists the threading program used to identify the template, and provide the 3D structure of aligned regions of threading templates (threading[1-10].pdb.gz).
(f)	Template residues identical to query sequence are highlighted in color.

Top 1 final models from D-I-TASSER

Click to view	Rank^a	Download	Estimated TM-score^b
	1	model1.pdb.gz	0.7976

(a)

D-I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, i.e. decoys. These decoys are clustered by SPICKER based on pairwise structure similarity to report up to five final models from the five largest clusters. Models are ranked in descending order of cluster size. If the simulations converge well, it is possible to have less than 5 models generated, which is usually an indication of good model quality.

(b)

The model confidence is quantitatified by estimated TM-score (eTM-score), calculated based on significance of threading template alignments, contact map satisfaction rate, mean absolute error between distance of model and distance of AttentionPotential, and convergence of D-I-TASSER simulations. eTM-score is typically in the range of [0, 1], with higher eTM-score signifies higher model confidence.

Proteins with similar structure

Top 10 structural analogs in PDB (as identified by TM-align)

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	Download Alignment
1	1zxqA	0.80	1.81	0.106	0.966	model1_1zxqA.pdb.gz
2	5zo1A	0.79	2.03	0.141	0.966	model1_5zo1A.pdb.gz
3	6lynC1	0.78	1.83	0.217	0.943	model1_6lynC1.pdb.gz
4	6mvgA3	0.78	1.77	0.060	0.943	model1_6mvgA3.pdb.gz
5	4of8A	0.78	2.22	0.207	0.989	model1_4of8A.pdb.gz
6	2petA	0.77	2.35	0.148	1.000	model1_2petA.pdb.gz
7	3bn3B	0.77	2.08	0.128	0.977	model1_3bn3B.pdb.gz
8	4oi9A4	0.77	2.01	0.131	0.955	model1_4oi9A4.pdb.gz
9	1f97A	0.75	2.15	0.153	0.966	model1_1f97A.pdb.gz
10	1nbqA	0.75	2.15	0.176	0.966	model1_1nbqA.pdb.gz

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Gene Ontology (GO) Terms

Molecular Function (MF)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0005198	0.53	structural molecule activity
GO:0003723	0.52	RNA binding

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Molecular Function. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Biological Process (BP)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0050794	1.00	regulation of cellular process
GO:0048518	1.00	positive regulation of biological process
GO:0048522	0.65	positive regulation of cellular process
GO:0051247	0.64	positive regulation of protein metabolic process
GO:0031325	0.64	positive regulation of cellular metabolic process
GO:0048583	0.63	regulation of response to stimulus
GO:0031328	0.63	positive regulation of cellular biosynthetic process
GO:0010557	0.63	positive regulation of macromolecule biosynthetic process
GO:0080134	0.61	regulation of response to stress
GO:0002682	0.61	regulation of immune system process
GO:0002376	0.61	immune system process
GO:0031347	0.60	regulation of defense response
GO:0002684	0.60	positive regulation of immune system process
GO:0044699	0.57	single-organism process
GO:0032270	0.53	positive regulation of cellular protein metabolic process
GO:0045727	0.52	positive regulation of translation
GO:0007165	0.52	signal transduction
GO:0048584	0.50	positive regulation of response to stimulus

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Biological Process. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Cellular Component (CC)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0044464	1.00	cell part
GO:0016020	0.91	membrane
GO:0043226	0.85	organelle
GO:0005886	0.84	plasma membrane
GO:0043227	0.83	membrane-bounded organelle
GO:0044425	0.81	membrane part
GO:0031224	0.77	intrinsic component of membrane
GO:0044424	0.73	intracellular part
GO:0016021	0.73	integral component of membrane
GO:0043229	0.64	intracellular organelle
GO:0031988	0.61	membrane-bounded vesicle
GO:0043231	0.59	intracellular membrane-bounded organelle
GO:0005634	0.57	nucleus
GO:0044421	0.55	extracellular region part
GO:0070062	0.54	extracellular exosome

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Cellular Component. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Predicted Enzyme Commission (EC) Numbers

Top 5 enzyme homologs in PDB

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	EC Number	Predicted Active Site Residues
1	0.096	2bk8A	0.709	2.24	0.074	0.920	2.7.11.1	NA
2	0.092	2wwmD	0.705	2.35	0.171	0.932	2.7.11.1	NA
3	0.089	1k85A	0.654	2.72	0.107	0.955	3.2.1.14	NA
4	0.079	2dleA	0.686	2.51	0.062	0.909	3.1.3.48	46
5	0.067	2edtA	0.665	2.48	0.117	0.875	2.7.11.1	NA

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted active site residues.
(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the Enzyme Commission (EC) number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Ligand Binding Sites

Template proteins with similar binding site:

Rank	Cscore^LB	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	BS-score	Lig. Name	Download Complex	Predicted binding site residues
1	0.04	1u3h2	0.660	2.69	0.114	0.898	0.58	III	complex1.pdb.gz	37,39,49,68,77,78,79,81,82,83
2	0.04	2bnqE	0.732	2.69	0.184	0.989	0.69	III	complex2.pdb.gz	34,73,74,75
3	0.03	1u3h1	0.671	2.58	0.122	0.932	0.61	III	complex3.pdb.gz	38,40,43,68,72,76,79,80,82,84
4	0.02	3dgcR	0.713	2.48	0.059	0.966	0.69	UUU	complex4.pdb.gz	39,40,43,62,67

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted binding site and residues.
(a)	Cscore^LB is the confidence score of predicted binding site. Cscore^LB values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable ligand-binding site prediction.
(b)	BS-score is a measure of local similarity (sequence & structure) between template binding site and predicted binding site in the query structure. Based on large scale benchmarking analysis, we have observed that a BS-score >1 reflects a significant local match between the predicted and template binding site.
(c)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(d)	RMSD^a the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(e)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(f)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

References:
1.	Wei Zheng, Chengxin Zhang, Yang Li, Robin Pearce, Eric W. Bell, Yang Zhang. Folding non-homology proteins by coupling deep-learning contact maps with I-TASSER assembly simulations. In preparation, 2020.