D-I-TASSER Q8N0Y7

D-I-TASSER results for Q8N0Y7

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

Summary of the Protein

Uniprot ID: Q8N0Y7
Protein Name: Probable phosphoglycerate mutase 4
Gene Name: PGAM4

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>Q8N0Y7 (254 residues)
MAAYKLVLIRHGESTWNLENRFSCWYDADLSPAGHEEAKRGGQALRDAGYEFDICLTSVQ
KRVIRTLWTVLDAIDQMWLPVVRTWRLNERHYGGLTGLNKAETAAKHGEAQVKIWRRSYD
VPPPPMEPDHPFYSNISKDRRYADLTEDQLPSYESPKDTIARALPFWNEEIVPQIKEGKR
VLIAAHGNSLQGIAKHVEGLSEEAIMELNLPTGIPIVYELDKNLKPIKPMQFLGDEETVC
KAIEAVAAQGKAKK

Predicted Contact and Distance Map Used in D-I-TASSER simulation

Contact Map

Distance Map

D-I-TASSER simulation is guided by the consensus contact map (left figure) and distance map (right figure) derived based on confidence scores of AttentionPotential. In the contact, distance map and hydrogen bond networks, the axes mark the residue index along the sequence. For the contact map, each dot represents a residue pair with predicted contact, while for the distance map and hydrogen bond network, a color scale represents a distance of 1-20+ angstroms or a angle of 0-180 degree.

Information of Domain

No. of Domain	Domain	Domain Boundary	Length of Domain	Models of Domain	Sequence
1	Q8N0Y7-D1	1-254	254		MAAYKLVLIRHGESTWNLENRFSCWYDADLSPAGHEEAKRGGQALRDAGYEFDICLTSVQKRVIRTLWTVLDAIDQMWLPVVRTWRLNERHYGGLTGLNKAETAAKHGEAQVKIWRRSYDVPPPPMEPDHPFYSNISKDRRYADLTEDQLPSYESPKDTIARALPFWNEEIVPQIKEGKRVLIAAHGNSLQGIAKHVEGLSEEAIMELNLPTGIPIVYELDKNLKPIKPMQFLGDEETVCKAIEAVAAQGKAKK

Top 1 final models from D-I-TASSER

Click to view	Rank^a	Download	Estimated TM-score^b
	1	model1.pdb.gz	0.9321

(a)

D-I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, i.e. decoys. These decoys are clustered by SPICKER based on pairwise structure similarity to report up to five final models from the five largest clusters. Models are ranked in descending order of cluster size. If the simulations converge well, it is possible to have less than 5 models generated, which is usually an indication of good model quality.

(b)

The model confidence is quantitatified by estimated TM-score (eTM-score), calculated based on significance of threading template alignments, contact map satisfaction rate, mean absolute error between distance of model and distance of AttentionPotential, and convergence of D-I-TASSER simulations. eTM-score is typically in the range of [0, 1], with higher eTM-score signifies higher model confidence.

Proteins with similar structure

Top 10 structural analogs in PDB (as identified by TM-align)

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	Download Alignment
1	2hhjA	0.95	1.36	0.518	0.996	model1_2hhjA.pdb.gz
2	3gp5A	0.95	1.19	0.585	0.976	model1_3gp5A.pdb.gz
3	1e58A	0.94	1.23	0.547	0.972	model1_1e58A.pdb.gz
4	5vveA	0.93	0.97	0.588	0.957	model1_5vveA.pdb.gz
5	1riiA	0.93	1.12	0.450	0.953	model1_1riiA.pdb.gz
6	1yjxA	0.92	1.65	0.951	0.965	model1_1yjxA.pdb.gz
7	1qhfA	0.92	0.95	0.475	0.945	model1_1qhfA.pdb.gz
8	4embA	0.91	1.37	0.533	0.953	model1_4embA.pdb.gz
9	1xq9A	0.91	1.28	0.535	0.949	model1_1xq9A.pdb.gz
10	3d8hB	0.88	1.40	0.498	0.917	model1_3d8hB.pdb.gz

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Gene Ontology (GO) Terms

Molecular Function (MF)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0003824	1.00	catalytic activity
GO:0004619	0.92	phosphoglycerate mutase activity
GO:0046538	0.90	2,3-bisphosphoglycerate-dependent phosphoglycerate mutase activity

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Molecular Function. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Biological Process (BP)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0044699	0.99	single-organism process
GO:0009987	0.99	cellular process
GO:0008152	0.99	metabolic process
GO:0071704	0.98	organic substance metabolic process
GO:0044763	0.98	single-organism cellular process
GO:0044281	0.98	small molecule metabolic process
GO:0044238	0.98	primary metabolic process
GO:0044237	0.98	cellular metabolic process
GO:1901564	0.97	organonitrogen compound metabolic process
GO:0006796	0.97	phosphate-containing compound metabolic process
GO:1901576	0.96	organic substance biosynthetic process
GO:0019318	0.96	hexose metabolic process
GO:0010675	0.96	regulation of cellular carbohydrate metabolic process
GO:0006096	0.96	glycolytic process
GO:0043456	0.95	regulation of pentose-phosphate shunt
GO:0006094	0.95	gluconeogenesis

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Biological Process. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Cellular Component (CC)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0044444	1.00	cytoplasmic part
GO:0005829	0.99	cytosol

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Cellular Component. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Predicted Enzyme Commission (EC) Numbers

Top 5 enzyme homologs in PDB

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	EC Number	Predicted Active Site Residues
1	0.463	2hhjA	0.952	1.36	0.518	0.996	3.1.3.13 5.4.2.1 5.4.2.4	NA
2	0.239	1e58A	0.944	1.23	0.547	0.972	5.4.2.1	NA
3	0.235	1qhfA	0.923	0.95	0.475	0.945	5.4.2.1	NA
4	0.142	1c7zA	0.669	2.41	0.225	0.744	2.7.1.105 3.1.3.46	10,11
5	0.135	2a6pA	0.660	2.62	0.198	0.756	5.4.2.1	11

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted active site residues.
(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the Enzyme Commission (EC) number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Ligand Binding Sites

Template proteins with similar binding site:

Rank	Cscore^LB	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	BS-score	Lig. Name	Download Complex	Predicted binding site residues
1	0.79	3gw8A	0.889	0.83	0.600	0.905	1.67	UUU	complex1.pdb.gz	10,11,17,21,22,23,24,62,89,92,186,187
2	0.76	3gp3A	0.887	0.77	0.598	0.902	1.68	PO3	complex2.pdb.gz	10,11,17,62,89,186,187
3	0.68	1e59A	0.922	0.87	0.552	0.941	1.51	VO3	complex3.pdb.gz	10,17,22,23,24,89,90,92,100,116,117,188
4	0.63	1bq3A	0.900	0.95	0.483	0.921	1.55	IHP	complex4.pdb.gz	10,11,13,14,16,17,21,22,23,92,100,116,117,209
5	0.54	1bq4A	0.901	0.91	0.483	0.921	1.30	BHC	complex5.pdb.gz	10,17,92,116,117,188,209
6	0.49	1yfk0	0.936	0.91	0.951	0.957	1.84	III	complex6.pdb.gz	51,52,53,59,61,64,65,68,72,75,76,77,78,79,81,83,140,141,180

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted binding site and residues.
(a)	Cscore^LB is the confidence score of predicted binding site. Cscore^LB values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable ligand-binding site prediction.
(b)	BS-score is a measure of local similarity (sequence & structure) between template binding site and predicted binding site in the query structure. Based on large scale benchmarking analysis, we have observed that a BS-score >1 reflects a significant local match between the predicted and template binding site.
(c)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(d)	RMSD^a the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(e)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(f)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

References:
1.	Wei Zheng, Chengxin Zhang, Yang Li, Robin Pearce, Eric W. Bell, Yang Zhang. Folding non-homology proteins by coupling deep-learning contact maps with I-TASSER assembly simulations. In preparation, 2020.