D-I-TASSER Q8IXT5-D3

D-I-TASSER results for Q8IXT5-D3

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>Q8IXT5 (76 residues)
SGQKLCIYIRNFPFDVTKVEVQKFFADFLLAEDDIYLLYDDKGVGLGEALVKFKSEEQAM
KAERLNRRRFLGTEVL

Predicted Secondary Structure

Sequence	20 40 60 \| \| \| SGQKLCIYIRNFPFDVTKVEVQKFFADFLLAEDDIYLLYDDKGVGLGEALVKFKSEEQAMKAERLNRRRFLGTEVL
Prediction	CCCCSSSSSSCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCSSSSSSCCCCCSCSSSSSSSCCHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCSSSC
Confidence	9996199995869988999999998516997214999978999924599999699999999999838734991529
	H:Helix; S:Strand; C:Coil

Predicted Solvent Accessibility

Sequence	20 40 60 \| \| \| SGQKLCIYIRNFPFDVTKVEVQKFFADFLLAEDDIYLLYDDKGVGLGEALVKFKSEEQAMKAERLNRRRFLGTEVL
Prediction	8665210102403361447203611772714663030233773434020203063572044016447661554525
	Values range from 0 (buried residue) to 8 (highly exposed residue)

Predicted Contact, Hydrogen and Distance Map Used in D-I-TASSER simulation

Contact Map

Distance Map

Hydrogen bond networks

D-I-TASSER simulation is guided by the consensus contact map (left figure), distance map (middle figure) and Hydrogen bond network (right figure) derived based on confidence scores of AttentionPotential. In the contact, distance map and hydrogen bond networks, the axes mark the residue index along the sequence. For the contact map, each dot represents a residue pair with predicted contact, while for the distance map and hydrogen bond network, a color scale represents a distance of 1-20+ angstroms or a angle of 0-180 degree.

Top 10 threading templates used by D-I-TASSER

Rank

PDB
hit

ID1

ID2

Cov

Norm.
Zscore

Download
alignment

                  20                  40                  60

                   |                   |                   |

SS
Seq

CCCCSSSSSSCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCSSSSSSCCCCCSCSSSSSSSCCHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCSSSC
SGQKLCIYIRNFPFDVTKVEVQKFFADFLLAEDDIYLLYDDKGVGLGEALVKFKSEEQAMKAERLNRRRFLGTEVL

1h2uX

0.21

6.67

1.50

DEthreader

KLKSCTLYVGNLSFYTTEEQIYELFSKSGDIK-KIIMGLDMKKTACGFCFVEYYSRADAENAMRINGTRLDDRIIR

4n0tA1

0.15

0.14

4.88

1.91

SPARKS-K

NRELTTVLVKNLPKSYNQNKVYKYFKHCGPIIHVDVADSLKKN--FRFARIEFARYDGALAAITKTHKVVGQNEII

5uz5A

0.24

0.22

6.99

0.47

MapAlign

---YRTIFIGRLPYDLDEIELQKYFVKFGEIE-KIRIVKDITQKSKGYAFIVFKDPISSKMAFKIGGIQIKDRICI

2la6A

0.24

7.39

0.31

CEthreader

HSDNNTIFVQGLGENVTIESVADYFKQIGIIKTMINLYTDETGKLKGEATVSFDDPPSAKAAIDWFGKEFSGNPIK

1cvjA1

0.21

0.20

6.28

1.75

MUSTER

----ASLYVGDLHPDVTEAMLYEKFSPAGPILSIRVCRDMITRRSLGYAYVNFQQPADAERALDMNFDVIKGKPVR

5uz5A

0.23

0.22

7.03

0.82

HHsearch

TDPYRTIFIGRLPYDLDEIELQKYFVKFGEIEK-IRIVKDITQKSKGYAFIVFKDPISSKMAKEIRGIQIKDRICI

1hd1A

0.23

0.21

6.61

1.58

FFAS-3D

-----KMFIGGLSWDTTKKDLKDYFSKFGEVVDCTLKLDPITGRSRGFGFVLFKESESVDKVMDQKEHKLNGKVI-

2cqpA

0.29

8.82

0.58

EigenThreader

KPGPTIIKVQNMPFTVSIDEILDFFYGYQVIPGSVCLKYNEKGMPTGEAMVAFESRDEATAAVIDLDRPIGSRKVK

5t9pA

0.22

0.21

6.66

1.59

CNFpred

--YSGIIYVSRLPHGFHEKELSKYFAQFGDLKEVRLARNKKTGNSRHYGFLEFVNKEDAMIAQSMNNYLLMGHLLQ

3s8sA

0.15

0.14

4.89

1.50

DEthreader

QIPLKEVTFARLNDNVRETFLKDMCRKYGEVE-EVEILLHPTRKHLGLARVLFTSTRGAKETVKNHLTSVMGNIIH

(a)	ID1 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by number of aligned residues.
(b)	ID2 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by query sequence length.
(c)	Cov is equal the number of aligned template residues divided by query sequence length.
(d)	Norm. Zscore is the normalized Z-score of the threading alignments. A Normalized Z-score >1 means a good alignment and is highlighted in bold.
(e)	Download alignment lists the threading program used to identify the template, and provide the 3D structure of aligned regions of threading templates (threading[1-10].pdb.gz).
(f)	Template residues identical to query sequence are highlighted in color.

Top 1 final models from D-I-TASSER

Click to view	Rank^a	Download	Estimated TM-score^b
	1	model1.pdb.gz	0.8441

(a)

D-I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, i.e. decoys. These decoys are clustered by SPICKER based on pairwise structure similarity to report up to five final models from the five largest clusters. Models are ranked in descending order of cluster size. If the simulations converge well, it is possible to have less than 5 models generated, which is usually an indication of good model quality.

(b)

The model confidence is quantitatified by estimated TM-score (eTM-score), calculated based on significance of threading template alignments, contact map satisfaction rate, mean absolute error between distance of model and distance of AttentionPotential, and convergence of D-I-TASSER simulations. eTM-score is typically in the range of [0, 1], with higher eTM-score signifies higher model confidence.

Proteins with similar structure

Top 10 structural analogs in PDB (as identified by TM-align)

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	Download Alignment
1	5mmjv	0.92	1.06	0.230	0.974	model1_5mmjv.pdb.gz
2	4pkdB2	0.92	1.30	0.173	0.987	model1_4pkdB2.pdb.gz
3	5uz5A	0.91	1.30	0.227	0.987	model1_5uz5A.pdb.gz
4	1h2uX	0.91	1.01	0.213	0.974	model1_1h2uX.pdb.gz
5	7b0yb	0.90	1.32	0.173	0.987	model1_7b0yb.pdb.gz
6	2cpeA	0.89	1.33	0.211	0.987	model1_2cpeA.pdb.gz
7	6n7pY	0.89	1.07	0.160	0.974	model1_6n7pY.pdb.gz
8	3s8sA	0.89	1.02	0.147	0.974	model1_3s8sA.pdb.gz
9	2la6A	0.89	1.50	0.237	0.987	model1_2la6A.pdb.gz
10	6tzeA	0.88	1.16	0.213	0.987	model1_6tzeA.pdb.gz

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Gene Ontology (GO) Terms

Molecular Function (MF)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0003723	1.00	RNA binding
GO:0044822	0.85	poly(A) RNA binding

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Molecular Function. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Biological Process (BP)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0009987	0.86	cellular process
GO:0065007	0.80	biological regulation
GO:0050789	0.79	regulation of biological process
GO:0050794	0.78	regulation of cellular process
GO:0008152	0.73	metabolic process
GO:0080090	0.72	regulation of primary metabolic process
GO:0071704	0.72	organic substance metabolic process
GO:0060255	0.72	regulation of macromolecule metabolic process
GO:0044237	0.72	cellular metabolic process
GO:0044238	0.71	primary metabolic process
GO:0031323	0.71	regulation of cellular metabolic process
GO:0010468	0.71	regulation of gene expression
GO:0051171	0.70	regulation of nitrogen compound metabolic process
GO:0044260	0.70	cellular macromolecule metabolic process
GO:0006807	0.68	nitrogen compound metabolic process
GO:0034641	0.67	cellular nitrogen compound metabolic process
GO:0090304	0.66	nucleic acid metabolic process
GO:0051252	0.66	regulation of RNA metabolic process
GO:0016070	0.64	RNA metabolic process
GO:0043484	0.61	regulation of RNA splicing
GO:0044699	0.59	single-organism process
GO:0006396	0.58	RNA processing
GO:0016071	0.56	mRNA metabolic process
GO:0006397	0.54	mRNA processing

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Biological Process. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Cellular Component (CC)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0044424	1.00	intracellular part
GO:0043226	0.95	organelle
GO:0043229	0.94	intracellular organelle
GO:0043227	0.94	membrane-bounded organelle
GO:0005634	0.93	nucleus
GO:0044422	0.91	organelle part
GO:0044446	0.90	intracellular organelle part
GO:0044428	0.87	nuclear part
GO:0032991	0.79	macromolecular complex
GO:0030529	0.67	intracellular ribonucleoprotein complex
GO:0005654	0.66	nucleoplasm
GO:0005737	0.63	cytoplasm

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Cellular Component. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Predicted Enzyme Commission (EC) Numbers

Top 5 enzyme homologs in PDB

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	EC Number	Predicted Active Site Residues
1	0.217	2cqbA	0.856	1.63	0.227	0.987	5.2.1.8	8,35
2	0.096	1urrA	0.571	2.75	0.043	0.895	3.6.1.7	NA
3	0.080	1ulrA	0.555	2.81	0.090	0.882	3.6.1.7	NA
4	0.067	2dnrA	0.676	2.15	0.162	0.882	3.1.3.36	26,28,35
5	0.067	1mwyA	0.547	2.58	0.065	0.816	3.6.3.3 3.6.3.5	18,38

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted active site residues.
(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the Enzyme Commission (EC) number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Ligand Binding Sites

Template proteins with similar binding site:

Rank	Cscore^LB	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	BS-score	Lig. Name	Download Complex	Predicted binding site residues
1	0.14	2kg0A	0.812	1.59	0.307	0.974	1.19	RQA	complex1.pdb.gz	10,11,12,14,44,45,66,67,73,74,75,76
2	0.12	1urnB	0.805	2.01	0.247	0.934	0.87	RQA	complex2.pdb.gz	8,10,11,14,36,38,40,46,47,48,50,73
3	0.06	1a9n1	0.819	1.94	0.274	0.934	0.96	III	complex3.pdb.gz	22,23,24,26,27,34,68,69,70,71,72
4	0.05	2xb2D	0.864	1.40	0.200	0.974	0.93	III	complex4.pdb.gz	14,40,42,43,45,46
5	0.04	1pgzA	0.838	1.65	0.173	0.987	0.80	UUU	complex5.pdb.gz	6,8,10,11,34,36,38,46,47,48,50,73
6	0.04	2errA	0.742	2.03	0.181	0.921	0.93	QNA	complex6.pdb.gz	8,10,11,12,14,36,37,38,39,40,46,47,48,50,73

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted binding site and residues.
(a)	Cscore^LB is the confidence score of predicted binding site. Cscore^LB values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable ligand-binding site prediction.
(b)	BS-score is a measure of local similarity (sequence & structure) between template binding site and predicted binding site in the query structure. Based on large scale benchmarking analysis, we have observed that a BS-score >1 reflects a significant local match between the predicted and template binding site.
(c)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(d)	RMSD^a the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(e)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(f)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

References:
1.	Wei Zheng, Chengxin Zhang, Yang Li, Robin Pearce, Eric W. Bell, Yang Zhang. Folding non-homology proteins by coupling deep-learning contact maps with I-TASSER assembly simulations. In preparation, 2020.