D-I-TASSER Q8IV01

D-I-TASSER results for Q8IV01

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

Summary of the Protein

Uniprot ID: Q8IV01
Protein Name: Synaptotagmin-12
Gene Name: SYT12

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>Q8IV01 (421 residues)
MAVDVAEYHLSVIKSPPGWEVGVYAAGALALLGIAAVSLWKLWTSGSFPSPSPFPNYDYR
YLQQKYGESCAEAREKRVPAWNAQRASTRGPPSRKGSLSIEDTFESISELGPLELMGREL
DLAPYGTLRKSQSADSLNSISSVSNTFGQDFTLGQVEVSMEYDTASHTLNVAVMQGKDLL
EREEASFESCFMRVSLLPDEQIVGISRIQRNAYSIFFDEKFSIPLDPTALEEKSLRFSVF
GIDEDERNVSTGVVELKLSVLDLPLQPFSGWLYLQDQNKAADAVGEILLSLSYLPTAERL
TVVVVKAKNLIWTNDKTTADPFVKVYLLQDGRKMSKKKTAVKRDDPNPVFNEAMIFSVPA
IVLQDLSLRVTVAESSSDGRGDNVGHVIIGPSASGMGTTHWNQMLATLRRPVSMWHAVRR
N

Predicted Contact and Distance Map Used in D-I-TASSER simulation

Contact Map

Distance Map

D-I-TASSER simulation is guided by the consensus contact map (left figure) and distance map (right figure) derived based on confidence scores of AttentionPotential. In the contact, distance map and hydrogen bond networks, the axes mark the residue index along the sequence. For the contact map, each dot represents a residue pair with predicted contact, while for the distance map and hydrogen bond network, a color scale represents a distance of 1-20+ angstroms or a angle of 0-180 degree.

Information of Domain

No. of Domain	Domain	Domain Boundary	Length of Domain	Models of Domain	Sequence
1	Q8IV01-D1	1-421	421		MAVDVAEYHLSVIKSPPGWEVGVYAAGALALLGIAAVSLWKLWTSGSFPSPSPFPNYDYRYLQQKYGESCAEAREKRVPAWNAQRASTRGPPSRKGSLSIEDTFESISELGPLELMGRELDLAPYGTLRKSQSADSLNSISSVSNTFGQDFTLGQVEVSMEYDTASHTLNVAVMQGKDLLEREEASFESCFMRVSLLPDEQIVGISRIQRNAYSIFFDEKFSIPLDPTALEEKSLRFSVFGIDEDERNVSTGVVELKLSVLDLPLQPFSGWLYLQDQNKAADAVGEILLSLSYLPTAERLTVVVVKAKNLIWTNDKTTADPFVKVYLLQDGRKMSKKKTAVKRDDPNPVFNEAMIFSVPAIVLQDLSLRVTVAESSSDGRGDNVGHVIIGPSASGMGTTHWNQMLATLRRPVSMWHAVRRN

Top 1 final models from D-I-TASSER

Click to view	Rank^a	Download	Estimated TM-score^b
	1	model1.pdb.gz	0.4514

(a)

D-I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, i.e. decoys. These decoys are clustered by SPICKER based on pairwise structure similarity to report up to five final models from the five largest clusters. Models are ranked in descending order of cluster size. If the simulations converge well, it is possible to have less than 5 models generated, which is usually an indication of good model quality.

(b)

The model confidence is quantitatified by estimated TM-score (eTM-score), calculated based on significance of threading template alignments, contact map satisfaction rate, mean absolute error between distance of model and distance of AttentionPotential, and convergence of D-I-TASSER simulations. eTM-score is typically in the range of [0, 1], with higher eTM-score signifies higher model confidence.

Proteins with similar structure

Top 10 structural analogs in PDB (as identified by TM-align)

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	Download Alignment
1	3hn8A	0.57	3.03	0.292	0.644	model1_3hn8A.pdb.gz
2	2r83A	0.42	4.17	0.253	0.501	model1_2r83A.pdb.gz
3	6ankA	0.41	3.64	0.228	0.468	model1_6ankA.pdb.gz
4	3hizA	0.41	6.73	0.047	0.637	model1_3hizA.pdb.gz
5	2j5wA	0.40	7.22	0.038	0.679	model1_2j5wA.pdb.gz
6	6oz1A	0.40	6.82	0.056	0.651	model1_6oz1A.pdb.gz
7	5ifiA	0.40	6.73	0.057	0.639	model1_5ifiA.pdb.gz
8	7lkpA1	0.40	7.13	0.061	0.665	model1_7lkpA1.pdb.gz
9	2x38A	0.40	6.75	0.034	0.629	model1_2x38A.pdb.gz
10	1w6jA	0.40	7.16	0.051	0.670	model1_1w6jA.pdb.gz

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Gene Ontology (GO) Terms

Molecular Function (MF)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0046872	0.91	metal ion binding
GO:0005543	0.91	phospholipid binding
GO:0005544	0.90	calcium-dependent phospholipid binding
GO:0005509	0.90	calcium ion binding
GO:0030276	0.88	clathrin binding
GO:0019905	0.88	syntaxin binding

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Molecular Function. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Biological Process (BP)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0065007	0.99	biological regulation
GO:0050789	0.98	regulation of biological process
GO:0009987	0.98	cellular process
GO:0050794	0.97	regulation of cellular process
GO:0044699	0.97	single-organism process
GO:0044763	0.96	single-organism cellular process
GO:0006810	0.93	transport
GO:0032940	0.92	secretion by cell
GO:0016192	0.92	vesicle-mediated transport
GO:0051049	0.91	regulation of transport
GO:0016079	0.91	synaptic vesicle exocytosis
GO:0016043	0.91	cellular component organization
GO:0017158	0.90	regulation of calcium ion-dependent exocytosis
GO:0006996	0.90	organelle organization
GO:1902589	0.89	single-organism organelle organization
GO:0048791	0.89	calcium ion-regulated exocytosis of neurotransmitter
GO:0006906	0.88	vesicle fusion

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Biological Process. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Cellular Component (CC)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0044464	1.00	cell part
GO:0016020	0.93	membrane
GO:0005886	0.90	plasma membrane
GO:0044424	0.80	intracellular part
GO:0044444	0.68	cytoplasmic part

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Cellular Component. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Predicted Enzyme Commission (EC) Numbers

Top 5 enzyme homologs in PDB

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	EC Number	Predicted Active Site Residues
1	0.060	1eusA	0.279	7.08	0.058	0.470	3.2.1.18	NA
2	0.060	3ebgA	0.376	7.43	0.054	0.656	3.4.11.-	NA
3	0.060	1kb0A	0.363	7.11	0.041	0.608	1.1.99.-	NA
4	0.060	2j5wA	0.403	7.22	0.038	0.679	1.16.3.1	NA
5	0.060	2fhbA	0.358	6.87	0.039	0.580	3.2.1.41	NA

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted active site residues.
(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the Enzyme Commission (EC) number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Ligand Binding Sites

Template proteins with similar binding site:

Rank	Cscore^LB	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	BS-score	Lig. Name	Download Complex	Predicted binding site residues
1	0.06	2wxoA	0.398	7.19	0.042	0.663	0.25	ZZP	complex1.pdb.gz	153,178,180,240,241
2	0.06	3qjzA	0.387	7.23	0.053	0.644	0.24	QJZ	complex2.pdb.gz	179,239,240,242
3	0.05	3apfA	0.340	7.40	0.059	0.582	0.22	BMW	complex3.pdb.gz	153,205,209
4	0.04	3ibeA	0.386	7.28	0.054	0.646	0.21	L64	complex4.pdb.gz	132,152,211,243,249,250,252
5	0.04	3cstA	0.382	7.32	0.050	0.644	0.25	E52	complex5.pdb.gz	177,179,180,181,188,190,210
6	0.04	1e8wA	0.384	7.38	0.056	0.648	0.22	QUE	complex6.pdb.gz	156,241,250
7	0.04	2wxqA	0.391	7.20	0.051	0.658	0.15	ZZQ	complex7.pdb.gz	177,178,179,190
8	0.04	2wxgA	0.389	7.20	0.037	0.651	0.20	ZZN	complex8.pdb.gz	153,154,176,204,239,240,241,242
9	0.03	2chxA	0.384	7.18	0.051	0.637	0.21	090	complex9.pdb.gz	177,178,180,188
10	0.01	2dqmA	0.396	6.92	0.045	0.651	0.25	BES	complex10.pdb.gz	153,154,179,180,181,239,243

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted binding site and residues.
(a)	Cscore^LB is the confidence score of predicted binding site. Cscore^LB values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable ligand-binding site prediction.
(b)	BS-score is a measure of local similarity (sequence & structure) between template binding site and predicted binding site in the query structure. Based on large scale benchmarking analysis, we have observed that a BS-score >1 reflects a significant local match between the predicted and template binding site.
(c)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(d)	RMSD^a the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(e)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(f)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

References:
1.	Wei Zheng, Chengxin Zhang, Yang Li, Robin Pearce, Eric W. Bell, Yang Zhang. Folding non-homology proteins by coupling deep-learning contact maps with I-TASSER assembly simulations. In preparation, 2020.