D-I-TASSER Q86W56

D-I-TASSER results for Q86W56

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

Summary of the Protein

Uniprot ID: Q86W56
Protein Name: Poly(ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase
Gene Name: PARG

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>Q86W56 (976 residues)
MNAGPGCEPCTKRPRWGAATTSPAASDARSFPSRQRRVLDPKDAHVQFRVPPSSPACVPG
RAGQHRGSATSLVFKQKTITSWMDTKGIKTAESESLDSKENNNTRIESMMSSVQKDNFYQ
HNVEKLENVSQLSLDKSPTEKSTQYLNQHQTAAMCKWQNEGKHTEQLLESEPQTVTLVPE
QFSNANIDRSPQNDDHSDTDSEENRDNQQFLTTVKLANAKQTTEDEQAREAKSHQKCSKS
CDPGEDCASCQQDEIDVVPESPLSDVGSEDVGTGPKNDNKLTRQESCLGNSPPFEKESEP
ESPMDVDNSKNSCQDSEADEETSPGFDEQEDGSSSQTANKPSRFQARDADIEFRKRYSTK
GGEVRLHFQFEGGESRTGMNDLNAKLPGNISSLNVECRNSKQHGKKDSKITDHFMRLPKA
EDRRKEQWETKHQRTERKIPKYVPPHLSPDKKWLGTPIEEMRRMPRCGIRLPLLRPSANH
TVTIRVDLLRAGEVPKPFPTHYKDLWDNKHVKMPCSEQNLYPVEDENGERTAGSRWELIQ
TALLNKFTRPQNLKDAILKYNVAYSKKWDFTALIDFWDKVLEEAEAQHLYQSILPDMVKI
ALCLPNICTQPIPLLKQKMNHSITMSQEQIASLLANAFFCTFPRRNAKMKSEYSSYPDIN
FNRLFEGRSSRKPEKLKTLFCYFRRVTEKKPTGLVTFTRQSLEDFPEWERCEKPLTRLHV
TYEGTIEENGQGMLQVDFANRFVGGGVTSAGLVQEEIRFLINPELIISRLFTEVLDHNEC
LIITGTEQYSEYTGYAETYRWSRSHEDGSERDDWQRRCTEIVAIDALHFRRYLDQFVPEK
MRRELNKAYCGFLRPGVSSENLSAVATGNWGCGAFGGDARLKALIQILAAAAAERDVVYF
TFGDSELMRDIYSMHIFLTERKLTVGDVYKLLLRYYNEECRNCSTPGPDIKLYPFIYHAV
ESCAETADHSGQRTGT

Predicted Contact and Distance Map Used in D-I-TASSER simulation

Contact Map

Distance Map

D-I-TASSER simulation is guided by the consensus contact map (left figure) and distance map (right figure) derived based on confidence scores of AttentionPotential. In the contact, distance map and hydrogen bond networks, the axes mark the residue index along the sequence. For the contact map, each dot represents a residue pair with predicted contact, while for the distance map and hydrogen bond network, a color scale represents a distance of 1-20+ angstroms or a angle of 0-180 degree.

Information of Domain

No. of Domain	Domain	Domain Boundary	Length of Domain	Models of Domain	Sequence
1	Q86W56-D1	1-415,695-976	697		MNAGPGCEPCTKRPRWGAATTSPAASDARSFPSRQRRVLDPKDAHVQFRVPPSSPACVPGRAGQHRGSATSLVFKQKTITSWMDTKGIKTAESESLDSKENNNTRIESMMSSVQKDNFYQHNVEKLENVSQLSLDKSPTEKSTQYLNQHQTAAMCKWQNEGKHTEQLLESEPQTVTLVPEQFSNANIDRSPQNDDHSDTDSEENRDNQQFLTTVKLANAKQTTEDEQAREAKSHQKCSKSCDPGEDCASCQQDEIDVVPESPLSDVGSEDVGTGPKNDNKLTRQESCLGNSPPFEKESEPESPMDVDNSKNSCQDSEADEETSPGFDEQEDGSSSQTANKPSRFQARDADIEFRKRYSTKGGEVRLHFQFEGGESRTGMNDLNAKLPGNISSLNVECRNSKQHGKKDSKITDHFMVTFTRQSLEDFPEWERCEKPLTRLHVTYEGTIEENGQGMLQVDFANRFVGGGVTSAGLVQEEIRFLINPELIISRLFTEVLDHNECLIITGTEQYSEYTGYAETYRWSRSHEDGSERDDWQRRCTEIVAIDALHFRRYLDQFVPEKMRRELNKAYCGFLRPGVSSENLSAVATGNWGCGAFGGDARLKALIQILAAAAAERDVVYFTFGDSELMRDIYSMHIFLTERKLTVGDVYKLLLRYYNEECRNCSTPGPDIKLYPFIYHAVESCAETADHSGQRTGT
2	Q86W56-D2	416-694	279		RLPKAEDRRKEQWETKHQRTERKIPKYVPPHLSPDKKWLGTPIEEMRRMPRCGIRLPLLRPSANHTVTIRVDLLRAGEVPKPFPTHYKDLWDNKHVKMPCSEQNLYPVEDENGERTAGSRWELIQTALLNKFTRPQNLKDAILKYNVAYSKKWDFTALIDFWDKVLEEAEAQHLYQSILPDMVKIALCLPNICTQPIPLLKQKMNHSITMSQEQIASLLANAFFCTFPRRNAKMKSEYSSYPDINFNRLFEGRSSRKPEKLKTLFCYFRRVTEKKPTGL

Top 1 final models from D-I-TASSER

Click to view	Rank^a	Download	Estimated TM-score^b
	1	model1.pdb.gz	0.41

(a)

D-I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, i.e. decoys. These decoys are clustered by SPICKER based on pairwise structure similarity to report up to five final models from the five largest clusters. Models are ranked in descending order of cluster size. If the simulations converge well, it is possible to have less than 5 models generated, which is usually an indication of good model quality.

(b)

The model confidence is quantitatified by estimated TM-score (eTM-score), calculated based on significance of threading template alignments, contact map satisfaction rate, mean absolute error between distance of model and distance of AttentionPotential, and convergence of D-I-TASSER simulations. eTM-score is typically in the range of [0, 1], with higher eTM-score signifies higher model confidence.

Proteins with similar structure

Top 10 structural analogs in PDB (as identified by TM-align)

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	Download Alignment
1	6sytA	0.33	8.92	0.045	0.515	model1_6sytA.pdb.gz
2	6ar6A	0.32	8.78	0.042	0.500	model1_6ar6A.pdb.gz
3	4r04A	0.32	8.76	0.034	0.493	model1_4r04A.pdb.gz
4	6z2wE	0.32	8.68	0.054	0.485	model1_6z2wE.pdb.gz
5	6bcuA	0.32	8.88	0.031	0.490	model1_6bcuA.pdb.gz
6	5a22A	0.31	9.35	0.028	0.511	model1_5a22A.pdb.gz
7	5d06A	0.31	9.15	0.043	0.499	model1_5d06A.pdb.gz
8	5nz7A	0.31	8.51	0.042	0.474	model1_5nz7A.pdb.gz
9	7k10A	0.31	9.14	0.044	0.494	model1_7k10A.pdb.gz
10	6yejA	0.31	9.22	0.039	0.497	model1_6yejA.pdb.gz

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Gene Ontology (GO) Terms

Molecular Function (MF)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0004649	1.00	poly(ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase activity

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Molecular Function. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Biological Process (BP)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0009987	1.00	cellular process
GO:0071704	0.98	organic substance metabolic process
GO:0044238	0.98	primary metabolic process
GO:0034641	0.96	cellular nitrogen compound metabolic process
GO:0044763	0.94	single-organism cellular process
GO:0006139	0.93	nucleobase-containing compound metabolic process
GO:0043170	0.90	macromolecule metabolic process
GO:1901564	0.89	organonitrogen compound metabolic process
GO:1901135	0.89	carbohydrate derivative metabolic process
GO:0006753	0.88	nucleoside phosphate metabolic process
GO:0009117	0.85	nucleotide metabolic process
GO:1990966	0.83	ATP generation from poly-ADP-D-ribose
GO:0050794	0.53	regulation of cellular process

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Biological Process. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Cellular Component (CC)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0044424	1.00	intracellular part
GO:0005634	0.97	nucleus
GO:0044446	0.95	intracellular organelle part
GO:0005654	0.66	nucleoplasm
GO:0005737	0.62	cytoplasm
GO:0044444	0.50	cytoplasmic part

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Cellular Component. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Predicted Enzyme Commission (EC) Numbers

Top 5 enzyme homologs in PDB

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	EC Number	Predicted Active Site Residues
1	0.060	1etuA	0.112	5.33	0.048	0.137	3.6.5.3	195
2	0.060	3ffzA	0.281	9.10	0.052	0.447	3.4.24.69	NA
3	0.060	1rs0A	0.179	7.26	0.044	0.250	3.4.21.47	NA
4	0.060	2pdaA	0.296	8.66	0.045	0.451	1.2.7.1	NA
5	0.060	3btaA	0.279	8.85	0.027	0.433	3.4.24.69	NA

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted active site residues.
(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the Enzyme Commission (EC) number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Ligand Binding Sites

Template proteins with similar binding site:

No Binding sites was predicted

Click to view	Rank	Cscore^LB	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	BS-score	Lig. Name	Download Complex	Predicted binding site residues

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted binding site and residues.
(a)	Cscore^LB is the confidence score of predicted binding site. Cscore^LB values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable ligand-binding site prediction.
(b)	BS-score is a measure of local similarity (sequence & structure) between template binding site and predicted binding site in the query structure. Based on large scale benchmarking analysis, we have observed that a BS-score >1 reflects a significant local match between the predicted and template binding site.
(c)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(d)	RMSD^a the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(e)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(f)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

References:
1.	Wei Zheng, Chengxin Zhang, Yang Li, Robin Pearce, Eric W. Bell, Yang Zhang. Folding non-homology proteins by coupling deep-learning contact maps with I-TASSER assembly simulations. In preparation, 2020.