D-I-TASSER Q86UQ5

D-I-TASSER results for Q86UQ5

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

Summary of the Protein

Uniprot ID: Q86UQ5
Protein Name: Gilles de la Tourette syndrome chromosomal region candidate gene 1 protein
Gene Name: GTSCR1

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>Q86UQ5 (136 residues)
MQSDIYHPGHSFPSWVLCWVHSCGHEGHLRETAEIRKTHQNGDLQIRGGRGRRESTEIFQ
VASVTEGEESPPAICMEVFLFLWFIAPIYACVCRIFKIQVRNTVKNSSTASLAPSISTSE
ERQIRIERHHYHLYGQ

Predicted Contact and Distance Map Used in D-I-TASSER simulation

Contact Map

Distance Map

D-I-TASSER simulation is guided by the consensus contact map (left figure) and distance map (right figure) derived based on confidence scores of AttentionPotential. In the contact, distance map and hydrogen bond networks, the axes mark the residue index along the sequence. For the contact map, each dot represents a residue pair with predicted contact, while for the distance map and hydrogen bond network, a color scale represents a distance of 1-20+ angstroms or a angle of 0-180 degree.

Information of Domain

No. of Domain	Domain	Domain Boundary	Length of Domain	Models of Domain	Sequence
1	Q86UQ5-D1	1-136	136		MQSDIYHPGHSFPSWVLCWVHSCGHEGHLRETAEIRKTHQNGDLQIRGGRGRRESTEIFQVASVTEGEESPPAICMEVFLFLWFIAPIYACVCRIFKIQVRNTVKNSSTASLAPSISTSEERQIRIERHHYHLYGQ

Top 1 final models from D-I-TASSER

Click to view	Rank^a	Download	Estimated TM-score^b
	1	model1.pdb.gz	0.545

(a)

D-I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, i.e. decoys. These decoys are clustered by SPICKER based on pairwise structure similarity to report up to five final models from the five largest clusters. Models are ranked in descending order of cluster size. If the simulations converge well, it is possible to have less than 5 models generated, which is usually an indication of good model quality.

(b)

The model confidence is quantitatified by estimated TM-score (eTM-score), calculated based on significance of threading template alignments, contact map satisfaction rate, mean absolute error between distance of model and distance of AttentionPotential, and convergence of D-I-TASSER simulations. eTM-score is typically in the range of [0, 1], with higher eTM-score signifies higher model confidence.

Proteins with similar structure

Top 10 structural analogs in PDB (as identified by TM-align)

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	Download Alignment
1	3jd8A	0.49	4.37	0.057	0.809	model1_3jd8A.pdb.gz
2	6v3fA	0.47	4.40	0.067	0.779	model1_6v3fA.pdb.gz
3	6lvfB	0.47	4.65	0.069	0.787	model1_6lvfB.pdb.gz
4	3ew8A	0.47	4.32	0.064	0.728	model1_3ew8A.pdb.gz
5	4im7A	0.46	4.42	0.015	0.735	model1_4im7A.pdb.gz
6	5fjsA	0.46	4.66	0.040	0.801	model1_5fjsA.pdb.gz
7	3h2zA1	0.42	4.90	0.065	0.743	model1_3h2zA1.pdb.gz
8	4pgaA1	0.40	4.33	0.056	0.640	model1_4pgaA1.pdb.gz
9	1tycA1	0.40	5.30	0.035	0.728	model1_1tycA1.pdb.gz
10	3q9bA2	0.40	4.79	0.038	0.684	model1_3q9bA2.pdb.gz

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Gene Ontology (GO) Terms

Molecular Function (MF)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0050662	0.13	coenzyme binding
GO:0046872	0.13	metal ion binding

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Molecular Function. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Biological Process (BP)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0055114	0.13	oxidation-reduction process
GO:0019594	0.13	mannitol metabolic process

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Biological Process. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Cellular Component (CC)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0044424	1.00	intracellular part
GO:0043234	0.89	protein complex
GO:1902494	0.78	catalytic complex
GO:0044446	0.78	intracellular organelle part
GO:0043226	0.78	organelle
GO:0005737	0.78	cytoplasm
GO:0005634	0.67	nucleus
GO:0000118	0.67	histone deacetylase complex
GO:0044444	0.56	cytoplasmic part
GO:0005654	0.56	nucleoplasm

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Cellular Component. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Predicted Enzyme Commission (EC) Numbers

Top 5 enzyme homologs in PDB

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	EC Number	Predicted Active Site Residues
1	0.060	1uirB	0.443	4.98	0.051	0.824	2.5.1.16	NA
2	0.060	1gaiA	0.443	4.25	0.026	0.691	3.2.1.3	NA
3	0.060	1r66A	0.439	4.78	0.111	0.743	4.2.1.46	NA
4	0.060	3flcX	0.440	4.81	0.018	0.765	2.7.1.30	NA
5	0.060	1kerB	0.441	4.58	0.085	0.735	4.2.1.46	NA

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted active site residues.
(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the Enzyme Commission (EC) number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Ligand Binding Sites

Template proteins with similar binding site:

Rank	Cscore^LB	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	BS-score	Lig. Name	Download Complex	Predicted binding site residues
1	0.01	2v5wB	0.376	4.79	0.044	0.654	0.15	III	complex1.pdb.gz	8,44,45
2	0.01	2v5xB	0.439	4.65	0.036	0.757	0.14	V5X	complex2.pdb.gz	6,9,10,53,54
3	0.01	1t64B	0.379	4.89	0.044	0.669	0.15	TSN	complex3.pdb.gz	10,39,46
4	0.01	3ew8A	0.467	4.32	0.064	0.728	0.10	B3N	complex4.pdb.gz	20,96,98
5	0.01	3mz7A	0.443	4.48	0.056	0.735	0.12	B3N	complex5.pdb.gz	6,7,9
6	0.01	3ahqA	0.449	5.07	0.038	0.816	0.15	FAD	complex6.pdb.gz	12,19,30,70
7	0.01	1jq3C	0.447	5.18	0.103	0.846	0.13	AAT	complex7.pdb.gz	1,39,43,57,59
8	0.01	3sffA	0.429	4.63	0.055	0.743	0.18	0DI	complex8.pdb.gz	5,6,7,38
9	0.01	2v5xA	0.442	4.59	0.064	0.757	0.16	V5X	complex9.pdb.gz	6,63,65
10	0.01	1vcoA	0.461	4.53	0.042	0.750	0.19	GLN	complex10.pdb.gz	9,11,12

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted binding site and residues.
(a)	Cscore^LB is the confidence score of predicted binding site. Cscore^LB values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable ligand-binding site prediction.
(b)	BS-score is a measure of local similarity (sequence & structure) between template binding site and predicted binding site in the query structure. Based on large scale benchmarking analysis, we have observed that a BS-score >1 reflects a significant local match between the predicted and template binding site.
(c)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(d)	RMSD^a the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(e)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(f)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

References:
1.	Wei Zheng, Chengxin Zhang, Yang Li, Robin Pearce, Eric W. Bell, Yang Zhang. Folding non-homology proteins by coupling deep-learning contact maps with I-TASSER assembly simulations. In preparation, 2020.