D-I-TASSER Q7RTY3

D-I-TASSER results for Q7RTY3

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

Summary of the Protein

Uniprot ID: Q7RTY3
Protein Name: Putative serine protease 45
Gene Name: PRSS45P

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>Q7RTY3 (260 residues)
MTRHWPWEVSLRMENEHVCGGALIDPSWVVTAAHCIQGTKEYSVVLGTSKLQPMNFSRAL
WVPVRDIIMHPKYWGRAFIMGDVALVHLQTPVTFSEYVQPICLPEPNFNLKVGTQCWVTG
WSQVKQRFSANSMLTPELQEAEVFIMDNKRCDRHYKKSFFPPVVPLVLGDMICATNYGEN
LCYGDSGGPLACEVEGRWILAGVLSWEKACVKAQNPGVYTRITKYTKWIKKQMSNGAFSG
PCASACLLFLCWLLQPQMGS

Predicted Contact and Distance Map Used in D-I-TASSER simulation

Contact Map

Distance Map

D-I-TASSER simulation is guided by the consensus contact map (left figure) and distance map (right figure) derived based on confidence scores of AttentionPotential. In the contact, distance map and hydrogen bond networks, the axes mark the residue index along the sequence. For the contact map, each dot represents a residue pair with predicted contact, while for the distance map and hydrogen bond network, a color scale represents a distance of 1-20+ angstroms or a angle of 0-180 degree.

Information of Domain

No. of Domain	Domain	Domain Boundary	Length of Domain	Models of Domain	Sequence
1	Q7RTY3-D1	1-100,225-260	136		MTRHWPWEVSLRMENEHVCGGALIDPSWVVTAAHCIQGTKEYSVVLGTSKLQPMNFSRALWVPVRDIIMHPKYWGRAFIMGDVALVHLQTPVTFSEYVQPYTKWIKKQMSNGAFSGPCASACLLFLCWLLQPQMGS
2	Q7RTY3-D2	101-224	124		ICLPEPNFNLKVGTQCWVTGWSQVKQRFSANSMLTPELQEAEVFIMDNKRCDRHYKKSFFPPVVPLVLGDMICATNYGENLCYGDSGGPLACEVEGRWILAGVLSWEKACVKAQNPGVYTRITK

Top 1 final models from D-I-TASSER

Click to view	Rank^a	Download	Estimated TM-score^b
	1	model1.pdb.gz	0.88

(a)

D-I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, i.e. decoys. These decoys are clustered by SPICKER based on pairwise structure similarity to report up to five final models from the five largest clusters. Models are ranked in descending order of cluster size. If the simulations converge well, it is possible to have less than 5 models generated, which is usually an indication of good model quality.

(b)

The model confidence is quantitatified by estimated TM-score (eTM-score), calculated based on significance of threading template alignments, contact map satisfaction rate, mean absolute error between distance of model and distance of AttentionPotential, and convergence of D-I-TASSER simulations. eTM-score is typically in the range of [0, 1], with higher eTM-score signifies higher model confidence.

Proteins with similar structure

Top 10 structural analogs in PDB (as identified by TM-align)

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	Download Alignment
1	3e0nB	0.81	1.91	0.401	0.873	model1_3e0nB.pdb.gz
2	1fizA	0.78	2.41	0.303	0.854	model1_1fizA.pdb.gz
3	1ekbB	0.78	1.95	0.329	0.831	model1_1ekbB.pdb.gz
4	3govB	0.78	2.19	0.318	0.835	model1_3govB.pdb.gz
5	3w94A	0.78	1.85	0.356	0.827	model1_3w94A.pdb.gz
6	5to3B	0.78	1.93	0.272	0.827	model1_5to3B.pdb.gz
7	1jwtA	0.78	1.90	0.280	0.827	model1_1jwtA.pdb.gz
8	3elaH	0.78	2.04	0.285	0.839	model1_3elaH.pdb.gz
9	1bruP	0.78	1.99	0.329	0.831	model1_1bruP.pdb.gz
10	3uwjH	0.78	1.89	0.295	0.823	model1_3uwjH.pdb.gz

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Gene Ontology (GO) Terms

Molecular Function (MF)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0070011	0.99	peptidase activity, acting on L-amino acid peptides
GO:0008236	0.98	serine-type peptidase activity
GO:0004175	0.95	endopeptidase activity
GO:0004252	0.94	serine-type endopeptidase activity
GO:0098772	0.70	molecular function regulator

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Molecular Function. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Biological Process (BP)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0065007	1.00	biological regulation
GO:0019538	0.98	protein metabolic process
GO:0006508	0.97	proteolysis
GO:0050789	0.86	regulation of biological process
GO:0048518	0.78	positive regulation of biological process
GO:0032501	0.75	multicellular organismal process
GO:0044699	0.68	single-organism process
GO:0032879	0.63	regulation of localization
GO:0043270	0.62	positive regulation of ion transport
GO:0010959	0.62	regulation of metal ion transport
GO:0010765	0.61	positive regulation of sodium ion transport
GO:0044707	0.60	single-multicellular organism process
GO:0065008	0.54	regulation of biological quality
GO:0050896	0.51	response to stimulus

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Biological Process. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Cellular Component (CC)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0005576	0.85	extracellular region
GO:0044421	0.81	extracellular region part
GO:0044464	0.79	cell part
GO:0005615	0.77	extracellular space
GO:0044424	0.69	intracellular part
GO:0043226	0.56	organelle
GO:0043227	0.55	membrane-bounded organelle

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Cellular Component. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Predicted Enzyme Commission (EC) Numbers

Top 5 enzyme homologs in PDB

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	EC Number	Predicted Active Site Residues
1	0.519	2eekA	0.728	2.34	0.308	0.788	3.4.21.4	34,82,182,184,185
2	0.510	2zgcA	0.747	2.27	0.300	0.815	3.4.21.-	34,82,184,186,187
3	0.504	1bitA	0.727	2.05	0.324	0.781	3.4.21.4	34,82,182,184,185
4	0.502	2qxgA	0.733	2.06	0.327	0.788	3.4.21.117	34,82,182,184,185
5	0.495	1npmA	0.735	1.95	0.340	0.788	3.4.21.118	202

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted active site residues.
(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the Enzyme Commission (EC) number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Ligand Binding Sites

Template proteins with similar binding site:

Rank	Cscore^LB	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	BS-score	Lig. Name	Download Complex	Predicted binding site residues
1	0.58	3e0nB	0.808	1.91	0.401	0.873	1.07	UUU	complex1.pdb.gz	34,78,79,180,181,182,183,184,186,205,206,207,208,217
2	0.53	3e0pB	0.788	2.26	0.376	0.858	1.18	B3C	complex2.pdb.gz	34,73,80,82,163,171,181,182,183,184,185,186,204,205,206,207,208,209
3	0.49	1dwcH	0.787	2.06	0.298	0.842	1.14	MIT	complex3.pdb.gz	34,165,182,186,206,207,208,209
4	0.49	2v3oH	0.774	1.90	0.296	0.823	1.10	I26	complex4.pdb.gz	34,77,79,186,204,205,206,207,209,210,217
5	0.46	2jh0D	0.774	1.91	0.295	0.823	1.08	701	complex5.pdb.gz	34,180,181,182,183,204,206,207,209,210,217,218,219
6	0.45	3qdzD	0.780	2.23	0.289	0.842	0.98	III	complex6.pdb.gz	34,79,180,181,183,184,186,204,207,209
7	0.32	2c93B	0.771	1.89	0.295	0.819	1.00	C4M	complex7.pdb.gz	34,75,79,183,206,207
8	0.32	1no9H	0.777	1.91	0.292	0.827	1.15	4ND	complex8.pdb.gz	34,181,182,186,204,205,206
9	0.32	8kme2	0.775	1.88	0.296	0.823	0.91	III	complex9.pdb.gz	79,165,180,181,183,205,206,207,208,209,210
10	0.20	1sb1H	0.772	1.88	0.296	0.819	1.43	NA	complex10.pdb.gz	8,20,119,120,185,188

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted binding site and residues.
(a)	Cscore^LB is the confidence score of predicted binding site. Cscore^LB values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable ligand-binding site prediction.
(b)	BS-score is a measure of local similarity (sequence & structure) between template binding site and predicted binding site in the query structure. Based on large scale benchmarking analysis, we have observed that a BS-score >1 reflects a significant local match between the predicted and template binding site.
(c)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(d)	RMSD^a the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(e)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(f)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

References:
1.	Wei Zheng, Chengxin Zhang, Yang Li, Robin Pearce, Eric W. Bell, Yang Zhang. Folding non-homology proteins by coupling deep-learning contact maps with I-TASSER assembly simulations. In preparation, 2020.