D-I-TASSER Q7RTY1

D-I-TASSER results for Q7RTY1

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

Summary of the Protein

Uniprot ID: Q7RTY1
Protein Name: Monocarboxylate transporter 9
Gene Name: SLC16A9

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>Q7RTY1 (509 residues)
MELKKSPDGGWGWVIVFVSFLTQFLCYGSPLAVGVLYIEWLDAFGEGKGKTAWVGSLASG
VGLLASPVCSLCVSSFGARPVTIFSGFMVAGGLMLSSFAPNIYFLFFSYGIVVGLGCGLL
YTATVTITCQYFDDRRGLALGLISTGSSVGLFIYAALQRMLVEFYGLDGCLLIVGALALN
ILACGSLMRPLQSSDCPLPKKIAPEDLPDKYSIYNEKGKNLEENINILDKSYSSEEKCRI
TLANGDWKQDSLLHKNPTVTHTKEPETYKKKVAEQTYFCKQLAKRKWQLYKNYCGETVAL
FKNKVFSALFIAILLFDIGGFPPSLLMEDVARSSNVKEEEFIMPLISIIGIMTAVGKLLL
GILADFKWINTLYLYVATLIIMGLALCAIPFAKSYVTLALLSGILGFLTGNWSIFPYVTT
KTVGIEKLAHAYGILMFFAGLGNSLGPPIVGWFYDWTQTYDIAFYFSGFCVLLGGFILLL
AALPSWDTCNKQLPKPAPTTFLYKVASNV

Predicted Contact and Distance Map Used in D-I-TASSER simulation

Contact Map

Distance Map

D-I-TASSER simulation is guided by the consensus contact map (left figure) and distance map (right figure) derived based on confidence scores of AttentionPotential. In the contact, distance map and hydrogen bond networks, the axes mark the residue index along the sequence. For the contact map, each dot represents a residue pair with predicted contact, while for the distance map and hydrogen bond network, a color scale represents a distance of 1-20+ angstroms or a angle of 0-180 degree.

Information of Domain

No. of Domain	Domain	Domain Boundary	Length of Domain	Models of Domain	Sequence
1	Q7RTY1-D1	1-202	202		MELKKSPDGGWGWVIVFVSFLTQFLCYGSPLAVGVLYIEWLDAFGEGKGKTAWVGSLASGVGLLASPVCSLCVSSFGARPVTIFSGFMVAGGLMLSSFAPNIYFLFFSYGIVVGLGCGLLYTATVTITCQYFDDRRGLALGLISTGSSVGLFIYAALQRMLVEFYGLDGCLLIVGALALNILACGSLMRPLQSSDCPLPKKI
2	Q7RTY1-D2	203-509	307		APEDLPDKYSIYNEKGKNLEENINILDKSYSSEEKCRITLANGDWKQDSLLHKNPTVTHTKEPETYKKKVAEQTYFCKQLAKRKWQLYKNYCGETVALFKNKVFSALFIAILLFDIGGFPPSLLMEDVARSSNVKEEEFIMPLISIIGIMTAVGKLLLGILADFKWINTLYLYVATLIIMGLALCAIPFAKSYVTLALLSGILGFLTGNWSIFPYVTTKTVGIEKLAHAYGILMFFAGLGNSLGPPIVGWFYDWTQTYDIAFYFSGFCVLLGGFILLLAALPSWDTCNKQLPKPAPTTFLYKVASNV

Top 1 final models from D-I-TASSER

Click to view	Rank^a	Download	Estimated TM-score^b
	1	model1.pdb.gz	0.87

(a)

D-I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, i.e. decoys. These decoys are clustered by SPICKER based on pairwise structure similarity to report up to five final models from the five largest clusters. Models are ranked in descending order of cluster size. If the simulations converge well, it is possible to have less than 5 models generated, which is usually an indication of good model quality.

(b)

The model confidence is quantitatified by estimated TM-score (eTM-score), calculated based on significance of threading template alignments, contact map satisfaction rate, mean absolute error between distance of model and distance of AttentionPotential, and convergence of D-I-TASSER simulations. eTM-score is typically in the range of [0, 1], with higher eTM-score signifies higher model confidence.

Proteins with similar structure

Top 10 structural analogs in PDB (as identified by TM-align)

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	Download Alignment
1	4gbyA	0.68	3.61	0.110	0.790	model1_4gbyA.pdb.gz
2	6thaA	0.68	2.91	0.111	0.749	model1_6thaA.pdb.gz
3	4zowA	0.67	2.99	0.122	0.750	model1_4zowA.pdb.gz
4	6lyyA	0.67	2.80	0.253	0.745	model1_6lyyA.pdb.gz
5	7crzA	0.67	3.59	0.108	0.776	model1_7crzA.pdb.gz
6	6h7dA	0.67	3.60	0.109	0.778	model1_6h7dA.pdb.gz
7	6e9nA	0.67	3.36	0.147	0.754	model1_6e9nA.pdb.gz
8	6gs1A	0.66	4.29	0.117	0.802	model1_6gs1A.pdb.gz
9	6exsA	0.66	4.19	0.123	0.794	model1_6exsA.pdb.gz
10	6kkiA	0.66	2.30	0.154	0.713	model1_6kkiA.pdb.gz

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Gene Ontology (GO) Terms

Molecular Function (MF)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0005215	1.00	transporter activity
GO:0022857	0.87	transmembrane transporter activity
GO:0022891	0.85	substrate-specific transmembrane transporter activity
GO:0046943	0.52	carboxylic acid transmembrane transporter activity

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Molecular Function. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Biological Process (BP)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0006810	0.97	transport
GO:0006811	0.96	ion transport
GO:0055085	0.91	transmembrane transport
GO:0034220	0.89	ion transmembrane transport
GO:0071702	0.66	organic substance transport
GO:0006820	0.64	anion transport
GO:0015718	0.63	monocarboxylic acid transport
GO:0035879	0.56	plasma membrane lactate transport

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Biological Process. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Cellular Component (CC)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0016021	0.99	integral component of membrane
GO:0044464	0.85	cell part
GO:0016020	0.52	membrane

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Cellular Component. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Predicted Enzyme Commission (EC) Numbers

Top 5 enzyme homologs in PDB

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	EC Number	Predicted Active Site Residues
1	0.060	1h16A	0.333	7.59	0.042	0.562	2.3.1.54	NA
2	0.060	1ea0A	0.317	8.10	0.046	0.554	1.4.1.13	149
3	0.060	1qleA	0.332	7.19	0.033	0.528	1.9.3.1	NA
4	0.060	2v45A	0.320	7.36	0.051	0.515	1.7.99.4	NA
5	0.060	1ug9A	0.327	7.56	0.058	0.540	3.2.1.70	NA

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted active site residues.
(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the Enzyme Commission (EC) number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Ligand Binding Sites

Template proteins with similar binding site:

Rank	Cscore^LB	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	BS-score	Lig. Name	Download Complex	Predicted binding site residues
1	0.01	2qjpD	0.342	6.76	0.055	0.530	0.48	HEM	complex1.pdb.gz	18,19,22,23,26,82,86,87,89,90,120,124
2	0.01	3rkoC	0.366	6.55	0.090	0.544	0.42	CA7	complex2.pdb.gz	20,142,149,150
3	0.01	2fynA	0.346	6.69	0.033	0.528	0.42	HEM	complex3.pdb.gz	9,12,13,16,17,19,20,125,128,132
4	0.01	3rkoL	0.354	6.65	0.058	0.528	0.68	LFA	complex4.pdb.gz	22,25,26,117
5	0.01	3aodA	0.291	7.26	0.036	0.462	0.41	MIY	complex5.pdb.gz	28,148,153,155
6	0.01	3rkoC	0.366	6.55	0.090	0.544	0.44	LFA	complex6.pdb.gz	13,16,26
7	0.01	2rddA	0.276	7.68	0.039	0.464	0.76	AIC	complex7.pdb.gz	353,354,355,356
8	0.01	2qjpA	0.346	6.84	0.060	0.536	0.47	HEM	complex8.pdb.gz	14,15,18,19,22,184,185,188

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted binding site and residues.
(a)	Cscore^LB is the confidence score of predicted binding site. Cscore^LB values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable ligand-binding site prediction.
(b)	BS-score is a measure of local similarity (sequence & structure) between template binding site and predicted binding site in the query structure. Based on large scale benchmarking analysis, we have observed that a BS-score >1 reflects a significant local match between the predicted and template binding site.
(c)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(d)	RMSD^a the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(e)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(f)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

References:
1.	Wei Zheng, Chengxin Zhang, Yang Li, Robin Pearce, Eric W. Bell, Yang Zhang. Folding non-homology proteins by coupling deep-learning contact maps with I-TASSER assembly simulations. In preparation, 2020.