D-I-TASSER Q6ZNG9-D3

D-I-TASSER results for Q6ZNG9-D3

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>Q6ZNG9 (249 residues)
VPKRGLAPKPMTFKDIDSTCQVEILDMQSSADGEFKFILYYQDHSTKFIILRPLRTKQAH
EVVSVLLDIFTILGTPSVLDSDSGVEFTNQVVHELNELWPDLKIVSGKYHPGQSQGSLEG
ASRDVKNMISTWMQSNHSCHWAKGLRFMQMVRNQAFDVSLQQSPFEAMFGYKAKFGLYSS
NLPRETVATLQTEEELEIAEEQLENSLWIRQEERAEIGADRSDMDDDMDPTPEASEPSTS
QGTSGLLCW

Predicted Secondary Structure

Sequence	20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| VPKRGLAPKPMTFKDIDSTCQVEILDMQSSADGEFKFILYYQDHSTKFIILRPLRTKQAHEVVSVLLDIFTILGTPSVLDSDSGVEFTNQVVHELNELWPDLKIVSGKYHPGQSQGSLEGASRDVKNMISTWMQSNHSCHWAKGLRFMQMVRNQAFDVSLQQSPFEAMFGYKAKFGLYSSNLPRETVATLQTEEELEIAEEQLENSLWIRQEERAEIGADRSDMDDDMDPTPEASEPSTSQGTSGLLCW
Prediction	CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHSSSSSSSCCCCCCCCCCCSSSSSSSCCCCSSSSSSCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCSSSSCCCCCSCHHHHHHHHHHHCCCSSSCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC
Confidence	998789988877777113477666179988999974899999466651899984899999999999999951199986772899842239999999993990235179999988729999999999999999802689976788889999984246421177935554198789885324575455423449999999999999999999999999999973323577877643467887666667789
	H:Helix; S:Strand; C:Coil

Predicted Solvent Accessibility

Sequence	20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| VPKRGLAPKPMTFKDIDSTCQVEILDMQSSADGEFKFILYYQDHSTKFIILRPLRTKQAHEVVSVLLDIFTILGTPSVLDSDSGVEFTNQVVHELNELWPDLKIVSGKYHPGQSQGSLEGASRDVKNMISTWMQSNHSCHWAKGLRFMQMVRNQAFDVSLQQSPFEAMFGYKAKFGLYSSNLPRETVATLQTEEELEIAEEQLENSLWIRQEERAEIGADRSDMDDDMDPTPEASEPSTSQGTSGLLCW
Prediction	646572332403444033000001020233474513000000023011000201434405300400230023121032020251440114104400641604232012221610211002004301400221024647450242021001001003432143000100132403110443615454243340352153125304531443354235414534436572623264343636544513247
	Values range from 0 (buried residue) to 8 (highly exposed residue)

Predicted Contact, Hydrogen and Distance Map Used in D-I-TASSER simulation

Contact Map

Distance Map

Hydrogen bond networks

D-I-TASSER simulation is guided by the consensus contact map (left figure), distance map (middle figure) and Hydrogen bond network (right figure) derived based on confidence scores of AttentionPotential. In the contact, distance map and hydrogen bond networks, the axes mark the residue index along the sequence. For the contact map, each dot represents a residue pair with predicted contact, while for the distance map and hydrogen bond network, a color scale represents a distance of 1-20+ angstroms or a angle of 0-180 degree.

Top 10 threading templates used by D-I-TASSER

Rank

PDB
hit

ID1

ID2

Cov

Norm.
Zscore

Download
alignment

                  20                  40                  60                  80                 100                 120                 140                 160                 180                 200                 220                 240

                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |

SS
Seq

CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHSSSSSSSCCCCCCCCCCCSSSSSSSCCCCSSSSSSCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCSSSSCCCCCSCHHHHHHHHHHHCCCSSSCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC
VPKRGLAPKPMTFKDIDSTCQVEILDMQSSADGEFKFILYYQDHSTKFIILRPLRTKQAHEVVSVLLDIFTILGTPSVLDSDSGVEFTNQVVHELNELWPDLKIVSGKYHPGQSQGSLEGASRDVKNMISTWMQSNHSCHWAKGLRFMQMVRNQAFDVSLQQSPFEAMFGYKAKFGLYSSNLPRETVATLQTEEELEIAEEQLENSLWIRQEERAEIGADRSDMDDDMDPTPEASEPSTSQGTSGLLCW

3l2rA

0.18

0.15

4.83

1.17

DEthreader

SGP--ILRPDRPQ-KPFDKFFIDYIGPLPPSQ-GYLYVLVVVDGMTGFTWLYPTKAPSTSATVKSLNVLTSI-AIPKVIHSDQGAAFTSSTFAEWAKERG-IHLEFSTPYHPQSSGKVERKNSDIKRLLTKLLVGRPTK-WYDLLPVVQLALNNTYSPVLKYTPHQLLFGIDSNTP-----A---DTLDLTREEELSLLQEIRTSLY---H--PST-PP--ASSRS-----------------------

1c0mC1

0.15

0.10

3.36

1.38

SPARKS-K

-------GVNPRGLGPLQIWQTDFTLEPRMAPR--SWLAVTVDTASSAIVVTQHGRVTSVAVQHHWATAIAVLGRPKAIKTDNGSCFTSKSTREWLARWG-IAHTTGIPGNSQGQAMVERANRLLKDRIRVLAEGDGFSKQGELLAKAMYALNHKERGENTKTPIQKHWRPT-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

3l2rA

0.16

5.18

1.47

MapAlign

--ASGPILRPDRPQKPFDKFFIDYIGPLPPSQ-GYLYVLVVVDGMTGFTWLYPTKAPSTSATVKSLNVLTSIA-IPKVIHSDQGAAFTSSTFAEWAKER-GIHLEFSTPYHPQSSGKVERKNSDIKRLLTKLLVGRPTK-WYDLLPVVQLALNNTYSPVLKYTPHQLLFGIDSNTPFAN-----QDTLDLTREEELSLLQEIRTSLYHPSTPPASSRSWSPVVGPSTVLKVLNPRTVVILDHLGNNRT-

3l2rA

0.16

0.15

5.08

1.10

CEthreader

NKASGPILRPDRPQKPFDKFFIDYIG-PLPPSQGYLYVLVVVDGMTGFTWLYPTKAPSTSATVKSLNVLT-SIAIPKVIHSDQGAAFTSSTFAEWAKER-GIHLEFSTPYHPQSSGKVERKNSDIKRLLTKLLVGRP-TKWYDLLPVVQLALNNTYSPVLKYTPHQLLFGIDSNTPFANQD-----TLDLTREEELSLLQEIRTSLYHPSTPPASSRSWSPVVGQLVQERVARPASLRPRWHKPSTVLK

3l2rA

0.18

0.16

5.38

1.51

MUSTER

NKASGPILRPDRPQKPFDKFFIDYIGPLPPS-QGYLYVLVVVDGMTGFTWLYPTKAPSTSATVKSLNVLTS-IAIPKVIHSDQGAAFTSSTFAEWAKERG-IHLEFSTPYHPQSSGKVERKNSDIKRLLTKLLV-GRPTKWYDLLPVVQLALNNTYSPVLKYTPHQLLFGIDSNTPFANQDTLDL------TREEELSLLQEIRTSLYHPST------PPASSRSWSPVVGQLVQERVA-RPASLRPRW

3l2rA

0.19

0.17

5.59

3.50

HHsearch

NASSGPILRPDRPQKPFDKFFIDYIGPLPPS-QGYLYVLVVVDGMTGFTWLYPTKAPSTSATVKSL-NVLTSIAIPKVIHSDQGAAFTSSTFAEWAKER-GIHLEFSTPYHPQSSGKVERKNSDIKRLLTKLLVGRP-TKWYDLLPVVQLALNNTYSPVLKYTPHQLLFGIDSNTPFANQDTLDL-----TREEEL-SLLQEIRTSLYHP----ST--PPASSRSWSPVVGQLVQERVARPA-SLRPRW

3jcaA2

0.17

0.11

3.70

2.08

FFAS-3D

APQLGVNPRG---LKPRVLWQMDVTHV--SEFGKLKYVHVTVDTYSHFTFATARTGEATKDVLQHLAQSFAYMGIPQKIKTDNAPAYVSRSIQEFLARWKISHVTGIPYNP-QGQAIVERTHQNIKAQLNKLQKAGKYYTPHHLLAHALFVLNHVNMDNQGHTAAERHWGP------------------------------------------------------------------------------

3l2rA

0.17

0.15

4.91

1.53

EigenThreader

ASNKAPILRPDRPQKPFDKFFIDYIGPLPPSQGYL-YVLVVVDGMTGFTWLYPTKAPSTSATVKSLNVLT----SPKVIHSDQGAAFTSSTFAEWAKERG-IHLEFSTPYHPQSSGKVERKNSDIKRLLTKLLV-GRPTKWYDLLPVVQLALNNTYSPVLKYTPHQLLFGIDSNTPFANQDTLD------LTREEELSLLQEIRTS-------------LYHPSTPPASSRPVVGQVARPASLRPRWHK

2x6nA

0.18

0.14

4.44

1.37

CNFpred

------------PQKPFDKFFMDYIGPLPPS-QGYLYVLVVVDGMTGFTWLYPTKAPSTSATVKSLNVLT-SIAIPRVIHSDQGAAFTSSTFAEWAKER-GIHLEFSTPYHPQSGSKVERKNSDMKRLLTKLLVG-RPTKWYDLLPVVQLAMNNTYSPVLKYTPHQLLFGIDSNTPFANQDTLDLT------REEELSLLQEIRTSLYHP---------------------------------------

3jcaA

0.14

0.10

3.45

1.00

DEthreader

HAPQLGVNP-RGL-KPRVLWQMDVTHVSEF--GKLKYVHVTVDTYSHFTFATARTGEATKDVLQHLAQSFAYMGIPQKIKTDNAPAYVSRSIQEFLARWK-ISHVTGIPYNPQGQAIVERTHQNIKAQLNKLQKAGKYYTPHHLLAHALFVLNHNMDN-QGHTAAERHWG-------------------------PI--SAD-KP-ITAGRGYAPD-RFI-----------------------------

(a)	ID1 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by number of aligned residues.
(b)	ID2 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by query sequence length.
(c)	Cov is equal the number of aligned template residues divided by query sequence length.
(d)	Norm. Zscore is the normalized Z-score of the threading alignments. A Normalized Z-score >1 means a good alignment and is highlighted in bold.
(e)	Download alignment lists the threading program used to identify the template, and provide the 3D structure of aligned regions of threading templates (threading[1-10].pdb.gz).
(f)	Template residues identical to query sequence are highlighted in color.

Top 1 final models from D-I-TASSER

Click to view	Rank^a	Download	Estimated TM-score^b
	1	model1.pdb.gz	0.7986

(a)

D-I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, i.e. decoys. These decoys are clustered by SPICKER based on pairwise structure similarity to report up to five final models from the five largest clusters. Models are ranked in descending order of cluster size. If the simulations converge well, it is possible to have less than 5 models generated, which is usually an indication of good model quality.

(b)

The model confidence is quantitatified by estimated TM-score (eTM-score), calculated based on significance of threading template alignments, contact map satisfaction rate, mean absolute error between distance of model and distance of AttentionPotential, and convergence of D-I-TASSER simulations. eTM-score is typically in the range of [0, 1], with higher eTM-score signifies higher model confidence.

Proteins with similar structure

Top 10 structural analogs in PDB (as identified by TM-align)

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	Download Alignment
1	3l2rA	0.87	2.08	0.185	0.936	model1_3l2rA.pdb.gz
2	6voyA	0.68	3.06	0.114	0.779	model1_6voyA.pdb.gz
3	3jcaA	0.66	2.91	0.130	0.755	model1_3jcaA.pdb.gz
4	1c0mC	0.64	2.75	0.145	0.727	model1_1c0mC.pdb.gz
5	1bl3C	0.54	2.62	0.158	0.606	model1_1bl3C.pdb.gz
6	3hpgB	0.54	2.92	0.162	0.623	model1_3hpgB.pdb.gz
7	1ex4A	0.53	2.48	0.131	0.586	model1_1ex4A.pdb.gz
8	3kkrA	0.52	2.63	0.166	0.586	model1_3kkrA.pdb.gz
9	1k6yB	0.52	2.38	0.139	0.570	model1_1k6yB.pdb.gz
10	4mq3A	0.48	1.79	0.172	0.514	model1_4mq3A.pdb.gz

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Gene Ontology (GO) Terms

Molecular Function (MF)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:1901363	0.92	heterocyclic compound binding
GO:0097159	0.92	organic cyclic compound binding
GO:0003676	0.90	nucleic acid binding
GO:0003677	0.82	DNA binding
GO:0000981	0.74	RNA polymerase II transcription factor activity, sequence-specific DNA binding
GO:0003824	0.70	catalytic activity
GO:0016740	0.60	transferase activity
GO:0004518	0.53	nuclease activity
GO:0004540	0.51	ribonuclease activity
GO:0003964	0.51	RNA-directed DNA polymerase activity

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Molecular Function. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Biological Process (BP)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0009987	1.00	cellular process
GO:0071704	0.89	organic substance metabolic process
GO:0044238	0.89	primary metabolic process
GO:0044237	0.89	cellular metabolic process
GO:0044260	0.85	cellular macromolecule metabolic process
GO:0044699	0.83	single-organism process
GO:0006139	0.82	nucleobase-containing compound metabolic process
GO:0090304	0.78	nucleic acid metabolic process
GO:0006259	0.77	DNA metabolic process
GO:0044763	0.73	single-organism cellular process
GO:1901576	0.70	organic substance biosynthetic process
GO:0044249	0.70	cellular biosynthetic process
GO:1901362	0.67	organic cyclic compound biosynthetic process
GO:0034645	0.67	cellular macromolecule biosynthetic process
GO:0018130	0.67	heterocycle biosynthetic process
GO:0034654	0.65	nucleobase-containing compound biosynthetic process
GO:0019538	0.65	protein metabolic process
GO:0016070	0.65	RNA metabolic process
GO:0090502	0.63	RNA phosphodiester bond hydrolysis, endonucleolytic
GO:0075713	0.63	establishment of integrated proviral latency
GO:0046718	0.63	viral entry into host cell
GO:0015074	0.63	DNA integration
GO:0006310	0.63	DNA recombination
GO:0006278	0.63	RNA-dependent DNA biosynthetic process
GO:0006508	0.55	proteolysis
GO:0032197	0.53	transposition, RNA-mediated

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Biological Process. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Cellular Component (CC)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0044464	1.00	cell part
GO:0044424	0.99	intracellular part
GO:0044428	0.94	nuclear part
GO:0005737	0.84	cytoplasm
GO:0005654	0.81	nucleoplasm
GO:0043227	0.52	membrane-bounded organelle

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Cellular Component. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Predicted Enzyme Commission (EC) Numbers

Top 5 enzyme homologs in PDB

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	EC Number	Predicted Active Site Residues
1	0.124	1k6yA	0.518	2.70	0.140	0.578	2.7.7.49	21,82
2	0.102	3dlrA	0.541	1.64	0.182	0.574	2.7.7.7 2.7.7.49	51,82,84
3	0.067	3hpgB	0.540	2.92	0.162	0.623	2.7.7.49	82,114
4	0.066	3f9kI	0.542	2.51	0.178	0.602	2.7.7.49	82
5	0.066	1ex4A	0.527	2.48	0.131	0.586	2.7.7.-	124

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted active site residues.
(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the Enzyme Commission (EC) number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Ligand Binding Sites

Template proteins with similar binding site:

Rank	Cscore^LB	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	BS-score	Lig. Name	Download Complex	Predicted binding site residues
1	0.19	3oyeA	0.866	2.09	0.185	0.936	1.42	ZYY	complex1.pdb.gz	23,82,83,84,111,113,119
2	0.19	3l2wA	0.867	2.08	0.185	0.936	1.36	ELV	complex2.pdb.gz	23,82,110,112,113,119
3	0.18	3oycA	0.866	2.09	0.185	0.936	1.18	ZZW	complex3.pdb.gz	23,82,111,112,118
4	0.13	3l2qA	0.866	2.10	0.185	0.936	0.95	QNA	complex4.pdb.gz	7,8,9,10,80,105,106,107,108,111,113,114,116,117,120,127,157,158
5	0.12	3oymA	0.866	2.09	0.185	0.936	1.14	QNA	complex5.pdb.gz	112,113,119,120,122,123,126
6	0.03	3ao5A	0.486	2.04	0.148	0.530	1.18	BBY	complex6.pdb.gz	153,154,163,165,166,169
7	0.03	3ao3B	0.483	1.98	0.157	0.526	0.92	BMC	complex7.pdb.gz	48,73,154,156,163,165,169

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted binding site and residues.
(a)	Cscore^LB is the confidence score of predicted binding site. Cscore^LB values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable ligand-binding site prediction.
(b)	BS-score is a measure of local similarity (sequence & structure) between template binding site and predicted binding site in the query structure. Based on large scale benchmarking analysis, we have observed that a BS-score >1 reflects a significant local match between the predicted and template binding site.
(c)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(d)	RMSD^a the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(e)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(f)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

References:
1.	Wei Zheng, Chengxin Zhang, Yang Li, Robin Pearce, Eric W. Bell, Yang Zhang. Folding non-homology proteins by coupling deep-learning contact maps with I-TASSER assembly simulations. In preparation, 2020.