D-I-TASSER Q6PD74-D1

D-I-TASSER results for Q6PD74-D1

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>Q6PD74 (315 residues)
MAAGVPCALVTSCSSVFSGDQLVQHILGTEDLIVEVTSNDAVRFYPWTIDNKYYSADINL
CVVPNKFLVTAEIAESVQAFVVYFDSTQKSGLDSVSSWLPLAKAWLPEVMILVCDRVSED
GINRQKAQEWCIKHGFELVELSPEELPEEDDDFPESTGVKRIVQALNANVWSNVVMKNDR
NQGFSLLNSLTGTNHSIGSADPCHPEQPHLPAADSTESLSDHRGGASNTTDAQVDSIVDP
MLDLDIQELASLTTGGGDVENFERLFSKLKEMKDKAATLPHEQRKVHAEKVAKAFWMAIG
GDRDEIEGLSSDEEH

Predicted Secondary Structure

Sequence	20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 300 \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| MAAGVPCALVTSCSSVFSGDQLVQHILGTEDLIVEVTSNDAVRFYPWTIDNKYYSADINLCVVPNKFLVTAEIAESVQAFVVYFDSTQKSGLDSVSSWLPLAKAWLPEVMILVCDRVSEDGINRQKAQEWCIKHGFELVELSPEELPEEDDDFPESTGVKRIVQALNANVWSNVVMKNDRNQGFSLLNSLTGTNHSIGSADPCHPEQPHLPAADSTESLSDHRGGASNTTDAQVDSIVDPMLDLDIQELASLTTGGGDVENFERLFSKLKEMKDKAATLPHEQRKVHAEKVAKAFWMAIGGDRDEIEGLSSDEEH
Prediction	CCCCCCSSSSSSCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCCCCCSSSSSSSSSCCCSSSSSSSSSCCCCCCCCHHHHHCCCSSSSSSSCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCSSSSSSCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHCCSSSSSCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC
Confidence	998898699997489987679999973677677767666650587778762318989999966884324367871499899999299812999999999999733776599993278877778999999999839859997488886422222222488999999997568777557877766554333223323445444455556666544420122201233212112233312354335320012345776313899999999999999986129999999999999999999968984223688887789
	H:Helix; S:Strand; C:Coil

Predicted Solvent Accessibility

Sequence	20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 300 \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| MAAGVPCALVTSCSSVFSGDQLVQHILGTEDLIVEVTSNDAVRFYPWTIDNKYYSADINLCVVPNKFLVTAEIAESVQAFVVYFDSTQKSGLDSVSSWLPLAKAWLPEVMILVCDRVSEDGINRQKAQEWCIKHGFELVELSPEELPEEDDDFPESTGVKRIVQALNANVWSNVVMKNDRNQGFSLLNSLTGTNHSIGSADPCHPEQPHLPAADSTESLSDHRGGASNTTDAQVDSIVDPMLDLDIQELASLTTGGGDVENFERLFSKLKEMKDKAATLPHEQRKVHAEKVAKAFWMAIGGDRDEIEGLSSDEEH
Prediction	734520000000026534334004403444634653546442421303050210304020110444632354125401000000005455015304501520662402000000131474414373035103722030020317645545544443340520140044231651524456554454455455455545544534555553645544453454455454544543553445545454553554464553144034005304501540661457202520040033006304436433462666678
	Values range from 0 (buried residue) to 8 (highly exposed residue)

Predicted Contact, Hydrogen and Distance Map Used in D-I-TASSER simulation

Contact Map

Distance Map

Hydrogen bond networks

D-I-TASSER simulation is guided by the consensus contact map (left figure), distance map (middle figure) and Hydrogen bond network (right figure) derived based on confidence scores of AttentionPotential. In the contact, distance map and hydrogen bond networks, the axes mark the residue index along the sequence. For the contact map, each dot represents a residue pair with predicted contact, while for the distance map and hydrogen bond network, a color scale represents a distance of 1-20+ angstroms or a angle of 0-180 degree.

Top 10 threading templates used by D-I-TASSER

Rank

PDB
hit

ID1

ID2

Cov

Norm.
Zscore

Download
alignment

                  20                  40                  60                  80                 100                 120                 140                 160                 180                 200                 220                 240                 260                 280                 300

                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |

SS
Seq

CCCCCCSSSSSSCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCCCCCSSSSSSSSSCCCSSSSSSSSSCCCCCCCCHHHHHCCCSSSSSSSCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCSSSSSSCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHCCSSSSSCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC
MAAGVPCALVTSCSSVFSGDQLVQHILGTEDLIVEVTSNDAVRFYPWTIDNKYYSADINLCVVPNKFLVTAEIAESVQAFVVYFDSTQKSGLDSVSSWLPLAKAWLPEVMILVCDRVSEDGINRQKAQEWCIKHGFELVELSPEELPEEDDDFPESTGVKRIVQALNANVWSNVVMKNDRNQGFSLLNSLTGTNHSIGSADPCHPEQPHLPAADSTESLSDHRGGASNTTDAQVDSIVDPMLDLDIQELASLTTGGGDVENFERLFSKLKEMKDKAATLPHEQRKVHAEKVAKAFWMAIGGDRDEIEGLSSDEEH

6jmgA

0.12

0.10

3.37

1.31

SPARKS-K

--ALRIKVISMG-NAEVGKSCIIKRYCEKRF-VPKYQATIGIDYGVTKVHIKDREIKVNIFDMGHPFFVRNEFYKDTQGVILVYDVGHKETFESLDGWLAEMKQELGIVFAVCANKIDSRSVDESEGRLWSESKGFLYFETSAQSGEGI------NEMFQAFYSAIVDLCDNGGKRPVSAINI---------------------------GFTKEQADSIRRIRNCK-----------------DSWDMLGVKP-GATRDEVNKAYRKLAVLLDKCMAPGSEDAFKAVVNARTALLKNIKLEHHHHH--------

6jmgA

0.12

0.09

3.24

1.28

CNFpred

----LRIKVISMGNAEVGKSCIIKRYCEKRFVP-KYQATIGIDYGVTKVHIKDREIKVNIFDMAGFYEVRNEFYKDTQGVILVYDVGHKETFESLDGWLAEMKQEL-IVFAVCANKIDS-SVDESEGRLWSESKGFLYFETSAQSGEGINEMFQ--AFYSAIVDLCDN-RPVSAINIGFTKEQADSIRRIRNCK-------------------------------------------------DSWDMLGVKP--GATRDEVNKAYRKLAVLLHKCMAPGSEDAFKAVVNARTALLKNI----------------

3uc9A

0.16

0.08

2.75

1.61

HHsearch

LQYPQNKILVLS-DHPHNFTQFLQDL-FH-CS-----STGISIVKDQTWENRYYKVHFDLYIDSPVEFITPPLRNVMAGIILITDIRQTKPQELLHQFMIAA---HRNTFVVLVNVNEEVQDEIDELNEIWSNNVIEFVNW-KTV---NHNDYGEKLGLDRIQEIIDTHDWLNCEVQP-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

6jmgA

0.15

0.12

3.96

1.08

FFAS-3D

-------KVISMGNAEVGKSCIIKRYC-EKRFVPKYQATIGIDYGVTKVHIKDREIKVNIFDMAGHPEVRNEFYKDTQGVILVYDVGHKETFESLDGWLAEMKQELGPVFAVCANKIDHRSVDESEGRLWSESKGFLYFETSAQSGEGINEMFQA--FYSAIVDLCD------------------------------------------------NGGKRPVSAINIGFTKEQADSIRRIRNCKDSWDMLG-VKPGATRDEVNKAYRKLAVLLDKCMAPGSEDAFKAVVNARTALLKNI--------KLEHHHHH

3uc9A

0.16

0.08

2.75

1.43

FFAS-3D

LQYPQNKILVLSDHPHNLKTQFLQDLFHCSS-------TGISIVKDQTWENRYYKVHFDLYIDSCKTPECEPLRNVMAGIILITDIRQTKPQELLHQFMIAAH--RNTFVVLVNVNEEVEQDEIDELNEIAFTNVIEFVNW----KTVNHNDYGEKLGLDRIQEIIDTHDWLNCEVQP-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1fuiA

0.04

0.03

1.46

0.83

DEthreader

MKKSLPKIGIRPVIRLEQTMNMAKATAAL----------------LTEKLRHACGAVECVISDTIAAACEEKFSSNVGLTITVTP-CW-CYGSET--IDM-DP---TRPKAIWGFNGTEPAVYLAAALAAHSQIPAFSIYGVQDADDTSI--PA--DVEEKLLRFARALAASM------------------------------------SMGIA--GQRHWTDYPNGDAEVATENDSLNRVNIIKGLGPV--------KGP--V--NW--NHGVLTIG---------DF-TLASMLRIPCQYGPLYKR-------

2f9mA

0.14

0.08

2.61

1.18

SPARKS-K

MYDYLFKVVLIGD-SGVGKSNLLSRFTRNE-FNLESKSTIGVEFATRSIQVDGKTIKAQIWDTAGQERITSAYYRGAVGALLVYDIAKHLTYENVERWLKELRDHADIVIMLVGNKSDLRAVPTDEARAFAEKNNLSFIETSALDSTNV------EEAFKNILTEIYRIVSQKQIADRAAHD-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

5c2kA

0.11

3.86

0.53

MapAlign

--AIRKKLVIVGDG-ACGKTCLLIVFSKDQFP--EVYVPTVFENYVADIEVDGKQVELALWDTAGDRLR-PLSYPDTDVILMCFSIDSPDSLENIPEWTPEVKHFCNVPIILVGNKKDLRPVKPEEGRDMANRIGAGYMECSAKTK----------DGVREVFEMATRAALIVVHCVNEIEQRGLTETGLYRIDGCDRTVKELKEKFLRVKTVPLLSKVDDIHAICSLLKDFLRNLKEPLLTFRLNRAFMEAAEITDEDNSIAAMYQAMIHLQRVAQSPHTKMVANLAKVFGPTIVADIKRQPKVVERLLSLPL-

2f9mA

0.14

0.08

2.61

0.38

CEthreader

MYDYLFKVVLIG-DSGVGKSNLLSRFTRNEFNLE-SKSTIGVEFATRSIQVDGKTIKAQIWDTAGQERITSAYYRGAVGALLVYDIAKHLTYENVERWLKELRDHADIVIMLVGNKSDLRAVPTDEARAFAEKNNLSFIETSALDS----------TNVEEAFKNILTEIYRIVSQKQIADRAAHD---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1ukvY

0.13

0.08

2.74

0.79

MUSTER

SEYDYLFKLLLIGNSGVGKSCLLLRFSDDT-YTNDYISTIGVDFKIKTVELDGKTVKLQIWDTAGQETITSSYYRGSHGIIIVYDVTDQESFNGVKMWLQEIDRYATSLKLLVGNKCDKRVVEYDVAKEFADANKMPFLETSALDS----------TNVEDAFLTMARQI--------KESMSQQNLNETTQKKEDKGNVNLKGQSL------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(a)	ID1 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by number of aligned residues.
(b)	ID2 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by query sequence length.
(c)	Cov is equal the number of aligned template residues divided by query sequence length.
(d)	Norm. Zscore is the normalized Z-score of the threading alignments. A Normalized Z-score >1 means a good alignment and is highlighted in bold.
(e)	Download alignment lists the threading program used to identify the template, and provide the 3D structure of aligned regions of threading templates (threading[1-10].pdb.gz).
(f)	Template residues identical to query sequence are highlighted in color.

Top 1 final models from D-I-TASSER

Click to view	Rank^a	Download	Estimated TM-score^b
	1	model1.pdb.gz	0.6047

(a)

D-I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, i.e. decoys. These decoys are clustered by SPICKER based on pairwise structure similarity to report up to five final models from the five largest clusters. Models are ranked in descending order of cluster size. If the simulations converge well, it is possible to have less than 5 models generated, which is usually an indication of good model quality.

(b)

The model confidence is quantitatified by estimated TM-score (eTM-score), calculated based on significance of threading template alignments, contact map satisfaction rate, mean absolute error between distance of model and distance of AttentionPotential, and convergence of D-I-TASSER simulations. eTM-score is typically in the range of [0, 1], with higher eTM-score signifies higher model confidence.

Proteins with similar structure

Top 10 structural analogs in PDB (as identified by TM-align)

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	Download Alignment
1	6jfkA	0.53	3.92	0.075	0.670	model1_6jfkA.pdb.gz
2	2j69A	0.52	4.19	0.087	0.667	model1_2j69A.pdb.gz
3	5gnrA	0.52	4.04	0.091	0.660	model1_5gnrA.pdb.gz
4	1f5nA	0.52	5.35	0.058	0.756	model1_1f5nA.pdb.gz
5	6jmgA	0.51	3.76	0.079	0.613	model1_6jmgA.pdb.gz
6	6j72A	0.51	4.11	0.089	0.648	model1_6j72A.pdb.gz
7	5owvA	0.50	4.30	0.087	0.654	model1_5owvA.pdb.gz
8	1fuiA	0.50	5.31	0.047	0.724	model1_1fuiA.pdb.gz
9	5ee0A	0.50	4.64	0.041	0.670	model1_5ee0A.pdb.gz
10	1ukvY	0.50	2.78	0.112	0.565	model1_1ukvY.pdb.gz

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Gene Ontology (GO) Terms

Molecular Function (MF)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:1901363	0.73	heterocyclic compound binding
GO:0097159	0.73	organic cyclic compound binding
GO:0036094	0.68	small molecule binding
GO:0035639	0.67	purine ribonucleoside triphosphate binding
GO:0032555	0.67	purine ribonucleotide binding
GO:0032550	0.67	purine ribonucleoside binding
GO:0005525	0.66	GTP binding

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Molecular Function. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Biological Process (BP)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0065007	0.82	biological regulation
GO:0050789	0.82	regulation of biological process
GO:0050794	0.81	regulation of cellular process
GO:0009987	0.78	cellular process
GO:0051179	0.77	localization
GO:0006810	0.76	transport
GO:0044699	0.69	single-organism process
GO:0007165	0.69	signal transduction
GO:0035556	0.67	intracellular signal transduction
GO:0007264	0.66	small GTPase mediated signal transduction
GO:0051641	0.65	cellular localization
GO:0051649	0.61	establishment of localization in cell
GO:1902578	0.58	single-organism localization
GO:0044765	0.57	single-organism transport
GO:0016043	0.51	cellular component organization

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Biological Process. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Cellular Component (CC)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0005737	1.00	cytoplasm
GO:0005654	1.00	nucleoplasm

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Cellular Component. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Predicted Enzyme Commission (EC) Numbers

Top 5 enzyme homologs in PDB

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	EC Number	Predicted Active Site Residues
1	0.234	3bfkB	0.491	2.31	0.159	0.540	3.6.5.2	233
2	0.101	3bc1A	0.482	2.00	0.146	0.521	3.6.5.2	NA
3	0.094	2f9mA	0.499	2.40	0.126	0.552	3.6.5.2	NA
4	0.067	2atxA	0.455	2.37	0.138	0.505	3.6.5.2	NA
5	0.060	3bpsA	0.378	6.22	0.032	0.625	3.4.21.-	NA

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted active site residues.
(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the Enzyme Commission (EC) number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Ligand Binding Sites

Template proteins with similar binding site:

Click to view	Rank	Cscore^LB	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	BS-score	Lig. Name	Download Complex	Predicted binding site residues
	1	0.02	1nf30	0.472	2.52	0.141	0.524	0.93	III	complex1.pdb.gz	26,27,29,40,41,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,163,166
	2	0.01	1e0aA	0.428	3.23	0.123	0.514	0.63	GNP	complex2.pdb.gz	17,21,22,24,25,31,83,113,115,140,141,142,147,159

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted binding site and residues.
(a)	Cscore^LB is the confidence score of predicted binding site. Cscore^LB values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable ligand-binding site prediction.
(b)	BS-score is a measure of local similarity (sequence & structure) between template binding site and predicted binding site in the query structure. Based on large scale benchmarking analysis, we have observed that a BS-score >1 reflects a significant local match between the predicted and template binding site.
(c)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(d)	RMSD^a the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(e)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(f)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

References:
1.	Wei Zheng, Chengxin Zhang, Yang Li, Robin Pearce, Eric W. Bell, Yang Zhang. Folding non-homology proteins by coupling deep-learning contact maps with I-TASSER assembly simulations. In preparation, 2020.